Relying on the ordering by tax code is not sufficient,
as some tax declarations such as the Luxemburg one,
show tax case codes not ordered numerically
Original fix courtesy of Stefan Rijnhart (Therp)
Fixes: lp:1168948
Rebase of: PR #759
After careful analysis, I'm now convinced it is a good thing to preserve
the analytic account on taxes line which have the same general account
as the invoice line.
This is the best default case and will save time for users,
while leaving the flexibility to adapt the analytic account on
taxes manually.
fixes#374
fixes https://bugs.launchpad.net/ocb-addons/+bug/1084822
The fix considers invoice tax lines with different analytic account
are equivalent for the purpose of checking if the list of tax line
is complete.
Caveat, this changes the structure of keys in the dictionary
returned by account.invoice.tax's compute method, I suppose this
is ok for the master branch.
product.product reuses most of the product.template views however some parts need to be excluded or replaced.
Instead of adding template only parts in base view and removing it for product, split the views in 'common' (product_template_form_view), 'template only' (product_template_only_form_view) and 'product only' (product_normal_form_view) where the first is inherited by the other two. The attribute mode='primary' on both second views allows to make sure that future inheritance of product_template_form_view and product_template_only_form_view will work with the full rendered product_template_form_view view.
This allows us to have valid buttons in crm for bill of material (filters based on active_id).
Also cleaning the mess with circular dependencies.
The accounts "TVA en amont" were not used by the l10n_lu chart of accounts.
Instead the accounts "TVA en aval" were used for all taxes both sale and purchase taxes.
(Manual rebase of PR #735)
A todo would only filter out records selectioned by the same field's caching,
it should filter out on the whole prefetching selection or an other field
could/would just add it back to the set of records to fetch (and lead to Bad
Things).
Note: this probably deserves a test somehow, but I'm not quite sure how the
todos thing works so...
If expansion of the recordset is done during _prefetch_field, if one of the
prefetches (not the base record(s) but one of those selected by
BaseModel._in_cache_without) can't be read by the current user (due to an
access rule or for field reading reasons, or whatever) the whole read is
failed, even if the record which was specifically asked for could be read on
its own.
By only expanding the read set in _read_from_database, the cache is correctly
set but read() and _prefetch_field() only check the records explicitly asked
for for AccessDenied, prefetched records will only be asked if they are ever
accessed.
fixes#1013
[FIX] web: update bootstrap to version 3.2.0.
[FIX] website.seo can't edit title and description; website.editor change link for internal page
[IMP] website editor: remove button style from cke and insert into the link dialog box.
In new API, selection field value is checked (against the selection's possible
values) at both read and write. For pricelist.type this requires read access
to product.pricelist.type.
At rev 84e9a67cdf a check to avoid the creation of ir.model.relation for custom modules was added. The condition is not correct as based on the string instead of the field name. We do not have access to column name at this level but the the m2m relation table do start with x_ for custom fields (see __init__ method).
[FIX] mail: misc bug fixing
- avoid deleting the Whole Company mail group if still present, because it is required for some module installation. In 7.0 installing some modules may crash if this group is not present.
- fixed an issue when computing possible recipients in the Chatter
- small fix in html2plaintext about blank lines
qdp-odoo