This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
Before, we only had a public method that installed
the CoA for the current active company.
With the multi-company changes, it was not
possible anymore to install a module with a
demo company and then have the CoA installed
in that demo company correctly.
We changed that public method to be able to
put an extra optional parameter and shortened
its name to try_loading instead of
try_loading_for_current_company. The method that
it calls when there is no chart installed
is made private and renamed to _load.
closesodoo/odoo#35703
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
Modify purchase report in order to make it consistent with
sales report.
For the RFQ it will show the Order Date and for the Purchase order
menu it will display the Confirmation Date.
Also rewrite a bit the SQL view in order to compute every purchase
order in the company currency.
Technicaly rewrite the SQL alias in order to have a report more
readable in the future.
Task ID : 1857130.
closesodoo/odoo#28248
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit remove force_assign method in every tests of point_of_sale, purchase, sale_mrp,
sale_stock, stock and stock_account . This method is not longer used since V11.
This commit is related to task ID 59417
This wizard allows the stock users to replenish a product using the
routes applied to this product. A specific route can also be applied
to bypass the default route.
This replaces the "request procurement" wizard from v10, lost during the
stock refactoing.
Task ID: 47938
related to #22041
Accounting entries made for invoices and stock valuation on the interim accounts (stock input/output accounts) are now reconciled together for both sales and purchases. This will definitively help to have those accounts zero-outed when all operations are processed.
The reconciliation is made as long as the stock valuation is set in real-time, whatever the costing method.
Note that change change also allow a particular use case to be solved: when a purchase is made in a foreign currency whose rate change between the incoming shipment reception and the bill validation (there will be an automated exchange rate entry created).
Was task 32331. Was PR #22483
Use case to reproduce:
- Create a Product MTO that should be buy
- Create a SO with this product and confirm it
- Confirm the RFQ
- Increase the ordered quantity on the SO
- Confirm the new RFQ
- Receive product from the 2 PO
-> Unable to reserve the quantity on the destination moves
It happens because the link between the reception move from the second PO and the delivery move is missing.
Update the quantity on the SO will create a new move with the missing quantity that will generate the new RFQ
then this move is merged in the main move. However the reception move is only created when the RFQ is confirm
and the move_dest_ids is stored on the purchase order line during this time.
Thus merge moves will unlink the new move with its reference on the purchase order line and the link is lost.
This commit do not merge move that have different RFQ/PO in order to avoid losing MTO information.
Moves UoM models, test and data to a new addon in
order to be able to use uom without product.
A simple example is be to be able to use UoM for
timesheets.
This commit only move code, and adapt xml ids
without chaging any feature or functionnal
behavior.
Note: 'product' module now depends on new
'uom' module.
When creating an extra move, the price_unit field was not copied. It is
normal since the field is copy=False following rev[0].
But there was a side effect: let's say you order 1 product @ $10 and you
receive 5. The received quantity field on the purchase order line is
correctly set to 5 and the valuation inside the stock is correctly set
at $50, but on the picking there is one move line of 5 and a move a 4
and of 1, instead of one of 5. Note that in v10, the pack operation
would be split between the original move and the extra move, but in our
case the extra move is merged back in the original move, so we don't
need to split the move line. The split mechanism is there only when
working with moves without picking[1].
The issue here is that the moves are not merged because they do not have
the same price unit (5 and 0). We thus copy the unit price when creating
the extra move.
When creating a backorder, the price_unit field wasn't copied either.
It's not important when working with the classic flows (the link to
purchase_line_id is kept), but to be consistent we also copy it.
[0] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/a4740861d3fdbecc8b1171b7d2072697e8a36258
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/561b3461a020021d911999cb41154f158b069a1d
Before this commit, the uom defined on the sale order line and on the
purchase order line was propagated to the moves. This is not the
behaviour of v8-10 and may confuse the stock operator (one time he's
working in dozen, another time in units for example). It also leads to
rounding issues if the configuration is not adapted correctly (product's
uom is in units, sale order line is in dozen, the rouding precision on
the uom is left to their defaults, now if a dozen is partially available
there's a good chance converting back and forth form dozen to units will
break).
An ir.config_parameter was added to restore the behaviour before this
commit.
Purpose: When running tests, all the tests for the installed/updated
files are done. This commit adds a 'tagged' decorator that can be used to
tag tests. Combined with a new 'test-tags' CLI option, it adds the ability
to filter which tests are executed. For example, @tagged('slow') will
add a tag 'slow' to the test. The CLI option 'test-tags="slow"' will
only run tests tagged 'slow'.
One can use prefixes to select cases with tags.
'+' or no prefix means that the tests tagged with this tag are selected
for execution. '-' prefix will exclude the tests tagged with this tag.
Exclusion takes precedence over inclusion.
Also, by default, all Odoo tests cases are tagged 'standard' and with
the technical name of the module.
This means that when selecting tests with the 'test-tags'
parameter, if '-standard' is not specified, all tests tags are
going to be executed.
When tagging tests, one can remove such automatic tag by prefixing the
tag name with '-'. E.g. @tagged('-standard') will remove the standard
tag from the test.
Another example, if one wants to test the 'sale' module alone,
even without adding any 'tagged' decorator thos tests can be selected
like that: --test-tags="sale"
Tests are selected or deselected using a TagsSelector. When instanciated,
a string is passed with comma separated tests selectors like
'+slow,-standard'. When the 'check' method is called with a test as argument,
it returns True or False if the test has to be executed or not.
Use case to reproduce:
- Create a SO with a product MTO and confirm the PO
-> PO -- Stock -- SO
- Cancel the SO
-> PO -- Stock canceled SO
- Set the quotation to draft and confirm it again
-> PO -- Stock
RFQ -- Stock -- SO
- If the user cancel the RFQ we will get this diagram:
-> PO -- Stock
Stock -- SO
The user can't reserve the chain correctly. Also a new RFQ will be
generated each time the user delete the existing one even if the PO
already exists.
It happens because the move keep the procure methode MTO although
the moves origin and destination links are broken.
This commit changes the move destination from purchase order
line to MTS if the RFQ is deleted. This implies that RFQ are
not automatically generated by the scheduler.
It is possible that the price unit the move was created with is no
longer valid (for instance, one could change the price unit on the
purchase before validating the receipt, or the currency rate has changed
in the meantime).
Fixes#20035
The rationale for the need of a merge move mechanism is that, with the new default view,
having multiple stock move for the same products is confusing. The idea is that if a move
is confirmed in a picking already having a move with the same characteristics, we update
the existing move and unlink the new one. That’s why it’s done at the end of `_action_confirm`.
In some cases, merging moves is unwanted (backordered moves for examples). Therefore, we chose
to add a kwarg to `_action_confirm` in order do control the mechanism.
Previously mrp, stock and purchase used _run methon on procurement
group and start with a if checking for the action type. This commit
instead launch a specific method depending the rule's action's type
Also _run method and their submethod used in procurement group
was always called with a rule. Thus we choose to move this method
on the rule object himself.
This removes the procurement.order model. To fufill their needs SO, PO, MO and
stock moves now call the _run method of the relevant procurement.group.
This mecanism is now only used for stockable product, tasks now uses their own
independent mecanism.
The _run method will check all the applicable rules and create directly the
needed model to fufill the need.
The modules stock, purchase, mrp, extends the _run method to implement their
specific strategy relevant for the rule type they define.
If an exception happens the message will be logged as a mail messsage on the
source model, for example, if a sales order cannot be fufilled the salesperson
will now see directly the reason.
OLD commit messages:
[WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
fixup! [WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
[IMP] Basic tests
[FIX] test not necessary anymore
[FIX] remove unnecessary print statement
[FIX] unnecessary test + why passing warehouse worked before?
[IMP] purchase: one move by purchase order line
[FIX] purchase: correct inventory tests and pass move_dest_ids among procurements
[FIX] because of bad cherry-pick merge
[IMP] make mrp pass by adding move_dest_ids there too
[IMP] tests of sale_mrp, no need for cancelpropagation then
[IMP] better to consistently use recordsets also for one2many
[FIX] purchase_requisition
[FIX] Exceptions should trigger errors, which should be caught in the tests
[FIX] sale_mrp: remove usage of procurement.order and use sale order name instead of sol
[FIX] stock_dropshipping: add sale_line_id on purchase_line_id
[FIX] Remove pdb
[IMP] add stock_dropshipping files
[IMP] stock: search carrier through sale line instead of procurement group
[IMP] add procrule test and preision needed when updating sol
[FIX] sale_order_dates + [IMP] procurement exceptions by scheduler
[FIX] No need to return task
[IMP] move file as name changes and add corrections
[FIX] Continue Run Schedulers wizard fix
[FIX] name issues of takss
[FIX] updating sale order line, but there is still a problem with the recompute
When deliver all at once on a picking the expected date for it
was the minimum expected date between the stock move
for this picking. (same behavior as partial delivery)
This commit merge both min_date and max_date field in a single
field named shceduled_date. It replace min_date in views by
sheduled date that varies following picking move_type.
The new implementation of stock moves the cost of products from quants to
moves. So we have implemented the FIFO and average cost method based on
those moves instead of using quants.
- When average price is choosed, a field average_price is set on the
product.
- The tests have been completed with an example of how fifo work with
negative stock.
As the use of real price method is really rare, because of the rigor
required on traceability for such method, we removed this functionnality.
- The tests purchase/test/fifo_price.yml have been adapted to use the
FIFO costing method instead of real price.
The old report stock history doesn't exist anymore, and is replaced by
the move view that contains all the cost information.
The methods `get_price_unit` have been moved from the stock to
stock_account.
The methods `_set_default_price_moves` and
`set_default_price_unit_from_product` have been removed from stock.
Explaination of FIFO and average:
- In action_done for an out move in average and fifo, the price_unit and
stock_value are updated.
- For FIFO, it will use the qty_remaining on the in moves to check from
which in moves to take the stock values for the out.
- In case of negative stock in FIFO, it puts also qty_remaining on OUTs.
- In the case of average, it will take the cumulated value of the last
move and divide it by the quantity in stock.
This commit is pretty much a 'work in progress':
- Edit 'done' moves when the costing method is FIFO doesn't trigger the
replay the FIFO stack.
- The landed_costs feature doesn't work.
This commit adapt purchase to be able to edit purchase line ordered quantity
and propagate it to the related picking after the request for quotation
validation.
These are the supported use case
- When you increase the quantity on a purchase line, an extra move (and
an extra picking if they are all done or canceled) is created with the
difference between old and new value and the push rules are applied on
it.
- When you decrease the quantity of a purchase line, different behaviors
can occurs:
* If you plan to decrese the ordered quantity under the received
quantity, you get a user error saying tht you have to make some
return before.
* Else the moves not done or cancelled are decreased by starting with
move having no procurement_id. The decrease is not propagated
through push or pull rules.
* If you decreased the quantity under the invoiced quantity, a next
activity is created to remind you to do a refund.
When we have purchase orders and we return some products to the
supplier, we now have the possibilty to set those moves as 'to refund'
and so the quantity received is decreased.
Because the feature 'to refund' already exists on the sale orders, we
will generalize it in the module 'stock_account' which is a dependency
of both 'sale_stock' and 'purchase' which are the both module that use
the feature 'to refund'.
- Create a PO with a product "Control Purchase Bills" set to "On
received quantities".
- Validate the PO.
The invoice status is "Waiting Bills", while it should be "Bills
Received".
opw-726245
Currently partners have a boolean field to choose whether to receive
notifications only in their Odoo inbox or to receive them in their inbox
and by email. This leads to several issues :
* if a customer is configured to not receive emails he will not receive
any notification on sales orders, leads, ... This is not clearly
indicated to the salesman and it is not easy to know how to change
that behavior
* if an user chooses to receive emails and does not use its inbox a lot
of notifications stay in Odoo. The user has to manually set them as
done to make them disappear which is redundant.
This commit changes that behavior. From now on customers will always
receive all notifications by email. Indeed Odoo is not a customer oriented
mailbox. Moreover sales orders or discussions on leads send to customers
should always be sent by email as it is the standard communication
mechanism. Users will be able to choose to receive notifications in Odoo
or by email. The choice is no longer inbox or inbox + email, but inbox
or email. Choosing one option or the other one depends on the way the
user wants to work.
Technically the field is moved on the users model and selection keys
are renamed. Notification process is modified
* notified_partner_ids contains as before specified recipients as well
as followers matching the subtype
* customers and users working with emails are notified. During that
process customers notifications are marked as done to be able to
track the email state without having needaction. Users notifications
are currently deleted as we do not track their email state.
The removal of partner field implies changes in various addons that
define partner data with this field set in the values.
Raphael Collet