It is possible in a dashboard item to open a form view of a record.
The view did not take into account the action used to display the item,
so for example: from a customer invoice clicking on a record would
display the "Vendor Bill" instead of "Customer Invoice" view.
With this fix, when a view is being loaded to be displayed in the
dashboard, we save a reference to a possible form view and if the form
view is displayed, we use this reference.
opw-1865454
closes#25718
Rev. 69c9500e recently added option 'keepSearchView' to doAction in
the ActionManager. When set to true, the searchview of the current
action is re-used by the executed action.
This caused issues with the dashboard, as the wrong action id was
used to save the current action to the dashboard (it was the one
of the action for which the searchview was instantiated, not the
one of the current action, executed with option keepSearchView set
to true). For instance, go to Website (in enterprise), in the
new dashboard (view) expand the graph view, try to add the graph
action to the dashboard (board).
Task 1835670.
Convert content so that the assets compile on app installation. The
style is still broken after this as the variables/mixins/... are not
defined in the right order (as it did not matter in LESS but does in
SCSS).
This commit basically changes:
- Variables: @var_hello -> $var-hello
- Mixins: .mixin_world() {} -> @mixin mixin-world {}
- Classes used as mixin: .my_class() -> @extend .my_class
- Here there were no other solution than to convert the use of
a mixin call by the use of an extend as a first approximation
- LESS functions -> SCSS functions (e.g. fade -> rgba)
- Move first variable definition before the variable is used
- Still need to make sure last variable definition is at the
right place
Before this commit, whenever we do an operation on any of these custom views,
such as folding it, the custom view was saved by creating a new one.
This behaviour comes from a lost feature to undo operations on custom views.
Since we do not have this feature anymore, it makes no sense to create new
custom views on save, instead of applying the changes in place.
With this commit, custom views are edited in place.
Fixes#23712
Recently, rev. 5b3cb812b added a new custom event ('update_filters')
handler to the ActionManager, and rev. 69c9500 added an option
('keepSearchView') to doAction (which can be called by triggering
up event 'do_action').
Both events ('update_filters' and 'do_action') can be triggered by
controllers, and when those controllers were in the dashboard, a
crash occured when they triggered those events. In particular, they
are triggered by the new 'web_dashboard' view, respectively when
clicking on an aggregate and when clicking on the subview button to
open it full screen.
The crashes occurred because the events weren't intercepted by the
dashboard, so they bubbled up to the ActionManager which couldn't
handle the requests properly as it wasn't aware of those sub
controllers.
As there is no search view in the dashboard, the 'update_filters'
event simply needs to be stopped (we can't handle such a request
in the dashboard), and for the 'do_action' event, the
'keepSearchView' option must be forced to false as there is no
search view to keep (we thus force the ActionManager to create a
new one).
Instead, create a new BoardView (in JS only) instead, referenced by
specifying js_class="board" on the fly on the root node of the
arch of the board view.
This ensures that the dashboard addon doesn't impact the FormView,
and this is necessary to ensure that the next commit doesn't break
anything.
Backported fixes:
1. [IMP] web: GraphView: remove hack to render in DOM
- ref. 166319fa4a
- fully backported.
This commit backports the fix that removes the hack for rendering graphs
(delay in a setTimeout), so that the graph is rendered when it is in the DOM.
2. [IMP] web: restore scroll position
- ref. 4e204ed223
- partially backported: only keeps `on_attach_callback`
and `on_detach_callback` in the abstract_controller
and in the abstract_renderer.
This commit backports the use of the hooks methods `on_attach_callback` and
`on_detach_callback` in abstract controller and renderer, so that the
controller of any view warns the renderer when it has been attached in
(or detach from) the DOM.
Also, this commit adds `on_attach_callback` and `on_detach_callback` for the
dashboard app, so that the graph view is correctly rendered.
Fixes#24092
* account, board, hr_holidays, mail, sale, website_sale
Small fixes on nocontent onboarding screens.
Initial commit: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/a87d761fdbf345ada5dc93e0a686b08a0f5a0417
Details:
- list: centered;
- pivot/graph: centered + empty folder face;
- Dashboard app with nocontent helper;
- Discuss inbox/starred: centered without neutral/smiling faces;
=> no faces because it's too much with animated
rainbow man when emptying the any of the boxes.
- hr_holidays: fixed onboarding screens;
- (technical) dropped obsolete 'o_view_nocontent_container' style;
- manual reconciliation 'nothing to reconcile': centered + inside form sheet;
=> renamed account's o_view_nocontent to o_view_noreconciliation,
so that it doesn't use the style of views.less.
- kanban: nocontent helper above the columns (if any);
- texts "no order to upsell"/"abandonned cart" paragraph split in two.
In a recent commit, the kanban view was changed to display a nocontent
help message, even when grouped. To do that, it was necessary to change
the nocontent structure, and in particular, to position it absolutely.
This totally breaks dashboards.
Also, from a functional point of view, dashboards are used to see
existing information, so it can be said that the nocontent helper is of
a more limited use in this case. Therefore, I think that the best
technical decision is to simply remove the nocontent helper in the
dashboard, rather than fiddling with the css to try to make them work.
Before this commit, when having a kanban within a dashboard and clicking on an action button,
the action was not triggered, instead, the board form view triggered 'save' on the board model
leading to a server side traceback
After this commit, the action button triggers the demanded one and only this one.
OPW 805707
closes#22191closes#22371
We would like to make the "no item found" screens more appealing.
Before this commit, it shows a small help tip in the top-left
corner of the screen, just below the "Create" button.
With this commit, these help tips have been replaced by onboarding
screens, which consist of a picture and some text below, both of which
are horizontally centered.
The texts have been slightly changed, so that they are shorter and clearer.
Considered modules:
(A)
account,
account_asset,
account_budget,
account_test,
account_voucher,
analytic
(B)
barcodes,
base,
base_automation,
board
(C)
calendar,
contacts,
crm
(D)
delivery
(E)
event
(F)
fleet
(G)
gamification,
google_drive
(H)
hr,
hr_attendance,
hr_contract,
hr_expense,
hr_gamification,
hr_holidays,
hr_payroll,
hr_recruitment,
hr_timesheet
(I)
im_livechat
(L)
l10n_fr_sale_closing,
link_tracker,
lunch
(M)
mail,
maintenance,
mass_mailing,
membership,
mrp
(N)
note
(P)
payment,
point_of_sale,
post_mercury,
pos_restaurant,
product,
project,
purchase,
purchase_requisition
(R)
rating,
repair,
resource
(S)
sale,
sale_timesheet,
sales_team,
stock,
stock_account,
stock_landed_costs,
stock_picking_batch,
survey
(U)
utm
(W)
web,
website,
website_blog,
website_customer,
website_event_track,
website_forum,
website_quote,
website_sale,
website_sale_digital,
website_slides
This rev. is the first part (out of 3) of the refactoring of the
ActionManager and ViewManager layer of the webclient.
The main changes are:
- there is no ViewManager anymore, its work is now handled by the
ActionManager itself, but isolated in a specific file ; this
eases a lot of things, as the breadcrumbs handling for example.
- the ActionManager code is converted to the new coding principles
and guidelines ; mainly, children widgets communicate with it by
triggering events up, and not by function calls anymore.
- the ActionManager layer is now testable, and a lot of tests have
already been written.
- the code in other addons has been adapted consequently.
What's coming next:
- introduce the 'AbstractAction' Widget, and make client actions
and view controllers inherit from it ; this widget will
implement a common API that could be used uniformly by the
ActionManager (e.g. restore(), canBeLeft(), renderButtons(),
getTitle()...).
- move the ControlPanel handling from the ActionManager to the
AbstractAction.
*board,sale_timesheet
This rev. changes the API of load_views, as it now assumes that
the given context has no longer to be evaluated. This is more
convenient that way, as we can now call load_views with contexts
that are dict, and not instances of the Context class.
After uninstalling an module, some actions specified in the dashboard
may not exist anymore (the dashboard view isn't correctly cleaned up).
This was causing a traceback because the dashboard was trying to load views
corresponding to an non-existing action.
Closes#19995
With da136d83 we have modifiers on every elements but when saving them
for dashboard they have to be stringified to be used.
Also a part of a previous code was still present that removed context
and domain from a saved dashboard when modifying it.
opw-779071
closes#20725
Before this commit, only the routes which began by '/web/image' were
mocked (simply ignored). This forgot the case were it is a full URL
(http://www.test.com/web/image). Now, also mock the static images
routes (for .png and .jpg).
When a graph is added to the dashboard, it doesn't have a minimum
height set, so only the label and the axis are displayed, not the
content.
opw-766454
In the dashboard, the domain wasn't passed to the view since the new views.
The action in the dashboard and the one saved were thus different (ex: when
saving 'Customer', you got all partners).
This was also causing a traceback when editing a value in the grid view.
This domain is now correctly passed.
*board,crm
Before this rev., the dashboard panel (e.g. of the sales team
dashboard) wasn't displayed when there were no record to display,
whereas it should. Only the nocontent helper was displayed.
This was a bug introduced with the new view: the views' controller
was in charge to display the renderer (if there were data to
display) xor the nocontent helper. As the dashboard panel was
rendered by the renderer, it couldn't be displayed alongside the
nocontent helper.
This rev. moves this logic to the renderer. So now, the controller
always contains the renderer, which decides what to render (the
data or the nocontent helper). This way, the dashboards can display
their panel and the nocontent helper.
Christophe Simonis