Before this commit, the field's description was stored on the
component and this component was then registered.
Now, an object describing the field is used on registration the same way
as it is done for views since https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b828cfc72c587d0b73fcc5459695705640437671.
This split the component's description (props, template, ...) of
the field's description (displayName, supportedTypes, ...) and makes
it clearer.
closesodoo/odoo#112498
Task: 3171520
Related: odoo/enterprise#37105
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to convert the last legacy client actions from
/hr_attendance to owl.
Client actions:
hr_attendance_greeting_message
hr_attendance_kiosk_confirm
hr_attendance_kiosk_mode
hr_attendance_my_attendances
closesodoo/odoo#110095
Taskid: 3138068
Related: odoo/enterprise#35884
Related: odoo/upgrade#4296
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
This commit removes the legacy implementation of the form, kanban
and list views. It also removes the legacy view widget registry,
and all legacy widgets it contained. The legacy field registry
couldn't be removed yet as some fields are still used (e.g. in
client actions: FieldMany2One, FieldMany2ManyTags...), and
sometimes accessed from that registry (e.g. uom service). More
clean up will come later. Note that all tests using legacy views
have thus been removed, even though the tested feature might still
remain (e.g. FieldMany2One tests have been removed, but that field
is still there). However, those features are deprecated and
unlikely to evolve. They should be removed in the next saas, or the
one after.
Finally, this commit also removes the legacy view dialogs.
Task 3168640
Part-of: odoo/odoo#111809
This is mostly a cleaning/refactoring change.
The current API for init hooks (pre, post, uninstall) is to pass
`cr, registry`.
But the first thing which was done by most
post init and uninstall hooks was to create an env using
the cr passed
e.g.
`env = api.Environment(cr, SUPERUSER_ID, {})`
and the `registry` argument was unused in all these hooks,
completely.
By changing the API of hooks to pass `env` instead
of `cr, registry`, we gain in average two lines in every
hooks:
- the line creating the env `env = api.Environment(cr, SUPERUSER_ID, {})`
- the line importing `api` and `SUPERUSER_ID`
Therefore removing ~250 lines of repeated code lines accross odoo/odoo and
odoo/enterprise.
In addition to these lines removed,
it also ease the API of init hooks for Odoo developers,
who are used to that `env` and not so much how to create an `env`
from a cursor.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#108254
Unused catch block arguments are now forbidden even when prefixed with an
underscore: if the argument on the catch block is not needed, the use of the
optional catch binding is enforced.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#105433
Before this commit, in new views, it is no longer possible to click
on buttons with barcode_trigger="..." using a barcode scanner.
Why:
New views no longer propagate all attributes to the button.
How to reproduce:
- Go to a form view with a button with barcode_trigger="doit"
- Scan "O-BTN.doit", "Enter".
Before this commit:
Nothing happens.
After this commit:
An event click is applied to the button.
closesodoo/odoo#102423
X-original-commit: b4cb2ee2662173e08f671eb736130f8332265de7
Signed-off-by: Georis François (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Let's say the company use a GS1 nomenclature and a user scans such a
barcode:
`(01)11111111111113(10)xyz(30)40`
It means a product P:
- that has the barcode value '11111111111113'
- for the lot 'xyz'
- with a quantity equal to 40
The GS1 nomenclature explains that a lot consists of a prefix `10` and
of up to 20 alphanumeric characters. In the above example, we could
believe that the lot is actually `xyz3040`. To prevent this kind of
issue, the GS1 standards use a special character: the Group Separator
(its hex value is `\x1d` and does not have any visual representation).
So, when reading the barcode of the above value, the barcode reader will
detect the GS between `z` and `3` (so we know that this is the end of
the lot name).
Because GS has no visual representation, the way the GS character is
given by the scanner to the device depends on the scanner itself. For
instance, some barcode readers try to encode GS thanks to its unicode
input (as used on a Windows device): it enters Alt+0+2+9 (i.e., the
unicode value of GS). This is an issue since we filter out all keydown
events with the `Alt` key pressed.
Also, our way to interpret the barcode value depends on the device: on a
desktop device, we listen the events. As explained above, this could be
an issue (for instance with Alt+029). On a mobile device, we let the
barcode reader write in an hidden input and we then extract the written
value. There is also an issue here: the GS is not present in the
extracted string.
For these reasons, some changes are need. The idea is to let the user
lists the ways his barcode readers will encode the GS character (the
scanners often give the possibility to set a value manually.). There is
already a field for this:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/320025ee630acadd4a5cbd32f425cddee4f81c1e/addons/barcodes_gs1_nomenclature/models/barcode_nomenclature.py#L18-L20
However, this is not correctly working. Suppose we now stop to filter
out the `Alt` keys: in the above example, the scanned value becomes
`011111111111111310xyzAlt0293040`(as you can see, there is an `Alt029`
at the end of the lot). Suppose also that we defined
`gs1_separator_fnc1` with `Alt029`. When parsing the barcode value, we
have:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1c0dec6d5813fa81a0fec8668ee13d8036cde5c5/addons/barcodes_gs1_nomenclature/static/src/js/barcode_parser.js#L91-L98
So, when we try to extract the lot name, the values will be:
- barcode: `10xyzAlt0293040`
- regex: `^(10)([!\"%-/0-9:-?A-Z_a-z]{0,20})(?:(Alt029))?`
And here is the issue: `Alt029` will be caught by the second capturing
group of the regex (instead of the third one), so it will be considered
as part of the lot name, we still have an issue => considering the
`Alt`/`Control` keys and defining some values in `gs1_separator_fnc1`
are not enough, we need to parse twice:
- The first parsing is used to convert all occurrences of
`gs1_separator_fnc1` into the hex `\x1d`. Then, it is also used to
remove all useless `Alt`/`Control`/`Shift`.
- The second parsing is the already-existing one and this parser is
already able to catch all `\x1d` as group separators:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1c0dec6d5813fa81a0fec8668ee13d8036cde5c5/addons/barcodes_gs1_nomenclature/static/src/js/barcode_parser.js#L90
For the mobile device, it means that the users will have to define a
special character that stands for GS (e.g., `#`), so we will retrieve it
in the input.
OPW-2930873
closesodoo/odoo#99730
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
The default value of max_time_between_keys_in_ms in barcode is 55 ms.
The default value of 55 ms is too low and creates an issue for RFID readers.
The default value of max_time_between_keys_in_ms is increased to 100 ms.
task-2996072
closesodoo/odoo#101331
X-original-commit: 9eda9679bd51b63bbc7b796419b3efdec4ba99bb
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: phwa-odoo <phwa@odoo.com>
On Chrome, have a field that supports autofill (you have to have set up an adress in Chrome first).
Click on that field, and apply the autofill proposition.
Before this commit, there was multiple crashes, roughly one for every handler of event `keydown`.
This was caused by the fact that the autofill feature triggers keydown events without the field `key`.
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=581537, I could not find a better ticket).
This seems to be a bug on Chrome's side, since the spec doesn't mention that field may be unset (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/KeyboardEvent/key).
After this commit, there is no crash.
closesodoo/odoo#99348
Signed-off-by: Bruno Boi (boi) <boi@odoo.com>
To reproduce the issue:
(Need stock_barcode)
1. Create a product:
- Barcode: 1234567890123
2. Print the label
3. Try to scan the barcode and check the value read.
Error: The value is 1234567890128, the last digit is incorrect (8
instead of 3)
When printing a barcode, we use the library 'report-lab' to generate a
barcode image from a value and a barcode type. In case of EAN-13, if the
value contains a non-digit character, it will raise an error. We then
catch the error and retry to generate the barcode according to the
barcode type Code128:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/87698d90f02bfe93c6e643f4876a5ccd74788eff/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_actions_report.py#L569-L575
However, if the value contains only digits, the method will use the 12
first digits:
https://github.com/mattjmorrison/ReportLab/blob/dade0f303cb6fcdbe535c4cc92e6102c2417b699/src/reportlab/graphics/barcode/eanbc.py#L187-L188
and will then add the last one, the check digit, which is computed by
the library. This explains why, in the above use case, the barcode value
returned by the scanner is not the same than the expected one.
Note: Similar behavior with type EAN-8
OPW-2902150
closesodoo/odoo#97052
X-original-commit: a2c7470f8fd46b2520f7b8f0750c63216273ce96
Related: odoo/enterprise#30160
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
In the QUnit test suite, we have cleanup code that runs after each
test to ensure that event listeners, setTimeouts... registered
during a test are removed. This is particularly useful for services,
as they do not have a "destroy" function to cleanup those handlers
they would have registered at startup. Side note: they don't
because it would only be useful for tests, as a service lives
forever in the prod environment.
Before this commit, that cleanup code didn't remove callbacks
registered with a setInterval. Moreover, we didn't remove event
handlers bound on document.body either. As a consequence, there
were memory leaks in the test suite (e.g. callbacks of the tooltip
service), and some crashes could occur if the user interacted with
the window after test completion.
closesodoo/odoo#97100
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
The previous commit removes a good part of the barcode form view. The
rest of the code was only used by the barcode_handler widget. Since it
is now much simpler, we can just implement the behaviour: simply set the
value to the barcode, so onchanges can be properly called.
closesodoo/odoo#95892
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
With this commit, we simplify the way barcodes prefixed by `O-CMD.` are
handled, by simply executing a ui action whenever it happens. The code
is much simpler, instead of having to add a widget=barcode_handler in a
specific view.
Note that it changes the behaviour: now, barcodes are available
everywhere, instead of just a selection of form views. This seems more
natural, since we consider that the barcode scanner is basically some
kind of input device.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#95892
Note that more 'non printable keys' are escaped now, like 'Home'.
This seems like a bit naive solution but it avoids having to list
every key.
The only issue we might have is if a device sends the whole value in the
'key' property directly without sending sequentially several keydown events.
As a reminder, 'ctrlKey', 'metaKey', 'altKey' properties are used
because we also want to ignore keys pressed while this modifier is
active. For example, if you press CTRL+e, we want to ignore 'CTRL'
AND 'e'.
Useful references:
https://w3c.github.io/uievents/tools/key-event-viewer.html
Part-of: odoo/odoo#93387
Before this commit 'tab' was escaped because isSpecialKey was true.
This was strange because this key was defined in 'endRegexp'.
So, there were only 'enter' key who worked as a barcode end key.
Note that it wasn't a big deal if 'tab' was used because checkBarcode
was executed anyway after a timeout.
Now the barcode value is directly checked if the strind ends with
'enter' or 'tab' (by-passing this timeout).
Part-of: odoo/odoo#93387
As we now use 'inputmode=none' on the barcode field, the mobile virtual
keyboard doesn't open anymore. So, there is no need
to have to blur barcode input after receiving a value.
There is no issue to keep the focus on this field. We only did it
to close the virtual keyboard as soon as they pop up after each scan.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#93387
And remove most of barcode_events. The goal is to have a service that
can be used by components to reliably detect a barcode action. For now,
we keep barcode_events around, but the goal is to completely remove it
as soon as all the code using it is updated
Part-of: odoo/odoo#93387
No method was readily available to know if a user is `internal` (has
group `base.group_user`), which was inconsistent with other base groups.
_is_internal is now used in the codebase where it is clear that
`.has_group('base.group_user')` is called on a single record.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#85703
Remove most values uselessly specified because giving the same value as
the default one (see _DEFAULT_MANIFEST in odoo/modules/module.py)
* auto_install is Falsy by default
* author is Odoo SA by default
* summary & description are empty strings by default
* application is False by default
* test, demo, depends and data are empty lists by default
This will reduce noise/inconsistencies between manifests specifications,
simplify analysis of manifests content, ...
closesodoo/odoo#90209
Related: odoo/enterprise#26807
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
The size constraint on the barcode pattern is an old one and is no more
required. Moreover, if someone wants to add new GS1 patterns, he might
need more than 32 characters.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82883
When a package name is a valid SSCC number, we prefer to auto-print the
datamatrix to be used by shippers, which includes:
- the SSCC number
- the pack date (i.e. when it was put in pack)
- the weight of the package (only when less or equal to 6 digits)
Pack date field was added to accomodate this and defaults to when
package is created (e.g. when buying packaged meat at the supermarket,
it's assumed the pack date is when the package of meat was created).
SSCC datamatrix will auto-print now in 3 package reports:
- Package with contents
- Package Barcode (PDF)
- Package Barcode (ZPL)
Note if ability to create datamatrix appears to not work (only in PDF
versions) then standard 1D barcode will be used.
Part of Task: 2494740
Related ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#23323
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3202
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82389
When a product's barcode is EAN compliant (i.e. EAN-8, EAN-13, GTIN-14})
and feature to create DataMatrix is fully installed then we would like
to print its GS1 datamatrix on the package content report.
Additionally, if the product is tracked, we would like to include its
SN/Lot if assigned one + any "use by"/"expiration date" to make the
overall usefulness of the report go up.
Part of Task: 2494740
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82389
The license is missing in most enterprise manifest so
the decision was taken to make it explicit in all cases.
When not defined, a warning will be triggered starting from
14.0 when falling back on the default LGPL-3.
closesodoo/odoo#74245
Related: odoo/design-themes#48
Related: odoo/enterprise#19862
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
When writing the new webclient, the notification service was rewritten,
and all of its uses in production code were changed to use the new
services, however, some tests were still reliant on the old notification
service.
This commit removes references to the legacy notification service so
that we can be one step closer to removing it from the code base.
Part of #72675
Conversion of all modules to the new manifest assets declaration.
Part of task: 2352566
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin <ges@odoo.com>
In order to integrate and use GS1 nomenclature into `stock_barcode`,
adds a new module with GS1 nomenclature and rules, and overrides parsing
methods.
task-1968113
closesodoo/odoo#65858
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ryv-odoo<ryv@odoo.com>
*: barcodes, mail, mass_mailing, note, test_website, web, web_tour,
website, website_blog, website_event, website_form, website_forum,
website_mail_channel, website_mass_mailing, website_profile,
website_sale, website_twitter, doc
New solutions are being investigated in master. For the moment, it seems
better to remove Jabberwock to unlock difficult forward-port between
14.0 and 14.1/master, until we decide what to do once and for all in
a later master. We may un-revert this later but that would be way easier
than reverting Jabberwock in a few months.
This was done as safely as possible by removing any commit related to
Jabberwock, then resolving conflicts, then reforcing commits from 14.0
that were hugely adapted for 14.1/master, then forcing the whole diff
over a rebased 14.1/master. The only possible miss (other than me making
a mistake) would be commits that were not forward-ported to 14.1 thanks
to Jabberwock handling the issue on its own (I know we had such commits
in website, which I manually included in this revert, see below).
For reference:
Commits which were reforced to their 14.0 version:
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/1a916fc2362c0b006460d94a219366ade1cce058
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/fd9e58a675bb7ec1bf97cb77b21b3c65369d51fe
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/bdfddace29b16404c06a7ebfc0cc242463a0e768
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/42b3ad10e0b32b7fc72f801e2c67d6baf938c566
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/710784da1f02d45cbe898da426ba7e2ac63dc711
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/597585c9b8b1350bcfd84e8433ea6c82060bcc3d
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/333a9124608ff655bd9ad5e63044a5cb7ef9c636
Commits that were not forward-ported to 14.1/master and now are:
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/55ff2d971b672dec5f103215be39101c88856b6c
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/ebbb3de1e5f363689a5ba1647bb4c26416e42d5b
+ Adapt this forward-port: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/60976 (as
it was simplified for non-stable master version relying to the
Jabberwock implementation and now needed to be adapted to the
summernote implementation).
See `!$el.data('oe-expression') && $el.data('oe-xpath')`
+ Revert https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/60477 and reforce original
14.0 fix https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/746bf53b4aecfc601f0581a948d7cb7153812c82
Note: this also means that any good refactoring that was done by the
Jabberwock-related commits is lost for now. Once the revert reaches
master, I'll try and restore what we want from those commits. Here
are their references (but obviously they have the opposite conflicts
than those resolved during this revert):
e766842a92b6 [REM] web_editor,website: empty summernote files
08c94c986e09 [REF] web_editor,web: adapt to new jabberwock editor
1546c1b74713 [REF] mass_mailing: adapt to new jabberwock editor
fd0b963c6028 [REF] website: adapt to new jabberwock editor
0113d05c6c94 [ADD] web_editor: add new Jabberwock editor lib
d0c88a396493 [FIX] web_editor: don't change background color out of the website editor
d52d3d67d4e1 [FIX] web_editor : better icon in text style dropdown
61cb2f0d21da [FIX] web_editor: should not ask if want to leave the page twice
c42012b863b5 [FIX] web_editor: trigger a resize when use the mobile preview
d934d05d6e39 [FIX] web_editor: need to build the snippet before commit it into vDom
495bea924745 [FIX] web_editor: remove box shadow on the #wrap container
bffb5612e689 [ADD] field_html: add resizer in most field_html
f3c94e40cccf [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit 41e4063
cc87dea3ef32 [FIX] web_editor: update header change position to work with JW
5d9b25f66704 [FIX] web_editor: do not insert chars around step icon on click
70d3f0e4630c [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit 0bd94881
a57f13891f82 [FIX] web_editor: open media modal in appropriate tab on dblclick media
5b7537397e08 [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit a7ba7c34
a8d7ec235eeb [FIX] web_editor: adapt iframe Qunit test to new editor
5f794eac7209 [FIX] mass_mailing: hide all panels on show themes
551d45641d19 [IMP] website: remove unused reference
10580e1c102f [IMP] wesbite: add comment in tour
c17049f6b764 [FIX] web_editor: Fix description toggle in pricelist snippet
18a428e854b1 [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit 43a10003
58a161c645a5 [REF] web_editor, website: use editor helper setClass
62dd0bd3bc66 [FIX] web_editor: properly deactivate snippets and reactivate the last
99eebcaa34cb [FIX] web_editor: disable snippet in preview mode on mouse leave options
a84216932958 [FIX] web_editor: fix the image gallery snippet
f8dd4ea3e7d5 [FIX] web_editor: fix shadow selector for Safari
e50a4f3a16de [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit de13ed7e
4a2718f7a5ba [FIX] web_editor: ensure dom is properly cleaned at end of save test
03684c004a4e [FIX] website: ensure reset of bg-image on add bg-video
d63397159708 [FIX] web_editor: fix image remove from images wall
82fa5142f1a5 [IMP] note: restyle note without sheet or resizer
8b9f1ce603d5 [FIX] web_editor: properly mock createWysiwygIntance (sic) in tests
fc2183b66305 [FIX] web_editor: image overlay did not update with changes
cd0d2f5791cd [FIX] web_editor: add color preview to color picker
28a168172454 [FIX] web_editor: restore removal of spinner
67c90dd3b946 [FIX] website_forum: properly initialize editor
920dfe2a430a [FIX] website_forum: better css in the JW toolbar
43f33fd651af [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit 6853b60
71246c92f8de [FIX] Web_editor: table options button should be inside the toolbar
12b9e5916692 [FIX] web_editor: properly update the image options on replace image
e889cf8583da [FIX] website, website_sale: properly save filter id of dynamic snippets
e0fd11e36e45 [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit 4b2c903b
8f2b7ba35614 [FIX] web_editor: properly stop snippet option changed event propagation
a30c2c4105c7 [FIX] website: fix megamenu snippet editor behavior
312091cf822b [FIX] web_editor: fix overlay that is not reappearing
9f1d03dda613 [FIX] web_editor: table picker not fully displayed
814ddada6124 [IMP] web_editor: remove message before leaving page if editor is destro
4f38e26af7da [FIX] web: allow saving copyright footer
01e947b6123b [FIX] web_editor: only save translations that changed
103676072c50 [FIX] web_editor: prevent traceback on open crop dialog
5844ff66d4a0 [FIX] web_editor: apply image crop in jw on save dialog
1b435652e4a0 [FIX] website_forum: ensure media modal opens on click button
4f4a6ca0b8ac [FIX] web_editor: ensure valid default html value
51e22026ac7b [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit ab1184f8
2413fa19be0e [FIX] web_editor: Qunit test properly wait for editor stop
aa89e1ea3e97 [FIX] web_editor: properly save view blocks with an id
e2e90b53992e [FIX] web_editor: ensure language selector is non editable
0efd72089d5c [IMP] web_editor: clean useless lines
f54dfc7631f9 [IMP] web_editor: remove useless comment
3995ab1b84f2 [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit b8d73691
0834b1e5740a [IMP] web_editor: withDomMutations
f1459fb7b45c [FIX] web_editor: fix non-deterministic error in QUnit wysiwyg tests
6e8acc6c8cc7 [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit 3bbb175c
18a0c95d51cb [FIX] website, web_editor: #wrapwrap in body
4686a92e742c [FIX] website_form: allow edition of success message
78cc4da075cc [FIX] web_editor: allow edition of branded nodes only
bcffa7353448 [FIX] web: dialog should not use field value footer items
67ff56e14746 [FIX] web_editor,website_mass_mailing: display the popup preview
3cb9bea50c20 [IMP] web_editor: update Jabberwock library to commit a20492ea
518f03e6f1c9 [FIX] web_editor: use withIntangibles to find ZoneNode
d0ad6a568f49 [FIX] website: move sidebar out of theme
d690f5da13ea [FIX] website: properly save popup id
43b3433df3e6 [FIX] web_editor: fix non-deterministic error in QUnit wysiwyg tests
4ee8f4dedc30 [FIX] web_editor: prevent deadlock when removing child snippet of popup
850be198ef6d [FIX] web_editor: prevent traceback on reposition background image
4c3eaba41f5d [FIX] mass_mailing: adapt tour to the new editor design.
496d3ea272ed [FIX] web_editor: properly position sidebar scrollbar
5be4de703074 [FIX] web_editor: Show the toolbar when select the text in forum edition
closesodoo/odoo#63768
Related: odoo/enterprise#15458
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Mainly transifex issues but also some errors found through 'grep' checks.
Fix typos and obscure english strings in xml contents, fields strings/helps, some docstrings, ...
ensuring correct translations base (and fallback when translations isn't available).
closesodoo/odoo#57276
X-original-commit: 4214f05d454bca2b60fda3a288d529c098e84f77
Related: odoo/enterprise#13053
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Large form views (containing a lot of fields), e.g. the crm.lead
form view, take a while to render (~ 250 ms). Most form views
contain several (sometimes a lot) invisible fields (invisible="1"),
whose only purpose in the view is to be fetched, so that they can
be used to evalute domains and contexts.
This commit implements a trivial optimization of the form renderer,
which consists in skipping the rendering of those invisible fields.
With this change, we gain ~25% of rendering time on the crm.lead
form view.
closesodoo/odoo#54368
Related: odoo/enterprise#11875
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Michael (mcm)