The parent commit allows to select a specific interval for any
date or datetime field in the groupby menu. This makes some filter
akward, for instance "Order Month".
Accordingly, we have rewritten the string and help attributes in
search views archs and removed groupbys related to the same field
(that would have become redundant).
product.product inheritS from product.template, and they both
define the 'standard_price' field, but implement it differently;
- product: the field is a company dependent one (so non stored)
- template: the field is a computed one based on tis variants
For the first case, since the field is not stored in database, when
doing SQL query, we have to get the value from the table ir_property.
That is what purchase report does, but instead of searching on resource
'product.product', it does it on 'product.template'. There are
obviously no entries in ir_property table for 'standard_price' field
on product template. As consequence, the "product value" (cost)
is always null in purchase reporting.
This commit fixes that by modifying SQL query to get the good
value from ir_property table.
We want to break the dependency between stock and purchase
for our furtur developpement. For more modularity, a new
bridge module 'purchase_stock' is created.
This commti move part of business code, views, data, ...
related to stock management from purchase into purchase_stock
without changing any feature.
Task #47927
The idea is to do like the sale report: being
able for other modules to extend the report and
add their own fields. As we are going to split
stock from purchase, we will need this.
Moves UoM models, test and data to a new addon in
order to be able to use uom without product.
A simple example is be to be able to use UoM for
timesheets.
This commit only move code, and adapt xml ids
without chaging any feature or functionnal
behavior.
Note: 'product' module now depends on new
'uom' module.
Purpose
=======
The attribute name isn't required on the <filter> tag. If not set, it can't be selected with a xpath and it can't be overwritten.
A lot of PR are coming from the community just to add a name on a filter because:
- It can't be selected with a xpath.
- It can't be used with `default_search_foo` on an action context.
Specification
=============
Make the atttribute name required
Instead of just using create_uid as responsible, use a plain user_id
field for the PO and PO agreement responsible. This field is named
purchase representative but works like SO responsible and is now
tracked.
Field is added to various views and filters to ease the daily job
of purchase representative people.
Closes#17788 .
Purpose of this commit is to clean and uniformize report naming through
various addons. It has been chosen to name them using a formatting like
<report_name> - <object_name or suffix> .
Improve report naming in sale, point of sale, l10n_ch, purchase,
purchase requisition, report intrastat, website_quote
- RML Reports
- Webkit Reports (most part already removed by 13b9982c62)
- LocalService in netsvc.py
- rename attributes like rml_% to report_%
- rename ir.actions.report.xml to ir.actions.report
- allow rendering directly on an ir.actions.report by calling render method
- remove 'controller' report_type
- remove unused res.font stuff
- remove print_report method in models.py (not used)
- restore removed call to pdftotext process in test_reports
There is a confusion in name of menuitems 'Reports'. For example whe have a lot of printed reports containing reports (eg. Expenses Reports)
For the 'Analysis' reporting views, we should rename this into 'Reporting'.
This reverts commit cbc760acb8.
The reasons we put the product name and description is in the SO line:
- users want to be able to change the description in the printed quotation
- product is in user lang, description+product_name is in customer lang
That commit breaks what was a good behaviour
- sale: Improvement in quotation/so line's description
Currently, quotation/so line's description shows product's name with description.
It should show only description of product if description is there else show name of the product in backend views.
- sale: show product with description in sale report
Due to change in description of quotation/SO line, sale report is affected. Fixed it.
- website_sale: show only description in cart lines
Due to previous commit, cart lines shown with product and it's description as a quotation/so line's name.
When we create order from frontend, quotation/so lines' name field takes product name and it's description.
It should only take description if description is there else product name. Fixed it.
- purchase: Improvement in RFQ/PO line's description
Currently, RFQ/PO line's description shows product's name with description.
It should show only description of product if description is there else show name of the product in backend views.
- purchase: show product with description in purchase report
Due to change in description of RFQ/PO line, purchase reports are affected. Fixed it.
One of the behavioural divergences between "create or replace" view and
DROP; CREATE turns out to be that "create or replace" can only add
columns *at the end* of the view, and can not change the name or type of
the view during replacement, which can break migrations.
closes#14028
Several modules defines records with the external ID `base.foo_bar` while it is
created inside this module (typically menus and groups).
While there is no technical reasons to do so but this may introduce issues:
- these records will not be deleted during uninstall
- if a language is loaded before the installation of the module, it won't be
translated
The uninstallation will only remove the records with an external id linked to
this module (these would only be removed when removing base).
Installing a language before the module will drop the translations not linked
to an existing external id (as it can not be resolved).
This commit correct all the external ids tagged as from base or other incorrect
modules.
In Odoo 9.0, the field `company_id` has been moved
from the `res.currency` model to the `res.currency.rate`
model.
The different reports applying the currency rates on the amount
at date have not been updated according to this change. This
includes the sales, purchases and invoices analysis report.
Basically, before 9.0, there was one `res.currency`
per existing currency per company. A simple `JOIN`
on the `res_currency` table was therefore enough
to apply the currency rate.
From 9.0, the currency records are shared between
companies. It's the rates (`res.currency.rate`) that can be
set a on specific company. The simple `JOIN` on
`res_currency` is therefore no longer enough: the company condition
must be added. Only rates from the specific company
(e.g the company of the invoice) must be considered, or rates
without companies.
We take the opportunity to factor out the method, so, if a correction
must be done, it must be done in one place only.
opw-669129
Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine