The interraction between currency rates owned by branches can not be
defined clearly.
It would also make the currency rates tables a lot bigger.
task-3371677
Part-of: odoo/odoo#125642
- Improve performances, as the ir.rule restricting private partners
visibility is also applied on res.users by inheritance, on each
prefetch.
- Solve the issue of partners set as followers on records (eg: application
form) and then made private, making them impossible to contact via the
chatter.
- Solve the multiple access issues when trying to access the bank
account, or the private address for non HR people like the accountants
forcing the usage of sudo in the business code.
TaskID: 3101400
* = account{_payment}, base, onboarding, payment{_stripe},
sale{_management}, web, website_sale
Use the dedicated onboarding module introduced in 16.0 instead of
the res.company model to store onboarding progress.
It allows
* onboarding steps to be reused across panels
* to support steps that should be completed per-database or per-company
* to clean the res.company model from many fields and methods,
* to remove many views, controllers, actions
Module-specific notes:
* account: We also clean the remaining two steps that are not
part of an accounting panel but make the most sense to be kept here.
* account_payment: Following 8e4e8eb8, the payment provider step is
added to the invoicing onboarding panel. We apply this change here too.
Also impacts the website_sale_dashboard panel (see related ENT PR).
(The "sale tax" one is currently used for to the website sale dashboard).
* payment: Note that the step was already not part of an onboarding
panel within this module.
* website_sale: We clean
* a field not used (The website_sale dashboard onboarding panel used
the payment_provider_onboarding_state field).
* a method that was only called from website_sale_dashboard, so it is
moved there. See related ENT PR.
Includes a few tests.
Moving views/templates/styling, as well as cleaning residual onboarding-related fields and methods in base, including populate.
This also includes restoring the "onboarding_complete" overlay panel
animating it to disappear after a few seconds so that it doesn't hide
text and block buttons to re-open steps.
Task-3025136
Part-of: odoo/odoo#104223
This commit simply removes the res.company favicon field and every
related code because the feature is obsolete
closesodoo/odoo#116367
Related: odoo/upgrade#4469
Signed-off-by: Pierre Paridans (app) <app@odoo.com>
The domain used in `get_filters`, used in `get_views` is
```python
[('action_id', 'in', [action_id, False]), ('model_id', '=', model), ('user_id', 'in', [self._uid, False])]
```
Therefore filtering the filters on `action_id`, `model_id` and
`user_id`.
An index on `(action_id, model_id, user_id)` would therefore be welcome
in order to search quicker on filters.
The unique constraint `name_model_uid_unique` almost does it,
but it puts the name in first, and therefore the index is not used
when searching on the above domain.
By moving `name` to the end of the unique constraint,
the index created for this unique constraint becomes
usable for the above domain,
and it makes the SQL statement to search on filters way quicker.
Before:
```sql
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT "ir_filters".id FROM "ir_filters" LEFT JOIN "ir_translation" AS "ir_filters__name" ON ("ir_filters"."id" = "ir_filters__name"."res_id" AND "ir_filters__name"."type" = 'model' AND "ir_filters__name"."name" = 'ir.filters,name' AND "ir_filters__name"."lang" = 'en_US' AND "ir_filters__name"."value" != '') WHERE (((("ir_filters"."active" = true) AND (("ir_filters"."action_id" in (225)) OR "ir_filters"."action_id" IS NULL)) AND ("ir_filters"."model_id" = 'account.move')) AND (("ir_filters"."user_id" in (2)) OR "ir_filters"."user_id" IS NULL)) AND TRUE ORDER BY "ir_filters"."model_id" ,COALESCE("ir_filters__name"."value", "ir_filters"."name") ,"ir_filters"."id" DESC;
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sort (cost=3500.58..3500.59 rows=1 width=56) (actual time=12.940..12.942 rows=0 loops=1)
Sort Key: (COALESCE(ir_filters__name.value, (ir_filters.name)::text)), ir_filters.id DESC
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..3500.57 rows=1 width=56) (actual time=12.933..12.934 rows=0 loops=1)
Join Filter: (ir_filters.id = ir_filters__name.res_id)
-> Seq Scan on ir_filters (cost=0.00..3499.02 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=12.932..12.932 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: (active AND ((action_id = 225) OR (action_id IS NULL)) AND ((user_id = 2) OR (user_id IS NULL)) AND ((model_id)::text = 'account.move'::text))
Rows Removed by Filter: 100001
-> Seq Scan on ir_translation ir_filters__name (cost=0.00..1.54 rows=1 width=36) (never executed)
Filter: ((value <> ''::text) AND ((type)::text = 'model'::text) AND ((name)::text = 'ir.filters,name'::text) AND ((lang)::text = 'en_US'::text))
Planning Time: 0.311 ms
Execution Time: 12.972 ms
```
After:
```sql
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT "ir_filters".id FROM "ir_filters" LEFT JOIN "ir_translation" AS "ir_filters__name" ON ("ir_filters"."id" = "ir_filters__name"."res_id" AND "ir_filters__name"."type" = 'model' AND "ir_filters__name"."name" = 'ir.filters,name' AND "ir_filters__name"."lang" = 'en_US' AND "ir_filters__name"."value" != '') WHERE (((("ir_filters"."active" = true) AND (("ir_filters"."action_id" in (225)) OR "ir_filters"."action_id" IS NULL)) AND ("ir_filters"."model_id" = 'account.move')) AND (("ir_filters"."user_id" in (2)) OR "ir_filters"."user_id" IS NULL)) AND TRUE ORDER BY "ir_filters"."model_id" ,COALESCE("ir_filters__name"."value", "ir_filters"."name") ,"ir_filters"."id" DESC;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sort (cost=14.44..14.44 rows=1 width=56) (actual time=0.086..0.087 rows=0 loops=1)
Sort Key: (COALESCE(ir_filters__name.value, (ir_filters.name)::text)), ir_filters.id DESC
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=8.86..14.43 rows=1 width=56) (actual time=0.080..0.081 rows=0 loops=1)
Join Filter: (ir_filters.id = ir_filters__name.res_id)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on ir_filters (cost=8.86..12.87 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.079..0.080 rows=0 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: ((((model_id)::text = 'account.move'::text) AND (user_id = 2)) OR (((model_id)::text = 'account.move'::text) AND (user_id IS NULL)))
Filter: (active AND ((action_id = 225) OR (action_id IS NULL)))
-> BitmapOr (cost=8.86..8.86 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.078..0.079 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on ir_filters_name_model_uid_unique (cost=0.00..4.43 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.075..0.075 rows=0 loops=1)
Index Cond: (((model_id)::text = 'account.move'::text) AND (user_id = 2))
-> Bitmap Index Scan on ir_filters_name_model_uid_unique (cost=0.00..4.43 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=0 loops=1)
Index Cond: (((model_id)::text = 'account.move'::text) AND (user_id IS NULL))
-> Seq Scan on ir_translation ir_filters__name (cost=0.00..1.54 rows=1 width=36) (never executed)
Filter: ((value <> ''::text) AND ((type)::text = 'model'::text) AND ((name)::text = 'ir.filters,name'::text) AND ((lang)::text = 'en_US'::text))
Planning Time: 1.000 ms
Execution Time: 0.121 ms
```
I take the opportunity to add the populate for `ir.filters`,
which helped me for the above analysis.
closesodoo/odoo#99657
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
The basic idea of this functionality is for users
to be able to put limits on Partners that would
trigger non-blocking warnings when trying to confirm new:
- Sales Orders
- Invoices
when that partner has too many open invoices.
task-2722165
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83205
The CHF currency was duplicated. Instead of using an hard coded list,
select from all the active currencies.
These are USD and EUR on a clean DB but it is easy to change if we want
to populate with another currency in some use case, without changing the
code.
* When setting company_id on the res.partner, the parent might have had
a different company_id
* We should not consume res.partner's when creating res.user's but
creating new ones instead.
The population of res users was emptying the list of populated partner
ids.
The lunch.supplier population was crashing because no partner id was
present in the partner population registry to use as `partner_id` for
the generated lunch suppliers.
closesodoo/odoo#50266
X-original-commit: a2adc346906ee753df6d8e49caa4ee5381629695
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
william-andre