* http_routing, portal, rating, survey, website, website_survey,
website_slides_survey
Before this commit, the final base layout of website was a fully
overridden layout of the one in portal, which was somehow a duplicated
one of the login one in web, which... so lots of duplicated code.
This commit is a first step towards a better organization:
1) The web app defines a frontend layout (to include base frontend
assets), with a base company logo as header.
2) The portal app modifies that layout in place to include the base
header, footer, ... It also uses a primary extension of it for
portal pages.
The survey app simply uses the above layout instead of defining its
own (by primary extension to include its own assets for its own
pages)
Same goes for the rating app and pages.
3) The website app modifies that layout in place to include the UI
assets, to add website UI, ... This allows to create frontend apps
which do not depend on website, with a non duplicated layout that
will be automatically adapted if website is ever installed (this
therefore allows to get rid of website_survey definitely)
This commit also fixes the session info system and the translation URL
on the frontend side to not require to redefine the whole session_info
for portal, website, ... Now the frontend session_info is defined in web
and http_routing extends it to add translation informations, then
website extends it again to add its own elements (not to redefine them
all as before). Note: before, http_routing defined the translation route
but only portal was adding it in its layout...
This is an adaptation of the work that was done with commit
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/99821fdcf89aa66ac9561a972c6823135ebf65c0
Note 1: Many frontend but non-website apps (not only survey / rating)
could probably use this too but this would be the topic of another task.
Note 2: survey currently depends on http_routing but does not add itself
in the list of frontend apps to translate, it probably should.
Note 3: web_editor does currently not depend on http_routing but does
add itself in the list of frontend apps to translate, it thus uses a
function it does not really depend on... to check after its work-in-
progress refactoring.
task-1961045
closesodoo/odoo#33825
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Some user might be logged but not have the right to access issue or task.
Plus it does not make any sense to redirect to backend after rating a task or an issue.
OPW: 748579
Several translation issues are faced with the rating module:
- the feedback page is always displayed in the admin language
- the feedback emails are always sent in the user's language
One would expect these to be in the partner language.
opw-694718
This commits adds the check W0101 to test_pylint and fixes the errors.
The index in sequence.py was added in rev 1381ac139e and cancelled a day later in 83fdc271e6
so i guess it is safe to remove it.
[IMP] rating: website rating page: reviewed design, rate on click, update on submit
[IMP] rating_project: rating_status: 'no' instead of False
[IMP] rating_project/issue: smileys insteaf of thumbs for consistency in kanban
[IMP] rating: allow to update an existing rating (feedback + rate)
[IMP] rating: consistency on rating names (statisfied, not satisfied, higly dissatisfed)
[IMP] rating: avoid deadend after rating, button to go to Odoo
[IMP] rating: res_config better sentence
Purpose:
For our internal project management, we would like to track the customer
satisfaction on the open projects. We send them an email every one or 2
weeks allowing them to give a feedback by clicking on one of 3
smileys: Happy, Average, Angry. They can also put a additional explanation.
We already have something similar which is working on livechat with a
unusable reporting, and on issues but unusable. Our project are managed by tasks.
Specification:
- On the project : Selection fields : (Periodical Rating or Rating on Stage)
+ Fields to choose the period if periodical
- On the stage : email_template_id field.
- IF :
---> Periodical : Send an email to all the customers for the tasks on this stage periodically
---> On Stage : Send an email to the customer's tasks when the task reaches the stage
- That way, it's impossible to send a satisfaction request both periodically and sequentially.
FP request
- Who is the customer : The customer on the task OR the customer on the related sales order
OR the customer on the projet OR nobody
- The last feedback is displayed on the task kanban card (Thumb up, down, or neutral)
- On the project kanban card, the customer satisfaction is displayed. This is the simple
mean of all the previous ratings.
qsm-odoo