Before this commit:
* Module A defines a field X of model M
* Module B inherits from model M without touching field X
* Module C inherits from model M and extends field X by giving an INDEX
/ NOT NULL constraint.
* Module B and C depend from Module A, but not each other
If all three modules are installed and Module B is updated, the INDEX /
NOT NULL constraint could be dropped.
This happens because Module B can be loaded before Module C is loaded,
if that's the case, then after the upgrade of Module B, during the
schema checking, we verify that the field object we have and the field
on the DB are the same, since Module B doesn't introduce the index then
this check is false and we drop the index. When we get to loading Module
C, we do not do any schema checking because the module is not marked as
`to upgrade`, therefore the index is lost forever.
To solve this, we re-init the models that belong to the set of the intersection
between upgraded and modified models and loaded and modified models.
Fixes#24958
Before this commit:
* Module A defines a field X of model M
* Module B inherits from model M without touching field X
* Module C inherits from model M and extends field X by giving an INDEX
/ NOT NULL constraint.
* Module B and C depend from Module A, but not each other
If all three modules are installed and Module B is updated, the INDEX /
NOT NULL constraint could be dropped.
This happens because Module B can be loaded before Module C is loaded,
if that's the case, then after the upgrade of Module B, during the
schema checking, we verify that the field object we have and the field
on the DB are the same, since Module B doesn't introduce the index then
this check is false and we drop the index. When we get to loading Module
C, we do not do any schema checking because the module is not marked as
`to upgrade`, therefore the index is lost forever.
To solve this, we re-init the models that belong to the set of the intersection
between upgraded and modified models and loaded and modified models.
Fixes#24958
Before this patch the registry and cache signaling was only activated
for PreforkServer. In case Odoo was deployed in a multi process/multi
threaded architecture the signaling was not ensured, causing registry
de-synchronisation amongst threaded servers.
Backported from fd4939dc78
Before this patch the registry and cache signaling was only activated
for PreforkServer. In case Odoo was deployed in a multi process/multi
threaded architecture the signaling was not ensured, causing registry
de-synchronisation amongst threaded servers.
Before this patch the registry and cache signaling was only activated
for PreforkServer. In case Odoo was deployed in a multi process/multi
threaded architecture the signaling was not ensured, causing registry
de-synchronisation amongst threaded servers.
This fix will be backported in v10.0 and v11.0 as soon as it has been
battle tested.
Before this commit:
* Install any module that creates a SQL view and another that extends
this view.
e.g.: sale and pos_sale for `report.all.channels.sales`.
* Uninstall the module that extended the SQL view.
e.g.: uninstall pos_sale.
* Try to access the view from the web client -> Traceback, table not
found.
This happens because when reloading the registry, postgres drops the sql
view and it must be re-initialized.
After this commit:
We solve this issue by calculating all missing tables/views during the
uninstallation process, and re-initializing all of them right before
reloading the registry.
Also remove sql-view hacks in the modules `sale` and `sale_margin`.
Fixes#23528, #23529, #23530
This allows rpc requests in `HttpCase` to use the cursor `self.cr`, which is
now shared between the Python test and the rpc requests. This simplifies code
to prepare a JS test, and code to check the result of a JS tour.
Fixes#12237
Put the code to update the MPTT in specific methods, and reduce the number of
queries being made (from 5-6 queries to 2-3 queries). Add test on MPTT to
validate the refactoring.
Commit 763d714 introduced cron job locking for databases which had
modules with states set to 'to x', however if an
installation/uninstallation/upgrade fails, the state will stay at 'to
x', and it may stay in that state for an indefinite amount of time,
meaning that cron jobs could stay locked forever.
This commit fixes this in part by adding a cleanup function to loading.py that
will be executed whenever load_modules fails, the function will change
every 'to x' module to their original state, effectively unlocking the
execution of cron jobs.
This however only works to prevent "zombie" transient states for
brand new databases, however for existing databases which already
contain some modules in a zombie state it won't do anything unless
a module is installed/uninstalled/upgraded, which may never happen.
This is where the second part comes in (ir_cron.py), when failing to
execute crons, we check if the failure was due to bad module state
and if an arbitrary amount of time (5 hours as of this commit) has passed
since the last time it was supposed to be executed, if it is the case, it means
that the cron execution failed around 5 * 60 times (1 failure per minute for 5h)
in which case we assume that the crons are stuck because the db
has zombie states and we force a call to reset_module_states.
Now that we're closer to switching to P3 for good, these helpers have
outlived their usefulness, and mostly add noise.
All remaining dict.iter*() or dict.view*() must be converted to the
normal keys(), values() or items() calls.
Whenever the result is likely to be used for more than the scope of a
loop, or when the dict needs to be modified during iteration, the calls
must be wrapped in a ``list()``, to protect the new P3 semantics.
Those cases are very exceptional.
Also removed some dead code or improved the API to remove unnecessary
conversions.
In Python 3:
* various builtins and dict methods were changed to return
view/iterable objects rather than lists
* and the separate Python 2 view/iterable builtins and methods were
removed altogether
This is problematic when using these items as list (which the happens
repeatedly in Odoo), but more viciously when iterating *multiple times*
over them (which also happens, which I've messed up multiple times while
writing this, and which is a pain to debug even when you've just created
the issue).
Convert all code using these to semantics-matching cross-version
helper functions to get the LCD behaviour between P2 and P3, and
forbid the builtins via lint.
issue #8530
Problem: the update of custom models/fields is not fully transactional, and may
potentially lead to an inconsistent database. An other problem is creating two
custom fields by writing on a model: if the second one fails, the first one has
been committed without notice. Retrying the request will give an unexpected
error (duplicate field name).
Solution: never commit in the middle of a request. If the changes have an
impact on the registry, then mark it as invalid (with a new flag), and signal
registry invalidation after everything has been committed. If the request
fails, reset the registry. Both registry and cache invalidation are handled
the same way.
When adding a field on a model, only the _inherit were checked, not the _inherits.
This commit fixes the following bug:
1. install `sale` (adding the field `sale_order_count` on `res.partner`)
- field `sale_order_count` is created on `res.partner`
- the ir.model.field is tagged with module `sale`
2. install `point_of_sale` (adding another field on `res.users`)
- field `sale_order_count` is created on `res.users`
- the ir.model.field is tagged with module `point_of_sale`
When installing sale, the model res.partner is returned in the list of impacted
models, on which _create_fields method is called but not res.users.
A direct consequence of this bug is that, the fields translations are in the
wrong module. May fix some uninstallation bugs too.
Closes#16104
Move the post-install tests execution outside `Registry.new`, and add a flag on
class `HttpCase` to enable/disable the registry "test mode".
This allows a test to run actual transactions that will reload the registry,
which may be used to test the creation of `ir.model` instances, etc.
After modifying the database schema, if some models do not have a table/view,
attempt to recreate it by calling their method `init()`, following inter-model
dependencies.
Fix the model `board.board` by making it an abstract model.
Add the missing model dependencies on report `crm.partner.report.assign` to make
it depend on report `account.invoice.report`.
Christophe Simonis