Commit Graph
204 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
oco-odoo d4cd8be48f [IMP] web: add decoration support for all field widgets (#25160)
It is sometimes useful to be able to customize slightly the color of a
field depending on some conditions on the current record.

For example, imagine that we want to show a VAT number field in green/red, if
it was validated or not. To do that, we can add a field with an
onchange, and simply add decoration-danger and decoration-success
attributes to the field.
2018-06-08 15:20:49 +02:00
Christophe Simonis e008ef302a [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.3 up to 53300648ed 2018-05-30 12:18:52 +02:00
Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine 3cfd3e6b0b [FIX] web: proper rendering of widget tag
There was no consideration of the fact that the widget
rendering process could be asynchronous. This commit
fixes that situation so that render a node of type
<widget name="..."> is now possible.
2018-05-30 12:03:24 +02:00
qsm-odoo b2ad88e38d [FIX] web: form buttons should always get a btn style class
Here is the story of the problem: back in 10.0, everything *seemed*
fine with button rendering except it was very messy duplicated codes.
The system was still not consistent:

-> In Header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-default btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-default btn-link
oe_link -> btn-default oe_link
btn-danger -> btn-default btn-danger
some_class -> btn-default some_class

-> Not in header, button with:
no class -> no class
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> oe_link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> some_class

So, outside the header, the system seemed to not process anything except
transforming the oe_highlight class. In the header, the btn-default was
always added, except if using the oe_highlight class. The style is fine
for those, except for .btn-default.btn-link and .btn-default.oe_link
where the link class has no effect (which is fine as header are not
supposed to contain links).

In 11.0, the new views were introduced alongside websitepocalypse. The
new system led to:

-> In Header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-default btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-default oe_highlight
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-default btn-link
oe_link -> btn-default oe_link
btn-danger -> btn-default btn-danger
some_class -> btn-default some_class

-> Not in header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> oe_highlight
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> oe_link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> some_class

So, it worsened the header buttons by not processing the oe_highlight
class and adding the btn-default class in all cases. This is even
worse since in 11.0 .btn-default.btn-link do have a specific style and
thus not appear as .btn-default anymore. Those may be invisible "bugs"
though as .btn-link are not supposed to be in header and oe_highlight
is styled correctly in css. For buttons outside the header, a little
processing was added to add "btn-default" class for buttons which did
not specify a class (and oe_highlight is not processed anymore there
too).

In master, with the less2scss task, the system had to change again but
led this time to visible bugs:

-> In Header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> btn-link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> some_class

-> Not in header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> btn-link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> some_class

As you can see, the system is now the same for both header button and
normal buttons. The system is also better for all cases as it produce
only *one* *bootstrap* class for all cases. However, the problematic
case is the last one for header buttons: it did not receive the
btn-default class automatically. Even though this is the API for the
rest of odoo (dialogs, renderButton (old WidgetButton), ...), this is
a problem here as fixing this would require to add the 'btn-default'
class in every view which is using this case.

While waiting for a better solution, this commit is instead forcing
the btn-default class in that header case only (so only when a class
was mentioned but it did not contain any bootstrap btn type class).
So the new system gives:

-> In Header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> btn-link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> btn-default some_class

-> Not in header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> btn-link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> some_class

This commit also adds tests which will prevent the system to change
again without noticing it.

Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/24443
2018-04-26 16:23:39 +02:00
Aaron Bohy f85a54257d [FIX] web: BasicRenderer: button's name attr in DOM
Rev. 374af56 changed the way 'button' nodes are rendered in basic
views (form, list, kanban). As a consequence, their 'name'
attribute wasn't transmitted to the produced html elements anymore.
However, this attribute is very convenient to debug views, and to
write selectors in tests. For instance, it broke the test added by
rev. 8d17a2a once forwardported in master.

This commit reverts 1ce5bea.
2018-04-25 15:08:53 +02:00
Christophe Simonis b192431aee [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.3 up to ec5e27bb7c 2018-04-24 17:42:41 +02:00
Christophe Simonis 1f22b81203 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.2 up to 7113b70762 2018-04-23 19:36:25 +02:00
Christophe Simonis e8bf128318 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 3ab25b60bc 2018-04-23 18:15:25 +02:00
Christophe Matthieu 07cd24b1ec [IMP] web: convert notification popup in service and add buttons params
this.call('web.Notification', 'notify', params)

Display a notification at the appropriate location, and returns the
reference id to the same widget. Note that this method does not wait
for the appendTo method to complete.

@param {Object} params
@param {string} params.title notification title
@param {string} params.message notification main message
@param {string} params.type 'notification' or 'warning'
@param {boolean} [params.sticky=false] if true, the notification will stay
  visible until the user clicks on it.
@param {string} [params.className] className to add on the dom
@param {function} [params.onClose] callback when the user click on the x
  or when the notification is auto close (no sticky)
@param {Array<Object>} params.buttons
@param {function} params.buttons[0].click callback on click
@param {Boolean} [params.buttons[0].primary] display the button as primary
@param {string} [params.buttons[0].text] button label
@param {string} [params.buttons[0].icon] font-awsome className or image src
@returns {Number} notification id

this.call('web.Notification', 'close', notificationId)
2018-04-19 17:17:54 +02:00
Géry Debongnie b8bf945335 [FIX] web: do not change pager when discarding changes
Here is a scenario that could happen before this commit:
1. go to a list view with more than one record, say 3
2. click on the 3rd record to open the form view
3. the pager says 3/3
4. click on edit button
5. click on discard button
6. the pager says 1/3 (but the record displayed is still the same)

It is often necessary to restore the offset for the sub records, because
the number of pages in a one2many could have changed.  However, it is
not a good idea to do that for the main record, since it interferes with
the usual flow of operations.
2018-04-19 17:15:26 +02:00
qsm-odoo e88913bd28 [IMP] web, *: do not use 'oe_highlight' and 'oe_link' class in the DOM
* test_main_flows

The style of a primary/link button is given by the
'btn-primary'/'btn-link' class. The old 'oe_highlight'/'oe_link'
class should still be supported in views but not rendered in the DOM.
2018-04-18 14:47:42 +02:00
Christophe Simonis 74033eb007 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.2 up to 90f8f17fb4 2018-04-16 19:50:50 +02:00
Géry Debongnie 9b2b5eddd4 [FIX] web: properly display buttonbox for large screens
In the form view, a new problem appeared since we introduced the extra device
size_class: the buttonbox was folded for large screens, even if there is
only two buttons.

The reason is that the form renderer code used a list to map size class
numbers to the number of buttons allowed to be displayed.  With the
extra size class, this number was undefined, which caused an issue.
2018-04-13 17:18:10 +02:00
Vincent Schippefilt 02a063fd73 [IMP] web: keyboard navigation in form view
The goal of this commit is to allow fast entry of the same model using
the keyboard for navigating through the form once, by blocking the user
from advancing in the form if there is a required field or once they
went through the form once to get them to a primary action (button)

This commit includes the following changes
    1) Enable moving forward from field to field using the TAB key
    2) Entering the one to many and many to many using the TAB key
        a. When entering it, set the focus on the "add new line" link or
            button
		b. When adding a new line, set the focus on the field visible
            editable field of the new line
        c. Discard adding a new line with ESC key
        d. If the user leaves the first field empty and uses TAB, we
            will cancel the adding of a new line and move to the next
            field of the form
    3) When a field is required and not filled in, do not allow the user
        to move out of the field using the TAB key (the user is still
        allowed to use the mouse though), mark the field as invalid
        instead
    4) After going though the form once, using the TAB key on the last
        field will move the focus to the first primary button of the page
    5) When the focus is on a primary button (EDIT/SAVE), the user cannot
        move the focus forward using the TAB key. Hitting TAB again will
        display a tooltip telling to hit ENTER to activate the button.
        The mouse is still available to move the focus.
    6) When the user saves, the focus is placed on the first primary
        button of the form renderer (like VALIDATE for a new invoice)
    7) On dialogs, primary buttons should stop the users from moving out
        of them, and showing a popup if the user tries
    8) When closing a dialog, the focus will be moved back to the widget
        that opened it.

This commit does not include the following features
    1) Navigation with the keyboard on a selection one to man
    2) Navigate between tabs in a form using the keyboard
    3) Cancelling the adding of a new line in a many to many using the
        ESC key do not set the focus correctly
    4) Enhancing the focusses fields (like blue underline)
2018-04-10 09:39:08 +02:00
Martin Geubelle 7c936c68f9 [FIX] web: forward-port
The rev. odoo/odoo@6397ce7 has not been correctly foward-ported.
The view option `sidebar` has been renamed `hasSidebar` in odoo/odoo@32b8cec
2018-04-09 15:11:29 +02:00
Christophe Simonis 860dfb5586 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to d277adf4d5 2018-04-06 15:36:10 +02:00
Nicolas MartinelliandGéry Debongnie 6397ce7eb0 [FIX] web: loss of context when duplicating
- Create a vendor bill, save and validate
- Duplicate the bill, save
- Click on "Create"

A customer invoice is created, while the user expects a vendor bill.

After duplication, the new record is loaded but the context is lost.
Since the default value for the invoice type is based on the context key
`type`, a loss of context leads to an incorrect invoice type.

opw-1826453

Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
2018-04-05 10:12:06 +02:00
Christophe Simonis b51f2d38c2 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.2 up to 500e3f4970 2018-03-21 11:04:48 +01:00
Christophe Simonis e0345a4a3f [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 2835d29979 2018-03-20 11:45:11 +01:00
Priyanka KakadiyaandMohammed Shekha 97fe1f0507 [FIX] web: FormView: handle string attribute on groups
Before this rev., this attribute was ignored for groups containing
sub groups.

Task 1786309
Closes #23514

Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
2018-03-13 12:51:44 +01:00
Vincent Schippefilt 02eef78bbd [FIX] web : remove useless reload of failed _callButtonAction
Before this fix, when a _callButtonAction failed, it would reload the model.
After this fix we will not reload if a _callButtonAction fails
2018-03-05 09:33:39 +01:00
Ankit Sathvara 6be9fa3967 [IMP] web,hr: Phone widget is always clickable
With this commit, when a phone number is clicked (in readonly),
 - if voip is not installed, it opens an app according to the user
   choice (e.g. skype), and on mobile, it opens the phone app to
   call the number
 - if voip is installed, in desktop, it opens voip, and on mobile,
   it still opens the phone app to call the number, because webRTC
   is not supported.

This commit also makes the employee form view use the phone widget
for the 'Work Phone' and 'Work Mobile' fields.

Task #30369
2018-03-02 15:45:42 +01:00
Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine ee44d238f1 [IMP] web: close dialogs when navigating to another action.
This commit fixes a problem of usability. By the past if several dialogs were opened
(e.g. after having clicked on several one2manys) and a user would click on a many2one in a dialog,
a new view was charged but the dialog was kept open so that the change was unnoticed.
This behavior has been changed. Now all dialogs are automatically closed in such a situation.
2018-02-14 10:12:24 +01:00
Christophe Simonis adeea2a88d [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.2 up to 0f02dcb639 2018-02-12 18:34:43 +01:00
Christophe Simonis 0f02dcb639 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.1 up to c69d00157e 2018-02-12 18:08:27 +01:00
Christophe Simonis c69d00157e [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 169f899e29 2018-02-12 13:15:06 +01:00
Géry Debongnie e0cb522bf2 [FIX] web: update form widgets when state has changed
Since the <widget> tag is not used anymore in any of our views, it was
not really properly supported. In particular, the form widget was not
notified when the state of the form view has changed, which makes it
very difficult to actually do any useful work.

With this commit, we make sure that the widget method 'updateState' (if
it exists) is called with the new state whenever it changed.

This should allow developers to do useful work without having to work
around the issue. Note that this is not really a perfect solution, since
the updateState methot may or may not have been implemented.

I think that we need some kind of ViewWidget abstraction, which could be
used to have a better and more complete API for widgets in a basic view.
And AbstractField could inherit from ViewWidget.
2018-02-12 10:35:54 +01:00
Christophe Simonis 5f3301e5cb [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 20e4cd5bcd 2018-02-09 16:13:08 +01:00
Aaron Bohy 20e4cd5bcd [FIX] web: field widget with readonly modifier
Rev. dbdd742 introduced the 'baseMode' parameter of field's nodes
in the BasicRenderer. Its purpose is to encode the generic mode
of the field, regardless of its readonly modifier (i.e. in form
views, the baseMode of all fields is the mode of the renderer and
in list views, the baseMode of all fields is 'readonly', except for
fields in the row being edited, whose baseMode is 'edit').

Unfortunately, when the value of the readonly modifier of a field
was 'readonly', its baseMode was changed from 'edit' to 'readonly',
which shouldn't, as the baseMode's value should not be affected by
the modifiers.

This produced a bug when a field had a readonly modifier, as once
its value became true, the field was rendered in 'readonly', and
whatever the value of the modifier afterwards, it always remained
in 'readonly'.

The rev. ensures that the baseMode is no longer impacted by the
value of the readonly modifier.

Closes #22729
2018-02-09 15:36:14 +01:00
jpr-odoo b7aa439826 [ADD] web: Add a new widget to attach documents on a record
Purpose
=======

Add the possibility to easily attach a document on a record. That could be used for to attach receipts on expense for example.

Specification
=============

Add a new widget (AttachDocument) to allow attach document from mobile/web directly on record form

After attaching document it will call action given on widget, that action will be a method name on given model
2018-02-09 06:59:56 +01:00
Christophe Matthieu 715e602bf0 [IMP] web: use patch for object in tests to avoid edge effects 2018-02-08 15:46:41 +01:00
Christophe Matthieu 3b9dda6106 [FIX] web: Views: always destroy BasicModel instances
Before this rev., it might happen that the parent of BasicModel instances
wasn't correctly set to the Controller instance. It was actually set to the
ActionManager instance, which is never destroyed. So when this happened,
the BasicModel instance wasn't destroyed when it's controller was.
2018-02-08 15:46:41 +01:00
Christophe Matthieu d288b33648 [IMP] web: use patch for object in tests to avoid edge effects 2018-02-08 15:46:00 +01:00
Christophe Matthieu b28ceec009 [FIX] web: Views: always destroy BasicModel instances
Before this rev., it might happen that the parent of BasicModel instances
wasn't correctly set to the Controller instance. It was actually set to the
ActionManager instance, which is never destroyed. So when this happened,
the BasicModel instance wasn't destroyed when it's controller was.
2018-02-08 15:46:00 +01:00
Aaron Bohy 7937347d75 [IMP] web: invalidate JS cache for some models
Models concerned are 'ir.ui.view', 'ir.actions.act_window' and
'ir.filters'.

The DataManager's cache is invalidated at each create, update and
unlink operation. This cache stores actions (results of calls to
/web/action/load route), views (results of load_views RPCs) and
filters (fetched alonside views).

This rev. thus spares the user from reloading the webclient after
performing such operations on these models to see the changes in
the interface, as he only has to replay the action to see the
changes.
2018-02-07 08:49:58 +01:00
Christophe Simonis a98b46b8f5 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.1 up to fa1f2132e7 2018-01-22 18:44:05 +01:00
Christophe Simonis fa1f2132e7 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 950d9b2369 2018-01-22 17:47:32 +01:00
Aaron Bohy 32b8cec536 [REF] web,*: ActionManager/ViewManager refactoring
This rev. is the first part (out of 3) of the refactoring of the
ActionManager and ViewManager layer of the webclient.

The main changes are:
  - there is no ViewManager anymore, its work is now handled by the
    ActionManager itself, but isolated in a specific file ; this
    eases a lot of things, as the breadcrumbs handling for example.
  - the ActionManager code is converted to the new coding principles
    and guidelines ; mainly, children widgets communicate with it by
    triggering events up, and not by function calls anymore.
  - the ActionManager layer is now testable, and a lot of tests have
    already been written.
  - the code in other addons has been adapted consequently.

What's coming next:
  - introduce the 'AbstractAction' Widget, and make client actions
    and view controllers inherit from it ; this widget will
    implement a common API that could be used uniformly by the
    ActionManager (e.g. restore(), canBeLeft(), renderButtons(),
    getTitle()...).
  - move the ControlPanel handling from the ActionManager to the
    AbstractAction.
2018-01-16 20:49:19 +01:00
Alexandre Kühn 2a5488619d [FIX] web: disable {bin_size: true} on binary fields
Revision on 41fe7f9d11

This commit intended to reduce the network load when reading records with
binary fields. This was made possible by enforcing the contextual key
`bin_size` to be set for records with binary fields.

However, it is causing some issues (see #22222, #22231) which are:
    - write with bin_size:true generates a traceback
    - read/search_read with bin_size:true breaks some images
      on some views (e.g. base.view_partner_form)

Since the problems outweight the gain of these changes, we revert them.
2018-01-15 10:03:14 +01:00
Christophe Simonis 56974322f8 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 3b80a059ff 2018-01-12 19:03:00 +01:00
Alexandre Kühn 41fe7f9d11 [FIX] web: contexts on field widgets + enforce bin_size for binary
Field widgets now have a key 'context' that let them
extend the context of the dataPoint (e.g. list).

In particular, widgets on binary fields enforce the contextual
item {bin_size: True}, so that the server gives the size of the
binary field as its value, instead of its content.

This change on binary fields reduces network load when accessing
a view with binary fields.
2018-01-12 16:12:49 +01:00
Nicolas Martinelli 411a9fa326 [FIX] web: autofocus
Support autofocus on notebook pages:
```
<page autofocus="autofocus">
```

This was supported before the web client refactoring.

opw-801259
2018-01-11 15:19:52 +01:00
Christophe Simonis 29590a61cd [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 8fb25e185b 2017-11-28 16:57:58 +01:00
Christophe Simonis 5851a69aa3 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-16 up to 3f66814a0d 2017-11-28 15:12:31 +01:00
Martin Geubelle cc031bd226 [FIX] web: Form: handle attributes and modifiers on header
This is done for all other tags (except <form> and <sheet>) but this one has been
forgotten.

Closes #21258
2017-11-27 14:01:50 +01:00
Géry Debongnie d6ff8c8351 [FIX] web: better support for async field widgets
Most field widgets are synchronous, but some of them have to do extra
work before being ready (for example, the pad widget, or widget which
needs to lazy load JS/CSS files).  Because of that, the new views have
been well tested with synchronous widgets, but not completely with async
widgets.

Some code depended upon the fact that the widget was ready immediately
after being created.  This was incorrect, and is fixed in this commit,
by adding a new hook that is called in (basic) views after a widget is
ready (meaning, start and willstart are done)
2017-11-24 14:59:14 +01:00
Géry Debongnie cc560531b9 [FIX] web: better support for async field widgets
Most field widgets are synchronous, but some of them have to do extra
work before being ready (for example, the pad widget, or widget which
needs to lazy load JS/CSS files).  Because of that, the new views have
been well tested with synchronous widgets, but not completely with async
widgets.

Some code depended upon the fact that the widget was ready immediately
after being created.  This was incorrect, and is fixed in this commit,
by adding a new hook that is called in (basic) views after a widget is
ready (meaning, start and willstart are done)
2017-11-24 14:55:53 +01:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) 16f7a15325 [FIX] web: on_open_record stop propagation
on pricelist, open a pricelist form
click on one country group [country group form opens]
click on a pricelist again

Before this commit, a traceback appeared, saying the pricelist record was null
YET the pricelist's form on which we clicked before opened.

After this commit, the form of the pricelist opens, and no traceback is thrown.

OPW 783896

[FIX] web: test circular many2many

closes #21148
2017-11-23 14:48:45 +01:00
Aaron Bohy 463a214699 [REF] web,*: give evaluated contexts to load_views
*board,sale_timesheet

This rev. changes the API of load_views, as it now assumes that
the given context has no longer to be evaluated. This is more
convenient that way, as we can now call load_views with contexts
that are dict, and not instances of the Context class.
2017-11-23 11:00:55 +01:00
Aaron Bohy baae272ffd [REF] web: tests: make load_views RPCs go through mockRPC
This allows to inspect those RPCs and the given arguments as well.
2017-11-23 11:00:53 +01:00