Before this commit, the payment providers (e.g., Stripe, Adyen...)
available for payment were displayed on the payment forms. The customer
had to select one to process their payment. After that, the customer had
to select their preferred payment method (e.g., Credit Card,
Bancontact...) from a list of payment methods supported by the selected
provider over which the website administrator had close to no control.
This was making the payment forms confusing because the payment methods
were displayed sometimes more than once, if at all, in a non-controlled
order, and behind the selection of a payment provider that customers
should not have to deal with.
As the payment method was selected in an iframe or directly on the
provider's website, the information on the selection payment method was
not available in Odoo. This posed many problems, among which were the
impossibility of assessing whether a specific feature (e.g.,
tokenization, refunds, manual capture...) was available, not being able
to easily identify payment tokens through the payment method logo,
listing available payment methods on the website, sorting and
fine-grained configuration of the available payment method, subpar
payment method-specific display on the payment form (e.g., PayPal that
requires displaying a "Pay with PayPal" button), etc.
In this commit, the payment providers are thus replaced by the payment
methods on the payment forms. All contextually available (depending on
the country, currency, requested feature...) payment methods are
displayed one after the other on a single-level list and in the order
configured by the website administrator. Each payment method is
"powered by" (i.e., linked) to a single payment provider: the first one,
by model order, to support it. This allows, for example, offering the
PayPal payment method through Mollie, which charges low processing fees,
while also offering Klarna through Stripe, which supports more payment
methods but charges higher processing fees.
While doing so, the two different payment forms, "Checkout" and
"Manage", are also merged together in a new, configurable case-by-case,
payment form that is entirely redesigned to offer a better user
experience.
After payment, the information on the selected payment method is saved
on the transaction and eventual payment record and updated with the
information received from the provider.
task-2882677
closesodoo/odoo#120446
Related: odoo/upgrade#5103
Related: odoo/documentation#5717
Related: odoo/enterprise#40666
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Anita (anko) <anko@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Brieuc-brd <brd@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Valeriya (vchu) <vchu@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the lists of supported currencies by payment
provider were hard-coded in the Python scripts, which made them
unavailable to the users.
With this commit, the implemented initial lists of supported currencies
are displayed on the form view and are editable, because Odoo lists may
not be up-to-date. Empty lists do not trigger any filtering on the
payment providers to access payment methods.
For Authorize.net and Asiapay payment providers, the specific
`(authorize,asiapay)_currency_id` are removed and the generic payment
provider field `available_currency_ids` is restricted to a single-item
list when one of those providers is enabled.
task-2926016
closesodoo/odoo#101018
Related: odoo/enterprise#34158
Related: odoo/documentation#2788
Related: odoo/upgrade#4069
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit the neutralize system introduced in v16 was using ORM
methods in order to change appropriate records. Although flexible, this approach
could lead to call some methods with side effects while neutralizing
(eg: overloads of write).
This patch converts the neutralize system to a safer "inert" SQL based approach
by migrating the generic method _neutralize to SQL files exposed in the
data folder.
Task id: 2961687closesodoo/odoo#102792
X-original-commit: e5dbded9bb363351feff7ca8a56c7f8a6860f492
Related: odoo/enterprise#32580
Signed-off-by: Fabien Meghazi <fme@odoo.com>
Changing the name of model payment.acquirer to payment.provider
and everything that it touches. It is technically incorrect to
use the term "acquirer" for systems that only provide a service
of payment.
After this commit the model payment.acquirer and all related to
it will be renamed to payment.provider.
Task - 2842088
closesodoo/odoo#90899
Related: odoo/upgrade#3542
Related: odoo/documentation#1981
Related: odoo/enterprise#27131
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, most acquirers needed to run several successive
searches for the transaction whose reference was received by a
controller in notification data. This is because the security checks
run on the notification data require access to the acquirer through the
transaction record which was immediately discarded.
Starting with this commit, all `*_feedback_data` method are no longer
decorated with `api.model` and can use the transaction record they're
called on if provided. They are also renamed to `*_notification_data`.
task-2737144
closesodoo/odoo#83850
Related: odoo/enterprise#23938
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
An overridable model method was added in a previous commit in order to
neutralize a database.
This commit introduce the implementation of this method for the payment
modules.
Also, a `_neutralize_fields` helper method is added on the
PaymentAcquirer model to simplify the neutralization of the various
payment modules.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#67825
Notification handling in some acquirers presents a subset of the
following issues:
1. The signature of synchronous notifications (redirect payloads) is not
checked. (Alipay, Authorize, Buckaroo, Mollie, PayU money, PayULatam)
2. When the signature check fails, we raise a ValidationError which
counts as an HTTP 200 for some providers (it's not the case if they
expect a specific string). (Adyen, Paypal, Sips, Stripe)
3. If a ValidationError is raised when processing the feedback data, it
is allowed to bubble up to the provider. (Alipay, Ogone)
The issues are respectively addressed as follows:
1. If the acquirer implements payments with redirection, make sure that
if either makes a request to the provider to validate the data or
that it verifies the signature. Verifying the origin of the request
is not enough: the payload must be checked too.
2. Instead of raising ValidationError's, raise an HTTP 403 FORBIDDEN
error if the signature check fails.
3. Wrap the call to `_handle_feedback_data` of the webhook method inside
a try/except clause to catch any ValidationError, log a warning, and
acknowledge the notification to avoid having the provider disable the
webhook because of too many failures.
task-2688139
task-2693293
closesodoo/odoo#81607
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucie Van Nieuwenhuyze <luvn@odoo.com>
Fix two issues:
The search of suitable payment token was searching on the journal_id
field of the payment acquirer that is no longer stored.
Change it to now search on the acquirer_id directly, since we have
this information.
The _inverse_journal_id method on payment acquirers would create
new payment line with the manual payment method when no provider
are given to an acquirer, or no payment method is existing for
a given provider. This would cause issues with the creation of
multiple line with the same name on a same journal, which would
trigger the constrains blocking that.
closesodoo/odoo#74990
X-original-commit: a3a2fcb0b299fafbf359ec9015da5c85cdb57b3a
Related: odoo/enterprise#20193
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Users may want to be able to have transactions coming from multiple
payment acquirers to be registered in the same journal.
This will allows that.
Task id #2414749closesodoo/odoo#67331
Related: odoo/upgrade#2500
Related: odoo/enterprise#17258
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
And other reported English mistakes in source string
Courtesy of Transifex translators
And remove leftover from gengo
closesodoo/odoo#59022
X-original-commit: 26efc84c5cac47a2cc83d7b084f8b71528fec6c7
Related: odoo/enterprise#13781
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
With this commit, Selection fields with `required=True` which are
extended via `selection_add` are given proper ondelete policies to
ensure the cleanup of records containing these extended options during
uninstall of the extending module.
This commit also cleans up leftover uninstall hooks that were being used
to handle the same set of problems prior to the ondelete mechanism being
implemented for Selection fields.
closesodoo/odoo#46325
Related: odoo/enterprise#9117
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Fine-tunning of 937b5c076e7175bec664ed0cf4b77505e342f1e2
Have a multiwebsite setup
have a payment installed for one of the two websites
Make an order on that website and try to pay
Before this commit, the transaction doesn't come back to odoo's
payment success controller
This was because the return url was set to the web base url ICP
After this commit, the payment success page is opened as we took
the request's url as the return url
opw-2080352
closesodoo/odoo#39643
X-original-commit: a9fb15b33fd041ee420581a5ba450017db06e0c7
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
before this commit: it gives error when we redirect to payumoney site
after this commit: payment testing in payumoney is working as expected
closesodoo/odoo#36937
X-original-commit: 97c0ece7857ca56b1fd20d3772262def5aeebdc4
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Replace website_published and environment by a generic state on
payment.acquirer
Payment acquirers aren't enabled by default. When setting their state to 'enabled' or 'test', it is verified the required fields for the provider are set.
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
It was very confusing for the user to distinct account.payment and payment.transaction. From now on, the transactions are
technical objects and, in the backend, we only refer to it in log messages (Front end will be adapted in the same fashion
later on). They are hidden in debug mode in accounting\configuration\payments as their purpose is now purely technical/log
This commit also aims to reduce the gap between the accounting app and the transactions: account.payment objects are
created/validated upon completion of transaction.
To ease the capture/voiding of pending transactions, the related buttons are now displayed directly on the SO/invoice
instead of the transactions.
Was task: https://www.odoo.com/web#id=35857&view_type=form&model=project.task&action=333&active_id=967&menu_id=4720
Was PR #24043
[FIX] add domain based on journal to payment tokens
Was opw: https://www.odoo.com/web?debug#id=1828206&view_type=form&model=project.task&menu_id=5200
In Python 3, all of these were "consolidated" under urllib(.request,
.parse, .errors) which is inconvenient.
Since we already have hard dependencies on requests and
werkzeug(.urls, which is a backport of Python 3's unicode-aware
urllib.parse) migrate *everything* to that.
A sticking point is urllib2.URLError, those were (mostly) replaced by
the slightly more general IOError which URLError extends.
In 8.0 private fields have been recently set as visible only to employees
at commit b226510840.
However between v9 and v10 two new payment acquirers have been implemented
payumoney and stripe. Those addons now have their credential set as private.
Methods using the acquirers have been sudoed accordingly to avoid access
issues when rendering the buttons. Other payment modules will be updated when
the forward port from 8 to 9 and pre-10-master will be done.
