The SQL view implementing the "Invoice Analysis" report
JOINs the res.currency.rate table in order to obtain the
correct currency rate to convert each invoice line amount
in the same currency.
The matching of the rate needs to be done on the date
of that rate (`name` column) - the last rate preceding
the invoice date is presumed to be the right one.
However there is no simple way to make a direct JOIN between
account.invoice.line and res.currency.rate with a single
match, without using an ORDER BY clause and LIMIT 1.
This requires a costly SUBSELECT query for each invoice
line, quickly becoming prohibitive.
Through the use of PostgreSQL's Common Table Expressions
(CTE) it is possible to construct a temporary table
with the rates' start and end date of application.
This temporary table can then be used in a direct
JOIN with account.invoice.line, delivering much better
performance (no SUBSELECT needed for each invoice line)
On a database with 50k invoice lines this makes invoice
analysis return results in less than 800 ms instead of
10+ seconds.
This is related to rev. ab9f02cdee
The above rev. take care to exclude payments that are not yet due;
meaning the ones due in the future, by checking the maturity
date.
Problem: Payments (e.g. move lines from bank statements)
do not have a maturity date. Only move lines that actually
have a maturity date, in the future, must be excluded,
not the one that do not have a maturity date.
opw-633930
Revert c06a96 "[FIX] stock: force recomputing transfer information on picking"
and unlink packoperations only when move lines are changed (fix opw 620636).
c06a96 introduced a regression as it prevents to plan moves (e.g. assigning lots
through the barcode interface) before the reception.
Since commit ffb8bf3 when doing fast succeeding kanban view searches,
several results could be concatenated together (if the next searches are
started before results are displayed).
This fix make fix the mutex so searches on kanban view are sequentials,
hence several concurrent searches are started one after the other and
not at the same time.
closes#6513
opw-632525
The domain on account.account was preprocessed in search method but it had no
effect on read_group. This lead to inconsistency or errors when using 'goup by'
filter.
Move domain processing in '_where_calc' method instead as this is used by both
'search' and 'read_group'.
when closing a modal, the class 'modal-open' was removed from the
'body' tag and all the existing modals became not scrollable.
The class 'modal-open' must be kept in the 'body' tag if there is
still a visible modal in the dom.
Inspired from commit: dee000be14
opw:633801
This reverts commit 24526b18a7.
The journal_id field is not present on account.account but is processed in
search method.
Next commit will improve the processing to also accept journal_id in read_group.
Migrate the models and controller to new API. Renaming xml id according to convention, renaming openerp tag into odoo tag. Add comment strings and documentations.
Adding an image from the frontend use ir.attachment or pre-existing url
and set the url in the blog.post's background_image field. This is
not the same as a binary field which sets the data in the field.
Since it's possible to do it in the frontend, there is no use of the
field in the backend. This fix removes this field.
closes#6497
issue #1305
opw-633725
The onchange partner on the sale.order set the 'note' field as the terms of the
company in the partner's language.
When the SO is created from an opportunity, the terms are not translated.
Call get_salenote method that handles patner's language.
Commit 8a6e859 wrongly introduced this new field when adding the new
`payment_authorize` module.
As 8.0 is a [stable version](http://git.io/vfACM), no data model change
is allowed.
We convert this field to a `fields.dummy` in case someone installed (or
update) this module with this fields to ensure the view still applied
and is not broken.
Forcing a related field to be required causes some issues. Having such a field
in a one2many relation may block the creation of records in the field, as the
main record does not exist yet, and the field has no value.
It may also cause trouble if the field is stored: being required constrains the
corresponding column to be NOT NULL. Inserting a row will fail, because
related fields are currently determined *after* the row insertion.
The function _unite_compute and _unit_compute_inv did not give the same display result.
Regardless the way the tax is computed, the display must be the same. The display must
only shows the name of the tax.
opw:633828
-Test the function _bom_find to check that it searches the bom corresponding
to the properties passed or takes the bom with the smallest sequence.
For this commit: d357667df4279070b51af58cad55ef314688d69f
- Test the function _bom_explode to check that it only takes the lines with the
right properties.
For this commit: 6b6e71a3e0c86aa8a9b8c4f20eaa61b17c64ce7b
Now it's possible to put a property on a bom line.
For example, the bom for an apple pie and for an apricot pie can be made
in a single bom.
Three lines are necessary in the bom of the product "pie":
- First line with product " dough" without property
- Second line, with product "apple" with property "apple" if you want an apple pie
- Third line, with product "apricot" with property "apricot" if you want an apricot pie
The type of this bom pie must be "set" to allow the customer to assemblate
his favorite pie by himself.
Now to sell an apple pie, you must create a SO with the product "pie" and
the property "apple".
In that way, the delivery order consists of two lines:
- dough
- apple
The bom related to the product in a sale line order must be
filtered by the function _bom_find. If two boms can be applied
on a product, the bom with the smallest sequence is applied.
opw:632558
This fix gives the domain to the "See selection" view opened from a
FieldCharDomain.
In Odoo 8.0, this widget is available at two places:
- mass_mailing: Marketing > Mass Mailing | Mass Mailing > (any
newsletter) > "See selection".
- gamification: Settings > Gamification Tools > Challenge > (any
challenge) > "See selection".
With this fix the "Selected records" view display selected records.
closes#6463
opw-633201
Sylvain GARANCHER