when creating the instance, set instance.session.uid to 42 so the evaluator has something to chew on when it tries to create the evaluation context
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20121120101733-b0ire11bbuywfi8u
During the creation of a new record (in an editable list), the
prospective new record has a ``false`` id. In a non-o2m, the row under
creation can be selected (checkbox) and deleted (More > Delete),
leading to the request to ``DELETE false`` being sent to the ORM…
which said ORM does not wish to entertain.
Before actually performing the delete request (more precisely
forwarding said request to the listview itself), remove all false-ish
ids from the array.
Also, don't send a request to delete nothing.
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20121119084203-0vz4v9myfizxz88u
move special case in o2m listview to main editable and expand to
correctly fit edition cases, not just work in case of creation
issue: if a row being edited is deleted in an o2m, the form will be
blurred and try cancelling/saving the edition and reloading the row,
but this will only happen *after* the record/row/whatever has been
"deleted" and (amongst other things) removed from the buffered o2m
cache, leading to a tentative read on the server side (usually with a
local id which doesn't even make sense) and thus an error.
Intercept the deletion signal to cancel the edition immediately and
only let the deletion through after the edition has successfully been
canceled.
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20121116164416-8kr39t6jtqy2s3jc
* mock(:) callback receives a pair (args, kwargs) not raw params
* list buttons test triggers domain evaluation, which depends on form (why???)
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20121116115544-cdowx66w3m8inqon
simplify code and make setup & teardown processes more reliable
add testing.Stack tools which stacks promise-returning functions
around the actual promise-returning function to execute (the test case
itself).
testing.Stack returns an object with 3 methods, ``push([setup][,
teardown])``, ``unshift([setup][, teardown])`` and ``execute(fn,
*args)``. ``push`` and ``unshift`` create a new stack with the
provided setup and teardown added respectively at the top and bottom
of the stack.
``execute`` will walk the stack from bottom to top executing ``setup``
handlers (and waiting on their result), if all setup handlers execute
without failure the ``fn`` callback gets executed (and waited on) then
*all* ``teardown`` handlers are executed from top to bottom:
| setup
| setup
| setup
| setup
| fn
| teardown
| teardown
| teardown
V teardown
If a ``setup`` handler fails (the promise is rejected), teardowns will
start executing *from the previous level* (so the ``teardown``
matching the failed ``setup`` will *not* be run), but all
``teardowns`` below that will be run regardless, even if one fails the
next one will still be executed.
The stack will either ultimately return a promise rejection using the
*first* rejection it got (a rejection may be cascading, so the
rejection of a setup may also lead to or be linked to a teardown being
rejected later), or will return the resolution from ``fn``.
If ``execute`` is passed further arguments, those arguments will in
turn be forwarded to ``fn`` as well as all ``setup`` and ``teardown``
handlers.
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20121116071712-zuld957icellezum
Xavier Morel