bad ux: it's difficult to understand why there is two way to do the
same thing. (4 fields for domains, instead of 2)
Example of confusion:
What happens if you set both a filter and a domain?
What happens if you change the filter? does it change the
automation?
The new domain widget is good enough. We don't need such extra fields.
Purpose of this commit is to continue to clean server actions, scheduled
actions and automated actions. Server actions hold code execution and
automated actions hold triggers and conditions.
This commit make automated action inherits from ir_actions_server.
Automated actions do not hold several server actions anymore. Instead
each new automated action creates its own server action holding the code
or actions to perform. Automated actions that held several server actions
should now simply use a server action of type multi. This commit also
features:
* rename 'kind' field to trigger
* remove 'act_user_id' as this should be done by the server action itself
not the automated action. This can be achieved using a write or code
server action;
* remove 'act_followers' as this is replaced by a followers server action;
* use a primary form view inherited from server action. This way automated
actions use the same base form as server actions with triggers and
conditions added;
Thanks to @fpodoo for the original idea and preliminary work. Thanks to
@jpr-odoo for first developments. Thanks to @jem-odoo and @rco-odoo
for reviewing.
First step towards cleaning and improving automated actions is to
correctly name things. base_action_rule module is therefore renamed
to base_automation. Model is also renamed to base.automation.
Christophe Simonis