The "fees" or "extra fees" or "customer fees" feature was meant to make
customers pay for the processing fee charged by the payment provider
they choose to make their payment. The fee was also displayed on the
payment form to deter customers and encourage them to choose another,
cheaper, payment provider.
In practice, it didn't hold up because:
1. the provider's API must allow sending the fee as a separate amount,
and PayPal was the only supported provider to do it;
2. charging extra fees is highly discouraged by providers, and forbidden
in Europe;
3. the final fee amount depends on the customer, country, payment
method, risk profile... rendering charging the actual fees amount
infeasible;
4. most of the time, only one payment provider is enabled at a time,
thus alienating customers who would have no other choice than paying
the fee;
task-3358581
closesodoo/odoo#132104
Related: odoo/documentation#5517
Related: odoo/upgrade#5053
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
UX was lacking comparing to other payment providers,
important fields were not always shown or were checkboxes
when they should be automatically true.
In order to make payment flow easier and more intitive, unnecessary fields
were removed, email is automatically filled. Now when user cancels transaction
on paypal before paying, it automatically cancels transaction on Odoo. Additionaly, quick
onboarding is only available if user already has paypal account and Stripe
no longer installs ond configures paypal if Stripe's onboarding get canceled.
task-2854184
closesodoo/odoo#104974
Related: odoo/upgrade#4025
Related: odoo/documentation#3063
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Payment fees appeared as float (and not monetary) in the Payment
provider form and were not converted into the chosen payment
currency.
Some tests check the `_compute_fees` function.
task-2854143
closesodoo/odoo#100156
Related: odoo/upgrade#4106
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Before this commit the neutralize system introduced in v16 was using ORM
methods in order to change appropriate records. Although flexible, this approach
could lead to call some methods with side effects while neutralizing
(eg: overloads of write).
This patch converts the neutralize system to a safer "inert" SQL based approach
by migrating the generic method _neutralize to SQL files exposed in the
data folder.
Task id: 2961687closesodoo/odoo#102792
X-original-commit: e5dbded9bb363351feff7ca8a56c7f8a6860f492
Related: odoo/enterprise#32580
Signed-off-by: Fabien Meghazi <fme@odoo.com>
Changing the name of model payment.acquirer to payment.provider
and everything that it touches. It is technically incorrect to
use the term "acquirer" for systems that only provide a service
of payment.
After this commit the model payment.acquirer and all related to
it will be renamed to payment.provider.
Task - 2842088
closesodoo/odoo#90899
Related: odoo/upgrade#3542
Related: odoo/documentation#1981
Related: odoo/enterprise#27131
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, most acquirers needed to run several successive
searches for the transaction whose reference was received by a
controller in notification data. This is because the security checks
run on the notification data require access to the acquirer through the
transaction record which was immediately discarded.
Starting with this commit, all `*_feedback_data` method are no longer
decorated with `api.model` and can use the transaction record they're
called on if provided. They are also renamed to `*_notification_data`.
task-2737144
closesodoo/odoo#83850
Related: odoo/enterprise#23938
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
An overridable model method was added in a previous commit in order to
neutralize a database.
This commit introduce the implementation of this method for the payment
modules.
Also, a `_neutralize_fields` helper method is added on the
PaymentAcquirer model to simplify the neutralization of the various
payment modules.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#67825
With commit 7b165cd5, it was incorrectly assumed that PDT notifications
sent by PayPal could not be verified with the suggested method
(dedicated to PDT notifications) because they were missing some required
parameters. The code was thus adapted to have their verification done
with the method already in place for IPN notifications, as it seemed to
do the job. It turns out that the PayPal sandbox account that was used
at that time was not properly configured, and that PayPal was then
sending IPN-like notifications instead of actual PDT notifications,
which is the reason why the swap of methods worked.
Actually, once the account is properly configured, PayPal sends
correctly populated PDT notifications that must be verified with the
method dedicated to PDT notifications, as the one dedicated to IPN
notifications stops working in that case.
With this commit, the method used to verify the origin and integrity of
PDT notifications is replaced by the one that was previously removed.
The method is however implemented in a more defensive manner to:
1. accept and process the notification without verification if the
account is not properly configured on PayPal.
2. silently discard the notification if the acquirer is not properly
configured on Odoo. We then rely on the IPN (webhook) to confirm the
transaction.
task-2744043
closesodoo/odoo#83659
X-original-commit: 7367f543498810bbdb018aa3566c7afed5684436
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Notification handling in some acquirers presents a subset of the
following issues:
1. The signature of synchronous notifications (redirect payloads) is not
checked. (Alipay, Authorize, Buckaroo, Mollie, PayU money, PayULatam)
2. When the signature check fails, we raise a ValidationError which
counts as an HTTP 200 for some providers (it's not the case if they
expect a specific string). (Adyen, Paypal, Sips, Stripe)
3. If a ValidationError is raised when processing the feedback data, it
is allowed to bubble up to the provider. (Alipay, Ogone)
The issues are respectively addressed as follows:
1. If the acquirer implements payments with redirection, make sure that
if either makes a request to the provider to validate the data or
that it verifies the signature. Verifying the origin of the request
is not enough: the payload must be checked too.
2. Instead of raising ValidationError's, raise an HTTP 403 FORBIDDEN
error if the signature check fails.
3. Wrap the call to `_handle_feedback_data` of the webhook method inside
a try/except clause to catch any ValidationError, log a warning, and
acknowledge the notification to avoid having the provider disable the
webhook because of too many failures.
task-2688139
task-2693293
closesodoo/odoo#81607
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucie Van Nieuwenhuyze <luvn@odoo.com>
Add a test for the computation of the Paypal fees
opw:2369557
closesodoo/odoo#61750
X-original-commit: 8bedef042bd7be5830de92ae9a6976c9e17fb792
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
l10n runbot builds are all failing when running at least one test depending of AccountTestCommon because it:
- doesn't create a sandboxed testing environnement to manage the multi-currency, multi-company, the default company's currency, the exchange rates...
- doesn't setup a testing user then all tests are done using the superuser.
- doesn't provide a fully setup chart of accounts: exchange difference journal is not set, accounts have bad types, etc...
- is run sometimes at-install.
--task: 2296213
Replace website_published and environment by a generic state on
payment.acquirer
Payment acquirers aren't enabled by default. When setting their state to 'enabled' or 'test', it is verified the required fields for the provider are set.
Accept payment on Paypal without having a merchant account
The merchant only need an email address to accept payment from Paypal
Paypal will send email to the merchant to create an account with the details
Odoo will send mail to the merchant to fill all the credentials after creating an account
Note: why used rm? - If IPN is disabled in the profile (case for the new user), the default action to call the return_url is a GET. This means that if your return_url is a script, you must set rm = 2 in order to have the IPN variable POSTed to that URL
task- 34668
PAYPAL
------
The paypal tests are not working working for two reasons:
- we check that there is no date in pending state on payment
transaction, but since the refactoring in this commit: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/01216345e28374b554bfe95df82d607c591271cf
the date is always set before the validation of transaction.
- Since the changes on dates, the datetime field doesn't return a string
anymore and the comparison fails. So we convert the datetime to string
for the comparison.
BUCKAROO
--------
The buckaroo tests were not working for multiple reasons.
STRIPE
------
The payment stripe tests were not working because:
- The reference set in transactions were not the same as the ones givent
to the payment provider.
- we were checking for a script tag in form that has been removed in
commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7c639be4aadce20bf6662ab347470fadf9afd99f
AUTHORIZE
---------
This test cannot be tested on runbot due to its server to server way of
working
closesodoo/odoo#30105
It was very confusing for the user to distinct account.payment and payment.transaction. From now on, the transactions are
technical objects and, in the backend, we only refer to it in log messages (Front end will be adapted in the same fashion
later on). They are hidden in debug mode in accounting\configuration\payments as their purpose is now purely technical/log
This commit also aims to reduce the gap between the accounting app and the transactions: account.payment objects are
created/validated upon completion of transaction.
To ease the capture/voiding of pending transactions, the related buttons are now displayed directly on the SO/invoice
instead of the transactions.
Was task: https://www.odoo.com/web#id=35857&view_type=form&model=project.task&action=333&active_id=967&menu_id=4720
Was PR #24043
[FIX] add domain based on journal to payment tokens
Was opw: https://www.odoo.com/web?debug#id=1828206&view_type=form&model=project.task&menu_id=5200
In Python 3, all of these were "consolidated" under urllib(.request,
.parse, .errors) which is inconvenient.
Since we already have hard dependencies on requests and
werkzeug(.urls, which is a backport of Python 3's unicode-aware
urllib.parse) migrate *everything* to that.
A sticking point is urllib2.URLError, those were (mostly) replaced by
the slightly more general IOError which URLError extends.
The installation of a new acquirer was a bit complicated : from settings,
check the acquirer, then apply (install the module) then list view of
acquirer and finally edit it in form view.
This needed to be simplified. The payment acquirers are pre-filled
in payment. From the kanban view an `Install` button installs and
redirects to the form field.
merge *ALL* the dicts
The form rendering used to receive a dict for partner information and a dict for tx information and to transmit another dict to the qweb template; now everything is done in a single dict
Antoine Vandevenne (anv)