To reproduce the issue:
1. Produce a SN product P with lot L
2. Unbuild it
3. Produce 1xP with lot L
Error: When setting the lot, an error is displayed. When marking the MO
as done, a second error is displayed
Both domains in `_onchange_lot_producing` and in the beginning of
`_check_sn_uniqueness` are incorrect. We should centralize the
uniqueness checking thanks to all existing computations in
`_check_sn_uniqueness`. This way, unbuilt/scrapped moves will be
considered
OPW-2721205
closesodoo/odoo#84374
X-original-commit: 2540104e95cea7baaa22ccfce97759771dbbaf34
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Previous versions of backorder mechanism would trigger reordering rules
for components of backorder MOs. This could lead to a procurement_group
mismatch (see original commit for details).
Backorders no longer trigger reordering rule, but it is still safer if
we clean the default_mo_ids when making backorders just in case. One
rare use case would be: if a user deletes multiple MOs'
procurement_groups, then creating backorders for those MOs at the same
time (i.e. via list view > multi-select + action > Mark As Done) can
result in incorrect procurement_group assignment due to default value
(same reason as explained in original commit).
closesodoo/odoo#84351Fixes: odoo/odoo#83742
X-original-commit: e3af56520fc3397f24c05b64d991f28a3227262b
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Before this commit, in the BoM Structure & Cost report, the By-Products
line quantity, product cost and BoM cost were misaligned.
The issue happens once the `mrp_mpl` module is installed because then,
the number of columns changes.
closesodoo/odoo#84278
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
In 9f7e6d2bb6ae0a6b0257edf26a5aa069cd00d78e , when start a workorder, we
always suggest the qty to produce to be the full qty to produce on MO.
If the previous WO produced less than the full qty to produce on MO,
user won't aware of that when start the WO. We revert it in this committ
Task-2678388
closesodoo/odoo#83389
Related: odoo/enterprise#23961
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Split a manufacturing order in several parts
using the back order mechanism
Merge several manufacturing orders related to the same product/bom
by cancelling all of them and creating a new one
closesodoo/odoo#82427
Task: 2662566
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
When printing a done MO with a non-tracked finished product that doesn't
have a product barcode, an invalid zpl file is created (i.e. there is
no end to the label in this case). Instead of an invalid label, we now
write "No barcode available" to have a valid ZPL and to match what
happens in the PDF version of this label.
Part of task: 2494740
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82389
Previously the PDF product labels were not printing to any standard
label size/format. This commit makes it so they match the 4x12 format
(same used by Product Labels). Because of the dynamic number of labels
that may be printed (i.e. units have 1 label printed per 1 unit), this
template is much more complicated than previous template. Note that we
expect these labels to ALWAYS print in a 4x12 format (i.e. we keep all
logic contained within 1 template to avoid custom report/wizard python
code).
Also, this commit removes the logic for printing labels for products of
not 'Done' MOs since this didn't seem to be a possible situation (report
appears to always print blank in this case).
Part of task: 2494740
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82389
When start_nextworkorder, if the WO is already cancelled, we
should try to check next one the this WO.
Task-2678388
closesodoo/odoo#83566
X-original-commit: 30fcfcc6c6ebb6fe9620d29475e1a7b6f1a46923
Related: odoo/enterprise#23819
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Huang (yhu) <yhu@odoo.com>
The possible index names have been renamed "btree", "btree_not_null"
(instead of "not null") and "trigram" (instead of "gin").
Task 2742526
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83274
It is sometimes impossible to unbuild a product because of decimal
values.
To reproduce the issue:
(Enable debug mode)
1. In Settings, enable "Units of Measure"
2. Set the decimal accuracy of "Product Unit of Measure" to 4
3. Set the rounding precision of "Units" to 0.001
4. Create two products P1, P2
5. Create a BoM:
- Product: P1
- Quantity: 3
- Type: Manufacture
- Components: 5 x P2
6. Process a MO with 3 x P1
7. Create an unbuild order UO:
- Manufacturing Order: MO
- Quantity: 1
8. Unbuild
Error: An error message is displayed "The quantity done for the product
"P2" doesn't respect the rounding precision[...]"
At some point, for each SM associated to the UO, the modules uses the
value of `product_uom_qty` to write the done quantity of the SM. The
rounding of `product_uom_qty` is based on "Product Unit of Measure" so
the component's SM has its quantity equal to `1.6667`. Moreover, writing
the done quantity trigger the creation of the associated SML. As a
result, the SML has its done quantity equal to `1.6667` while the
rounding of the associated UoM is `0.001`. When calling `_action_done`
on such a SML, it will raise an error because the value doesn't respect
the rounding.
Side note: the error message is incorrectly written, the indents in the
file are displayed on the front-end.
OPW-2710038
closesodoo/odoo#83369
X-original-commit: c11d772f39179c5dec5eb431b6f4bc02c680643a
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
There were some discrepencies when adding to/removing from WO Real
Duration:
- When adding time that is brings the total Duration over the expected
duration, the time should be split between the "productive" and
"performance" (i.e. reduced speed) times. This is already happening
when using start/pause buttons, so now it is consistent.
- Use 'id' instead of "Start Date" to determine which time_ids
to reduce/remove since adding a large enough "real duration" value
compared to previous time_id(s) could result in an earlier "Start
Date" for a newer time_id (i.e. results in which one is adjusted/
deleted = confusing). Using "End Date" was considered, but same
non-sequential issue can occur during time split from point above.
- Correctly determine if the "productivity" should be 'productive' or
not (i.e. 'performance') based on total WO duration (not duration
of newly added time_id)
Refinement of Part 4 of Task: 2667151
closesodoo/odoo#80319
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Due to many move values being set only during an onchange, there were
inconsistencies with the values of the products to manufacture and the
MO's components in the following cases:
- when a MO has manually added components/byproducts (i.e. not from a
BoM or a MO with no BoM) = missing values
- a MO is copied = incorrect values copied
- a backorder is made = backorders' moves contained new "-00#" name, but
original "-001" MO did not update all corresponding values to new name
There were also a couple of default values for manually added moves that
were either incorrect or not correctly saving.
Most of these inconsistencies are not visible to the user unless they do
a data export or are playing close attention (e.g. copying an MTO
triggered MO will copy the date_deadline, and this value cannot be
edited by the user.)
Part 6 of Task: 2667151
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80319
Several UX improvements:
1 - Add "Unbuild" filter to MOs (1 or more 'Done' unbuilds) + added
Unbuilds smart button to MO form view
2 - When copying an operation across BoMs, it is annoying that it adds
"Copy" to the end of the name, so we remove that.
3 - Display a warning when using an expired Lot/SN in detailed operations
view (burger window + tab).
4 - Allow adding/removing WO Real Duration + add/remove/edit specific time
time tracking (time_ids) for Done, Unlocked MOs.
5 - Allow search WOs by product to manufacture
7 - Fix validation error message typo
Parts 1-5 and 7 of Task: 2667151
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80319
Allow use of reception report for MOs. Same behavior is expected as with
(non-outgoing) pickings. With exception that procurement group linkage
should be included when assigning.
Original Reception Report Task: 2500844
Follow Up Reception Report Task: 2632884
Task: 2662730
Part-of: odoo/odoo#79627
odoo/odoo#35551 removed the section the "byproducts" setting was in, but
the "o_settings_container" div wasn't removed at the same time. This is
mostly not noticeable, but it is annoying when adding new settings after
this setting since the layout will be messed up, so let's delete it now.
odoo/odoo#73939 switched the setting Lock by default => Unlock by
default, but forgot to update the setting title. Let's delete this title
as the setting is now self-explanatory.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#79627
Three supported types:
- btree (default for index=True)
- btree not null (when >90% of the data are null)
- gin trigram search (for char fields)
Review of indexes on all objects.
closesodoo/odoo#83015
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
*: mrp,point_of_sale,purchase,sale,stock
This commit adds the product tag model access to accurate manager groups.
task-2675384
Part-of: odoo/odoo#79296
In mrp_production_workorder_tree_editable_view the name field is defined twice, once invisible. This makes inheritance more difficult than it needs to be. After this commit, the first invisible name field is removed, leaving it defined only once.
closesodoo/odoo#82765
X-original-commit: 33b34d05a1ddcb0ab51c1b457b5bbca92e5eb89b
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Suppose a tracked-by-usn and consumed product returns in the stock
thanks to a repair order. Using again this component in a new
manufacturing order will raise an error
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Storage Locations"
2. Create two products P_finished, P_compo
- Storable
- P_comp tracked by USN
3. Update the quantity of P_compo:
- WH/Stock: 1 x Lot01
4. Create a manufacturing order MO:
- Product: P_finished
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo
5. Confirm, Check availability and Mark MO as Done
- (Lot01 should be consumed)
6. Create a repair order RO:
- Product: P_finished
- Parts:
- Type: Remove
- Product: P_compo
- Lot: Lot01
- Destination Location: WH/Stock
7. Confirm RO, Start RO, End RO
- (There should be one Lot01 available in stock)
8. Repeat 4-5
Error: When checking the availability on the MO, Lot01 is correctly
reserved. However, when marking the second MO as done, a User Error is
displayed: "The serial number Lot01 used for component P_compo has
already been consumed" although this lot should be available
When checking the uniqueness of the lot, nothing includes the products
back in stock thanks to the repair orders.
OPW-2701668
closesodoo/odoo#82544
X-original-commit: 3d9355f90fa1dd9436f1745c515c89947ed04de0
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Unlinking a workorder which was in the middle of a chain of workorder created two subchains which both created a product when reaching their new respective ends.
The issue was solve by assuring that when we a link is remove from a workorder chain, their adjacent workorders are linked together using next_workorder_id
opw-2669514
closesodoo/odoo#82553
X-original-commit: a826608044f2a0b50c2ad9ed0228717f9ec66522
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Step to reproduce:
- Inventory > Configuration > Operations Types > Manufacturing (or any other operation type with code 'mrp_operation')
- Change 'Type of Operation' to 'Receipt' (or any other but 'manufacturing')
- Uncheck box field 'Use Existing Lots/Serial Numbers'
- Change 'Type of Operation' back to 'Manufacturing'
- Set correct value for 'Default Source Location' (type Receipt changed the value to 'Vendor', need to fix it)
- Create a storable product with the route 'Manufacture' selected.
- Create a BoM for this product, with a component tracked by lot (Add quantity to component)
- Create a MO for the product > Confirm > Check Availability
Current Behaviour :
Quantity are reserved, but the lot_ids are not visible
The behaviour is due to the fact that hidden parameters still have effect when they should act as their default value. To ensure it's the case, they are set back to their original value when the user switch between configuration to avoid ending in a wrongful configuration.
Behaviour after PR :
Lot ids are shown no matter the hidden configuration of picking type
opw-2680370
closesodoo/odoo#82377
X-original-commit: 22bbf43eba0927bdf27218da16f8435b33756112
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Damhaut Florian (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
Mass produce originally prohibited multiple lots components.
Later commit removed this limitation (among others).
This one displays a warning to make sure it is intentional.
task 2633369
closesodoo/odoo#77254
Related: odoo/enterprise#22797
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
There is 2 major issues with the production of multiple serials number
- Performance issue
- Duplicated code with classic backorder mechanism
The performance issues exist since backorders were create one by one
and `stock.move` and `stock.move.line` are always recomputed. They
are not created in batch neither.
_generate_backorders is removed and replace by _split_productions. The
functionality are the same. Technicaly it does the maximum in batch,
first it creates all the `mrp.production` then all the `stock.move`
and finaly, it splits the existing `stock.move.line` among the new
`stock.move`
It means that the reservation is not recompute anymore during a
backorder process and will remain the same than the splitted production
order.
Performance metrics (10 components):
| 2 | 10 100 1000
before | 0.47s | 2.84s | 32.25s | 580.53s
-----------------------------------------------
after | 0.13s | 0.36s | 2.60s | 35.17s
task 2633369
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77254
Both mrp_subcontracting and a module in Enterprise both inherit
`mrp.mrp_production_form_view`. This was leading to a conflict where the
Enterprise view could overwrite the invisible=1 attribute added by
mrp_subcontracting, therefore we update the views to avoid this.
Part of Task: 2695173
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#22637
X-original-commit: 6317c34808d381e54bae2431fec2de4b8503b447
Part-of: odoo/odoo#81649
Fixes 2 issues:
Issue 1: wrong view shown when registering strict consumption
To reproduce:
- create tracked product to subcontract
- create subcontract BoM with no tracked components + strict consumption
- create receipt of subcontracted product (remember to select From =
subcontractor)
- click on `action_show_details` burger button in Operations
Expected result:
- Detailed Operations window with no move lines in it (i.e.
stock.view_stock_move_nosuggest_operations view)
Actual Result:
- Detailed Operations window with move lines w/ 0 Done
(i.e. stock.view_stock_move_operations view _ lines also do
not get filled in when using the `action_assign_serial_show_details`,
=> twice as many lines as needed end up in view)i
Similar issue can occur when using a non-strict BoM + tracked product.
Issue appears to be that conditional was incorrectly updated during
refactoring to allow non-strict BoMs also record components.
stock.view_stock_move_operations view should only appear when all
productions are recorded
Issue 2: Consumption warning wizard not showing correctly
To reproduce:
- same as Issue 1, except consume less than BoM amount
Expected result: Consumption Wizard
Actual Result: stock move view shown instead
Issue was due to 'form_view_ref' value in context of picking view,
therefore we force clear this value everytime we expect this wizard
to open.
Task: 2695173
X-original-commit: b9990a5dab8731a8f69fd07aa73a318fc9d4a808
Part-of: odoo/odoo#81649
This commit adds an index on picking_type_id for models stock.picking
and mrp.production.
Filtering on picking_type_id is often done via the Inventory Overview.
This should speed up the list render in case of many object.
Task : 2648449
closesodoo/odoo#80434
Related: odoo/upgrade#3068
Related: odoo/enterprise#22535
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
This commit rename product_uom_qty into reserved_uom_qty and product_qty
into reserved_qty on stock move line to stop mistake them with the stock
move quantities fields.
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
The stock convention on location name is always to name the destination
`location_dest_id`. It was not the
case on the stock rule model
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a storable product > add a BOM
- Create a MO> add the product > confirm > Mark as done
- Go to the product form > click on product moves
- The move linked to the MO is displayed
- Add the "Manufacturing" filter
- No move is displayed
Solution:
Display all "stock.move.line" which are linked to a "stock.move" with a "mrp.production"
Bug2:
The "Manufacturing" filter should be defined in the MRP module instead of the stock
otherwise, users who do not have MRP installed will have access to this filter as well
opw-2697254
closesodoo/odoo#80578
X-original-commit: f4ab29a19f0aaac567da27d4c4d5c79119982bc6
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a BOM:
- Set the quantity of the finished product and component as more than 1
- Save > Go to BOM Structure & Cost > the quantity in the input is set on 3
- Print
Problem:
The report generated shows the qty and cost for production of 1 unit of product, regardless of the BOM quantity set in the input
The "_onClickPrint" function tries to get the quantity of the bom in the context,
but since the value of "this.given_context.searchQty" is null, the function will use the default value of 1.
The "searchQty" is only set in the "onchange", so we can manually trigger it when initiating the page so that the "searchQty" is set correctly
opw-2691632
closesodoo/odoo#80524
X-original-commit: dcd3de94f708425ca06527483cf30e21077caab0
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Previously, when underconsumption occured, we split the move (in
post_inventory). And if backorder, the moves not done would be linked to
the new backorder MO (when backorder MO is created).
After 8883c06ada, we create backorder MOs
before _post_inventory, making it so the moves not done will not be
linked to the backorder MOs and reserved qtys are not released.
To fix, we set cancel_backorder to be true to cancel all the leftover
moves and release the reserved qty.
Task-2697611
closesodoo/odoo#80446
X-original-commit: cffb2b455d73f64d96f91b9e0301c346989eae63
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
When cancelling a manufacturing order that does not include any
component, the associated moves won't be cancelled.
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create a storable product P
2. Create & Confirm a MO for 1 x P
3. Cancel the MO
4. Consult the form page of P
Error: The forecasted quantity of P is 1 instead of 0
The finished move associated to the MO hasn't been cancelled. Since [1],
we have the possibility to process MOs without any component, so the
cancellation process shouldn't be bypassed anymore.
[1] bf5e1debf9
OPW-2691422
closesodoo/odoo#80407
X-original-commit: 2adff866a598fc8fb872fb8127875fbb7cc7335c
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Fixes 2 issues:
1 - odoo/odoo#61027 made mrp.routing.workcenter.company_id =
self.bom_id.company_id. This made it so the work center selection is
empty until a BoM is selected, which is confusing to users. To make it
less confusing, we switch the order since we expect users to fill in
the fields from top to bottom.
2 - odoo/odoo#65628 made it so the BoM can be changed. This made it so
it's possible to save the record and have the company of the BoM and
the work center not match. This can lead to a usererror when users try
to start the WO associated with the operation. Steps to reproduce:
- create a new operation from Configuration > Operations
- select a BoM from company 1 and a Work Center from company 1 + save
- edit and change BoM to a BoM from company 2 and DO NOT change the
Work Center
Expected result: save error
Actual result: Save will be allowed, but WO will throw an usererror
when you try to start it.
To fix this, we prevent the user from saving when the workcenter
company does not match the BoM's (if both have a company_id assigned).
closesodoo/odoo#80337
Task: 2682365
X-original-commit: f77c9560ad304940610d797018246a8f5d32f721
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a BOM:
- set the quantity of the finished product and component as more than 1
- save > print > BOM Structure
Problem:
The report generated shows the qty and cost for production of 1 unit of product, regardless of the BOM quantity
opw-2691632
closesodoo/odoo#80145
X-original-commit: d08b0abd56a04a23e155b345bf1796a031321f2f
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Current behavior:
When creating a BOM with quantity different than 1 (here 12) with operation duration 1 minute and work center capacity 23
The BoM Structure & Cost report only changes the time for the operation when the quantity is > 276
However, when planning a MO the expected duration changes to 2 minutes when the quantity is > 23
Expected behavior:
Expected duration should be the same in the MO and BoM report
Steps to reproduce:
- BOM with quantity different than 1 (here 12)
- operation duration 1 minute
- work center capacity 23
- go in BoM report
closesodoo/odoo#80048
X-original-commit: cf90943875da25456cde4faf967ce27d886c0851
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
In multi steps configurations, the additional products of a MO could be
missing in the associated picking
To reproduce the issue:
(Use demo data)
1. In Settings, enable "Multi-Step Routes"
2. Update the current warehouse:
- Manufacture: 2 steps
3. Create a MO for product "Table Top"
4. Edit the MO:
- Add 1 x Screw in the components
5. Confirm the MO
6. Open the generated Picking
Error: The operations only contains one line for "Wood Panel". There
should be a second line for the "Screw"
When adding the new component, a new stock move is created but the
latter does not have any `group_id` defined. This is the reason why the
generated picking does not include this stock move.
OPW-2671995
closesodoo/odoo#79894
X-original-commit: 720f29fc6b7626ae734187242870a27065441ac2
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Updating the producing quantity may wrongly change the consumed quantity
of tracked products
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create two storable products P1, P2:
- P2 is tracked by lots
2. Update P2's quantity >= 10
3. Create a BoM:
- Product: P1
- Components: 1 x P2
4. Create and confirm a MO for 10 x P1
5. Check availability
6. Edit the MO and set the consumed quantity of P2 to 10
7. Edit the MO and set the producing quantity to 8
Error: The consumed quantity of P2 becomes 1
When saving the MO, it also writes the `lot_ids` on `move_raw_ids` while
it shouldn't. As a result, it triggers method `_set_lot_ids` for no
reason and lead to an undesirable behavior.
OPW-2667412
closesodoo/odoo#79757
X-original-commit: 66a1e96f88b3b06f40f9fd8035fca61d4e2a4e3a
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Current behavior :
When a bom is created with uom set as dozens the report
operations time is not correct. For exemple if the operation
time is 10 minutes. The operation time for a dozen should be
120, but at the moment it's 10 minutes
Steps to reproduce:
Have a product in units.
Create a bill of materials in dozens.
Have a operation where the workstation that has a capacity of 1.
Look at the Bill of material cost and structure even though it uses a dozen it shows
the operation time for one unit.
opw-2669899
closesodoo/odoo#79624
X-original-commit: 11f905737ea73aaf26dc792639abf66549a31864
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Engels Robin (roen) <roen@odoo.com>
In a previous commit, the reception report label was refactored to be
better, making this report obsolete. For migration purposes, we remove
it in this separate commit.
Previous COM PR refactoring: odoo/odoo#76411closesodoo/odoo#76147
Task: 2632884
Related: odoo/upgrade#2815
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
stock.orderpoint._post_process_scheduler confirms
productions after procurements have been run.
This was introduced to avoid conflict between
procurements, conflicts that can happen e.g. in
the purchase_mrp module.
However, currently action_confirm might
also be called on done or cancelled productions.
That can happen if there are already been lots
of procurements for the same product/orderpoint,
i.e. MO with the same values have been created multiple times.
To avoid this, add ('state', '=', 'draft' in the search_domain.
opw-2666960
closesodoo/odoo#79437
X-original-commit: 11c7b92f90804a4d73833e22c071e1665058fbdb
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Current Behaviour :
When mass producing with SN, the default number of SN to generate is set to 0.
Behaviour after the PR :
When mass producing with SN, the default number of SN to generate is the number of item to produce.
opw-2680306
closesodoo/odoo#79431
X-original-commit: 38e5d002acc2e516987acc0afe38648473fff708
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Damhaut Florian (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
Previously the reception report > "print labels" would only print the
picking name (or SO if provided) + delivery address (if provided) when
not for a MO. Label has been updated to include the product name.
During this update a few other related improvements were made:
- make the label based on stock.move (so extending is no longer
needed in MRP)
- formatting of label is improved so now address will be truncated
instead of wrapping (and potentially losing lines at end of address)
- line padding is reduced so we can fit more lines in the label
- "Print Labels" button at source level will now be enabled when its
corresponding "Assign All" button is pushed (previously only the
"Print Label"s of each moves' line was enabled.
Part of Task: 2632884
X-original-commit: 9774c1ab1d68cf095b64a82b56f100d747fc8a56
Part-of: odoo/odoo#79408
The component status of a MO is not correctly computed
To reproduce the issue:
(Use demo data)
1. Create and confirm a MO for 1 x [FURN_9666] Table
2. Unlock and edit the target of To Consume Qty:
- For [FURN_8522] Table Top: 0.1
- For [FURN_2333] Table Leg: 0.1
Error: The Component Status of the MO becomes "Available" while Table
Top and Table Leg are not available.
Due to the signature of `float_compare`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/56f8c1c0487bf95325ca859e2f266d1beed28ad4/odoo/tools/float_utils.py#L127
`move.product_id.uom_id.rounding` is implicitly given to
`precision_digits`, which is incorrect.
OPW-2669931
closesodoo/odoo#79362
X-original-commit: c7077dedd63ad317517ad383855821e6570b963d
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Adrien Widart