Before this commit, the company specific colors and font were
implemented by systematically overwriting a "virtual" report SCSS
asset file before rendering each report.
This caused many issues, forced frequent asset bundles recomputations
(performance problem + cache invalidation causing random bugs).
And it could simply not work in a multi-company setup where multiple
styles are involved, as the asset management could be made not
thread-safe.
PR #44225 was a first attempt to mitigate the numerous problems by
making the asset bundle invalidation less frequent. But the problems
were still present and a more complete solution was necessary for
multi-company setups.
Besides, the design of the bundle forbade making company specific assets.
This commit uses a different approach: instead of having a
company-specific asset that needs to be constantly updated, a global
"multi-company" asset is maintained and included in the report assets.
It only needs to be generated when a company style changes, not for
every rendering operation.
Unfortunately this change cannot be fully performed without updating the
template declarations, so it will require an update of the `web` (or
`base`) module to be operational.
As this represents a rather invasive change in a stable branch, extensive
testing was conducted to minimize the effects and ensure proper
degradation of features for production deployments where the new code
would be deployed without forcing an update of the `web` module:
- The report SCSS files were left untouched, to prevent any bundle
invalidation, ensuring that old cached assets would remain valid. This
means that single-company setups should not see any visible difference
after pulling the code (with or without updating `web`).
SCSS cleanup will be done later.
- Existing Python methods were kept but emptied, to make sure that
old templates and code would not crash.
- For multi-companies, the last used colors will be applied for all
reports until the `web` module is updated. The old behavior was not
working correctly anyways, so the degradation is actually limited.
- For all setups, changing the colors after deploying this patch will
have no effect unless the `web` module is updated.
/UPDATED FOR master on top of #44393/:
- removed the `res_company.update_scss()` method entirely
- fixed the report SCSS styles, as the variable names referred to the old
behavior, e.g. "$o-company-primary-color" is nonsense.
Renamed to "$o-default-report-primary-color" etc.
--
Improves #44225
Forward of #44393
opw-2168623
opw-2171040
closesodoo/odoo#46647
X-original-commit: a5b1421aecf27b1de408434d3bb6d7ac81f57dc3
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
Issue
- Install CRM for example
- Add 41 leads
- Create an activity on each of them
Everything ok, load more shows up
- Add another activity on one of them
Load more doesn't shows up
Cause
The uniquify method:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/saas-12.3/odoo/models.py#L4187:#L4191
Consider the second activity as a duplicate and removes it.
So, in `web_search_read`:
`len(records) <= limit` is `True` and we ignore all
the others records
Solution
Add `force_search_count` in the context when using this action
to avoid uniquify to falsify the records length.
I added the tree view for this action too. It improves UX.
OPW-2165455
closesodoo/odoo#43149
X-original-commit: 13ec3503fbfb5d3d2b1e824059737bd866a3a9f4
Signed-off-by: Jason Van Malder <jvm-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
en_US may not be activated as it is possible to create a database in
another language using the database manager.
When trying to install a chart of account, the tax return entry tried
to format a date at the installation of the module, with no lang in
the context. The fallback was made on en_US but an error is raised if
that language is not activated.
As it is a very common scenario to retrieve a language from the
context, add a generic tool method to do it.
Replace and closesodoo/odoo#37629closesodoo/odoo#37568
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
This rev. adds params to the 'web_read_group' method, allowing to
search_read records inside each groups in a single RPC, instead of
doing a 'web_read_group' RPC followed by n 'search_read' RPCs,
where n is the number of opened groups.
Part of task 1915702
With this rev., when there are a lot of groups in a grouped list
view, groups are displayed under several pages, whereas they were
all displayed in the same page before.
This is especially interesting with the new 'expand' attribute, to
ensure that we don't read records for a large number of groups.
By default, the groups limit is set to 80 (like records), and to 10
is the 'expand' attribute is set to true. This limit can be
overriden with the 'groups_limit' attribute.
Part of task 1915702
The departments being already rendered according to the hierarchy,
only the name of the department should be displayed (e.g. 'Direct
Sales' instead of 'Sales / Direct Sales'.
closesodoo/odoo#31353
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
This rev. defines a searchPanel widget used in Kanban views to
refine search according to specific dimensions. This wigdet is
displayed as a sidebar to the left of the kanban view.
Part of task 1892462
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Fine-tuning of commit 92b4e2e866,
itself a performance fine-tuning of commit b7e2d47596
which added progress bar support for selection fields.
However it assumed that every record had a value in the selection,
whereas False is (nearly) always a possible value.
opw 1916472
closesodoo/odoo#30322
This commit replaces calls to pycompat helpers that were intended for
python 2 <-> python 3 interoperability for python 3 builtins, as python
2 is no longer officially supported by Odoo.
This includes:
* calls to imap/izip/ifilter replaced by map/zip/filter
* uses of text_type replaced by str
* uses of unichr replaced by chr
* calls to implements_to_string, implements_iterator removed
* string_types and integer_types replaced by str, int respectively
* calls to to_native replaced by calls to to_text
This is done in preparation to the removal of these deprecated helpers
in the following commit.
The read_progress_bar method is incredibly not efficient. It is also
wrong in other ways (for example, if 2 groups have same labels, there is
a collision). But let us talk about efficiency: it iterates on each
records on the domain, then, it computes some information. It is really
worse for selection fields: it performs a fields_get for each iteration.
This commit improves the situation by doing the fields_get only once.
Note that this is not the end of the story: this only has a small effect on
the performance of this method. It looks like there is a deeper issue in
some cases (kanban view for subscription, field 'activity_state')
Since rev. 960360af, Date (resp. Datetime) fields return
datetime.date (resp. datetime.datetime) objects. This caused an
issue in the read_progress_bar method which returns a dict, whose
keys are values of the group_by. Indeed, when grouped on a Date or
Datetime field, the key was no longer a string but a datetime.date
or datetime.datetime object, and it crashed when that dict was
turned into a JSON string.
This method isn't tested at all for now, but tests will come
shortly.
Task 1878254.
Purpose
=======
The progress bar on a kanban column doesn't work with selection fields
Specification
=============
In kanban view, subgroupCounts of progressbar should work if columns are grouped with a selection field
Currently, progressbar's subgroupCounts only worked if column is grouped by a 'Many2one' field. If column
is grouped by a 'selection' field then its not working.
For example,
If column is grouped by a 'Many2one' field then we've tuple,
{'state': (2, 'Signatures in Progress')}
So, here for preparing progressBar values for subgroupCounts we'll get
{Signatures in Progress: {overdue: 0, planned: 0, today: 1}}
But for a selection field, we'll have a string 'sent' i.e a technical value,
{'state': 'sent'}
So here 'group_by_value' as a 'key' will never be matched as we have 'sent' instead
of 'Signatures in Progress'. We've a technical value instead of its UI value and
dict of subgroupCounts would be based on UI values that's why it'll never find values.
To fix this issue we need to set proper 'group_by_value'.
That's why added one condition for 'selection' field to gets its value of specific
state inside 'read_progress_bar' method.
Related to Task: 1862371
Before this commit, when grouping a kanban by date with a modifier
e.g. crm.lead grouped by create_date:month
A traceback was thrown on the python side bacause create_date:month was literally not a field
After this commit, the progress bar in that situation displays well,
at the price of copying bits of the read_group infrastructure
OPW 785021
* crm, project
Add a new feature which allows to put a progressbar in the kanban
columns. The progressbar shows with the same color the amount of
records whose value of a given field are the same in the column.
It also indicate the sum of another given field or simply the total
number of records. It also allows to subgroup the column content.
To define a progressbar, add this as a direct child of the kanban
arch:
<progressbar field="<name of the field to use for subgroups>"
colors="{<one possible value for the above field>: <success, warning or danger>, ...}"
sum="<name of the field to sum or nothing to use total number of records>"/>
Also:
- Properly update record model data's parentID when moving a record
- ...
Lucas Perais (lpe)