Before the commit, `_action_unfollow()` can be called by
`_message_receive_bounce()` and then multiple leave notifications
can be sent even if the partner has been removed from the channel,
when the partner is a follower of the channel and without a
valid email address.
Unfollow action should also remove the partner from the followers,
and only be processed if the partner is still a member of the channel.
Task id: 2456233
closesodoo/odoo#68314
X-original-commit: 5cf22425eb68f15d94a8b283c50198561bbc240a
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
add mail_tz to calendar_attendee model in order to make it easier to change the
timezone displayed in the mail template so that we can use it to make the
appointment time shown on the email reminder sent to the attendees consistent
with the time shown on the website page.
Change the invitation mail template and use the mail_tz field to display time
field instead of using the partner's timezone in order to make the time shown
in the invitation consistent with the time shown on the website page.
Remove the get_interval method in the calendar_event model and use standard
formatting tools instead, as this is more conveniant than having a custom
method for formatting dates, For this reason the format_time function located
in tools/misc.py has been modified to be capable of handling timezones in
order to be able to display time in the correct timezone, furthermore, this
function has been added to the rendering context provided in the
mail_render_mixin file to be used in email templates.
see: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/16204
Task-2451154
closesodoo/odoo#65729
Related: odoo/enterprise#16204
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Attract the attention of the user on messages that need action from him in the
mass of messages that are sent in a channel.
SPECIFICATIONS
Highlight messages mentioning the current user in a channel.
Task-2365956
closesodoo/odoo#66889
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
- Connect with Admin
- Go to Contacts, edit himself by adding a Private Address
- Create an Internal User without "Access to Private Addresses" right (i.e. User X)
- Go to any app implementing chatter (i.e. Sales)
- Create a SO
- Add the created Private Address as follower
- Make sure User X can access the record (i.e. Sales: Administrator)
- Connect with User X and open the SO
An Access Error is raised while trying to fetch data about the followers.
This commit prevents to:
- add a private address as follower of a record
- add a private address as Recipient in full composer
- propose private addresses when adding a mention to a partner
opw-2428936
closesodoo/odoo#68493
Task-id: 2463622
X-original-commit: 20536e1bbeb641539c0de44364f8376e7cef651b
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Anh Thao PHAM <kitan191@users.noreply.github.com>
if you check on any chatter with a lot of messages, you will see that it starts
loading all the messages as soon as you scroll down even just 1 pixel.
This makes a lot of loading of the messages for no reason unnecessarily.
What should happen instead is that it should load more message only when
scrolling all the way down to the bottom.This works fine in chatwindow & discuss.
With this commit, resolved this issue by providing the exact scrollable element
to the message list from parent component to the child. so with proper element
we can have proper scrollable heights and other dimensions as well to handle
load more messages properly.
Task : 2382735
closesodoo/odoo#68430
X-original-commit: 63b15e23d95b310a12bdbc30c983081ed84187a3
Related: odoo/enterprise#17335
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
PURPOSE:
command suggestion should only open if command is the first char.
SPECIFICATION:
command suggestion should only open if command is the first char.
Task-2487518
closesodoo/odoo#68428
X-original-commit: 2208a9b5e18881f5fbfea56872990daafba45579
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
PURPOSE:
Currently typing status is sent when typing a command.
SPECIFICATION:
Typing status should not be sent when typing a command.
Task-2363267
closesodoo/odoo#68424
X-original-commit: 7f28e68776849993f16b4b27e6213c0cce67de37
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Currently subject of message is visible in Discuss' Inbox and mailing channels,
need to add subject into chatter and non mailing channels.
SPECIFICATION
Adding subject into the message in chatter and non mailing channels.
LINKS
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/61570
Task-2156170
closesodoo/odoo#61570
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
In this commit we improve event communication scheduling tests. We make tests
more detailed and use mail tools to ensure content. We also check scheduled
dates and use freezegun to ease date management.
Related to Task ID-2414658
COM PR odoo/odoo#68158
X-original-commit: 1a66d9cb57dc17b697b7a56effa91de3a4b50bd7
Current behavior before PR:
mail notification not sent when using the full composer.
Desired behavior after PR is merged:
mail notification will send when using the full composer.
LINKS:
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/66421
Task-2446855
closesodoo/odoo#67933
X-original-commit: 349f07670ea4938e7fc3d9fa3a6fc5fae40dac65
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
When Odoo routes incoming emails it is looking for existing messages in
database using Message Ids which are coming from e-mail header
References.
In Odoo the message id looks pretty long like
743570479975566.1584086032.522504091262817-openerp-message-notify@ip-172-31-45-160
As it declared in [RFC2822] long header bodies can be "folded" using
CRLF+WSP. And some mail clients do that very thing. They split
References header body which contains Message Ids by "\n ". The example
of mail client where it can be reproduced is apps.rackspace.com We
created Sales Order in Odoo, sent this quotation to the client email. He
replied with e-mail, and this email can't be matched with any existing
message id and as result it's not attached to the Sales Order.
RFC2882: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-2.2.3closesodoo/odoo#68077
X-original-commit: 559f6cf62711ad45557eddec3af7c66616724eb5
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <Julien00859@users.noreply.github.com>
The code from v13 used to look for partners in JS before making the RPC, which
was much faster, and also gave better results by returning partners that were
already known and therefore more likely to be selected.
The same logic is reintroduced here, and further improved to take into account
all known partners and sort them according to the likeliness they will be
selected based on various criteria.
task-2413776
closesodoo/odoo#68045
X-original-commit: 930e090ced8134c3819a5a87b9052467ba23e8e4
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
Now that recipients in notification process are always partners due to
simplification of MailFollower model we can safely simplify the structure
used to collect and propagate recipients information.
Before this task it was a dictionary with a list of partner related data and
a list of channel related data. It is now simply a list of partner related
data, leading to various code cleaning.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
Purpose of this commit is to make low-level API of subscribe process a bit
easier to understand and use. Notably some parameters are now defined as
named parameters in order to better understand calls.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we force messages to belong to a single document using
``model`` / ``res_id`` pair. It is not possible anymore to link a message
to channels using ``channel_ids``. A message belongs to a document and
is displayed in that document's chatter.
This change implies modifying a lot of domains, notably in chatter. Indeed
discuss for channels does not use ``('channel_ids', 'in', [3])`` domains.
They now use ``('model', '=', 'mail.channel'), ('res_id', 'in', [3])`` like
other documents fetching their messages.
This commit also removes ``channel_message_ids`` field on ``mail.channel``
model. As channels are now considered as standard documents they will use
``message_ids`` field like all other documents. Linking a channel on a message
is possible only as a link in message from now on. It is not possible to push
it into a channel anymore (no more listener channels, no more channel link).
Finally a global cleaning also linked to all previous commits is done.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we remove support of ``channel_ids`` parameter when posting
a message. This means we do not support notifying channels as side-part
of notification mechanism on a document. Either we post on a channel and
its members are notified, either we post on a business documents and its
followers are notified. There is no possibility to add channels as being
notified when posting a message.
This is done as a followup of removing followers being channel-based and
prepares ground to make channel use model / res_id as all other documents
inheriting form mail.thread.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
As there is no way to add channel-based follower anymore we can remove all
fields and code supporting this feature. Notably we can remove ``channel_id``
field on ``mail.follower`` model as well all code using it, notably compute
methods.
In this commit we also make ``partner_id`` field required as now followers
are always partners. Email, name and active fields are now simple related
fields on the partner.
Code computing data about subscription is also updated and simplified. As
we do not have channels anymore but only partners all custom SQL queries
are now simplified.
JS models for Discuss are also cleaned. Following python change, JS models
are simplified to match the backend models. Channel_id is removed, partner_id
is now required, and various code is updated according to the simplified
model.
Side note: we could probably get rid of specific index on ``partner_id``
field. However we have to ensure we never search for followers without being
in a model / res_id context. This will be done in another cleaning step to
be sure performance are not broken.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``channel_ids`` field from ``ir.actions.server``. As we removed
support of (un)subscribing channel-based followers there is no need anymore
to have a field to add them through server actions. We can now safely remove
this field as it has no use anymore.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``channel_id`` field from ``mail.invite.wizard``. As we removed
support of (un)subscribing channel-based followers there is no need anymore
to have a field to add them in invite wizard. We can now safely remove this
field as it has no use anymore.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``message_channel_ids`` field from ``mail.thread``. As we removed
support of (un)subscribing channel-based followers there is no need anymore
to have a field to access them. We can now safely remove this field as it
has no use anymore.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``channel_ids`` argument and support from ``message_subscribe`` and
``message_unsubscribe`` API. Indeed we do not support adding channel-based
followers anymore. Only partners should be added or removed from followers.
It also allows to simplify API and understanding of both methods.
Various addons are updated to match the simplified (un)subscribe API. Some
enterprise addons may also be impacted.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
Support mentioning partners on channels like done on other documents. When
there is an user input (comment or email) that mentions someone that specific
recipient is not notified. Its notification will be done in Inbox or email
depending on its choice or customer state.
This feature somehow replaces the follower-based support that is now removed
on channels. It allows to ping people and send them notifications. It is
less broad (limited to a post with ping) but already gives flexibility when
using channels.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Channel now use only their members for notification purpose. Having followers
is redundant with members. Moreover as followers are not taken into account
for notification people may think followers mechanism is broken on channel.
Let us simply prevent from adding followers on channels and remove the widget.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models..
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we remove the auto-follow mechanism on mail.channel. It is
used as a trick to have self-notifying channels. When posting on a channel
it listens itself. When a channel listens to a record its members are notified
depending on channel type. It means that a channel following itself notifies
its members in a magic way.
We decided to remove this magic and instead do a cleaner implementation of
this mechanism. ``_notify_compute_recipients`` method from ``mail.thread`` is
now overridden on channel model. It computes recipients to notify using a
custom SQL instead of the generic one given by ``mail.thread``. Some other
code adaptation is done to ensure notification on channel model is done as
intended on that specific model.
As channel model is somewhat different from classic mail.thread enabled
models let us implement its features in a more traditional way. More overrides
and less magic !
QUERY COUNTERS
Due to changes in ``channel_partner_ids`` fields being a computed inverse
searchable field there may be an additional query when performing a message
post as indicated by ``test_complete_message_post`` test. This is due notably
to message_format fetching channel_ids information. A call to ir rules on
channel is performed that uses ``channel_partner_ids`` as part its rule domain.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose of this commit is to better differentiate channel members technical
model from partner members in code :
* ``channel_partner_ids``: contacts member of a channel, filtering notably
on active and checking ACLs on res.partner business model. This one
should be used whenever we deal with members of a channel at business
level;
* ``channel_last_seen_partner_ids``: memberships of a channel and technical
model. This one should be used for internal processes and members
management;
Also containing
* clean naming or API of methods managing channel members. This should
not change anything functionally as only code renaming / cleaning is
performed;
* improve performances of channel member auto subscription by aggregating
all members to add and creating them at once;
* check the use of ``mail.channel.partner`` and ``res.partner`` records
through ``channel_last_seen_partner_ids`` and ``channel_partner_ids``
Channel fields;
Functionally nothing should change with this commit. It only cleans code
in order to prepare future modifications.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATION
Channel holds two fields computing current user's membership on channel.
``is_subscribed`` is a duplicate of ``is_member``. It is therefore removed
to keep a single field.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose is to prepare modifications in models by doing a preparatory cleaning
of some fields and model definitions. Notably
* move mail.channel.partner im_livechat override in its own file;
* slightly re-order member-related fields on channel or mail.channel.partner
models, and split long lines;
This commit should not change anything functionally as it contains is only some
code move and reordering.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
Purpose is to use available tools, easier for debug and asserts than doing
everything manually. It prepares future changes in channel model that may
have an impact on bus notifications.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
Purpose of this commit is to enforce model cleanliness by avoiding ugly
defined ``mail.channel.partner`` records.
``mail.channel.partner`` model is a decorated many2many relationship between
channels and partners (members). Both ``partner_id`` and ``channel_id`` fields
should be required. Members of a channel are always partners and belonging to
a channel is mandatory in that decorated m2m table.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
A context key is added allowing to bypass user / channel synchronization
when creating users. This is used notably in tests to avoid subscribing
new test users to "general" channel created as default data.
Purpose is to avoid interferences in query-based performance tests. It also
avoids unnecessary data creation and/or update when it is not necessary
especially in tests.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
Currently, In channels listing, the order of the channels is case sensitive.
The Uppercase names are listing first and then all the Lowercase ones.
but it should be displayed in the alphabetical case insensitive order.
With this commit, we have resolved this issue and now channels are listing
in case insensitive alphabetical manner.
Task : 2453592
closesodoo/odoo#67889
X-original-commit: 4445207161c84d2854055df63013c1361e5d4697
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Before this commit:
When deleting/archiving any user, the user’s related chat changed name due to
losing one of its members.
After this commit:
Chat name should remain the same after archiving/deleting the user.
Reasoning:
The unsubscribe was meant to target channels of type channel specifically.
`test_channel_auto_unsubscribe_archived_or_deleted_users` has been reintroduced
after having been removed by mistake in eda542c82f84d7b5589846691b9cb6b7f1021947
task-2442235
closesodoo/odoo#67884
X-original-commit: cb4bd4cbc4a36276cc6c9cb68e51c260e7c0d761
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Current behavior before PR:
When having a small screen, the composer in a chat window has no actual
shortcut to send the message.
Desired behavior after PR is merged:
'CTRL-Enter' keyboard shortcut will work for small screen size.
LINKS:
PR https://github.com//pull/65241
Task-2446076
closesodoo/odoo#67724
X-original-commit: 2542f731c5b06c3b451ecde7992d3bb45adb2c60
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
When formatting a message, a message could be with an empty or obsolete
record_name field. It's better to rely on the relation between the message and
the thread and fetch the current thread name.
task-2411715
closesodoo/odoo#63000closesodoo/odoo#67549
X-original-commit: 51e962803d2048efeb0f7e96a9fe561ac49ee05a
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Currently in init of mail.notification we search for a specific index
and create it if not found. This is easily replaced by a standard
CREATE IF NOT EXISTS allowing to simplify code.
LINKS
Task ID-2477444
Prepares Task ID-2377974 (trace management cleaning task)
Prepares Task ID-2070632 (channel members main task)
Prepares Task ID-2419762 (channel members followup task)
COM PR #67382
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2245
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
RATIONALE
A bit of history. Link between a message and its recipients has been added
at first mail refactoring towards a Chatter / Discuss feature. It was done
in v7 at d64f3c9783 with the base addition of mail notification model (lots
of commits follow that one but that's the first one about notification).
Due to some people thinking that it was unnecessary to keep a model for
notification it has been removed in v9 at 88b8cd0587. Notification table was
renamed from mail_notification to mail_message_res_partner_needaction_rel.
It was proven to be a mistake even if those "some people" were warned and
model made its way back to Odoo in v10 at 72dfcae2a4 . Table name mail_message
_res_partner_needaction_rel was kept to ease migration and backward
compatibility.
It is now time to complete the circle and rename it to mail_notification.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename ``mail_message_res_partner_needaction_rel`` to ``mail_notification`` .
RIP JEM.
Never forget.
LINKS
Task ID-2477444
Prepares Task ID-2377974 (trace management cleaning task)
Prepares Task ID-2070632 (channel members main task)
Prepares Task ID-2419762 (channel members followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#67382
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2245
Co-Authored-By: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
As I was passing by I found some docstrings or helpers could be updated or
rephrased a bit more clearly. This is free as in free beers, without beers.
Some code about mail features (posting) may also be re-indented to ease
understanding of future modifications. Or just because we had to read
it and go through many files. Still free beers.
LINKS
Task ID-2477444
Prepares Task ID-2377974 (trace management cleaning task)
Prepares Task ID-2070632 (channel members main task)
Prepares Task ID-2419762 (channel members followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#67382
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2245
* Reorganize and reword some of the fields for the activity form type view
* The fields `force_next` from `mail.activity.type` and its related
field from `mail.activity` are removed.
Instead, a new field `chaining_type`, which is a `selection` will
improve the readability of the activity_type form. (It is made more
obvious that the user has to choose between 2 modes :
- 'Trigger Next Activity': used when the user wants to specify the type of the
next activity, which will be triggered once the current activity is done
- 'Suggest Next Activity': used when the user wants to recommend the
next activity for the user to schedule once the current activity is done
* To be consistent with this change :
- The field `default_next_type_id` is renamed `triggered_next_type_id`
- The field `next_type_ids` is renamed `suggested_next_type_ids`
* The field `default_description` is renamed `default_note` to better match the
`note` field from `mail.activity`
* About the specific case of activity_type.category = 'upload_file' :
An activity which has this type's category is automatically marked as done as soon as
the file is uploaded. This prevents the user from choosing a "next activity type".
As such, an activity_type with this category can only make use of the
chaining_type = "trigger", to be part of an automated process.
An activity_type with this chaining_type should have the
triggered_next_type_id set (usually required in the Form).
But, since it does not make sense to set suggested_next_type_ids in this case :
- chaining_type will stay hidden in the Form
- triggered_next_type_id will always be shown and is not marked as required in the Form
- if triggered_next_type_id is not set, chaining_type will be "suggest"
Task ID : 2410217
PR : https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/63370
UPGRADE : https://github.com/odoo/upgrade/pull/2167
Some characters were not rendered properly, this commit restores the display
as it was in v13.0.
closesodoo/odoo#67095
X-original-commit: 9c8286b8a6fb376aa21b833cb35da044d2eb0e23
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
When we search for a name in the chat window having a very long name
of the user will overflowing the screen. The autocomplete dropdown list is
overflowing and rendering out of the screen.
With this commit, we have resized the width of autocomplete dropdown list with
the width of the outer element's width as it's standard behavior.
Task : 2449115
closesodoo/odoo#67063
X-original-commit: 72e96af8dc392796d4e45b96784e7ac50d660127
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
The goal of this task to increase the height of the systray message dropdown
to simply allow more messages to be displayed at once for better readability.
Currently, we can see a maximum of 6 chat listing in the dropdown at once and
then need to scroll down for more chats to be listed
but with this commit, We can see more number of chats based on the viewport
height for better readability.
Task : 2428779
closesodoo/odoo#66432
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Context
-------
Lead assignement is now based on PLS probability.
We want to avoid giving the same score to real email addresses
and email addresses that are just well formed
Flanker try to acheive that be checking specific
criteria according to the domain, check the dns and mx record
Improvement
-----------
Define a mail_validate function seach as phone_validate.
If flanker is installed, use flanker for validation of
email addresses else use email_normalize.
It should help the PLS to give a bad score to well formed addresses
that flanker suspect to be wrong.
Setup
-----
NB: flanker is not available as debian package, we make it optional
To install flanker
```
pip install flanker
pip install redis
pip install dnsq
```
If you have installed it as root you may need to run
```py
from flanker.addresslib import address
```
as root for the first initialisation
closesodoo/odoo#66429
X-original-commit: f540976c8751e2bf402fed8db830ec0fbf98f654
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
* hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail, snailmail, website,
website_livechat
This commit removes `patchMixin` and improve `utils.patch`.
`utils.patch` now supports native classes and has a new parameter
used to patch class members.
`utils.patch` is now used everywhere `patchMixin` was and it must
be used to patch classes.
closesodoo/odoo#65967
Related: odoo/enterprise#16278
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: ged-odoo <ged@odoo.com>
Before this commit, a page reload or a redirect could raise following
error:
```
Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: this.env.services.bus_service is undefined
```
This happens due to `Messaging` model relying on `bus_service` in its
teardown method `_willDelete`. This is sometimes unsafe because the
bus service may not have been deployed yet.
Task-2468469
closesodoo/odoo#66857
X-original-commit: a444f9c89bb8d5790b8a068a8f120f6ea9d1b17f
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Qiuyu (QHO)