289adeb63f introduced a bug where we tried to trigger an event on an element that didn't exist. Indeed there is no input if it's not in edit mode.
This commit fixes it.
PR: none
Task: none
When there is no handle field, there was an unnecessary margin-left. When there was a handle field, the margin-left wasn't the correct way to align it.
PR: #26566
Task: 1869469
* mail, calendar
- Fix traceback when clicking on a tag without color field (introduced
in recent changes)
- Properly allow to delete tags on firefox (a button obviously cannot
contain another button)
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/26547
Thanks to @hbh-odoo
In a one2many, pressing ENTER or TAB from a required input (of type text or char) that is on the last editable column of its line would fail to navigate to next line.
The issue was that the validation of the required field would happen before the change to its value was actually applied.
This commit fixes it.
PR: #26430
Task: 1869469
This rev. allows to navigate, in mobile, through records in form
views by swiping.
We also moved mobile-specific tests involving a form view to the
mobile test suite, since those tests became async because of the
lazy loading of the swipe lib (in the mobile suite, that lib is
already loaded).
Related to task #34727
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
Currently, to remove link of x2m field from any record, sometimes there's no way.
For example, if we are on mobile and open any Quotation, it's linked quotation lines
are automatically converted in kanban, and there is no way to delete a line from
that quotation. However, in some of the manually designed kanban, there is special 'x'
for removing / unlinking x2m record, for example, Contacts of Partner.
This commit makes the behavior more consistent. During edition (mobile and desktop), if
a view dialog is opened on click of x2m field, it will have one 'Remove' button (based
on user rights) on right side of dialog footer, allowing users to delete / unlink the
record. Moreover, in mobile, the modal is opened fullscreen, with sticky header and
footer.
Related Task# : 31641
Closes PR #15857
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
example: <field name="product_id" options="{'no_open': True}" readonly="1"/>
This has been broken by rev. 43d21dd9c due to misplaced parentheses
(an empty object in javascript being truthy).
From this rev., the empty value isn't available in the options of
required selection fields, thus preventing the user to unset it.
Related to task #49262Closes#24404
Before this commit, Odoo used checkboxes in three different ways:
- A simple <input type="checkbox"/>, mainly in the frontend. The style
is browser dependant.
- Same as above but with the BS3, checkbox structure. The style is still
the same, but the alignement is supposed to be better (which is not
always the case).
- The Odoo official structure:
```
<div class="o_checkbox">
<input type="checkbox"/>
<span/>
</div>
```
which allows to have a cross-browser checkbox style and correct
alignements.
The goal after this commit is to only use the BS4 *custom* checkbox
structure to achieve the same goal as our official structure (and
remove that one):
```
<div class="custom-control custom-checkbox">
<input type="checkbox" class="custom-control-input" id="customCheck1">
<label class="custom-control-label" for="customCheck1">...</label>
</div>
```
/!\ Labels are now required (use a zero-width space if necessary)
- The dropdown structure was simplified, allowing to get rid of the
3-levels structure induced by <ul/> elements and dropdowns can now
contain anything. The class 'dropdown-item' is now mandatory for
each dropdown clickable element. The class 'dropdown-item-text' can
be used to add same padding and style but without making the element
have a clickable look.
- Dividers now use the class 'dropdown-divider'
- The way dropdowns are opened and hidden also changed (before the
'open' class was added on the `.dropdown-menu` parent, now the
'show' class is added on both the `.dropdown-menu` parent and the
`.dropdown-menu` itself).
- JS-wise, no click event handlers can be put on `.dropdown-toggle`
elements anymore (instead, use handlers for dropdown events).
- Carets are automatically put on `.dropdown-toggle` elements, so this
commit replaces the `.caret` elements with this. This feature was
possible to disable but would prevent us from adding a caret with
scss. Also, this simplifies the DOM. The 'o-no-caret' class was also
introduced to allow using the 'dropdown-toggle' class on non-caret
elements.
- Also adapt the scss to use $caret-width instead of $caret-width-base
Odoo made the bad choice of using the 'btn-sm' class for every button
instead of configuring the padding for default 'btn' to be smaller.
In BS4, the style of btn-sm is actually more complex, lowering the
font-size too. Also, btn-xs was removed so we would not have the
possibility to display smaller button than our default ones.
This commit removes btn-sm wherever it was used. Unfortunately, this
might remove it at some places where it made sense but this can be
restored in a second time.
The default "add a line" button creates a new line with the default values from the model. Sometimes we want to create a new line with different default values (or more generally a customized context), which is possible with this commit. Moreover it is possible to create multiple buttons for multiple default values/contexts.
This works both for in-line creation ("editable=") and dialog creation.
The new tags are:
<control> defines custom controls for the current view.
Does not support any attribute, but can have children:
<create> adds a button to create a new element on the current list.
This makes sense when the parent tree view is inside a One2many field.
If any create is defined, it will overwrite the default "add a line" button.
For more information and example, have a look at the Views documentation.
Technically, the commit will:
- parse the new XML tags (+ add appropriate validation)
- display the buttons based on the XML
- on button click/keyboard: pull up the additional context information from the button event up to the default_get
- add unit tests
- add documentation
PR #25209
Currently, using the shortcut "tab" inside a list will crash if the list has no input field (ex. if it has only a textarea field).
This commit prevents the bug.
Also moved the test for the orderedResIDs crash in the correct module.
PR #25209
- JS Modals were not correctly built anymore, their .modal-body element
was duplicated and many without-effect JS lines were introduced (as a
side effect, the form view design was broken when inside modals)
- Tests were changed to make bugs go unnoticed. For example, the media
dialog functionnality was entirely broken because the .modal-dialog
element was not receiving the correct class anymore.
- The JS translation function is _t, not _
- Do not use the <title/> tag as a regular DOM element, it is meant to
be unique, in the <head/> section
- CSS rules were added to the utils.scss file, which is meant to contain
functions and mixins, otherwise, the rule is duplicated in every asset
- Some icons were still broken, as missed by https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f90cf060a3cfeb37a67bec83264c0aaab8892b56
- Tests were changed to use [role="dialog"]/footer/header in their
selectors without any reason, this commit restores some of that to
avoid rebase conflicts with the BS4 work.
- ...
Note: other elements should still be discussed, like the direct use of
the 'o_form_label' class in views definition... but those do not cause
direct problems.
Suppose there is a one2many field embedded in a one2many,
(say we are viewing record A with one2many field B itself with a one2many C).
Furthermore, there is a second page of the one2many field B.
If an onchange is applied on B, then the server replies with a 1 command for all
B records attached to the currently viewed object A.
This includes a list of commands [[5], [4, C_id]*] for each B record,
in particular B records that are on the second page.
Since they are on the second page, they might not have been fetched by the
frontend; in that case the corresponding C_ids are thus unknown.
As a consequence, on save the frontend sends a command 0 to create the records
for all unknown C_ids.
Since it doesn't have any value to give to the 0 command, the row creation
usually crash in the backend.
Another wrong behaviour is fixed at the same time: if the server sends an update
on the list of C ids with 4 commands.
In that case, if the record has not been prefetched, we have no way to know
if the list changed or not.
To solve this, when we receive the 4 commands by the server, we send back 4
commands.
coauthored by @aab-odoo
opw 1835936
This fixes the following bug:
Creating an Invoice, clicking on Validate (with no invoice line), and then trying to add a product.
Before this fix, this would throw an error message.
Now it works.
The sequence had a static default value, but when there is an handle, it's important that new items are added at the top or the bottom of the list.
This is a rare case where the defaul_get from the server will be ignored by the view for a certain field.
This will work:
- both in editable mode (inline) and in dialog mode,
- both for X2Many and standalone list.
The scenario is:
- create a new parent model, which has a one2many
- add at least 2 one2many lines which have:
- a handle field
- a many2one, which is not required, and we will leave it empty
- reorder the lines with the handle
This will call a resequence, which calls a name_get.
With the bug that would throw an error at the RPC, but this commit fixes it.
Today, Odoo is really tricky to use without seeing the screen, it must be improved to be usable.
This PR forbid to use labels without a "for" attribute, add some title, rule and aria attributes in HTML. With that, Odoo will be fully usable with a screen reader.
* [IMP] Labels must have a for attribute. Improve accessibility.
* [IMP] Better error message when trying to read a missing cached value
* [FIX] Add some aria-label and title attributes for screen readers.
* [FIX] Template name is not included in the error message in case of SyntaxError in QWeb
* [FIX] Improve the Tour failed at step error message to be more explicit.
* [IMP] Add aria-labels
* [FIX] Add missing aria-label on failing test
* [IMP] aria-hidden means hidden. Fix all bad aria-hidden and hide aria-hidden for all.
* [IMP] Color names on kanban views and many2many tags
* [IMP] Add some checks on views for accessibility.
* [IMP] Add `alt` attribute on `img` tags.
* [IMP] Add aria-label and title on non-described icons
* [IMP] Add button role to widgets with btn class
* [IMP] Translate aria and formatted attributes.
* [IMP] Remove wrong aria-labelledby
* [IMP] Add menu role on dropdowns
* [IMP] Buttons must be focusable
* [IMP] Add aria attributes on progress bars
* [IMP] Improve accessibility of basic widgets
* [IMP] Change main layout to more semantic tags
* [IMP] Add menuitem role when missing
* [IMP] Remove wrong role='presentation'
* [IMP] Improve accessibility of tab panels
* [IMP] Add aria-invalid on invalid fields
* [IMP] Add aria-sort on ordered columns
* [IMP] Add role on alerts
* [IMP] Use dialog role, header, main and footer tags for modals
* [IMP] Add labels on o_status
* [IMP] Improve accessibility of kanban view with feeds and articles
* [IMP] Add alerts in case of new messages
* [IMP] Add widget, navigation or img role to aria-labelled items
Let's assume a one2many A inside a form view, such that the one2many
views (list, not editable, and form) are defined inline, and there is an
onchange on A. There is another inline one2many B editable list
displayed in the inner form view (and B isn't in the list). There are
two records on the one2many A, both of them having one record in their
one2many B. Edit the first record of A, and edit it's subrecord in B.
Click on save. This triggers an onchange on A and the onchange returns a
command 5 (DELETE_ALL), and two commands 1 (UPDATE). Now edit the second
record of A, and simply close the dialog (e.g. 'Discard'). Save the main
record: the record in one2many B of the second record of A has been duplicated.
This occured because the code in BasicModel messed up information coming
from the onchange (UPDATE command) and from the read (performed when
opening the second record), thus producing a CREATE command instead of
an UPDATE one.
This rev. ensures to properly mix the read data with the onchange
result, by transfering the changes over the list datapoint created after
the read.
opw-1836785
closes#25330
Let's assume a one2many list with two fields A and B, and an
onchange on A that sets B. Before this rev., on new records, the
onchange was only triggered if the one2many list was defined
inline.
Rev. 13c885195 was an attempt to fix the onchange issue in x2manys
with non inline views, but it only worked on existing records. This
rev. fixes the problem for both cases (existing and new records),
and thus reverts the fix of 13c885195.
The idea of this fix is to make both cases behave similarly, w.r.t.
fields and viewFields stuff in the fieldsView. In the inline case
(like in the main view case), fields and viewFields are the same.
In the non inline case, viewFields contained more information than
fields. As fields is used everywhere in BasicModel (and viewFields
is basically ignored), the fix is to set fields to viewFields.
Let's assume a one2many list with two fields A and B, and an
onchange on A that sets B. Before this rev., on new records, the
onchange was only triggered if the one2many list was defined
inline.
Rev. 13c885195 was an attempt to fix the onchange issue in x2manys
with non inline views, but it only worked on existing records. This
rev. fixes the problem for both cases (existing and new records),
and thus reverts the fix of 13c885195.
The idea of this fix is to make both cases behave similarly, w.r.t.
fields and viewFields stuff in the fieldsView. In the inline case
(like in the main view case), fields and viewFields are the same.
In the non inline case, viewFields contained more information than
fields. As fields is used everywhere in BasicModel (and viewFields
is basically ignored), the fix is to set fields to viewFields.
Revision on b09f0c99
The intent of the previous commit was to no drop records in a list
on discard in the following cases:
- when they have been created from a `default_get`
- when they have been created from an `onchange` that result
from a `default_get`
Before the commit above, the kind of records that were abandoned
in those cases are stated as invalid, which happens when a record
has a required field that is empty.
The case of an `onchange` that is not involved in a `default_get`
was not considered in the fixes above. In fact, this is the intent
behaviour in most cases. However, if the items in the list are
created from such an `onchange`, we should not drop them.
This commit fixes the bug where records in a list that are created
from an `onchange` are wrongly abandoned. Here is the new logic to
abandon a record on discard in a list:
- the record that is marked as "do not abandon" should not be
abandoned;
- a record that is registered as a "not new addition" in the
list should not be dropped;
- a record that is registered as a "new addition" in the list,
and has been updated afterwards, should not be dropped;
- a record that is not new should not be dropped;
opw-806650
In this commit, we extend the search view to allow the selection
of some intervals for date or datetime fields in groupby menu.
The valid intervals are day, week, month, quarter, and year.
It is also possible to add a button 'Group By' in the control panel
owned by a graph view in case it is declared 'embedded' (e.g. in a
dashboard view).
Note that have three new generic reusable widgets have been introduced
in this commit: DropdownMenu, GroupByMenu, and FiltersMenu.
Have a model A with a o2m to B.
In the list have a field B > m2o > C
Also have a sequence field (widget handle) on B
Then Create a record A
Arrange yourself to have two new records B popping right away (through an onchange)
in the o2m. Their C field have to be empty
Resequence those two B lines with the handle
Before this commit, there was a traceback when trying to do an name_get on the C fields
Since both of them are empty, there is no record in the localData
Hence, no model. And also no records anyway, so no need to do a name_get
After this commit, there is no traceback, the name_get is avoided when no data is to be fetched
OPW 1853088
closes#24988
This commit introduces a new widget to be used for selection-based fields.
Valid choices are displayed using rectangular badges and not like the
standard list. This widget is valid for selection and many2one fields
like selection or radio widgets.
Co-authored-by: Siddarth Gajjar <sga@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
Sébastien Theys