This commit introduces a date picker OWL component meant to handle the
following use-cases:
- date picker
- date & time picker
- date range picker
- date & time range picker
Basically, this component is the union of the two previous third-party
libraries handling these cases: TempusDominus and DateRangePicker.
New components introduced:
* The main addition of this commit is the `DateTimePicker` itself which
handles the display and interactions of the calendar and time pickers.
> see @web/core/datetime/datetime_picker
* The picker can then be coupled to an input using the
`useDateTimePicker` hook. The purpose of this hook is to handle events
on a given input element and syncronize its value to a date picker it
will spawn in a popover.
> see @web/core/datetime/datetime_hook
* Lastly, a simple `DateTimeInput` component will render an input and
call the hook mentioned above to handle it. This component is
effectively replacing the previous DatePicker and DateTimePicker
components (note that it does not handle range values).
> see @web/core/datetime/datetime_input
Another noticeable change of this commit is the definition of daterange
fields in views:
- Previously, the arch would have to define both fields
and bind them via their options, while also adding an arrow between
inputs or other forms of connection.
- In the new implementation, only the start date field must be declared,
and a date range can be spawned by providing an `end_date_field` in its
options.
Example:
```xml
<field
name="start_datetime"
widget="daterange"
options="{'end_date_field': 'end_datetime'}"
/>
```
warning Added limitations:
- this new way of declaring date ranges means that templates have been
revised to declare one field tag instead of two. This means that list
views using date ranges have lost the ability to be sorted on their end
date fields.
> Justification: the current use cases have been reviewed and it has
been decided that it was not needed to sort on the end date on the
affected list views.
> Workaround: drop the date range and declare both fields as simple date
pickers (i.e. without the end_date_field option).
- all modifiers applied to a field using a date range will be copied and
applied to the end date field. There is no way to define modifiers
specific to one field or the other.
> Justification: there was no use case where one of the two fields
needed specific modifiers.
> Workaround: same as the previous point: split the range into 2 simple
date picker fields.
Additional notes:
- the widget="daterange" is not mandatory in form views, but is required
in list views because only fields with explicit widgets will not be
rendered as simple <span> elements. The date range feature will be
available as soon as an end_date_field is specified.
- as the end date field is not explicitly defined in the view anymore,
any modifier depending on it need to have it defined as invisible
somewhere in the arch.
Task ID: 3121497
Part-of: odoo/odoo#112171
Co-authored-by: Julien Carion <juca@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Pulinckx <pipu@odoo.com>
In the BS5 migration, the legacy `checkbox` and `boolean_toggle` widget
were adapted but not the OWL Component.
Also, we have tweaked the old widget and the component to have better
positioning and margins.
Note:
the CSS for the print is already done in BS5
```css
@media print {
.form-check-input {
color-adjust: exact;
}
}
```
Also we change `offsetWidth` by `getBoundingClientRect().width` in
`list_renderer` to avoid inaccurate rounding in columns width's
calculation.
Lastly a `.o-checkbox` class is added to the Checkbox component for a
more universal and context independent targetting.
closesodoo/odoo#96185
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
This commit redesigns the `TrackingValue` component.
Part of the ChatWindow/Discuss redesign
task-2823627
closesodoo/odoo#92872
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, test_mail.
The target returned by the mail's test utils start method is useless since it's
almost the same thing than querying document. Let's remove it and replace it by
document. This will reduce the diff in the PR introducing the new environment in
the discuss app.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#92077
Related: odoo/enterprise#27670
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: hr, test_mail.
This PR prepares the ground for the one introducing the new environment in the
discuss app. Indeed, the createWebClient helper will be used instead of createView/Widget
thus the returned value won't be a Widget anymore but a DOM element. This change impacts
they way the tests were written: JQuery functions have to be transformed to native JavaScript
ones. In order to reduce the noise in the main PR, those changes are done now.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#91290
Related: odoo/enterprise#27313
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: sms, snailmail, test_mail
This commit introduces models that define records being 1:1 map with components,
as a step to move further to having essentially all business code in models.
Having code in models is desirable to have very maintainable code, thanks to
robust and declarative code with an ORM-like architecture.
Task-2831082
closesodoo/odoo#90320
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
This PR helps redducing the noise in the one introducing the new environment
in discuss. Indeed, the createWebClient helper will always be used so we won't
be able to use the form utils anymore. Moreover, since the clean up of the widget
is now handled by the start method, the calls to widget.destroy in those test was
not required.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#90079
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail, mail_bot, sms, snailmail, test_mail,
website_livechat, website_slides.
Mail tests are currently relying on this during tests to make env, widget,
data available. We don't wan't to add magic keys to this anymore.
task-2792108
closesodoo/odoo#86559
Related: odoo/enterprise#25341
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail, snailmail, test_mail, website_livechat,
website_slides.
This commit will remove the need to duplicate models definition for
test purposes. Indeed, for now, we need to mock the model definitions
on the client side. Those models definitions are often very different
from the ones found on the server.
This approach will allow us :
- to ease model definitions during tests
- to get closer from the real models
task-2767820
closesodoo/odoo#84828
Related: odoo/enterprise#24486
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
task-2767820
This move is done to prepare the use of server side model definitions during tests.
Indeed, a model having all type of tracked fields will be needed to ease tracking
value testing. This model will be added to the test_mail module so the tracking
value tests need to be there as well.
closesodoo/odoo#85819
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
