This commit changes the display name for the model event.type from
"Event Category" to "Event Template"
This change was needed before introducing the new model event.tag.category
which will be used to group tags (event.tag)
This commit introduces two new models: event.tag.category & event.tag
The tags will be grouped by category and will be used to filter events.
In the front-end, if the user activates the "filter by categories", each
event.tag.category will generate a new dropdown of related tags.
Clicking on one of these tags will add a new "tag badge" above the events
(same way as in eLearning).
LINKS:
TaskID:2162438
PR: #43856
ir.rule are default values but can be customized based on the
company's policy and needs.
This is typically a record that is in noupdate as should be
customization-friendly.
PURPOSE
Integration between event and eCommerce is required only when users handle the
entire selling process online. However users may require ticketing support
while managing payments outside of Odoo. Purpose of this commit is to support
tickets directly in event application without need of sales.
RATIONALE
Remove the need to have event_sale installed to manage basic multi ticket
event type. Integration with eCommerce is needed only when one wants to handle
the entire selling flow online, i.e. order, payment, ... Integration with
Sales is needed only when one wants to create sale orders linked to attendees.
Many event users do not need all of this. Their attendees pay through bank
transfers or they simply manage payments outside of Odoo while still
requiring tickets management.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove the need to have event_sale installed to manage basic ticketing on
events.
Move ticket model (event.event.ticket) directly into event, copying most
fields from event_sale. Only sale specific fields and behavior should be kept
in event_sale :
* keep product_id and price information in event_sale;
* keep sales analysis in event_sale;
We also split tickets model used for event type (event.type.ticket) and
events (event.event.ticket). Indeed previously to this commit both are
modeled in the same table, with the following issues :
* tickets on templates use only a subset of fields: name, seats availability,
product, price;
* a ticket has either an event_id, either an event_type_id, and there are
constraints to try to avoid having lost tickets. This leads to a strange
model where m2o fields are required only in some cases with a dual
behavior;
* tickets are not shared between event.type and event.event. They are copied
and having a single model is therefore not necessary;
We therefore choose to have a light model for event.type.ticket. It is linked
to event.type when configuring template tickets. They are copied in the
onchange copying event template configuration to the event itself, leading
to event.event.ticket creation.
Some tests are moved / completed accordingly.
Access rights are copied from website_event_sale to website_even concerning
ticket access for public / portal. Currently they are kept as they are with
some rewording as it is not the purpose of this commit to rewrite them.
LINKS
Task ID 2177281
Community PR odoo/odoo#43488
* event, website_event, website_forum,
* website_hr_recruitment, website_sale
Website access rights were buggy. The editor assets and website editor
assets have to be loaded together to work so the previous behavior
which only loaded one with the restricted access right was not right.
Also, people which had the "Manager" access right for model like event
or job only got access to creation and edition of those objects if they
had the full access to website access rights.
Now the website module creates the two same groups :
* group_website_publisher: load all editor assets, give access to
page creation for model the user has access (event, job, ...) and
edition of those pages
* group_website_designer: implies the first one and give access in
creation and edition of all pages + access of all website menus
The manager access rights for event, product, jobs, etc now implies
the group_website_publisher group for the user (so that the manager
have the editor assets and editor ui).
Note: some python codes use the group_website_publisher for no right
reason, this has to be adapted.
qmo-odoo