The commit change the design of the Many2ManyAvatarFieldPopover the goal
is to remove the m2m dropdown and fill the dropdown content directly
inside the popover.
It also reverses the order of the displayed tags inside the m2m avatar
field in the kanban view and inside the popover.
It removes the possibility to unassign users on mouse hover in kanban
view.
Note:
It's still possible to remove users inside an m2m_avatar_field popover.
Task ID: 3229888
closesodoo/odoo#117194
X-original-commit: f0d71e98743421318a798ef9d4f1e75d11a23334
Signed-off-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
* The tours are now run by the `MacroEngine` defined in `macro.js`.
* This is accomplished by converting (at runtime) the user-defined tours to
`Macro`s. See `tour_compilers.js` for the step (and tour-to-macro) compilation.
* API is kept the same as much as possible. Basically, declaring tours stayed
the same with some exceptions:
* `allowInvisible` can be provided in a step to allow consuming the trigger
element even if it is invisible.
* `isCheck` can now be used to replace the no operation `run` that is
traditionally signals the runner to only perform a check.
* Before, multiple `run`s can be called simultaneously. Now, each `run` method
is awaited before proceeding to the next step.
* If the trigger element is `disabled`, the tour runner will *not* proceed on
calling the `run` method and the runner will stay on current step until the
trigger element becomes `enabled`.
* However, the tour runner is okay with `disabled` trigger element if the step
has `isCheck = true`. As long as the trigger element is found for `isCheck`
step, the tour runner will happily move to the next step.
* Some tours are adjusted to properly run with this new tour runner.
* When the tour failed:
* The dom string is not logged anymore.
* However, a warning message containing the relative location of the step will
be logged. This is better in helping the author in locating the failed step.
**Some guidelines learned during the development:**
* Each step may trigger a dom mutation. It's a good practice to insert an
intermediate step that *checks* the existence of an element that result from
the action of the previous step.
* Refrain from using the `run` method for assertions. `run`, in principle, is
provided to perform actions that are not offered by the helper. Use the
`trigger` for assertions.
* During dev, find `SHOW_POINTER_DURATION` and set it to `250`. This will show
the pointer (pointing to the trigger element) for 250ms when watching the
tour.
closesodoo/odoo#107618
Task-id: 3082036
Related: odoo/enterprise#37560
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Purpose:
Allow quick assignation of records in the kanban views (and other places
by extension).
Currently, if you want to work in a board-like env (e.g. tasks in
kanban, crm in pipeline, that kind of thing), having the possibility to
quickly assign/unassign records without having to open them fullscreen
can be really useful => it should be possible to "quick edit" these
fields in kanban views easily, without switching to form views.
If you want to keep the field readonly don't forget to add the readonly
attribute.
Task-id: 3121207
Part-of: odoo/odoo#114400
This commit removes the legacy implementation of the form, kanban
and list views. It also removes the legacy view widget registry,
and all legacy widgets it contained. The legacy field registry
couldn't be removed yet as some fields are still used (e.g. in
client actions: FieldMany2One, FieldMany2ManyTags...), and
sometimes accessed from that registry (e.g. uom service). More
clean up will come later. Note that all tests using legacy views
have thus been removed, even though the tested feature might still
remain (e.g. FieldMany2One tests have been removed, but that field
is still there). However, those features are deprecated and
unlikely to evolve. They should be removed in the next saas, or the
one after.
Finally, this commit also removes the legacy view dialogs.
Task 3168640
Part-of: odoo/odoo#111809
This is a step closer to a goal of avoiding dependence on asynchronous
modules. Starting from this commit, new tour definition should be
registered to `registry.category("web_tour.tours")` registry.
So, instead of the following:
```js
import tour from "web_tour.tour";
tour.register(name, options, steps);
```
We now do:
```js
import { registry } from "@web/core/registry";
registry.category("web_tour.tours").add(name, optionsWithSteps);
```
Notice the `options` and `steps` params are merged when registering
the tour definition. It should look something like so:
```js
registry.category("web_tour.tours").add("account_tour", {
test: true,
steps: [ ... ],
});
```
And if the `TourManager` instance is needed, one can get it from the
registry like so `registry.get("tourManager")`. Note however that
this instance is only available when the `TourManager` has been
instantiated -- so it's not available at top level of the module.
closesodoo/odoo#111103
Related: odoo/enterprise#36335
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when saving a language change in My Profile,
nothing happened. The expected behavior is a page reload.
How to reproduce:
- Go to the "My profile" tab in the User Menu
- Edit the language
- Click on save
Before this commit:
The record is save.
After this commit:
The record is saved and the page is reloaded.
closesodoo/odoo#109508
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
The res.users model functions a bit uniquely since it should allow a user to
modify their own parameters but turns off model edition priviledges by default.
See "SELF_WRITEABLE_FIELDS".
This implies that ir_ui_view#_postprocess_access_rights method will by default
turn off record edition, by automatically adding a 'edit="false"' attribute on
the form node when the frontend calls 'get_views'.
This will in turn prevent the user from modifying its preferences as it will
set the form view in readonly mode.
(It was apparently ignored pre-OWL, hence why we only have this issue now).
To fix the issue, we force the edition by manually setting 'edit="1"' on our
"view_users_form_simple_modif" form.
Allowing the end-user to modify their own settings again.
A tour was added to ensure this behavior.
Note that tour steps need to be adapted in the 'hr' module, as this module
changes the flow of modifying user preferences.
Task-3067001
closesodoo/odoo#106440
X-original-commit: 490d480458590c205962c3f9b95a63790a59f4d3
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to fix the behaviour of clicking on a field
with the "many2one_avatar" widget in a list view.
Expected behaviour when clicking on a field with the "many2one_avatar" widget:
- Editable list view: switch row to edit
- Multi_edit list view with selected record: switch row to edit
- Other case: open the many2one_avatar record in a form view
Before this commit, clicking on a field with the "many2one_avatar" widget always
opens the record in a form view.
After this commit, the expected behaviour when clicking on a field with
the "many2one_avatar" widget is respected.
closesodoo/odoo#102146
X-original-commit: ad597d414c59723d3c6af5dfdc1a3a41fd4f4032
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
This commit does multiple things:
- The readonly mode of form view is removed but not for the fields.
it means that the fields in the view are always in edit mode except
if we force them to be readonly.
- The control panel is revamped to take less vertical space and shows now
the record editing (dirtiness)/validity status after editing the record.
- The record is saved only when leaving the view or by clicking the save
button when hovering the record status in the control panel.
- The record can still be discarded by clicking the discard button when
hovering the status text in control panel.
task id: 2822553
X-original-commit: 77824ad44b6945a9811120380747f87ef6362ae2
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101118
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
Those fields may be used in the new views.
Some of the legacy fields had to be kept because they are used
in some legacy views, more notably the gantt and activity views as well
as in the mrp work order tablet mode.
X-original-commit: 1c871ad9ea4a77468911ff6a5546688a26398a8b
Part-of: odoo/odoo#100764
It was no longer possible to load the My Profile for users with an
employee that were not HR Officer.
In the `get_views()` method, the 'search' view was requested after the
'form', thus it omited the fields requested as SUPERUSER in
`get_view()`.
closesodoo/odoo#99750
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
* hr, im_livechat, mail, sms, snailmail, test_mail_full, website_livechat,
website_slides
PURPOSE:
Creating a record with no values has no sense but is sometimes useful during
tests.
The support should be dropped for `default` parameter in `create`.
SPECIFICATION:
All the occurrences of `create()` have been replaced by `create({})`.
Task-2869394
closesodoo/odoo#93917
Related: odoo/enterprise#28538
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, test_mail.
The target returned by the mail's test utils start method is useless since it's
almost the same thing than querying document. Let's remove it and replace it by
document. This will reduce the diff in the PR introducing the new environment in
the discuss app.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#92077
Related: odoo/enterprise#27670
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: hr, test_mail.
This PR prepares the ground for the one introducing the new environment in the
discuss app. Indeed, the createWebClient helper will be used instead of createView/Widget
thus the returned value won't be a Widget anymore but a DOM element. This change impacts
they way the tests were written: JQuery functions have to be transformed to native JavaScript
ones. In order to reduce the noise in the main PR, those changes are done now.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#91290
Related: odoo/enterprise#27313
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: calendar, hr, note, test_mail.
Since community#86338, widget destruction is registered in the start method. Thus,
explicit calls to widget.destroy during tests are useless. This PR prepares the ground
for the one introducing the new environment in the discuss app. Indeed, the former PR
will use createWebClient instead of createView/Widget constructor thus, we won't be able
to call destroy on the returned value anymore. In order to reduce the noise in the main PR,
all the calls to widget.destroy have been removed.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#91082
Related: odoo/enterprise#27192
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: hr, im_livechat, snailmail, website_livechat.
This PR prepares the ground for the one introducing the new environment in the
discuss app. Indeed, tests will now use the mainComponentRegistry in order to mount
those components. Doing so, the parameters has{Discuss/Dialog/ChatWindow} will become
obsolete. Removing those parameters now helps reducing the noise in the main PR.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#90120
Related: odoo/enterprise#26759
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
In preparation of test adaptation after introducing a new way to
seed test data, the fake model present on the m2x avatar employee test
has been registered to the model definitions instead of being
declared on it's test.
task-2792108
closesodoo/odoo#87665
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: calendar, hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail, mail_bot, note, sms, snailmail,
website_livechat, website_slides.
This commit prepares the removal of beforeEach function in the
mail test suite. Cleanup was relying on beforeEach adding widgets,
components, unpatch method 'this'. We need to clean things up without
using either beforeEach or 'this'.
task-2792108
closesodoo/odoo#86526
Related: odoo/enterprise#25326
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail, snailmail, test_mail, website_livechat,
website_slides.
This commit will remove the need to duplicate models definition for
test purposes. Indeed, for now, we need to mock the model definitions
on the client side. Those models definitions are often very different
from the ones found on the server.
This approach will allow us :
- to ease model definitions during tests
- to get closer from the real models
task-2767820
closesodoo/odoo#84828
Related: odoo/enterprise#24486
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: calendar, hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, note, sms, snailmail,
website_livechat, website_slides.
This commit prepares the ground for the model definitions PR.
In order to reduce the noise, all mail module's beforeEach
functions will be made async.
task-2767820
closesodoo/odoo#84845
Related: odoo/enterprise#24489
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
In the next version of Owl, all exported terms are directly available
from the top level `owl` object. This commit aims to adapt existing
imports to this new system. This is done by importing any Owl property
used in files at the top, right after the `import` or `require`
statements.
closesodoo/odoo#82736
Related: odoo/enterprise#23609
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Purpose
The aim of the current task is to adapt the design of this new widget to the
list and kanban views.
SPECIFICATION
Kanban
when there is only one record set in the m2m field, display it like a
many2one_avatar widget when there are two or three records set in the m2m
field, display the avatars next to each other when there are more than three
records set in the m2m field, display the first two avatars, then a grey circle
with +X in it (where X is the number of records beyond the first two), when
hovering the +X avatar, open a tooltip with the list of the remaining records
the display order of the records is the same as the order in the m2m field
the avatars behave like in the other avatar widgets (i.e. darkens on hover and
clicking on it opens the chat) except the +X avatar that does not darken or has
a cursor:pointer; on hover and is not clickable
List
same specs as for the kanban view, with the difference that the widget displays
up to five records instead of three when the widget is editable display it like
the current formview version of the many2many_avatar_user widget (i.e. tags
with avatars)
task-2563591
closesodoo/odoo#72166
Signed-off-by: Simon Genin (ges@odoo) <ges@odoo.com>
When writing the new webclient, the notification service was rewritten,
and all of its uses in production code were changed to use the new
services, however, some tests were still reliant on the old notification
service.
This commit removes references to the legacy notification service so
that we can be one step closer to removing it from the code base.
Part of #72675
* = hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, sms, snailmail, website_livechat,
website_slides
Exporting directly on the line of the class or variable definition is less lines
of code and less repetition (and risk or mistake).
Exporting with a name instead of default allows to catch typos more easily when
importing and ensures the same name is used for consistency (and ease of grep).
closesodoo/odoo#72597
Related: odoo/enterprise#19224
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
It is currently quite difficult to differentiate users. Most of the time, people
don't take the time to upload an actual avatar so everybody looks the same. This
PR generates a custom avatar with the users initials and random color to
differentiate them. For res.users, res.partner and hr.employee, image fields now
hold the binary image and avatar are used to show the image or svg.
Current behavior before PR:
Avatar had only random colors and was being saved in database, being inefficient
Desired behavior after PR is merged:
A new mixin defines image fields and in case no image is set, it generates an
SVG image with the user's initials and random color.
closesodoo/odoo#69819
Task: 2404630
Related: odoo/enterprise#18199
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
with this commit: we improve many2one_avatar widget for editable form view,
previously many2one avatar in edit mode was not displaying image, it was
displaying only many2one selection input, this commit adds image before
many2one input to have unify design with readonly form view.
This is especially motivated by the fact that we plan on getting rid of the
readonly formview to always be in edit mode.
task-2451340
closesodoo/odoo#67366
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
* hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail, snailmail, website,
website_livechat
This commit removes `patchMixin` and improve `utils.patch`.
`utils.patch` now supports native classes and has a new parameter
used to patch class members.
`utils.patch` is now used everywhere `patchMixin` was and it must
be used to patch classes.
closesodoo/odoo#65967
Related: odoo/enterprise#16278
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: ged-odoo <ged@odoo.com>
This will be useful for special views like gantt, grid…
A StandaloneM2OAvatarEmployee widget will be available and would allow to
instantiate a Many2OneAvatarEmployee widget anywhere.
Usage:
const widget = new StandaloneM2OAvatarEmployee(<parent>, <value>);
widget.appendTo(<Node>);
Where:
<parent> the widget parent, if it is given
<value> {number|[number, char]} either the employee id or an array representing the employee: [id, display_name]. If only the id is passed, the widget will fetch the display_name through a name_get rpc.
<Node> any DOM Node object you want the widget to be appended to.
Examples:
const w1 = new StandaloneM2OAvatarEmployee(null, 3);
const w2 = new StandaloneM2OAvatarEmployee(null, [1, 'Mitchell Admin']);
w1.appendTo(document.body);
w2.appendTo(document.body);
closesodoo/odoo#54230
Taskid: 2272544
Taskid: 2272582
Related: odoo/enterprise#11412
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <Polymorphe57@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Improve mock server:
- add support for mocked `fetch`
- add support for `active_test`
- add support for x2m `in` in domains
- add support for default values computed from a function
- implement a more natural "next id" compute
- allow initial data without ids
- ensure write and x2m commands integrity
- improve bad data/bad commands error messages
- always warn for failing RPC, not only in debug mode
- fix all existing tests that had inconsistency data
Other changes done in mail (or dependents) that are not just related to tests:
- remove `direct_partner` from formatter result
->`correspondent` can be computed from other keys, especially `members`
- fix `livechat_visitor` convertData
-> only process if there is value
- add `current_partner` and `current_user_id` as `init_messaging` result
-> easier to mock than session
- remove usage of `need_moderation`
-> that was just a search indirection to `moderation_status`
- adapt `partner_id` -> `res_partner_id` key in `_notification_format`
-> to be consistent with field name
- add name in result of `mail_partner_format`
-> sometimes display_name is not the same
- remove usage of `is_moderator`
-> that was just an indirection to `moderation_channel_ids`
Enterprise counterpart: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/11523
task-2287171
closesodoo/odoo#55854
X-original-commit: 7ba3fecb3377a720d1eb70e7515a0c45da73836d
Related: odoo/enterprise#12391
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
This commit is a significant rewriting of client-side discuss, chatter,
chat window, and messaging menu using OWL. The behavior should be broadly
the same, with some slight functional changes here and there.
From a technical standpoint, the code of messaging is mainly organized in 2
main groups of modules:
- models, which are logical entities that depict the client-side state of
messaging as a whole.
- components, which are in charge of displaying information from models.
This refactoring also introduces new JS guidelines regarding folder structure
(/static) and naming rules for JS modules.
Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/39023
Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/6249
Task-1914207
This PR is a collaborative work by Alexandre, Julien, Sébastien and Xavier,
with the precious help of Lucas to speed it up towards the end.
closesodoo/odoo#39023
Related: odoo/enterprise#6249
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Giannone <jgi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier Dubuc <xdu@odoo.com>
Romain Estievenart