Let's assume a form view with an x2many list, containing itself
an x2many field (no widget, so simply displaying the number of
records). When a record of the list is clicked, a form view
opens and displays the same sub x2many field, with widget
many2many_tags. Both list and form views of the x2many aren't
inline (thus have to be fetched on demand).
Before this commit, it crashed when the user clicked on a row
of the x2many list.
The bug has been introduced by a9cebd5a, which wrongly removed the
code handling this specific situation. At least, now we have a
test attesting that this code isn't useless.
Note that the diff isn't as scary as it looks like (we just added
an if/else, and thus indented the former code inside the else
clause).
closesodoo/odoo#48116
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Use of the new control panel helpers to increase consistency and change the assertions
according to the new DOM/behaviour (e.g. components removed instead of turning invisible).
Part of task 2196029
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
The FieldMany2One allows to quick create record (name_create).
However, sometimes, required fields on the co-model make the
name_create crash. In this case, the FieldMany2one opens a form
view in a dialog to let the user specify those fields, and create
a new record with the 'create' method. This was working fine.
The FieldMany2ManyTags embeds a FieldMany2One to let the user
search for and select or (quick) create tags. In this case, failing
quick creation didn't fallback on the dialog form view, but
displayed a server error instead. This commit fixes this issue.
Bug introduced by 50bf8309f8
Task 2192754
closesodoo/odoo#47183
X-original-commit: 63ab065f3298c13bb19ae1245d7fd2652581b254
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Let's assume a form view with a boolean field and a one2many field,
displayed for instance with widget many2many_tags. There is an
onchange on the boolean field, which populates the one2many, e.g.
[[5], [0, 0, {display_name: 'name', other_field: 'value'}]]
Before this commit, only the display_name was sent to the server on
save, because 'other_field' is unknown by the webclient.
Similar situations occurred with one2manys displayed as lists, and
onchanges returning values for fields that aren't in the list.
These situations probably didn't exist in Odoo yet, but a pending
task on website event adds one.
This commit ensures that all values returned by the onchange for
the x2many subrecords are sent back to the server when the user
saves.
closesodoo/odoo#46807
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
This commit fixes two issues that occurred in the following
situation: in a form view, have a one2many field F1 displayed as a
list, that contains another one2many field F2, displayed with
widget many2many_tags (in the list), and with a list in the form
(in the dialog). In the dialog, the list of F2 displays a
field, say 'name', which has an onchange that sets 'display_name'.
Moreover, there is an onchange in the (main) form view, that
populates F1 and F2, for instance, it returns something like: {
F1: [[5], [0, 0, {
F2: [[5], [0, 0, {
display_name: 'xxx',
name: 'xxx',
}]]
}]]
}
1) If the user opens a related record in F1, and adds (in the
dialog) a related record in F2, then validates the dialog, the
newly created record in F2 isn't correctly displayed in the
many2many_tags (the display_name is `false`), i.e. the onchange
hasn't been applied.
2) If field 'name' in F2 in the list is required, the new record
can't be saved, even if the user enters a correct value.
In both cases, the reason is that we use the incorrect viewType in
datapoints: as we don't specify that we specifically want 'list',
the 'default' one is taken, and we thus use the fieldsInfo of the
many2many_tags, which only knows field 'display_name'. As a
consequence, onchanges aren't correctly applied (issue 1), and
fields aren't correctly reset (issue 2).
Issue reported on task 2189529
When x2many fields are displayed with widgets like many2many_tags,
there is no limit on the number of related records to fetch and
display. In this case, the 'limit' attribute on the datapoints is
undefined. This could lead to weird issues when the limit is used
in computation, e.g.
var index = list.offset + list.limit; // = NaN
There are several occurrences of the above examples in the code,
which can be observed in specific scenarios, e.g. the one encoded
in the test. In this scenario, when the bug occurs, new records
added to editable list views are inserted on top (even if the list
is editable="bottom"), but the edited row is the last one.
Issue reported on task 2189529
Let's assume the following scenario in a form view:
- have a one2many field, say fieldA, displayed as a list,
containing another one2many, fieldB, (no widget, thus
displaying 'n record(s)')
- the one2many list is not editable, so there is a sub form view,
displaying fieldB as a list, and in this list some random field,
say fieldC, is displayed
- have a random field on the main form view, with an onchange to
populate the one2many
- set that random field s.t. the onchange returns something like
fieldA: [[5], [0, 0, {fieldB: [[0, 0, {fieldC: 'value'}]]}]]
- there is now a record in fieldA's list, displaying '1 record'
as value for fieldB
- click on that record to open it in a form view (dialog)
- in the dialog, in fieldB's list, we expect to have a single row
displaying 'value' as value for fieldC
Before this rev., it crashed when opening the record in the dialog,
whether the form view was inline or not.
The crash occured because fieldB was already in the list view, so
datapoints already existed for it (a list datapoint, and record
datapoints for records in the relation, in our example one record
datapoint). However, those datapoints didn't have the fieldsInfo of
the form view. When opening the form view, we added the fieldsInfo
of the form to the datapoint of the record we opened, but we didn't
recursively apply the fieldsInfo to its children. As a consequence,
when rendering the list view for fieldB in the dialog, we haven't
the information about fieldC, and it crashed.
Note that if fieldB wasn't present in fieldA's list view, it worked
fine because datapoints didn't exist before we opened the record in
the dialog.
Task 2120235
This commit trims leading and trailing spaces in search terms of
many2one.
task-2187414
closesodoo/odoo#45282
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the behavior of the phone widget was tested in web
as if it was always altered with module SMS
Giving wrong test results when sms module was not installed
After this commit, the separation is clearer, and the phone widget's
behavior is tested according to the modules it is altered by
closesodoo/odoo#45271
X-original-commit: 2e337516468797dd898c79c9669b5a90c83b56a7
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Before this commit the % symbol was part of the input. We could write a
value with the % symbol to divide the value by 100 (50% = 0.5, 50 = 50)
This commit removes the % symbol from the input and adds it in a span
after the input so we do not need to write the % symbol anymore.
The value from the input will be saved as $value / 100 in database.
task-2065078
closesodoo/odoo#43995
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Before this commit, there was a discrepancy between
many2many_tags widget and regular many2many list
That is, in tag mode, when someone had read access alone on the comodel
he could modify the members of the m2m relation on the current model
Which couldn't be done in m2m list
After this commit, it is possible in a m2m list to add
records to a relation, even if we don't have CRUD access on the comodel
Task 44074
closesodoo/odoo#40194
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
With this commit, the url widget automatically prefixes the href
url by http:// if no protocol is specified, so that clicking on
the url will by default redirect to an external website.
To prevent this behavior, one can still specify the new option
'website_path: true' on the url field node in the view arch.
Thanks to this, we can remove a similar logic (only implemented on
res_partner model) which automatically altered the value saved in
database to force its 'http://' prefix.
task-2153184
closesodoo/odoo#42118
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
When the value is empty in a related field, string of the element was
displaying "false" instead of an empty string which is not what we expect.
This commit fixes that issue.
Task ID 2119333
PR #40949
Task 2123526
Before this task, the phone widget on char fields was not
displaying the send sms button by default
After this task, the default behavior of the phone
widget is to display the send sms button
By default, in readonly, unset field widgets (and their labels) are
not displayed. However, we would like the statusbar widget to be
always displayed (even when it is not set).
This commit introduces a new method 'isEmpty' on AbstractField, and
uses it (instead of isSet) to determine whether or not a field should
be hidden. By default, it uses isSet, so that it doesn't change
anything for the other fields, and we override it in statusbar to
always return false.
There was a need to make the distinction with isSet, as this one is
used to determine if a record can be saved (if the field is required,
and isSet returns false, it can't be).
task-2172272
closesodoo/odoo#43419
Related: odoo/enterprise#7929
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
After this commit, x2many fields can have options like
create/delete which accept a domain, to make create/delete on
x2many conditional, say for example x2many field can have options
like:
options="{'create:' [('foo', '=', True)]', 'delete:' [('foo', '=', True)]'}"
With this when foo field is True, Create and Delete actions will
be available, but if foo is False then they won't.
In case of one2many fields, if 'create' is false, then 'Add a line'
(list) or 'Add' button (kanban) won't be displayed.
In case of many2many fields, 'Add a line' or 'Add' button will
always be displayed even if 'create' condition is false as it
doesn't really create records (but rather links existing ones).
Same applies for delete.
Task-2092953
closesodoo/odoo#42919
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Parth Chokshi <pch@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy<aab@odoo.com>
*sale,sale_product_configurator
Let's assume a form view containing a many2one with an onchange
that updates the value of a one2many. Do a quick create in the
many2one. While the name_create request is pending, add a row to
the one2many but do not leave it. When the name_create returns, and
the onchange has been performed, the one2many is reset, and the row
is no longer in edition (worse, it could be invalid, i.e. in a state
that the user could not have reached in a normal situation).
This commit fixes this issue by considering the whole [name_create +
onchange] operation as one. This operation is executed in the mutex
of the model, so the other request (adding a row to the one2many) is
delayed until the many2one value has been correctly set.
This fixes an issue with the sale and rental tours (on sale_order),
that had been deactivated for a while.
When accessing stock_barcode module to validate pickings, is not
possible to add floating point quantities for any localizaton which uses
',' as decimal separator.
The numeric field is now defined via browser tags <input="numeric"> to
make the numeric keyboard popup automatically on mobile devices
(commit 8f5840369b28962ab2be9edfce7331a836c3df22)
Adding the override to avoid further processing when the input
is already anumber
opw-2154657
closesodoo/odoo#42748
X-original-commit: 1ccc60deeb067f8d461d48cbf51719317c22cb90
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Let's assume a many2many_checkboxes widget in a form view with a
dynamic domain (depending on another field in the view). At first
rendering, the widget contains a checkbox for each value matching
the domain.
Before this rev., if the user changed the value of the field used
in the domain, the many2many_checkboxes wasn't redrawn, so it still
displayed the values matching the previous version of the domain.
Closes#38509Closes#40173closesodoo/odoo#42867
X-original-commit: 1ace56f9a8cb56fb39235468dd13447bcbbee40a
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Removing the test "field changes are correctly debounced in text fields"
because it doesn't represent the reality that fields are not debounced
anymore in production code.
This test was nondeterministic.
In this commit:
- transformed test_utils helpers to always trigger native events
- introduced new test_utils_create helper: prepareTarget
- updated qunit asserts to support Owl Components
- updated all misused helpers that would crash with the updated test_utils
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Rousseau <pro@odoo.com>
This is a weird situation, but the python handles it. Let's assume
a many2one field F1 on model M1 with comodel M2, and on M2 the name
field (which is the _rec_name) being itself a many2one, and the
following scenario:
- create a new record for M1
- for field F1, select 'Create and Edit': it opens a form view for
M2 in a dialog
- type something in F2 input, and click 'Quick create'
- save the dialog
Before this rev., the value of F1 was [object Object]. Now, the new
value is properly displayed.
OPW 2091106
closesodoo/odoo#40549
X-original-commit: 5a04ea848abf50b1fb1f9893d1fcd98013bc025d
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Before this commit, all the computation of the default widths for column
headers was done before the list was attached to the DOM, meaning that no
column was actually visible. This was a problem since columns that are
meant to stay unseen were taken into account in the calculation of relative
column widths.
Now, the same algorithm runs once the columns are visible so that invisible
columns can be properly excluded.
fixes#38744
Task 2076721
X-original-commit: 4bf98b47898b075049975dfe597f0fb92c7c14d1
Purpose
=======
We want to add an option on the widgets
- many2many_binary,
- binary,
- image
This option specifies what file extensions the user can pick from the file input dialog box.
Examples
========
```xml
<field widget="many2many_binary" options="{'accepted_file_extensions': 'image/*'}"/>
<field widget="many2many_binary" options="{'accepted_file_extensions': '.png,.jpeg'}"/>
<field widget="many2many_binary" options="{'accepted_file_extensions': 'application/pdf'}"/>
<field widget="image" options="{'accepted_file_extensions': '.png,.jpeg'}"/>
<field widget="binary" options="{'accepted_file_extensions': '.pdf,.svg'}"/>
```
How
===
Add an option (accepted_file_extensions) in the template ``HiddenInputFile`` (the widget many2many_binary is using this template)
So, we can also use this new option in others widgets using ``HiddenInputFile``
In the many2many_binary, read the ``nodeOptions`` and set the widget attribute ``accepted_file_extensions``
We also have to fix some other widget, because an property ``image_only`` was already existing in the template ``HiddenInputFile``
(we just need to replace ``image_only=True`` to ``accepted_file_extensions='image/*'``
The widget ``FieldPdfViewer`` (pdf_viewer) now use the new option to filtrate PDF
(instead of removing the <input/> and adding <input accept='.pdf'/>).
Tests
=====
We also test if the option is correctly set on the <input/>
- binary
- image
- many2many_binary
Impacted widgets
===============
- many2many_binary
- image: this widget use ``options="{accepted_file_extensions='image/*'}"`` instead of ``image_only=True``
- tablet_image: same as ``image``
Task #2082815closesodoo/odoo#38351
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
This option, if set to True, prevents the user from modifying the
color of the tags.
Part of task 2070454
closesodoo/odoo#38848
X-original-commit: a62b65a8f9114493064d4efae92825814a880c04
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
-Import a subscription with end date beyond 200 in the future (ex: 2500-01-01).
-Open the subscription and click the Edit button.
Before this commit:
A stacktrace appears indicating that a date is not valid. It's not possible to
edit the subscription.
After this commit:
The maxDate of the date picker has been increased to 31/12/9999, allowing the
user to edit subscriptions whose end date is that far in the future.
A test `toggle datepicker far in the future` for this case has been created.
closesodoo/odoo#38527
Opw: 2079696
X-original-commit: 32b6131c04fef7a542a0ccbdb924d177627bfe38
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Backport of 64f6e50d0c, with a test!
Closes#27109
Purpose
=======
If the model on a reference fields is not modified from the interface
by the user but by the server, the selection is not correctly
recomputed on the interface.
Specification
=============
By calling super first on the '_reset' method, the new model
is taken into account when resetting the selection.
closesodoo/odoo#38109
X-original-commit: b5b992d9c4e85c224ded795ff9ce14d1608b3ed6
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Changes the behaviour of many2ones when their value is changed via a form dialog.
Before this commit, when editing a m2o with a form dialog opened by an external button,
the field triggered an onchange with its old value before reloading its widget.
This caused the edition in list views to display outdated information when
saving multiple records.
Now, the reload is executed first, then the onchange occurs so that the value is
the newly updated one.
Part of task 2078807
closesodoo/odoo#37576
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
only activate multi-edit on list with specific attribute.
When the attribute multi_edit="1" is set on the tree view the user
can select a/some records and it will activate the multi-edit
with confirmation dialog (even for a single record).
Also, on-change are not applied when using multi-edit
closesodoo/odoo#37525
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
1/ Write a form view with a o2m field that has its own inline tree view
(no other view exist in db for the target model)
2/ Open that view in a mobile environment
3/ Instead of having a list view, you get a kanban view. No luck for
you, since the default kanban generated by `models.py` is an empty one,
your records are *invisible* \o/
From what I can tell, the previous condition made no sense:
```
if (there is a list view and a kanban view) <-- this seems absurd
then (use the list mode)
elif (there is no list view but a kanban view)
then (use the kanban mode)
else (use both modes)
```
The first condition seems absurd: it *actively* ignores a kanban view
if there is one. Even better, the list view whose existence it checks
is never there: it checks for a `tree` when it should be checking for a
`list`. In short, the first condition was *never* met, and you ended up
either with exclusive kanban mode or with both modes - even if you had
no existing kanban view for the target model...
This commit moves the normalization of `tree` into `list` before
attempting to process the x2many field's subviews. It clarify the usage
of `tree` vs `list` (cf. only use `list`) which prevents weird edge
cases like described above.
closesodoo/odoo#36237
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Dieudonné <adr@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Paridans <app@odoo.com>
ClassNames 'oe_read_only' (resp. 'oe_edit_only') can be used in
x2many lists to hide columns in 'edit' (resp. 'readonly') modes.
However, before this rev., there were two issues:
1) Having such a className on a <button> tag didn't work well as
the 'display: none' rule didn't apply on the body cell (it only
applied on the button). Same could be observed on <widget>
nodes.
2) Having more than one invisible column (with those classNames)
didn't work either, because the footer cells weren't hidden.
We didn't notice it with one invisible column, because the
footer contained one cell less than the header and the body.
Those two issues could be observed on the mrp.bom form view.
Task 2068261
This commit fixes:
- body of a email.template in a small field
- translation of website_description of a product does not show the
source of the translation
- translation of website_description of a product shows the full
content for the current language
HTML fields are typically fields with longer of content.
If the field is an HTML field, it should be displayed in a textarea,
like the text fields.
Most of HTML fields are split in meaningful chunks of content (using
xml_translate or html_translate method).
For these fields, the source must be displayed.
Also sort the entries on the source to have a consistent order
closesodoo/odoo#37215
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
From the settings activate:
- Multiple Sales Prices per Product
-- Prices computed from formulas
- Discounts
Create a pricelist with discount policy "Show public price & discount to
the customer", set the price calculation formula:
- Rounding: 10
- Price discount: 10%
Modify the sale order xml list view adding 'digits="[3, 2]"' to the
discount shown in the sale order line.
Create a sale order with such pricelist and on the so line put a
product with quantity 1 and sale price 4190 (VAT 19% included in the price).
The discount will not display the requested number of decimal digits (2)
in list view, but it will when editing the field.
The cell formatting is done calling the appropriate function (formatFloat),
which search the digits option from the 'options' parameter or from the field
definition. The latter stores the default digits coming from
the DecimalAccuracy settings, which, as side effect, alter the behavior
of the discount calculation.
https://www.odoo.com/web#view_type=form&model=project.task&id=2069939&active_id=2069939
When passing into edit mode the field is created as widget, parsing its options
which have 'digits', instead when coming back in list mode it is "just a
float field" rendered directly from the list_renderer which no options,
so the formatFloat will look at the field definition
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/12.0/addons/web/static/src/js/fields/field_utils.js#L172
Adding the correct parameter to the dictionary passed to formatFloat
during the list rendering is a possible solution, because it is the
"closest" point in which parsing the parameter is possible without
touching higher level code or forcing the creation of a widget (adding
widget='float' as xml parameter).
closesodoo/odoo#37167
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Since fbbfa6d it's not longer possible
to write a date without separator (e.g., 0102 for 01/02/2019; 121298 for
12/12/1998; 02042018 for 02/04/2018), or a date without year (e.g.,
01/02 for 01/02/2019) in the datepicker widget.
In this commit we have decided to be as permissive as tempus dominus
that call moment.js with strict false. This allows moment.js to deduct a
date from a string in a more versatile way. This also allows a more
versatile autocomplete in the search views.
opw-2070464
opw-2070931
closesodoo/odoo#37095
Forward-port-of: odoo/odoo#36821
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Gives time to the user to enter an actual value in m2o in list views.
Before this commit, emptying a many2one field (selecting all > BACKSPACE or DELETE)
triggered instantly a field_change. This was an issue in multi edition as a field
changed triggered instantly a save on selected records without giving time to the
user to enter a new value.
Now, many2ones only trigger a fieldChange when selecting a new valid value.
The Date(Time)Fields listen to 'input' and 'change' events (like
all InputFields) to keep track of changes. However, the datepicker
already listens to the 'change' event. As a consequence, in multi
edition in a list view, if the user changed the value of a
date(time) field by directly editing the input, the fieldChanged
event was triggered twice, and there were 2 dialogs asking the user
if he wanted to save the change.
This rev. makes the Date(Time)Fields stop listening themselves to
'input' and 'change' events, and instead completely rely on the
datepicker widget.
Task 2068280
Before this rev., the 'fieldChanged' event was triggered each time
the user selected a value (a day, an hour, a minute or a second) in
the datepicker. This means that if there was an onchange on the
field, a lot of RPCs could have been done when a user set a
datetime. In addition, in a list view with multi edition, the user
was asked to save the changes at each step of the datetime
selection, making the feature unusable.
Task 2068280
The progress bar was pretty broken before this commit.
> It was not possible to input the value as text
> Moving the progress bar to modify value and saving crashed
> modifying the max value crashed
> The whole feature was ill-defined
With this commit, we fix the crashed. It is now possible to write the field
behind the progress bar by moving it in RO mode
or by typing the input in RW mode
*if it is the value we want to write on*
It it is the max value that the field targets, we can do it in RO and RW mode,
only with the input as text
Note that this works *only if* the editable option on the widget is set to true
OPW 2061846
closesodoo/odoo#36928closesodoo/odoo#36970
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
The FieldColor widget had been designed exclusively for the document
layout configurator. Because of this, the widget would not display/behave
correctly in other views.
Before this commit:
- in list views, the widget had a "white-space" attribute adapted for char fields,
which gave it much more space than it needed
- there was no handling of the widget in readonly state: it was always editable
- its size in list views was a bit too large
Now:
- all styling problems have been adjusted for list views (unchanged for forms)
- the widget is disabled when in readonly mode
Task 2072466
closesodoo/odoo#36949
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
There are too many image sizes. Since they are stored resized this takes time to
generate when saving a new image, it's more rows on the attachment table, more
files on the disk, ...
64px is close enough to 128px that it can be removed without a big impact on
download size.
It will even reduce download and number of requests when both images are
displayed because now only one has to be downloaded and then benefit from cache.
The difference between the two is typically around 1.5kB which is negligible
these days, especially when the request overhead is around 0.5kB already, not
even taking into account other factors such as latency.
If a 64px image must absolutely be returned, it is still possible to pass the
size parameters to the image route. But the current guideline is to handle
resizing in the views when necessary.
Views
=====
- remove width and height attributes when existing CSS rules are overriding them
(eg. `.oe_kanban_avatar` in the right context)
- add CSS rules instead of width and height attributes when possible
- use `object-fit: cover;` where width and height are forced to avoid distortion
of non-square images
- for products, use `object-fit: contain;` instead, keep ratio but without crop
- add new CSS rules where the expected size was max 64px*64px before due to the
image size itself
- remove `img-fluid` where using size classes to avoid conflicting rules
task-2060865
closesodoo/odoo#36147
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Previously when the 'SAVE & NEW' button was pressed in the 'create and
edit...' menu of the many2many_tags widget was pressed, the modal window
would close and the button would act exactly like the 'SAVE & CLOSE'
button. This was due to the fact that whenever a new record was created
and added to the field, it would reset the many2one field it uses for
display, which would destroy the edit modal.
This commit fixes that by not notifying the underlying many2one field of
any change until the modal is closed by the user. This has the
disadvantage that tags display, if visible behind the modal 'shade',
will not be updated until the modal is closed, but restores the
functionality of the save&new button. It also adds a test for this
behaviour
task-2070454
closesodoo/odoo#37114
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Aaron Bohy