Having a non paid membership for last year and being associate with
someone having a non paid membership was dispalying an 'old' membership
state instead if a 'non' membership.
Assumption:
If an associate member is added, take the state of the associate member
(tooltip of associate member).
In case the associate member is a 'non member', it's stupid to associate
with someone that is paying or have paid as it won't consider the state of
the current paid member, the link has to be made on the other side:
the 'non' paying will be associate with the 'paid'.
Create membership for
a/ 2019 (1jan to 31dec)
> For the calculation of the 'old' state
b/ 2020 (1jan to 31dec)
> For the calculation of the 'paid' state
Create few res.partner:
AA: No associate.
2019 - Paid
2020 - Paid
>> Paid member
(= ok)
CC Case 1:
Associate with AA
2019 - Invoiced (but not paid)
2020 - None
>> Paid member due to association with AA
(= ok)
CC Case 2:
Not associate:
2019 - Invoiced (but not paid)
2020 - None
>> Before fix: Old member
(= nok)
>> After fix: Non member
(= ok) As he never paid and not linked to someone that paid.
DD: Associate with AA
2019 - Invoiced not paid
2020 - Paid
>> Paid member (with or without association with AA)
(= ok)
EE Case 1:
Not associate:
2019 - Paid
2020 - None
>> Old member
(= ok)
Case 2:
Associate with DD
2019 - Invoiced (not paid)
2020 - None
>> Paid member (due to association with DD)
(= ok)
Case 3:
Associate with CC
2019 - Invoiced (not paid)
2020 - None
>> Before fix: Old member (due to none having a current 2020 invoiced)
(= nok it should take the state of CC)
>> After fix: Non member (as CC is not a member)
opw-2287050
closesodoo/odoo#55773
X-original-commit: 5e7b7b0a645bcff175bf8d2483eae5ffd4aaf89b
Signed-off-by: agr-odoo <agr-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
time.clock is deprecated since python 3.3 and no longer exists in python 3.8
time.process_time was introduced in python 3.3
Replace "is" by "==" as this produces a SyntaxWarning in python 3.8
Fixesodoo/odoo#41313closesodoo/odoo#44502
X-original-commit: f03b4cb5576f264b6845242ba112f02422af4f5f
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
- 'partial' payment state corresponds to invoices whose payable/receivable move line has been partially reconciled with some other line.
- 'reversed' payment state corresponds to entries that have been cancelled by the creation of a single reverse entry (using the dedicated button on the form view). This state can be set on invoice as well as on regular entries.
=> To stay consistent with the naming conventions, this commit also renames invoice_payment_state field to payment_state, since it's no longer only applicable on invoices.
closesodoo/odoo#41723
Related: odoo/enterprise#7202
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
In a still-to-determnie situation, a cyclic dependency with
`associate_member` is observed, preventing the installation of the
module.
We remove the dependency, and trigger a recompute on the parent members.
opw-2005325
closesodoo/odoo#33977
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Purpose: improve understanding of partner and product models as well as their
daily use. This is done by improving tooltips and labels of some fields
according to business logic.
This commit is related to task ID 1880696 and closes PR #27133 .
Thanks to @xmo-odoo for its in-depth review.
- Go to a contact C1 > Membership tab > Buy membership
- Create an invoice with the membership
=> It creates a membership line on C1
- Change the partner on the invoice to C2
The membership line and the membership status is not transfered to C2.
We first need to recompute on C1, and we also need to explicitly write
the new partner C2 on the membership lines.
opw-1875673
- Go to a contact > Membership tab > Buy membership
- Create an invoice with the membership
=> The status of the member goes to 'Waiting membership'
- Validate the invoice
=> The status of the member goes to 'Invoiced membership'
- Create a credit note to cancel the membership
=> The status of the member goes to 'Paid members'.
It shouldn't be the case because the client has canceled his membership.
We look on `payment_move_line_ids` instead of `payment_ids`. Indeed, the
latter doesn't list credit notes, while the first one lists all move
lines used for payment.
opw-1875673
The signature _check_recursion already exists in odoo/models.py
So calling _check_recursion, the function which checks the constraint on
associate_member overwrote _check_recursion in "res.partner" model and
the function _check_parent_id defined in "res.partner" was completely
wrong because it needs _check_recursion defined in models.py
opw:710524
Purpose
=======
we use to make proforma invoice to get payment before the creation of the real invoice. In the current odoo, the proforma state is too late. Because you have to confirm the SO to generate the draft invoice and so the proforma. But, if you do that, you have generated a subscription or a delivery order in the mean time. A proforma is actually a quote. In old ERP they used to make proforma to send a quote and don't generate invoice number.
Specification
=============
- Remove everything related to Proforma from accounting
- Remove the configuration of pro-forma from account setting
- Invoice form, remove "Pro-froma" button, stage, report title
- Add proforma configuration option in sales setting under "Quotation and Sales" section
- In quote/sale, add Pro-forma under Print
- A pro-forma is a quote, but the title of the report is Pro-Forma and not Quotation
- button (secondary) on quotation form "SEND PRO-FORMA" to send proforma by mail attached with related report.
- button
- mail template
- when preparing a quotation this button is visible but if even one invoice this should be invisible (as confirming SO doesn't generate invoice currently)
- Split compute function in res.partner into 4 functions as they no more share the same dependencies
- removed dead constraint from 'membership.membership_line' model. That constraint checks if the invoice's date
is greater than membership line's date but the membership line is created before the draft invoice is created
(and that too without date set), hence it can't be raised.(Though, it can be raised if we check it on 'state' field).
Baptiste Vergote