THese are rarely intended for all users but often intended only for
employees.
account:
account.incoterms: only used within internal business models
account.journal.group: same as account.journal, add sudo in computed field
account_edi: need access to accounting objects
base_address_extended:
res.city: only employees should access address data
board: only employees uses this (old) module
crm:
crm.stage: internal users business object
hr_recruitment: employees can read
im_livechat: apply same as for the steps
l10n_ar: used on partner, not only invoices
l10n_ec: accessed only through account.move
l10n_latam: accessed on res.partner
mail:
publisher.warrenty.contract: no data, only static models
mail.channel: group_user has already his own rule
mail.group: group_user has already his own rule
mail.message.subtype: group_user has already his own rule
mail.message.all: remove, already has a portal and employee rule
partner_autocomplete: no interaction with public
project:
project.tags: only needed for project sharing
sale_management:
sale.order.option: same as sale.order
utm: employee already has write access
web_editor: test models that have nothing to do here
web_tour: only employees uses tours
website_sale:
product.ribbon: add sudo for access
base:
ir.default: only employees uses set (could probably be converted to group_system)
ir.ui.view.custom: same as ir.ui.view, add sudo when needed
report.*: portal users don't configure reports
res.users.log: create in sudo, no access needed (adapt test to use another model)
res.lang: still needed for public
closesodoo/odoo#118701
Related: odoo/enterprise#41285
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
The license is missing in most enterprise manifest so
the decision was taken to make it explicit in all cases.
When not defined, a warning will be triggered starting from
14.0 when falling back on the default LGPL-3.
closesodoo/odoo#74245
Related: odoo/design-themes#48
Related: odoo/enterprise#19862
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
In the search panel, the domain used to compute the field image values
(when the attribute expand is false) was the same as the domain used
to compute counters (if enabled). The idea was that a value bringing an
empty domain is totally useless and should not displayed.
That being true, it turns out that if one does not allow them and
several fields are used, selecting a value in the search panel will very
often totally transform the search panel. From a UI perspective,
this turns out to be bad: the search panel 'moves'.
Let us give an example:
Let us start from a search panel that looks like to:
first_field
A 1
B 3
second_field
C 1
D 2 <--- mouse above D
E 1
with first_field and second_field both with expand="0" and
enable_counters="1". Let us also assume that no record in the global
domain has both first_field=A and second_field=D.
Click on D would make the search panel look like to something like
first_field
B 1
second_field
C 1
D 2
E 1 <--- mouse here
(the selection of D does not impact the values for the second_field but
does for the other first_field values).
This has led us to use basically only the domain comming from
outside of the search panel to compute field image values.
This means that we might now have value with zero count even if expand
is false. In the above situation, a click on D would give us
first_field
A
B 1
second_field
C 1
D 2 <--- mouse still above D
E 1
Task ID: 2154749
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
This commit introduces a new attribute 'limit' for search panel fields
that allows to avoid performance issues. That integer attribute (with
default 200) allows to fix a maximal number of values to display for the
fields. When the number of field values to display reaches the limit,
no values will be displayed. Instead, a warning message will be shown
in the corresponding search panel section.
Note it is possible to have no limit using limit="0" on a field.
This commit reintroduces in a better way the principle brought by the
fix 8d57153b34c04952a85f6642951cb2697016da84.
Task ID: 2154749
The commit introduces two new attributes for search panel fields:
- hierarchize: boolean attribute (default True) available for
many2one fields with select="one". It allows to choose whether
to hierarchize the field values using the _parent_name (if set)
on the field comodel.
Note that a sanitization of the parent hierarchy takes place.
Basically, it ensures that parent chains are
completely in the domain (on comodel) accessible by the user.
See _search_panel_sanitized_parent_hierarchy documentation for
more information.
- expand: boolean attribute (default False) available for many2one
and many2many fields. If set to true, all field values are fetched
and displayed in the search panel. If set to false, only the
values that have at least one corresponding value in the field
model (and in some domain) are fetched.
An exception in the case of an hierarchized field
(hierarchize=True and _parent_name set): more/less values can be
displayed in order to have a good representation of the parent
hierarchy. That means we complete and sanitize the set of initial
field image values.
Note that the fix 8d57153b34c04952a85f6642951cb2697016da84 bringing the
notion of limit in search panel has been reverted in the present commit.
An upcomming commit will reintroduce the limit principle in a better way.
Task ID: 2154749
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
This commit introduces several changes in the search panel with
respect to record counts:
- the record counts are now also available for
the fields with select="one" attribute
(if not disabled explicitely).
- the record counts are better computed using the idea that
selected values within a group should not impact the counts
for the group values but only the counts for the other
group values.
On the way we have changed two keys in the values returned
by the server:
- 'count' becomes '__count'.
It has been done to avoid a possible clash in case a model would
have a field named 'count' and that the field values would be
wanted for some reason.
- 'name' (multi case) becomes 'display_name'.
It has been done in order to make the select one and multi cases
more similar and factorize some code.
TASK-ID: 2166814
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Collet <rco@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexis Lacroix <laa@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Martin Trigaux