When generating a link for a payment through the website_payment/pay
route, including the partner_id 'blindly' is somewhat of a security
issue since it means you could potentially create payments for any
partner of your choosing.
This commit instead introduces an access token mechanism where the
partner_id, amount and currency_id are used to generate a unique access
token that can be checked upon accessing the payment page. This token
is only checked if the partner_id field is set (otherwise this is just
an anonymous payment like any other).
Currently when payment is processed through the payment link by
public user then there is no details of partner(email, country etc..)
so due to that some payment provider(paypal, stripe etc.) produce
the traceback on public payment
so when generating link for the payment pass the partner on link so
where payment is processed by public user then it will get the customer
of the record as partner, so on behalf of the customer the payment is
processed.
task-1938635
Closes: #31575
Replace website_published and environment by a generic state on
payment.acquirer
Payment acquirers aren't enabled by default. When setting their state to 'enabled' or 'test', it is verified the required fields for the provider are set.
- treat s2s transactions as such
- don't filter out tokens saved on acquirers that are not set for full
s2s mode, as tokens might get created through a form and still be usable
- detect the submit event as well as the click on the 'Pay Now' button
to avoid completely wrecking the payment flow by pressing the return key
- correct start override in JS should chain promises
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
- When validating payments on the payment process polling page
errors can occurs and the tracebacks aren't logged which doesn't help
when trying to understand the issues.
With this commit we display the traceback instead of shadowing them.
closesodoo/odoo#33537
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
- When processing payments on the payments processing page,
`psycopg2.OperationalError` can be raised.
We do not want those exceptions to be displayed to the customers,
instead we want the polling page to try to process the payments again.
This commit hides the display of psycopg2 operational errors.
- This commit also fixes the "processing your payments" message being
hidden after the first polling, no matter if the processing has succeeded or not.
closesodoo/odoo#33462
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
Sequentially previewing and paying two sale orders was causing a
redirection issue. Instead of being redirect to the SO preview
(/my/orders/<:order_id>), the user was redirected to /payment/process.
The issue was due to processed transactions not being removed from the
session.
opw-1948288
Closes#31741
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
- Activate multi-company
- Create 2 S2S payment methods (Payment Flow: Payment from Odoo), one
for each company
- Connect as a regular user to `/my/payment_method`
The user has access to both payment methods, while he should only have
access to the method of his company.
opw-1920483
closesodoo/odoo#30558
The user should always be redirected when paying with wire transfer.
This is because the landing page displays useful data such as the communication.
Closes#27194
Sips does not accept special characters as a transaction reference.
Replacing '-' solve this issue.
Parsing Sips response was failing when the return url had query parameters.
This was due to the split on '='. Encoding the url solve this issue.
This commit aims to improve the user experience when using payment acquirers. There currently are no error feedback with some acquirers, which leaves the user wondering what is going on and what is the real status of its payment.
In some cases, the user is currently being redirected to the home page even though the payment has failed. We want to make it more obvious to the user that something unexpected has happened by redirecting to an intermediate page that will provide good feedback on payments status.
Another goal of this commit is to order acquirers by sequence instead of by flow and to select the first acquirer by default. This feature was already implmented in commit fe294fd43e521bd2d339e962f43acf46c3d4cb97, some UI adaptations were needed though.
Related to task #36680Closes#26958
- When creating a transaction on the payment page of the portal, the
transaction reference returned was incorrect.
This commit return the newly created transaction's reference.
- The method to compute the reference of a payment.transaction and avoid
duplicate was missing some edge cases (for example if there was a '-'
in the reference).
- The creation of transactions in the route /website_payment/pay was not
checking for duplicate payment.transaction.
It was very confusing for the user to distinct account.payment and payment.transaction. From now on, the transactions are
technical objects and, in the backend, we only refer to it in log messages (Front end will be adapted in the same fashion
later on). They are hidden in debug mode in accounting\configuration\payments as their purpose is now purely technical/log
This commit also aims to reduce the gap between the accounting app and the transactions: account.payment objects are
created/validated upon completion of transaction.
To ease the capture/voiding of pending transactions, the related buttons are now displayed directly on the SO/invoice
instead of the transactions.
Was task: https://www.odoo.com/web#id=35857&view_type=form&model=project.task&action=333&active_id=967&menu_id=4720
Was PR #24043
[FIX] add domain based on journal to payment tokens
Was opw: https://www.odoo.com/web?debug#id=1828206&view_type=form&model=project.task&menu_id=5200
- Fix an issue where the transaction were always set a 'form_save' thus always creating payment tokens.
- Fix an issue where when the customer paying while not being logged in was crashing.
The issue is due to the fact that we are creating payment transactions linked to no partners, doing so it crashing the code when creating the payment token with no partner set.
- On 'website_payment/pay' if the reference contains a '/' the payment will never succeed.
It is due to the fact that in the template "payment.pay" were setting "prepare_tx_url" and "form_action" using this reference.
But having a '/' in the reference breaks the URL to call to create a transaction.
So when creating a transaction (or even paying in S2S) the payment never succeed and returns a HTTP 404 error.
The generic payment form introduced in 11.0 has changed the way we collect payment and so does the code.
The route /website_payment/pay hasn't been changed to support the new payment form.
This commit fixes this.
It also fixes a bug for when a customer tries to create two transactions with the same reference.
- Fixed 500 errors when trying to display payment form because of variables partner_id/acquirer_id missing.
- Accepted credit cards are now display next to the acquirer name on the payment form
- Online quotation and e-commerce now use the new payment form.
- Added the ability to chose on an acquirer if it uses only form/s2s or both.
(Still need some code cleaning)
Customer portal controller and templates contained in website_payment
module are moved to payment. This module now uses the customer portal
defined in portal module and most of website_payment code is moved
to payment.
website_payment now contain code really related to website, such as
payment acquirers configuration for website.
Damien Bouvy