Before this commit, when the user displays the subtasks list on a kanban
card and change the state of a subtask to set to Done then the
`closed_subtask_count` field does not changed in the kanban card.
This commit updates the `closed_subtask_count` when the subtask will
be closed or opened on the subtask list displayed in the kanban card.
Also, the `this.props.record.activeFields` is no longer used to fill in
the activeFields of Record component because the `activeFields` will
change in the future.
task-3248592
Part-of: odoo/odoo#120508
This commit introduces a date picker OWL component meant to handle the
following use-cases:
- date picker
- date & time picker
- date range picker
- date & time range picker
Basically, this component is the union of the two previous third-party
libraries handling these cases: TempusDominus and DateRangePicker.
New components introduced:
* The main addition of this commit is the `DateTimePicker` itself which
handles the display and interactions of the calendar and time pickers.
> see @web/core/datetime/datetime_picker
* The picker can then be coupled to an input using the
`useDateTimePicker` hook. The purpose of this hook is to handle events
on a given input element and syncronize its value to a date picker it
will spawn in a popover.
> see @web/core/datetime/datetime_hook
* Lastly, a simple `DateTimeInput` component will render an input and
call the hook mentioned above to handle it. This component is
effectively replacing the previous DatePicker and DateTimePicker
components (note that it does not handle range values).
> see @web/core/datetime/datetime_input
Another noticeable change of this commit is the definition of daterange
fields in views:
- Previously, the arch would have to define both fields
and bind them via their options, while also adding an arrow between
inputs or other forms of connection.
- In the new implementation, only the start date field must be declared,
and a date range can be spawned by providing an `end_date_field` in its
options.
Example:
```xml
<field
name="start_datetime"
widget="daterange"
options="{'end_date_field': 'end_datetime'}"
/>
```
warning Added limitations:
- this new way of declaring date ranges means that templates have been
revised to declare one field tag instead of two. This means that list
views using date ranges have lost the ability to be sorted on their end
date fields.
> Justification: the current use cases have been reviewed and it has
been decided that it was not needed to sort on the end date on the
affected list views.
> Workaround: drop the date range and declare both fields as simple date
pickers (i.e. without the end_date_field option).
- all modifiers applied to a field using a date range will be copied and
applied to the end date field. There is no way to define modifiers
specific to one field or the other.
> Justification: there was no use case where one of the two fields
needed specific modifiers.
> Workaround: same as the previous point: split the range into 2 simple
date picker fields.
Additional notes:
- the widget="daterange" is not mandatory in form views, but is required
in list views because only fields with explicit widgets will not be
rendered as simple <span> elements. The date range feature will be
available as soon as an end_date_field is specified.
- as the end date field is not explicitly defined in the view anymore,
any modifier depending on it need to have it defined as invisible
somewhere in the arch.
Task ID: 3121497
Part-of: odoo/odoo#112171
Co-authored-by: Julien Carion <juca@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Pulinckx <pipu@odoo.com>
The refactor of the kanban quick create implemented in
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/117449 introduced a traceback when
creating a task from the My Tasks kanban view due to the presence of
'default_personal_stage_type_ids' key in the context.
This commit fix that by removing this key from the context in the
customization of the kanban view for project.task model. It also add a
js tour test to ensure that personal tasks can be created from the quick
create form in the My Tasks kanban view.
Steps
=====
- Install module project
- Go to the view "Tasks -> My Tasks"
- In the main Kanban View click on "New"
- Enter a Task title and clicl on "ADD"
Issue
=====
A traceback appears indicating that the value of the field user_id is
missing for the model project.task.stage.personal and the task is not
created.
Cause
=====
In kanban and list views, when the records a grouped by a given field, a
key is added in the context when creating a record from one of the
resulting categories. This key is of the form:
`default_fieldGroupedBy: current_category_value`
In the case of the view My Tasks, the records are grouped by their
fields personal_stage_type_ids (M2M). Therefore, the key
default_personal_stage_type_ids will results in a write in that M2M
table when creating the record. But the way personal stages are managed
in project is as confusing as it is mindblowing and the M2M table
storing the relation between task and personal stages is also the table
that store records from the model project.task.stage.personal. And this
model also as a field user_id that is required. Therefore
at creation of the project.task record with that key, the orm will miss
a user_id for the newly created project.task.stage.personal.
Fix
===
The correct way to add/modify a record project.task by setting its
personal stage is actually to use the already existing methods of
project.task, i.e. _inverse_personal_stage_type_id. Therfore, instead of
modifying directly the M2M relation, update the computed M2O field and
let the inverse method to the job of personal stage assignment.
To do that, the value contained in the context for the M2M relation is
copied in the write value of the M2O (personal_stage_type_id) and the
key in the context corresponding to the M2M relation is deleted.
task-3281005
closesodoo/odoo#119055
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the field node id (`field_id`) uses the field name
for the first occurrence on the arch, and add an underscore and a number
for the rest of the occurrences. This can create inconsistencies when
sombody assumes that the field_id is equal to the name, and don't take
into account the possibility of multiple occurrences.
Now, a unique id is created since the first occurrence, this remove all
ambiguity between the id and the name.
Part-of task-id 3179751
closesodoo/odoo#117799
Related: odoo/enterprise#39511
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Before this commit:
- The burndown chart displayed the stage in order of the data fetching which wasn't logical especial for a chart that supposed to represent the evolution of the tasks in the project
- When sorting all/my tasks by stage, It was possible to select any project in any quickcreate of the stages which didn't make much sense
After this commit:
The burndown chart legend is now ordered according to the stage sequence (previously was ordered randomly by comming data)
Modified the burndownChartModel, simply makes a RPC to get the stages and sequences then sort the legend elements (one by stage) with it
Display only the projects which uses the stage in the dropdown menu of the task kanban quickcreate (when grouping by stage)
When sorting by all/my tasks by stage, the quickcreate now only display the projects which contains the stage selected
done by adding a domain in the quickcreate form
(shoutout to LTU and AUON who actually found the fix)
Task-3067445
closesodoo/odoo#105694
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit reviews the UX and UI in Project app and improves the usability of the
new features recently added (subtasks list in kanban card, state field replacing
kanban_state field, etc).
The following changes are made in this commit:
- swap of user_id icon in the kanban box and the removal of the allow_unassign field and setting
- change the ordering of the fields in the subtask list
- make small layout changes in the project.task and project.project kanban cards
- remove the "lock-icon private" sub-title of private tasks, replace it with a
little lock icon on the bottom right icons of the kanban card.
- remove the break tag in the project.task kanban card that was unecessary
given the new display and margin style settings
- lock icon is bigger
- kanban icons are better aligned
- state is as big as avatar
- remove the 'remaining hours on SO' field
- deadline field will be optional and hidden by default in project.task list view
- remove the rating field
- add stage field as optional in project.task list views
- priority and state fields will no longer be optional
- stage_id will be copied when duplicating a task, except when the task is
generated through the recurrence
- remove the tooltip of the tag_ids field
- When duplicating a task having sub-tasks, '(copy)' is no longer
added to the name of the sub-tasks of this task.
- project.task kanban view:
* (+ x tasks) mention next to the name is removed
* The caret is replaced with 'fa-check-square-o x/y'
which will represent the number of sub-tasks closed
compared to the total number of sub-tasks
* Only open subtasks are displayed
* When changing the state of a sub-task to a closing one,
the sub-task is muted and removed from the list on the view reload
* The name of the parent task on the kanban card of sub-tasks is
displayed except when viewing the sub-tasks of a particular task
through the sub-tasks stat button
* project.project kanban view: the fa-check-square-o icon of
milestones is replaced with fa-flag-o
* project.task kanban card: the fa-play and fa-pause icons
are moved on the right of the remaining hours widge.
* Allow users to edit the stage_id in batch from the list view of tasks
if all of the selected tasks are part of the same project.
* the state will have the same size as the avatar
* change the opacity of the tasks that are closed
* state is at the right of subtask list
* the striked should be replaced by the opacity on the kanban card
Enterprise PR: odoo/enterprise#38132
Task-3229873
closesodoo/odoo#116628
X-original-commit: 09b5d5843096d27b5a4ab0f603ad44bdb2e74723
Related: odoo/upgrade#4478
Related: odoo/enterprise#38771
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Panagiotis Kyriakou <paky@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastien (bvdn) <bvdn@odoo.com>
Purpose:
- In the project, My Tasks and All Tasks menu are related to the task model so
having two main menus for the same model which display almost the same
thing would not be great for UI and it'll not look good if we add another menu
in the future or via customer customization.
So in this Commit:
- We have added a menu named Tasks which has 2 sub-menus My Tasks and All Tasks
which would be great to display tasks
task-3180910
closesodoo/odoo#113335
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
* The tours are now run by the `MacroEngine` defined in `macro.js`.
* This is accomplished by converting (at runtime) the user-defined tours to
`Macro`s. See `tour_compilers.js` for the step (and tour-to-macro) compilation.
* API is kept the same as much as possible. Basically, declaring tours stayed
the same with some exceptions:
* `allowInvisible` can be provided in a step to allow consuming the trigger
element even if it is invisible.
* `isCheck` can now be used to replace the no operation `run` that is
traditionally signals the runner to only perform a check.
* Before, multiple `run`s can be called simultaneously. Now, each `run` method
is awaited before proceeding to the next step.
* If the trigger element is `disabled`, the tour runner will *not* proceed on
calling the `run` method and the runner will stay on current step until the
trigger element becomes `enabled`.
* However, the tour runner is okay with `disabled` trigger element if the step
has `isCheck = true`. As long as the trigger element is found for `isCheck`
step, the tour runner will happily move to the next step.
* Some tours are adjusted to properly run with this new tour runner.
* When the tour failed:
* The dom string is not logged anymore.
* However, a warning message containing the relative location of the step will
be logged. This is better in helping the author in locating the failed step.
**Some guidelines learned during the development:**
* Each step may trigger a dom mutation. It's a good practice to insert an
intermediate step that *checks* the existence of an element that result from
the action of the previous step.
* Refrain from using the `run` method for assertions. `run`, in principle, is
provided to perform actions that are not offered by the helper. Use the
`trigger` for assertions.
* During dev, find `SHOW_POINTER_DURATION` and set it to `250`. This will show
the pointer (pointing to the trigger element) for 250ms when watching the
tour.
closesodoo/odoo#107618
Task-id: 3082036
Related: odoo/enterprise#37560
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Before this PR the task state was fixed by the kanban_state field which was useful when you use the stage of the project as parts of a pipeline,
but not relevant when users are using stages as bucket lists. (specific examples at the end of the specs)
The goal of this PR is to provide users a way to mark their tasks as done with a simple button press,
while keeping the option to label a task as Approved, Canceled or Requesting changes like in the old kanban_state field.
The kanban_state of a task had no impact whatsoever on other tasks of the pipe, we would like to change that and make the task state have an influence on its dependent tasks.
The state will also have influence over the 'recurrent' tasks (to be implemented in Task #3084945)
If you want a better description of those changes with screenshot and colors check specs of:
Task-3084930
PRs:
See odoo/enterprise#35359
See odoo/upgrade#4367
-----------------------------------------
Interaction with blocking tasks:
the closed values which mark the task as closed or finished:
- Done
- Canceled
The Open values when the task isn't finished yet:
- In progress
- Changes Requested
- Approved
- Waiting (which is not selectable)
Where to change the state of a task:
- For kanban and form views: same place as kanban_state (bottom right of kanban card, top right of form view)
- For list view: left of list (after task priority)
more details about the state widget in state field widgets part
Interaction with existing fields
- is_closed: which was determined by the task.stage_id.fold, now a task is closed when in one of the following stages
- Done
- Canceled
a closed task is considered as finished, the time of the closing will be stored in the date_last_stage_update field
- is_blocked: a task is considered blocked if ANY of its blocking task is in one of the blocking states (more details about this in the following part Interaction with blocking tasks):
- in Progress
- Changes Requested
- Approved
- Waiting
!! important !! is_closed and is_blocked are not mutually exclusive, you can have a task that blocked and is closed at the same time, the reason why will be explained late
date_last_stage_update: this field is updated everytime the task goes into a closing state OR when the task changes stage.
We need to check that the value is updated in each case (using the already available filter)
Interaction with blocking tasks
the state of a task can now be changed by its blocking tasks following the logic:
if ANY of the blocking tasks is NOT closed (so its state is in one of the open values) the task is considered as blocked
- if a task is blocked and NOT closed its state will switch to Waiting
- the Waiting state will display an unclickable hourglass icon on the task kanban/list views, once in the waiting state you can't change the state of the taskfrom the kanban/list views
- a blocked task state can be changed through the form view, so you can override the 'block' by choosing a closed state (only done or canceled)
- once overriden, the task will change to the closed state the user wants, but the task is still blocked so in case where the user comes back to an open state, the task will automatically switch back to the waiting state (according to the state before the block)
- if the blocking task switches to a non-blocking state, the task will not be considered as blocked anymore and its state will switch back to In Progress
Default values
the default value is always in progress
Special cases
when a task is moved from a stage to another one
- if the state was in one of the open states (approved, changes requested, in progress ) the state goes back to In Progress
- if not, the state stays the same
when a task is moved from a project to another one
- the state goes back to In Progress
when a task is duplicated
- if the state was in one of the open states (approved, changes requested, in progress ) the state goes back to In Progress
- if not, the state stays the same
closesodoo/odoo#107593
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
In this commit,
-We Ease the quick creation of tasks by providing shortcuts allowing the user
to set different fields (planned_hours, tags, priority, and assign to users)
without opening the form view.
task-3145203
closesodoo/odoo#112821
Related: odoo/enterprise#37166
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
**Before this commit**
- The optional "class" attribute set on the root node of a view arch
is ignored, except for the kanban view which has a custom
way of using it.
- The optional "js_class" attribute set on the root node of a view arch
does not have any impact on the class names passed to its controller.
**After this commit**
The content of the optional attribute "class" set on the root node of an
arch like in
<list class="o_custom_class">
...
</list>
as well as an additionnal class derived [1] from the value of the
"js_class" attribute set on the root node of an arch like in
<list js_class="extended_list">
...
</list>
will both be found in the prop "className" of any view controller.
[1] a js_class value of "xyz" yields to the class "o_xyz_view"
**Note on this commit**
The kanban view was already appending the root node class attribute
to its renderer element. This is no longer the case and some styling
rules has been adapted.
closesodoo/odoo#113014
Related: odoo/enterprise#37265
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
This commit changes some of the way that users will
work with subtasks in the project app.
Initially, it changes subtasks from a many2many to
a one2many field.
We also add the ability for subtasks to be viewed
straight from the kanban view by drawing a list of
them inside of the kanban box of the parent task.
task-3085016
closesodoo/odoo#112279
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
From a practical point of view, it seems better to also add the
dialog service in the service registry when calling
setupControlPanelServiceRegistry.
closesodoo/odoo#113610
Related: odoo/enterprise#37510
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
This commit removes the legacy implementation of the form, kanban
and list views. It also removes the legacy view widget registry,
and all legacy widgets it contained. The legacy field registry
couldn't be removed yet as some fields are still used (e.g. in
client actions: FieldMany2One, FieldMany2ManyTags...), and
sometimes accessed from that registry (e.g. uom service). More
clean up will come later. Note that all tests using legacy views
have thus been removed, even though the tested feature might still
remain (e.g. FieldMany2One tests have been removed, but that field
is still there). However, those features are deprecated and
unlikely to evolve. They should be removed in the next saas, or the
one after.
Finally, this commit also removes the legacy view dialogs.
Task 3168640
Part-of: odoo/odoo#111809
This is a step closer to a goal of avoiding dependence on asynchronous
modules. Starting from this commit, new tour definition should be
registered to `registry.category("web_tour.tours")` registry.
So, instead of the following:
```js
import tour from "web_tour.tour";
tour.register(name, options, steps);
```
We now do:
```js
import { registry } from "@web/core/registry";
registry.category("web_tour.tours").add(name, optionsWithSteps);
```
Notice the `options` and `steps` params are merged when registering
the tour definition. It should look something like so:
```js
registry.category("web_tour.tours").add("account_tour", {
test: true,
steps: [ ... ],
});
```
And if the `TourManager` instance is needed, one can get it from the
registry like so `registry.get("tourManager")`. Note however that
this instance is only available when the `TourManager` has been
instantiated -- so it's not available at top level of the module.
closesodoo/odoo#111103
Related: odoo/enterprise#36335
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
This commit separate the templates, one for the card and another one for
the menu (the ellipsis dropdown).
The new template, called 'kanban-menu', will only contain the dropdown.
Note that, this behaviour is the same as the one used for the kanban
tooltips.
closesodoo/odoo#107589
Task-id: 3096776
Related: odoo/documentation#3284
Related: odoo/enterprise#34962
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
This commit adapts the codebase to match its enterprise counterpart
where calls to legacy cookie api (cf. web.utils.cookies) are replaced by
cookie_service ones.
closesodoo/odoo#104080
X-original-commit: 724469e19ff83e91a41c6721e334df1ad8d1c02c
Related: odoo/enterprise#33189
Signed-off-by: Pierre Paridans (app) <app@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the form view in project sharing was always in
legacy. Moreover, in that view, the chatter used is the portal one
and so it is also a legacy widget.
This commit converts the form view and then convert the chatter in
OWL to be able to correctly compile and add the chatter in the form
view.
Also, some styling has been done to remove the overflow. Only the
overflow on the y axis in the chatter can be scrolled on the page.
task-2947516
X-original-commit: 175430f3593337ce582cbec644b9d630894c074b
This commit introduces the new calendar view written in owl.
closesodoo/odoo#101185
X-original-commit: e88988f58582d5b49a32d7102a74a176f40c4c69
Related: odoo/enterprise#31808
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruno Boi (boi) <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Since odoo/odoo#98380, the `Set Status` can be selected in the `project.project`
kanban view, which was not previously feasible as considered as not suitable.
This commit prevents selecting that value.
task-2989015
closesodoo/odoo#100561
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Before this commit, all the custom code for the widgets, form, list and
kanban views are always in OWL and have to be migrate to the new JS
framework.
This commit converts all the widgets, list, kanban and form views used
in the project app in OWL. Some JS tours has been adapted according to
the OWL views, the project right side panel has been reviewed since it
was LegacyComponent (in old component in OWL)
task-2944742
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98380
Before this commit, the `getFirstElementForXpath` function is used in
the unit test for the burndown chart. This function is used to select a
HTMLELement with xpath expression and could be used outside the unit
test of the burndown chart.
This commit externalizes this function in a project test utils JS file
to use this function in another unit tests file if needed.
task-2924268
closesodoo/odoo#97574
Related: odoo/enterprise#30173
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
This commit's purpose is to improve the user experience when using the
burdown chart as well as preventing fetching all the data in order to
prevent long loading time on big databases.
This commit adds `Allocated Hours` (`planned_hours` field) in the chart
measures as well as default filters in order to restrict the data to
the tasks which stage have been modified this year or the previous
one, or which current stage is not `closed`. This commit also hides the
`stage_id` field from the one that are available in the group by as this
report requires it to be set (and thus we need to prevent the user from
removing it).
task-2941625
closesodoo/odoo#97321
Related: odoo/documentation#2551
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
- Purpose
Improve the UX of the "column creation" mechanism in the kanban view
so that users better understand what it is they are creating.
- Specifications
In the kanban creation mechanism, use the name of field on the model
(e.g. when grouped by stage_id in project.tasks kanban, "Add a Column"
would become "Add a Stage" because the stage_id field's name is "Stage").
task-2755570
closesodoo/odoo#95550
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Add stacked option on line chart.
The option already existed in Project for burndown graph, so I exported
and adapted everything concerning stacked lines from Project to Web.
closesodoo/odoo#96833
Task-id: 2929576
Signed-off-by: Simon Genin (ges@odoo) <ges@odoo.com>
The new list and form views were merged recently [1], but they
weren't activated because they weren't 100% ready yet. This is now
the case. This commit adds those views to the view registry. As a
consequence, a lot of qunit tests and tours needed to be adapted,
mostly for selector changes.
We also add legacy list and form views to the view registry, with
keys 'legacy_list' and 'legacy_form'. This allows to force those
legacy views when necessary. For instance, we did it in views
using complex custom legacy x2many field widgets that haven't been
converted yet (we have a compatibility layer but it isn't complete
and doesn't support every advanced usecases).
[1] odoo/odoo#92475
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78221
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Francois (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit
======================
The Burndown Chart report was very slow on big databases as it was not
possible for Postgresql to optimize the query as it was based on a view
that was using several generate series.
This commit aims to improve the performance by injecting the constraints
at a lower level than it was in the past, lowering the amount of data
processed in the higher level of the query.
/!\ Important note
------------------
Overwriting the `read_group_raw` is really not a good practice and should
be avoided in most case. If you fall on this implementation by grepping
the source code, please be advised that this is not the right way of doing
things.
Implementation details
----------------------
- The report is now run by generating the `SQL` that is executed by the
`read_group_raw`. This allows inserting `SQL` constraints at a lower
level and simnifically improves performance. As there is no other way
to do it, the code is unfortunately a modified copy of the actual
`read_group_raw`.
- The pivot view has been removed as it had no meaning and was creating
confusing data.
- The `Group By` menu has been limited to `stage_id` and `date` as bringing
more data trough the different `GROUP BY` statements up to the higher level
is costly. Further more, additional `Group By` did not bring added value
as the Chart was less readable.
- The JS code has been adapted in order to force a group by both `stage_id`
and `date` so that the date displayed is always making sense.
- The sort ascending and descending options have been removed as creating
confusing data.
- The compare with previous period has also been removed as the chart only
really make sense when seen chronologically.
- A lot of tests have been added in order to ensure that changes that would
be harmful for the report will trigger test fails.
task-2845729
Co-authored-by: Yannick Tivisse <yti@odoo.com>
This commit makes various adapations in addons with respect to
the introduction of the owl kanban view. Mainly, some selectors
in scss and in tests needed to be adapted. Moreover, in some tests
that we haven't adapted yet, we must ensure that legacy form and
list views are still used (useLegacyViews).
It also contains some adaptations in kanban templates, e.g. the
replacement of moment by luxon, the removal of underscore...
Part-of: odoo/odoo#92475
This commit allows project users to create and modify their own personal
stages.
A lot of overrides have been done on the kanban view to handle our
multiple cases.
Project user will now only see the options to create columns/edit stages
when grouping by personal stage.
This is hardcoded and does not follow possible custom access rules
however.
Any stage created while grouping by personal stage will directly be
assigned to the user and will be seen in the 'My Tasks' menu.
A special method has been added to delete a personal stage.
Upon deletion any task assigned to this personal stage will move to a
lower sequence stage if possible otherwise the next in line.
TaskId-2858445
closesodoo/odoo#92103
X-original-commit: 7b3acbc0b0c21ab106b1b34d9f5c8bc1ceb2fe58
Signed-off-by: William Braeckman (wbr) <wbr@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
*crm, project
With owl2, the `el` of components is no longer available. It still
works in Odoo on LegacyComponent, which has been introduced to ease
the switch from owl1 to owl2, and we're now incrementally removing
it.
With this commit, the action scrolling helpers no longer rely on
component.el, meaning that views using them (through the hook
`useSetupAction`) no longer need to extend LegacyComponent.
More specifically, we move the action scrolling helpers from core/
to webclient/actions, as those helpers make no sense outside the
context of actions (and thus are unnecessary in the frontend).
Tests have been adapted as well.
closesodoo/odoo#85631
Related: odoo/enterprise#24902
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
For the moment we cannot groupby an inherited field (which is therefore related) in a graph view, so it is counted as being non-stored.
Because in the `_normalize` function we do not process fields that are not stored, whereas like here
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d679cd0d8ba9a2420e81a42a698763e9be2327e1/addons/web/static/src/legacy/js /control_panel/groupby_menu.js#L45-L49.
Typically when a field has store=False but sortable=True it is inherited from a stored field, so it can be sortable
So we have to use `sortable` instead of `sort` to make it consistent.
opw-2733133
closesodoo/odoo#84612
X-original-commit: ce2a538e2988aef572171f783891cd6ee644ad14
Related: odoo/enterprise#24351
Signed-off-by: Achraf <abz@odoo.com>
Before this commit, we duplicate some steps of the tour js launched
with internal user to the tour js launched with portal user.
This commit avoid duplicating the steps. To do this, a list variable
stores the common steps of both tours and use this list in both tour
js to avoid duplicating the steps in both tour js.
task-2648955
Closes#82379
When a user double clicks on a record in the kanban view of the form view of project a crash occurs.
This happens because there is an init which is called twice and during the second time the component created during the first click is destroyed and a DOM_updated event is still trigger which leads to a crash because in the case of project_form there is has a use of the element's dom which is then no longer available.
There is the same case in "FieldHtmlWithAction" and in "MassMailingFullWidthFormController"
The problem can be easily fixed by using on_attached_callback and on_detach_callback instead of setting a listener on DOM_updated in the init method.
opw-2685867
closesodoo/odoo#81680
X-original-commit: 8d83433d463dd3d1aef321921939962883f57d68
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Achraf <abz@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the collaborator clicks on the favorite menu,
he has a traceback because the 'spreadsheet' service is not available.
Since we don't want to use this service and we just want the menu item
to save the current as favorite. This commit override the favorite menu
to remove the registry items to add the menu item and we just add the
one we want.
task-2633229
closes#77156
X-original-commit: d970c13494db2c3e085155b7855b656fbbe26467
This commit fixes the broken inheritence between project and
hr_timesheet modules regarding the GraphView.
Hr Timesheet module extends GraphView rather than ProjectGraphView which
makes the view unaware it should use the ProjectControlPanel.
This commit adds project tour steps to ensure every view contains the
project update breadcrumb.
task-2642872
closesodoo/odoo#78503
X-original-commit: aa59771d3a4ffd2f7372c58bf56ca8dcc1183d2e
Signed-off-by: LTU-Odoo <IT-Ideas@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Libioulle (tle) <tlibioulle@users.noreply.github.com>
-- This is a follow-up of odoo/enterprise#72736 --
The project overview is a significant technical debt
as it is a custom qweb view. It is quite limited:
It is not possible to group the data, to filter on dates,
SOs or Field Service projects.
Improving this is very difficult and would require weeks
of development that are not worth it.
In any case, all the information provided by the project overview
can be found elsewhere. The stat buttons of the report are basically
duplicates of the ones from the project form view.
Therefore, we are removing this report and its twin,
the Project Costs and Revenues.
In addition, analytic items lack context for the user to understand
what generated a certain cost or revenue:
there is no link to the source document;
the entries are not categorized (e.g. it is not easy to understand
if a cost comes from a timesheet cost, a purchase order or an expense);
the billable type group by works fine for timesheets but then all
the other entries are flagged as Undefined, which is not very helpful;
there is no option to easily isolate costs from revenues.
task-2637495
See odoo/enterprise#20740closesodoo/odoo#77547
X-original-commit: 9bbfd3c8f948a3a947cbc0eb73ffc5d89c23d4ca
Related: odoo/enterprise#21324
Signed-off-by: LTU-Odoo <IT-Ideas@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds an unit test to start a tour with an internal user
connected to test the project sharing feature. Another test is
created to start a tour with a portal user connected to test the
project sharing feature.
part of task-2633229
closesodoo/odoo#76906
X-original-commit: db7825efb1b5cc052ecc795f9c81db5f3f58a5d3
Signed-off-by: LTU-Odoo <IT-Ideas@users.noreply.github.com>
Elements referring to the sales order from the project module have been
removed from the project update js tour and moved to sale_timesheet
tour.
task-2638359
closes#76166
X-original-commit: 0b9d5b4a9c5552e22bb6a8f89b0e492330a034fd
Before this commit, we rename the 'Edit' button into 'See more' but we
prefer to directly edit the project when we click on this button
So, it is to have 'Edit' as name and directly enter in the form view of
the project in edit mode.
This commit renames the button into 'Edit'.
task-2638359
closes#76166
X-original-commit: e960b2966bdd16f369df9fbd8e4cf372c37bd37a
This commit improves the project updates panel and the data reported
in the update description.
This commit prepares the removal of the project overview feature.
PR : #72736
See odoo/upgrade#2706
task-2545084
Previously, the step produced an owl error do to the fact that
FormViewDialogComponentAdapter parent component was not ready in the
view.
This commit adds a timeout, that waits the component to be completely
rendered.
Associated PR : #68899
Associated task : task-2393768
closesodoo/odoo#71605
Signed-off-by: LTU-Odoo <IT-Ideas@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds some unit tests in JS to check to check the line chart
for the burndown chart. If this view can be stacked as bar chart and the
stacked button is hidden only when the mode is pie chart in the graph
view.
task-2458017
Previously, we could only set cover image on the kanban view of project
task. This commit makes the feature generic so now cover image can be
added to any kanban view.
Technical notes:
- field used to display the cover image has to be set as 'data-field'
attribute on the kanban dropdown's menu related to cover image
- developer will have to take care while designing kanban views with
cover image ability in such a way that it does not break the design
Task 32108
closesodoo/odoo#31731
Signed-off-by: Martin Geubelle (mge) <mge@openerp.com>
stefanorigano (SRI)