Before this commit:
when reset template, the strategy is
1. write the template value from the data file with_context(lang=None)
(some legacy translations may be kept, if their en_US values were not changed)
2. use the translations in the po file to override current translations
But when a term is not translated in the po file
(for example, all en_UK terms, since we don't have en.po),
the old translation of the term cannot be overridden and reset
After this commit:
Thanks to the new feature introduced in #109858, the translation for a term can
be voided before the step 2
As a result, translations for model translated fields can be correctly reset
opw-3241014
closesodoo/odoo#121201
X-original-commit: 43afdc20d2fc01668ae2665240fc2be26b45ebf5
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Chong (cwg) <cwg@odoo.com>
When receiving an email on a mailbox with an alias that triggers the
creation of invoices, 4 bugs could occur.
1. If the xml received contains replacement characters (U+FFFD �), and
the charset of the part of the email is "US-ASCII" the encoding of the
string will fail, preventing the rest of the flow to be completed. Be
more resilient, encode the string and ignores these characters if this
case occurs.
NB: sometimes, the charset is omitted for a Content-type: text/xml. This
is valid but not recommended (see:
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2376.txt). In this case, the default used is
"US-ASCII". This means that any non-ascii char will be lost (they are
replaced by the replacement character: �, see:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/3.10/Lib/email/contentmanager.py#L67)
when decoding the attachment.
2. When the xml attachment is created in Odoo, the mimetype is
'text/plain' (rather than 'application/xml'). Thus, the
`_decode_attachment` needs to be more flexible when guessing the type of
the attachment (to know which function to use to read the content of the
attachment and create the invoice).
3. When creating an invoice from an email with an xml attachment, the
xml is attached as the `message_main_attachment_id`. It's only later on
that the content of the xml is read and we possibly find the PDF in
base64 inside. When creating the PDF attachment, it was not set as the
`message_main_attachment_id`, so the PDF was not rendered on the right
part of the invoice form view. Add a clause to replace the
`message_main_attachment_id` in such a case.
4. When the xml attachment represents a credit note, the move_type of
the invoice created by the email alias needs to be changed. Indeed, the
invoice is created before decoding the attachment, so we can only change
the `move_type` later.
opw-3144519
opw-3149649
closesodoo/odoo#121076
X-original-commit: 1e193a92b9c84e75b958985f8067873b90f686e0
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Van Roy <juvr@odoo.com>
Issue 1: before this patch it was impossible to create a manual model
marked as "Is blacklist". The reason is that a blacklist model
implicitly need an `email` field, but such field is impossible to add in
a manual model: the field must start with `x_`.
Solution: append `x_` to the implicit email field. Note, in principle
the user gets an error if `x_email` is not present. Solved by adding the
field when creating the custom model. Ideally we should show some hint
in the interface to make it more user friendly. That is out of the scope
of this patch.
Issue 2: when we have a manual model that is mail blacklist it's
impossible to create its model class. We get an error because the MRO is
not correct. The reason is that we are adding `mail.thread.blacklist`
_after_ `mail.thread` in the `_inherit` list. That list is used to
generated the `__bases__` of the model class[1]. According to Python's
MRO rules[2], since `mail.thread.blacklist` appears after `mail.thread`
as parents of the custom model class this order _must_ be respected. But
`mail.thread` must appear _before_ `mail.thread.blacklist` because the
latter inherits from the former. This is a contradiction and the MRO
algorithm cannot succeed. To put it in a simple example:
```py
class A: pass
class B(A): pass
# This fails:
# class C(A, B): pass
# The right order is:
class C(B, A): pass
# Equivalent to:
class D(B): pass
# C and D have the same MRO linearization excluding themselves
assert D.mro()[1:] == C.mro()[1:]
```
Example traceback:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/14.0/odoo/service/server.py", line 1201, in preload_registries
registry = Registry.new(dbname, update_module=update_module)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/14.0/odoo/modules/registry.py", line 89, in new
odoo.modules.load_modules(registry._db, force_demo, status, update_module)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/14.0/odoo/modules/loading.py", line 464, in load_modules
registry.setup_models(cr)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/14.0/odoo/modules/registry.py", line 263, in setup_models
env['ir.model']._add_manual_models()
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/14.0/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_model.py", line 430, in _add_manual_models
Model = model_class._build_model(self.pool, cr)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/14.0/odoo/models.py", line 585, in _build_model
ModelClass.__bases__ = tuple(bases)
TypeError: Cannot create a consistent method resolution
order (MRO) for bases BaseModel, mail.thread, mail.thread.blacklist, base
```
Solution: check if a model inherits from `mail.thread.blacklist` first.
There is no need to add `mail.thread` if inheriting
`mail.thread.blacklist` because the inheritance is already implicit.
This issue was observed during upgrades. We convert custom models and
fields into manual to allow upgrading without custom code. This causes
issues because the MRO error appears when a custom model inherits mail
blacklist.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/02f820fb0eaddbb3a4269a0967184c8aaf52c363/odoo/models.py#L585
[2]: https://www.python.org/download/releases/2.3/mro/closesodoo/odoo#120977
X-original-commit: 8848bb57ff7f086d801178c582d7f6371eeb8479
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvaro Fuentes Suarez (afu) <afu@odoo.com>
Allow partner to unfollow a document from a follow up email of that document
through an unsubscribe URL in the email even if not connected.
It works for internal user for follow up on any document and for any partner on
follow up of document tagged as authorizing being unfollowed by any partner (
slide.channel and slide.slide).
Technical note:
The unfollow block is rendered in mail_thread and updated for each recipient in
mail_mail. We don't render it in mail_mail because we don't have the language
of the message at that point.
Depending on the partner and the related document, the unfollow block is:
- either removed if the user cannot unfollow the document (for example if it
doesn't follow it)
- or updated with partner and document information + a security token
Task-3061864
Part-of: odoo/odoo#107978
Allow users to unfollow easily document from the inbox for which he/she doesn't
want to be notified anymore.
When hovering on a follow up message with a related document followed by the
user, the interface displays an action to unfollow it that allows the user to
remove himself/herself as follower of the document. As a result of performing
that action a toast is displayed as a feedback.
Technical note:
The unfollow link is displayed on a message.canUnfollow is true which check
that the thread related to the message is followed by the user.
In order to know if the user follows the record related to the message, we now
transmit with each message the id of the follower table that link the user to
the related record if it follows it. This allows to insert the follower on
client side so that the unfollow action can use the standard mechaism already
developed to unfollow a record.
Unfortunately, that information coudn't be added in the already public method
message_format of mail message because that method is not always called on the
user retreiving the message but also by the one posting message. We didn't want
also to include all followers in the formated message so we rely on additional
method that add that information per partner.
To support unfollowing a document in the inbox no matter the current company,
we have modified message_unsubscribe in mail_thread to allow internal user to
unsubscribe themself without checking any rights. Indeed, some document have
record rule that prevents reading it if the user is not in the right company
(ex. crm.lead) and then was preventing the user to unfollow the document using
that method.
Task-3061864
Part-of: odoo/odoo#107978
Currently some auto_reply templates are internal as a means to prevent
notifying users everytime we send a reply to somebody.
This raises the issue that since responses to internal notifications
are themselves internal notifications, often nobody will be notified of
responses to these automated messages.
We fix this by marking these messages as auto_comments, which will
ensure responses to these messages are
considered non-internal (and thus 'discussions', by default).
task-2834304
closesodoo/odoo#94018
Related: odoo/enterprise#35466
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
If a tracked value sent a mail template on creation of a record,
the template was displayed before the original message in the chatter.
We fix this by using precommit hooks similar to those already used for
tracking.
We also update the query count for a couple of tests. This is required
because in those tests the test user is not in the cache when we execute
the precommit hook, which we use to fetch a fallback language early in
the precommit.
Task-2834304
Part-of: odoo/odoo#94018
By this commit, If a user edits the message body or changes
the message attachments, the edited label in the blob,
shows the last edit Info.
Task-2664848
closesodoo/odoo#117896
Related: odoo/enterprise#40208
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Adds `id` in the `mail.activity`'s order to force deterministic order in
case multiple activities have the same deadline.
Not having a deterministic order can cause issue when tests check
activities' values but don't ensure they are sorted also by id.
closesodoo/odoo#120034
X-original-commit: b0a99bde8efef287f3ed89afb9da2a67233d4bd8
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
As a bonus, add cross-tab update for current user in chatter.
Part of task-3265211
closesodoo/odoo#120018
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Before this PR, link previews where not updated when a user was editing a
message.
This clear the current link previews and reprocess the updated message.
closesodoo/odoo#119917
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
The opportunity is taken to clean the methods to make the override
actually possible.
Part of task-3265211
closesodoo/odoo#119942
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
This commit focuses on removing all references to discuss.channel from
controllers of mail module.
In preparation of splitting discuss and mail modules.
Part of task-3265211
closesodoo/odoo#119523
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
This commit focuses on removing all references to discuss.channel from
code located in /models of mail module.
In preparation of splitting discuss and mail modules.
Part of task-3265211
closesodoo/odoo#119413
Signed-off-by: Debondt Didier (did) <did@odoo.com>
Enforce strict types for returned values for
* create
* write
* unlink
* default_get
to make those methods more consistent and reliable.
Also make sure they can be called with empty self/values,
i.e. that they follow the same behavior as the base methods
defined in the main orm Model.
closesodoo/odoo#116809
Related: odoo/enterprise#38880
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
this commit removes unnecessary modal that does not let users create
a new users from apps like crm, sale, etc. Now instead of giving requests
that lack email redirectWarning, we open user creation form where user must
set email up.
Reason behind this change is the fact that login is required at the model level,
so the manual checks for this value is not necessary anymore.
task-3262468
closesodoo/odoo#119508
X-original-commit: 7796e8ca971167a96b23baa4b57056c2007ea8b4
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
* = bus, calendar, crm_livechat, hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail_bot,
mass_mailing, privacy_lookup, test_discuss_full, test_mail,
test_mail_full, website_crm_livechat, website_livechat, base
In preparation of splitting discuss and mail modules.
Part of task-3265211
closesodoo/odoo#118354
Related: odoo/upgrade#4553
Related: odoo/enterprise#39661
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Lot of override of read_group reimplement partially custom security
rule of `_search` method. In order to simplify these security check
and have a consistent behavior between the search and read_group method,
_read_group now use _search to create the from and where clause.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#110737
A new `_track_set_author` method is now available to explicitly set the
author of the tracking messages.
Related Enterprise PR: odoo/enterprise#38986closesodoo/odoo#117073
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Configure incoming mail server and set it to create X record
on incoming mails (X can be any model with a chatter)
- Create a CSV file and set the encoding to UTF-16
- Send the CSV file through Gmail to the Odoo instance
- Go to model X and open the created record
- In the chatter, click/download the CSV file
- Open the downloaded file with Geany (or any file editor that can
show the file encoding)
Issue:
The file encoding is not the same as the original file (utf-8 instead
of utf-16).
Working with Outlook.
Cause:
The difference between Outlook and Gmail is that Gmail provides the
charset of the file.
The content of the mail is retrieved using `email` python lib.
The lib will try to retrieve the charset of the file and fallback
on `ASCII` if not available, then return the decode content.
```python
def get_text_content(msg, errors='replace'):
content = msg.get_payload(decode=True)
charset = msg.get_param('charset', 'ASCII')
return content.decode(charset, errors=errors)
```
Example:
content = b'd\x00a\x00,\x00,\x00,\......'
Outlook:
charset = 'ASCII'
return => 'd\x00a\x00,\x00,\x00...'
Gmail:
charset = 'UTF-16LE'
return => 'da,,,,,\n,,,,,\....'
In the post process of the attachment, the content is encoded in
'utf-8' (to then encoded in base64) before creating the attachment
record.
Content encoded to 'utf-8':
Outlook: b'd\x00a\x00,\x00,\x00...'
Gmail: b'da,,,,,\n,,,,,\n....'
Therefore, when writing the file on the disk, the encoding is based
on the binary content.
Solution:
When parsing the mail, add the encoding charset to the `info` variable.
Then, when creating the attachment, use the charset in `info` (or
fallback on 'utf'8' if no charset set) to encode the content.
opw-3089009
closesodoo/odoo#118694
X-original-commit: 2d1b13e68d8bb204ecfe12a9d3db519c4264592c
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nasreddin Boulif (bon) <bon@odoo.com>
Templates could previously be created for abstract models.
The methods are not written with that in mind and most useful ones will
raise an exception when calling them on that template.
task-3162320
X-original-commit: 0d4b473ee54d2376f4f71efd864aa0e16822d4ba
Part-of: odoo/odoo#118710
When using message_post, the body format must be explicitly specified.
If html is expected, a Markup object should be used.
If text is given, the content will be escaped.
Before this PR:
message_post was unaware if the content of a message was HTML or
text. This lead to multiple situation where the content was
incorrectly considered as HTML and led to display errors.
In
self.message_post(body="Hello %s!" % self.name)
if the name contained HTML, it would be evaluated.
In
self.message_post(body="Contact Raoul <raoul@caramail.be>")
the email would not be displayed as considered as unknown HTML and
discarded by the sanitizer
Now each call must explict the type of content.
Use the escape() helper to properly combine Markup and translations.
It would also be acceptable to use Markup() to wrap a static
translation but escape is better as one can not guarantee the content
of a translation.
closesodoo/odoo#111850
Related: odoo/documentation#3612
Related: odoo/enterprise#36728
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
With this commit, messages can be pinned on a channel and
chat conversation. There's a new menu listing all pinned
messages on a conversation, and we can jump to these messages
in the current conversation.
As this feature incentives to see older messages, this commit
also adds a "Jump to Present" button when looking at old messages.
closesodoo/odoo#116666
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Adapt code of message fetch so that fetching of
(needaction) messages are controlled in a way to
keep continuous sequence of messages at all time.
This code design solves the "holes" problem in a message
list by not allowing holes. This fixes many scenario that
generated these holes, resulting in unfetchable messages.
Example of such a scenario:
- post 40 messages
- post a new message that is reply of the oldest message
- page reload and scroll up until load more
=> 10 messages are missing in-between replied message and
following message (that should have been 11 messages apart)
This code also prepares for allowing jumps in a conversation.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#116666
"Order by" makes the query really slow.
On a database with 1000000 partner and 10000 user, this query goes from 5.5s to
600ms. Once cached by Pgsql it goes down below 100ms.
task-2982401
closesodoo/odoo#118198
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
While we run cron `Data Merge: Find Duplicate Records` an issue raises because
`data_merge.model` has no method `_message_compute_subject`. Indeed it is
possible to notify on non-thread models but that method is a thread-only
method.
In this commit, we only call `_message_compute_subject` when it's available
in model.
sentry-3947126655
Task-3254379
Part-of: odoo/odoo#117763
Before this commit, the portal user get a Access Error.
After this commit, the portal user see the chatter without error.
The code works with reaction browsed in sudo, but since we use a ior
with a record not in sudo, we loose the sudo flag and so the right for
portal user to read it.
```py
x = record.sudo()
y = record
x |= y -> (x, y) in sudo
y |= x -> (x, y) not in sudo
```
How to reproduce ?
Assign lead to a portal user
Post a message with another user like demo on the lead
Add reaction with the admin user
Open the opportunity on the portal with portal user
-> access error
opw-3215507
closesodoo/odoo#117313
X-original-commit: 2bde53541b7a0171c7d1b89e0e412d624f5eab37
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten <jke@odoo.com>
Currently there is no way of knowing who changed the address
of a partner. This field is of high importance and should be
tracked to be able to follow who is editing it.
As addresses are represented with a bunch of fields, tracking
them individually would result in weird-looking tracking
messages with each value stacked on top of the other.
To avoid this, we take advantage of the fact that tracking can
be used on non-stored compute fields to log any change as a
change over the full address.
The full address is derived from the contact_address field to
take advantage of the existing regional formatting of addresses.
It is however modified to replace return to lines with commas to
accomodate the formatting of tracking messages in the front-end.
task-3165293
closesodoo/odoo#114695
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Use case
--------
If the a user has partner_share set to NULL not to 'false'
he will not receive any notification
The orm consider False and NULL value as False for boolean field,
the query that fetch the recipient data should have a consistent
behavior
closesodoo/odoo#117083
X-original-commit: a50fbd1f9404fd05eb576474eb3d10c94d37aa52
Signed-off-by: Thibault Francois <tfr@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
`PartnerRoot` is a confusing name for what is in fact what everyone call `odoobot`
closesodoo/odoo#116823
Signed-off-by: Debondt Didier (did) <did@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Install l10n_mx modules
- Switch to MX company
- Create invoice and confirm it
- Send it to PAC in test environment (Process Now button)
- Click Send & Print button
Issue:
- XML Preview does not display, only shows the file name in the top right corner of the chatter.
Cause:
In l10n_mx_edi, when posting the invoice, the only attachment available is the xml sent to the government in `_message_set_main_attachment_id`.
Therefore the xml is set as the main attachment.
When clicking on "Send and Print", the pdf is generated but the main attachment is still the xml
Solution:
Redefine the main attachment everytime the the main attachment is an xml
Note:
- octet-stream have also been filtered out
opw-3085934
closesodoo/odoo#116784
X-original-commit: 48e6e81a47f5371f5985d135e56f39f445eb2854
Related: odoo/enterprise#38861
Signed-off-by: Yolann Sabaux (yosa) <yosa@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
If applied, this commit will solve the keyError for _invalidate_documents.
Before this commit:
============================================
KeyError 'rating' or 'False' occurs when a user tries to send a message and
_invalidate_documents() takes the parameter model equal to 'rating' or 'False'.
but the model 'rating' is not available in the database and It will be accessed
by the self.pool[model].
After this commit:
============================================
Solved the issue when the model 'rating' is not available or the model is 'False'
while sending a message.
sentry - 3956327451
closesodoo/odoo#116302
X-original-commit: 5becbca6531d5829bee262a5c1b64ae5e0917f8e
Signed-off-by: Anh Thao PHAM <pta@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
According to Wiktionary, French spacing is "the archaic practice (though
still current in French) of inserting a space around colons, semicolons,
question marks, and exclamation marks". This is not standard practice in
English and most languages of the world.
The purpose of this commit is to start purging the code from this typo,
as it may reflect poorly on the software for some people.
closesodoo/odoo#116167
Related: odoo/enterprise#38542
Signed-off-by: Louis Wicket (wil) <wil@odoo.com>
Since [1], the `temporary_id` of a message is passed to the
`message_post` route in order to renconciliate the temporary
message on the client side and the real message created by the
server.
This led to crashes when sending message on the chatter because
this parameter was not allowed as a `_notify_thread` parameter.
Since this parameter is highly specific and isn't linked to any
business/model code, this parameter is now passed via the context
thus solving this issue.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/116085closesodoo/odoo#116333
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
This commit removes the "new message" separator when posting a
message on a channel.
At the same time, this commit solves an issue that caused messages
to flicker when the message came from the bus before the answer of
the rpc.
In order to do so:
- messages are marked as read immediately after
`message_post` for the member of user that posted it.
- a temporary id is passed to `message_post` in order
to reconcialiate temporary/server messages.
task-3232911
closesodoo/odoo#116085
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Previously:
The displaying of the technical menu email would be cut
if you had a zoom of > than 100% on your browser
Currently:
It allows to see the whole content of the message without scrolling.
closesodoo/odoo#116124
X-original-commit: 5055b374c3bac0126f441dad61afd7e0b68b1370
Signed-off-by: Dalcq Jordan (joda) <joda@odoo.com>
OSError: cannot read from timed out object while evaluating a
"model._fetch_mails()", it occurs because when we try to quit a POP server
of incoming mail using the "pop_server.quit()" method, sometimes it is not
able to reach the remote server to quit the pop server, so it throws an OSError.
We added the try block for POP and IMAP.
if it fails then we display the os error.
sentry-3932133536
closesodoo/odoo#116004
X-original-commit: 0c30529cc9256c0b2483c2fcbbc599b87c1f8577
Signed-off-by: Anh Thao PHAM <pta@odoo.com>
Add back the 'sudo()' on batch mail unlinking.
Sudo is necessary to delete user notifications on auto-delete.
Which makes sense as the recipient would have an email for it anyway.
The sudo was there as far back as:
c5c369355d
Then transfered in this change:
036a739b62
And removed in the recent optimization here:
e38bfd25df1bb25e7e5695b536052d5a0c85c5c4
task-3225207
closesodoo/odoo#115956
X-original-commit: 93a28f17024511e30d3c70eb847c361ca87e0ffe
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thiry Renaud (reth) <reth@odoo.com>
In mail, changing the setting "Restrict mail templates edition and
QWEB placeholders usage" to false should remove all users but admins
from the group, including the template user.
Before this commit, you could have weird behaviou such as
1. Disable the restrictiong (group_mail_template_editor in
group_user.implied_ids)
2. Install mass_mailing (group_mail_template_editor in
group_mass_mailing_user.implied_ids)
3. Create a user test with minimum employee roles (still has
group_mail_template_editor as employee)
4. Check the box "Restrict mail templates edition and QWEB
placeholders usage"
-> test still has the template group nothing implied it
The issue was a combinaison of recomputation of implied groups
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b2f760cae74201d1622e56a0027dae67dcff9e33/odoo/addons/base/models/res_users.py#L1292-L1295
that triggered the synchronisation of groups on template user
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b2f760cae74201d1622e56a0027dae67dcff9e33/odoo/addons/base/models/res_users.py#L611-L616
By removing the users already in a group, we avoid falling into the
condition added at 121cd0d608 where the default user gets a
group removed, readded, hence added for everybody.
closesodoo/odoo#115108
X-original-commit: 6398dd287f07641c85807f291d9fe078fcb8a231
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Chong Wang (cwg)