before this commit,
the wording of the visibility options can be quite confusing.
after this commit,
- Visibility has been updated
- Visible to all: I see those training to the public
- Visible to logged users only: I am a B2B business, and I do not want the
public to see what I offer + the pricing I have on those
- Visible to members only: I am a school, I want to invite my students but
external visitors should not be able to enroll
- Move the field above the "enroll policy"
- Enroll Policy has been set to invite when visibility is set as a Course
attendee and hide the enroll policy
task- 2862003
closesodoo/odoo#102085
Related: odoo/upgrade#3946
Signed-off-by: Stéphane Debauche (std) <std@odoo.com>
ir.rule are default values but can be customized based on the
company's policy and needs.
This is typically a record that is in noupdate as should be
customization-friendly.
Add privacy on forum: public or private. If private, we must select
one group that has access.
For forum linked to eLearning course: the privacy of forum is the same
as the course. If the course is not yet published, the forum will be
invisible (unless we have the group group_website_slides_officer).
If a forum linked to a course is unlinked or removed, the forum will
become private and his group will be set to group_website_slides_officer.
All posts and tags have the same access rules as their linked forum.
closesodoo/odoo#43486
Taskid: 2169965
Related: odoo/upgrade#758
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Have user groups specific to eLearning to separate them from generic website
editors. Indeed this is a specific work area and require more than pure design
skills.
SPECIFICATIONS
Two user groups are added in this commit
* group_website_slides_officer
+ can read any course/slide
+ can create a course (will be responsible)
+ can write on its courses
+ can upload slides to the courses he is responsible
+ can publish slides to the courses he is responsible
- cannot unlink courses/slides (you should archive them)
* implies group_website_publisher in order to see the top navbar in
frontend with the publish toggle button and the new content button;
* group_website_slides_manager: has full rights
+ can read any course/slide;
+ can create a course;
+ can add slide to any courses;
+ can publish any courses/slides;
+ can unlink any courses/slides;
+ has access to reporting menu entries;
Rights for other groups are untouched for courses / slides. As a reminder
we still support responsibles being outside of eLearning groups, for example
if an employee is a teacher that handles a course:
* people in upload_group_ids of a channel can upload slides, even if they
don't belong to any eLearning group;
* people responsible of a course can upload and publish slides even if they
don't belong to any eLearning group (done through controller as they
don't have real rights on underlying models);
We choose to keep the survey rights separated from eLearning ones. Indeed
it is easy in odoo to update the imply_ids field of groups if necessary
to link survey / eLearning groups; default user template can also be updated
easily. Standard Odoo should therefore correctly separate those groups. The
only specific rights is that eLearning officers can read all surveys, allowing
to choose them for certification-based courses.
LINKS
Task ID 2062462
PR #39485
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Since 556b6454dab07cdf716d404ec0db9aa51a09b165, channel can be linked to a dedicated forum.
But the link could only be done in backend, in the slide.channel configuration
For now on, website_publishers can create a new dedicated forum when they create
a new slide.channel.
Link buttons have been added in both forum and slide.channel headers to navigate easily
between them.
Fix the relation between course and forum in a model point of view.
Task ID : 1922159
PR #31109
Nikunj Ladava