As this field is defined directly in payment and is displayed on
acquirer form view let us display it in tree view also directly
in payment instead of website payment.
Since the new views, `record.id.value` contains the formatted value of
the ID, meaning it can contain separators. For example, by default,
`1234 => 1,234`. Since this value is used in the image URL, using
`value` won't work anymore.
When registering a payment token, validating it using a payment of a small amount followed by a refund
allows ensuring that the method is valid (i.e. checksumming the card number simple ensure the number
is valid but not that the card exists). This commit introduces a generic approach that must be implemented
for each acquirer that has tokenization support. This commit also introduces a generic payment token registration/usage template that can be adapted according to one's need.
payment_ogone: add support for tokens validation
-added tour for invoicing
-allow to set easily the number of the first invoice/bill/refund of a journal, from the invoice screen
-small usability fixes and refactoring
Move sale and payment bridge code into its own module. This commit mainly
moves (and reorganizes without changes) code from website_sale related
to payment and SO confirmation.
Only change is that payment_acquirer_id field on sale order is now a
related on transaction.acquirer_id . Indeed in website_sale and
website_quote both values were written but only managing transactions
and getting its acquirer is more efficient and ensure values are coherent.
JS part controlling payment form management is moved directly into
payment to reuse later on in future commits. Probably.
Purpose
=======
The field journal_id on a payment.acquired is required on the view. The only issue is that the journals cannot be created before having installed a localization. When the payment acquire module is installed before the localization, the journal id is not set on the payment acquire and it's impossible to make a call to `write` (For example publish the acquire)
Specification
=============
When making a write or a create on a payment acquire, udpate the journal_id with a default value if not set.
PURPOSE
=======
The field auto_confirm is complicated to understand for common users. Furthermore, on of its options is only useful for authorize module.
SPECIFICATION
=============
Remove the auto_confirm field. The destinies of its options are the following:
- none: Simply disappear.
- authorize: Become capture_manually. It has nothing to do with the auto_confirm field has it's related to the autorize module (And could be extended to other payment acquirers too).
- confirm_so: Remove it. Will be automatic, and we will always validate the sales order and generate the accounting entries on acquirer validation.
- generate_and_pay_invoice: Is linked to the journal_id. The field journal_id is always set and we will use it to validate the sales order and generate the accounting entries on acquirer validation.
Bonus: website_sale: Allow to create/validate invoice automatically on `Mark as Paid`
* add provider, related on acquirer_id.provider, in order to display
certain piece of information on tx depending on their provider;
* better tx form view and partner address display;
* remove unnecessary notebook on tx form view as it is not used;
* rename Payment Acquirers menu into Payment Methods, easier to
understand;
* acquirer kanban view improved to install / activate / configure them
depending on their state;
* be able to publish / unpublish acquirers without having to wait for
website_payment to add a button;
Indeed as transfer transactions are always pending and independant of
any callback, it is not necessary to see credentials, auto confirmation
settings and error / cancel / done messages.
Since the new views merge, a lot of design elements were broken. This
was particularly impacting the fields in the editable list view; indeed
the editable list view is not using an inline form view anymore so the
fields in the list were not properly styled as the LESS was still
defined assuming the form view environment (for example the invalid
fields were red for o2m fields in form view but not in editable list
view even though they got the right CSS class).
This commit refactor the LESS following these rules:
- No more division of non-layout and layout rules. Dividing LESS rules
in x_layout.less and x.less was a mistake. Many rules can be
considered to be layout and not layout at the same time, developers
always have to switch from one file part to the other, many CSS
selectors (and rules!) are duplicated for nothing, ...
- Field style is extracted from x_view.less and put in the new
fields.less file. As before, the fields_extra.less will contain the
rules specific to community so that the enterprise repo can override
those by replacing the whole file.
- Many classes have been renamed so that o_form_x_y becomes o_x_y as
many classes can now be applied outside of form view. These classes
should not be used in templates anyway.
The commit also changes the DOM of fields so that it is more minimalist
(no useless parent div, etc).
Input elements are not automatically styled anymore, they have to get
the o_input class explicitely. This allows to fix lots of small style
bugs of previous versions (required monetary field had not the proper
style, readonly m2m tags appeared as editable, ...). This also improves
the LESS code.
The editable list view should also completely stop flickering on chrome
and firefox.
The commit also removes the orange outline on list view dirty cells.
The commit also removes deprecated static xml, LESS and other code.
Notice there are still styles to restore/fix and LESS to improve.
This commit introduce a full redesign of all JS views. We started
basically from scratch. The goal was to unify all the various views
under a common framework, to make them testable, to make then usable in
different conditions (in studio, or in the frontend), and to make our
lives easier.
Some important points are:
- we introduced new coding guidelines (camelCase, 80 chars width, ...)
- we have a brand new testing framework (still QUnit based)
- kanban view moved to the web addon
- calendar view (formerly web_calender) moved to web as well
- the tree view was removed
- all new code should be documented
We hope that this code is the start of a new era for the Odoo web
client, we want to have a high quality codebase, well documented, well
tested, well designed.
Work done by the framework team: mostly aab, ged, chm, dmo, qsm
Allow to configure the bank statement import mode from kanban
When doing a manual journal entry, don't show the maturity date
Removing Issued total, using credit instead (less code, more
useful to have due amounts, instead of overdue)
Creating a bank, set a name 'BofA Current' and an
account number (that way, the account.account is based
on name)
Settings Wizard & menus: better sentences
Statement CSV Import: installed by default (it
does not add any menu)
remove use_in_payment: complex field, only
used for a default value
Small code cleanup
[IMP] sale: moving order date to secondary tab (strange on a quotation)
Remove field 'display_on_footer' to stop displaying
account journal on report documents.
As the field is removed but also used in payment to
generate default 'Thanks Message', put a new field
on account.journal in payment module, to keep the
role 'display_on_footer' had in payment.
It is already defined as a payment method (subtype=inbound) and that's what we want. No need of adding 'electronic' in 'payment_type' selection (that crashes if we select that, btw) and 'payment_method_id_code' is a duplicate of 'payment_method_code'.
This commit improves the tokenization process, allowing users
to set the acquirer to save payment data never, always or letting
the customer decide (only implemented in ecommerce for now).
Support for tokenization is improved for Ogone and Authorize.net
This commits also factorizes advanced payment features support
(authorization, tokenization, fees computation) in a generic method
overriden by every provider to specifiy which features are supported.
This process can be used in views to hide/show fields depending on
feature support or in constraint checks.
This allows using a modern e-commerce flow where amounts are first
authorized at checkout then captured when the picking is in fact
shipped instead of immediately capturing the amount.
To access this flow, a new selection value is available on the payment
acquirer: "Authorize the amount and confirm the SO on acquirer
confirmation". If this value is selected, s2s/form transactions should
only require authorization to the acquirer; the user can then
capture/void the payment manually from the Odoo backend transaction
form view by simply using buttons.
Introduces two new options:
- confirm_so: to confirm the sale order on acquirer confirmation
- generate_and_pay_invoice: confirm_so + generation of invoice and
payment registration
The installation of a new acquirer was a bit complicated : from settings,
check the acquirer, then apply (install the module) then list view of
acquirer and finally edit it in form view.
This needed to be simplified. The payment acquirers are pre-filled
in payment. From the kanban view an `Install` button installs and
redirects to the form field.
Environment field on payment.acquirer model now has a shiny stat button on its
form view. It allows to toggle between production and testing mode.
All payment acquirers are by default in testing environment now, to avoid issues.
Thibault Delavallée