1. simplify message reaction formatter (personas)
Data was formatted to have "partners" and "guests" entries, both
of which contribute to personas.
To avoid some post-processing of data in JS, it's best to format
data to immediately include type of persona.
2. include "guestAuthor" in "author" data of message
Discuss models in JS group partners and guests into a single model
Persona, to make feature works regardless on whether user is
authenticated or not.
This commit simplifies code by removing data guestAuthor in message
formatted data, and instead author contains author data in all cases,
whether the author is a partner or guest.
3. simplify insert (remove id, redundant with preinsert)
Also rename Follower.isActive to Follower.is_active, for
even simpler Follower.insert()
closesodoo/odoo#137276
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Before this PR, channel update were not sent via bus notifications.
Part of task-2821415
closesodoo/odoo#136623
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Relational data in server formatter are:
- for one relation: None/false or object
- for many relations: list of objects or list of commands
The commands were:
- 'insert': to add a new item in a relational field
- 'unlink': to remove an item from a relational field
- 'insert-and-unlink': to remove an item from a relational field
- 'clear': to remove all items from relational field
There was a slight nuance between 'unlink' and 'insert-and-unlink'
at some point, but it becomes irrelevant with current code of model.
The name of the commands were hard to grasp what they actually mean
for the many relations.
This commit improves it by renaming 'insert' by 'ADD' and the 2
'unlink' commands by 'DELETE'. This makes it more apparent that
the data in 'ADD' refers to data of record to add in the relation,
while 'DELETE' refers to data of record to delete from the relation.
The 'clear' has been replaced by `False` value instead of a command.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#136308
Some tests are updated to lessen diff in future tests, especially about
aliases. Some tests are fixed as they are somehow incorrect (notably
in gateway testing) but currently passing as mail gateway is quite
permissive.
Add some tests preparing MC / alias domains configuration notably about
company / alias synchronization, which is currently only based on config
parameters.
Also update some tests by using fstrings which are generally more readable.
Finally move some tests to their right file / main testing class to keep
them ordered by main topic.
Prepares Task-36879 (Mail: Support MultiCompany Aliases)
closesodoo/odoo#136318
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@c18300e225
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Cleanup some code bits in common classes, add some docstrings. Improve
notifications related helpers, notably to ease checking content of mail.mail
or outgoing emails when posting messages.
Update 'test_message_post' with those new helpers, to ease inclusion of
additional specific values test with alias domains in mind in next commits.
Prepares Task-36879 (Mail: Support MultiCompany Aliases)
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@513fb74f5c
Part-of: odoo/odoo#136318
Update (some) query counters according to runbot state.
Also make some tests deterministic when involving company name.
Task-36879 (Mail: Support MultiCompany Aliases)
closesodoo/odoo#135288
Related: odoo/enterprise#47345
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Only duplicate emails used to be checked when sending a mass mail.
However it is possible (e.g. using templates) to send a mass mail
to the same person containing different information.
The existing functions to allow models to specify emails
processed in the past by some other means are kept.
A new check is added in the processing that checks the full contents
of the message, subject and attachment ids.
The strings are not hashed as most situations are:
- Sending the exact same mail to everyone
-> Only need to check against one message
-> Same complexity as hashing
- Sending all different emails
-> Checking inequality of str is usually very fast
For attachments, as we cannot compare them easily.
They are ignored for the purpose of equating emails
whenever there are the same number of attachments
in the email values as there are on the composer.
This is because each email should receive its own copy
of the composer attachments. If they have a different
number of attachments, they were generated dynamically
through reports and we assume they are all different.
We can thus remove the 'document based' information
as it is implicitly infered from this check.
-------------------------
Test utils are also updated for two purposes:
1. Add optional body and attachment_name discriminents
assertMailMail assumed all emails could at least be
differentiated by subject. Our test breaks that
assumption, so we use body and attachment to find the
best-fitting email based on the data passed in.
2. Check email_formatted on recipients
When using assertMailMailWEmails, we first find the
email using the non-formatted email of the recipient.
This does not match assertSentMail which checks against
the raw email_to value, which would often be formatted.
Task-2826811
closesodoo/odoo#99541
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
The Dynamic placeholder was not opening properly in mail template since the wysiwyg OWL conversion.
Fix it and also fix the tour that should have detected this error.
The tour itself was not running properly.
task-3495254
closesodoo/odoo#135275
X-original-commit: df8532cffc74038db0faef36b5f43758e1bbdf43
Signed-off-by: David Monjoie (dmo) <dmo@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Geelen Sébastien (sge) <sge@odoo.com>
Have all mail tests be in a controlled multi-company environment by default.
Remove extra calls to '_activate_multi_company' as it is now part of the
base 'MailCommon' test class.
Task-3453577 (TestMail: Update Alias/Gateway tests for MC)
Prepares Task-36879 (Mail: Support MultiCompany Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#135055
With input 'name email@domain.com' (missing chevrons allowing to clearly spot
the email part) 'getaddresses' returns ('', 'name email@domain.com) i.e. the
whole input is considered as being the email.
To improve the heuristic we can add a fallback by recalling 'getadresses'
on the input with spaces replaced by commas when it found only an email and
no name. The new email will be split into sub pairs allowing to find the real
email and various name parts, allowing to make a new name / email pair.
Emails should not contain spaces thus this is coherent with email formation.
This fallback actually comes from a specific code done in '_parse_partner_name'
of Partner model. Supporting it directly at tools level make the behavior
coherent for all models.
Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@18c71edf59
Part-of: odoo/odoo#134934
As it already normalizes returned emails some manual calls to 'email_normalize'
are not necessary. Some variable names are updated to be clearer about the
email being normalized.
Parsing contact name and email is also moved into a tool function to avoid
using a partner environment just for a tool parsing method.
Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@f7add44c28
Part-of: odoo/odoo#134934
PURPOSE
Be defensive when dealing with email fields, notably when having multi-emails
or email field containing an already-formatted email.
SPECIFICATIONS
Tool method '_mail_find_partner_from_emails' that searches for partners based
on email is improved to support multi-emails input. Instead of skipping
multi-email (current behavior of 'email_normalize') we now consider first
found email in the input.
It is used notably to match incoming email / partners or suggest recipients
in Chatter.
Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@e0582b9e1f
Part-of: odoo/odoo#134934
PURPOSE
Be defensive when dealing with email fields, notably when having multi-emails
or email field containing an already-formatted email.
SPECIFICATIONS
When having multi-emails input in an email field, 'email_normalized' field is
currently 'False', as they expect the field to contain a single email. This
has several drawbacks
* searching partners or fetching information based on emails does not work as
most tool methods use 'email_normalized' which is False (see e.g.
'_message_partner_info_from_emails', '_mail_find_partner_from_emails'
or 'find_or_create');
* blacklist is not available as it is based on 'email_normalized';
* mass_mailing wrongly considers those emails as invalid and cancel their
mail and related trace, as it tries to skip sending emails to invalid
emails;
Be more defensive and use first found email in case of multi-emails field.
Other emails are ignored. It is already an improvement that does not break
flows in stable and allow more emails to be sent.
before
-> email: '"Raoul" <raoul1@raoul.fr>, raoul2@raoul.fr'
-> email_normalized: False
after
-> email: '"Raoul" <raoul1@raoul.fr>, raoul2@raoul.fr'
-> email_normalized: raoul1@raoul.fr
A side effect is that it helps finding back some partners, as indicated in
tests where less phantom partners are created. It also helps suggested
partners / emails flow in discuss.
Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@90218186c5
Part-of: odoo/odoo#134934
PURPOSE
Be defensive when dealing with email fields, notably when having multi-emails
or email field containing an already-formatted email.
SPECIFICATIONS
When building the final 'from' of outgoing emails using 'formataddr' we
have issues if email contains multi emails or formatted email. Having a
wrongly formatted email in 'email_from' leads to issues as it is badly
recognized by email providers, could be considered as being phishing and
also breaks reply_to mechanism.
Main fix of this commit is to extract emails and rebuild the 'email_from'
based on found emails. 'from' of sent emails is now the first found email
in 'email_from' field of related <mail.mail> record like
-> before: email_from: '"Raoul" <raoul@raoul.fr>, raoul2@raoul.fr'
-> after: email_from: '"Raoul" <raoul@raoul.fr>' and raoul2 is ignored
Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@1453db1a74
Part-of: odoo/odoo#134934
PURPOSE
Be defensive when dealing with email fields, notably when having multi-emails
or email field containing an already-formatted email.
SPECIFICATIONS
When building the final 'email_to' of outgoing emails using 'formataddr' we
have issues if email contains multi emails or formatted email. Main fix of
this commit is to extract emails and rebuild the 'email_to' list based on
found emails.
E.g. partner Raoul - email: "Raoul" <raoul@raoul.fr>
-> before: to: "Raoul" <"Raoul" <raoul@raoul.fr>> (double format)
-> after: to: "Raoul" <raoul@raoul.fr>
E.g. partner Raoul - email: raoul1@raoul.fr, raoul2@raoul.fr
-> before: to: "Raoul" <raoul1@raoul.fr, raoul2@raoul.fr>
single email with multiple emails, depends on server fault tolerance)
-> after: to: "Raoul" <raoul1@raoul.fr>, "Raoul" <raoul2@raoul.fr>
multi emails
Fix that computation by using all normalized emails found in 'email' fields
and rebuilding a formatted email based on name + those emails. We do not
use `email_formatted` as it is not really multi-enabled. We prefer a local
defensive approach to be as tolerant as possible with respect to user inputs.
Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@1c4b704149
Part-of: odoo/odoo#134934
PURPOSE
Be defensive when dealing with email fields, notably when having multi-emails
or email field containing an already-formatted email.
SPECIFICATIONS
Main fix in this commit: fix multiple nested formatting in 'email_formatted'
computation for <res.partner>. Other use cases are mainly left untouched as
we let users deal with their input. In summary :
* double format: if email already holds a formatted email, we should not use
it to compute email_formatted, like
name: Name / email: 'Format' <email@domain.com>
-> before '"Name" <"Name" <email@domain.com>>"
-> after '"Name" <email@domain.com>''
* multi emails: sometimes this field is used to hold several addresses
like email1@domain.com, email2@domain.com. We currently let this value
globally untouched by extracting emails and joining them, as we do not
expect email_formatted to be a list of emails. Extractin emails allows
to filter out extra text stored in email field, like
name: Name / email: text, email1@domain.com, email2@domain.com
-> before: "Name" <text, email1@domain.com, email2@domain.com>
-> after: "Name" <email1@domain.com,email2@domain.com>
* invalid email: if something is wrong, better keep it in email_formatted
than harcoding "False". Indeed this eases management and understanding
of failures at mail.mail, mail.notification and mailing.trace level. This
behavior does not change as it was already implemented like that even if
not sure it was intended;
Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@9175bbd8e2
Part-of: odoo/odoo#134934
Move tests currently in mail about helpers defined in 'tools/mail.py' directly
into base. No need to test it in mail, there is no specific override or
behavior change compared to base.
Regroup partner related tests in base into 'test_res_partner'. This breaks
part of test history but it helps knowing which features are tested.
Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#134934
PURPOSE
Be defensive when dealing with email fields, notably when having multi-emails
or email field containing an already-formatted email.
RATIONALE
Add tests related to not standard usage of email field. Two main use cases
are tested here
* formatted emails: `"Full Name" <email@domain.com>` stored into the 'email'
field;
* multi emails: `email1@domain.com, email2@domain.com` stored into a single
'email' field;
Additional tests: tests with unicode / ascii / case / wrong formatting are also
added to check the support in normalize and format methods.
IMPLICATION
Email field is generally managed as "containing a valid email". This means
it is sometimes used as it in 'formataddr' as well as to perform searches or
identification checks. Example of issue: partner 'Raoul' has a formatted email
like "Raoul" <raoul@raoul.fr>. Using 'formataddr' in email_from leads to
from: "Raoul" <"Raoul" <raoul@raoul.fr>>
-> which is incorrect (but often dynamically corrected by email servers);
Email field holding multi-emails are not normalized, as current normalize
is done only if the field holds a single email. It means
* no easy finding based on 'email_normalized', e.g. various tools like
'_mail_find_partner_from_emails' or 'find_or_create' do not find partners
based on this email;
* no exclusion list management;
* issue with formatting, like
to: "Raoul" <raoul@raoul.fr,raoul.other@raoul.fr>
-> which is incorrect (but often dynamically corrected by email servers);
USAGE: OUTGOING EMAILS
Those use cases currently generate faulty outgoing emails. This is valid for
recipients ('email_cc', 'email_to') as well as author ('email_from').
For formatted emails: `email_to` is formatted again based on name and email
which leads to sending emails to `"Full Name" <"Other"<email@domain.com>>`.
Note that multi emails without formatting may work as it leads to email_to
`"Full name" <email1@domain.com,email2@domain.com>`. Some outgoing email
servers correctly send multiple emails. It depends on their fault
tolerance.
USAGE: FIND BASED ON EMAIL (NORMALIZED)
When searching for partners (e.g. using '_mail_find_partner_from_emails' or
'find_or_create') normalized version of input is used.
In case of multi emails sanitize is 'False', as normalization expects a single
email in the field. Therefore no partner is found. In processes that do a
"search or create" (e.g. using a template on a record) this leads to creating
a new partner (or several partners in case of multi emails) each time.
USAGE: OTHER FLOWS
Other flows are build on top of '_mail_find_partner_from_emails' / 'create'
of outgoing emails and are impacted by formatted email / multi email usage.
Those include notably
* mass_mailing: '_message_get_default_recipients' should be defensive to
give correct values when creating mailing emails;
* mass_mailing: faulty emails is based on normalize and multi-emails are
considered as faulty and ignored;
* after post hook: '_message_post_after_hook' tries to link messages without
author (but email_from) with newly-created partners, when partners are
created from chatter. It is therefore impacted by those corner cases;
* marketing_automation: built on top of mass_mailing and suffers from the
same issues;
USAGE: UNICODE
Unicode in emails should be supported. 'formataddr' and IrMailServer notably
received fixes to support unicode. Some check performed on email addresses
fail when unicode is involved, which leads to some emails not being sent
while they could.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add tests related to those corner cases. Also add tests for computation of
`email_formatted` field of Partner model. It currently generates wrong email
values for the same corner cases (multi emails, formatted emails).
Tests are also added for the computation of `email_normalized` field used
notably for blacklists. It is not computed currently when being in multi
email mode which prevents from any blacklist mechanism as well as make
email finding harder. `_mail_find_partner_from_emails` tool method is also
tested with multi email as it uses the same heuristic as normalized email
field.
Tests are also added for mass mailing, when having to mail documents that
have a partner with formatted emails / multi-emails, or that have an email
field with formatted emails / multi-emails.
Also restore a test removed at odoo/odoo@afcb734908 while it should have been
updated to state that email addresses containing non-ascii characters are
supported.
Add some tests for tools methods used in various email processing flows.
Unicode tests are also added.
In future commits we will try to make email usage a bit more defensive to
try to lessen issues with that kind of use cases.
Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@fc8442f133
Part-of: odoo/odoo#134934
To reproduce
============
- login as Mitchell Admin
- change the email of a portal user, ex: Joel Willis, to the same email
as Mitchell Admin. Do this through the Contacts App
- always connected as Mitchell Admin, create a sale order and send it by
email to client, in chatter the sender will be Joel Willis
Problem
=======
when setting the author, `_mail_find_partner_from_emails` is called, when searching
for users with the given eamil, two results are found and the first one
is taken as author
Solution
========
give the priority to the current user when it matches the given conditions
opw-3455520
closesodoo/odoo#134609
X-original-commit: b4a9095497fb77e6963103fa2a27d20e00172ea1
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Abdelouahab Laaroussi (abla) <abla@odoo.com>
odoo/enterprise#46143
Before this commit, messages of type email were not rendered properly in the chatter. For example, the email may display text with dark color even when in dark theme or the layout of bootstrap elements like btn might not look correct.
These style issues are caused by combining the style in content of the email (e.g. inline styles) with the style of the webclient, giving the impression that the original visual of the email is buggy.
This commit fixes the issue by showing a slightly transformed style of email messages in chatter that is readable and looks nice with the Odoo theme at hand. In particular with dark theme, the background color matches the bubble color and the text is white.
Sometimes the exact visual of the original email is desired. A button "Show Original Email" in the top-right corner of the message bubble allows seeing the visual of email in its original intention.
Task-3437069
Forward-port-of: #133545
Forward-port-of: #131202
Part-of: odoo/odoo#134234
Before this PR the link preview formatter was creating an unnecessary complex
object in the message key.
This PR simplify the payload by using a message_id key and remove the
unnecessary object.
closesodoo/odoo#134283
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
This PR adds a panel to consult all attachments of a discuss channel
easily.
task-3476444
closesodoo/odoo#132784
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Stockbauer (tsm) <tsm@odoo.com>
RATIONALE
As multi-company tolerant alias domains will soon replace the usage of
configuration parameters, having them in base then replaced by more advanced
models in mail would be complicated to handle and not useful. Move those
ICP to 'mail' so that all mail configuration is done in that module.
SPECIFICATIONS
Move config parameter used for alias domains configuration in 'mail' module.
Base should be as simple as possible and let mail deal with mail server
complexity.
Move 'mail.{bounce/catchall}.alias' used with 'mail.alias.domain' to make
bounce and catchall emails. Move 'mail.default.from' as it will be integrated
into alias domains in some form.
Note that 'mail.default.from_filter' stays as an ICP in base as it is a
more global default parameter. It is used as default value in 'connect' when
no mail_server is used and no from_filter can be retrieved.
Some tests in 'base' are either fixed, either moved directly into 'mail'.
We now differentiate base behavior (without ICP) from configurable behavior
(with ICP in mail).
Task-3453347 (Mail: Move Mail ICP from Base to Mail)
Prepares Task-36879 (Mail: Support MultiCompany Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130750
Prepares the move of ICP to mail before replacing them by dynamic alias
domains. Improve test coverage, notably for edge cases. Continue to make
tests more explicit after odoo/odoo#131492. Some tests are also merged to
lessen number of different tests when possible, notably when only a test
parameter differs (like giving an SMTP session or not).
Clean ICP and mail servers setup in test classes allowing to remove some
unnecessary extra initialization. Cleanup a mock in mail.
Task-3453347 (Mail: Move Mail ICP from Base to Mail)
Prepares Task-36879 (Mail: Support MultiCompany Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130750
[1] introduces an issue when a response is sent to an aliased email.
In that case, it is intended that the message should be created
by the owner of the alias by [2]
Which breaks the assumption of made in the first commit, as the message
is being passively processed by fetchmail.
This causes the owner of the alias to never be notified on reponses
in cases where the message could be an alias update.
i.e. on any model where the alias applies.
Because the responses are assumed to have been authored by the owner.
As we do not actually care who creates the message records
and deciding the alias owner 'created the message' does not
actually make sense.
We make sure messages are created by odoobot even
if the message was sent to an alias address.
[1]: c676ed3ea906e99d27a6116cd77218c5ec95b416
[2]: af80c68ae5
task-3383275
X-original-commit: 96fe37d37c94c3d6f4642bd6c28d13fcd87075b7
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130798
Rename alias domain and aliases used a test data. This allows to make
them easier to read, follow, grep and understand.
Activate multi-company on alias and gateway tests, ensuring it currently
has few impact on tests.
Task-3453577 (TestMail: Update Alias/Gateway tests for MC)
Prepares Task-36879 (Mail: Support MultiCompany Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130768
RATIONALE
Simplify field management for mail / phone / sms flows. Make it working out
of the box, easier to use and tweak.
SPECIFICATIONS
In addition to finding the customer, sometimes we just want any partner on
a record, notably for VOIP. For that purpose we improve heuristic for
finding partner (fields or records). It introspects the model to find any
relational field towards res.partner. Note that as it is generic it does
not ensure the partner is a customer, just some partner.
Task-3422449 (Mail, Phone: Move and improve field helpers)
Prepares Task-36879 (Mail: Support MultiCompany Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130468
Improve low-level checks of recipients in mail asserts. Sometimes 'email_to'
cannot be easily deduced from given input (partners, records customers, ...)
when some record -> email transformations are involved e.g. when dealing
with multiple emails input, double encapsulation, ...
Those tools are about to be used in upcoming tests and fixes.
Task-3438381 (TestMail: backport tools)
Prepares Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
X-original-commit: bdbe846329ed51e4c5e3b75740e8f594edf7b138
Part-of: odoo/odoo#129839
PURPOSE
Purpose of this commit is to backport some improvements done in mail testing
tools done in newer versions. Some of them are required for incoming tests
to be added, other just to try to ease writing tests across versions.
SPECIFICATIONS
Partial backport of odoo/odoo@94208cb8b4
Improve finding outgoing mails and emails when batch methods (mass mailing)
create similar emails, that can be distinguished notably by the subject
in addition to from / to.
Partial backport of odoo/odoo@c98f259736
Add a method to check MailMail, based on a given record. When having duplicates
to differentiate in a given mailing, having just recipients is not sufficient
as multiple emails may match a given recipients list. Checking model / res_id
is another method for finding emails.
Partial backport of odoo/odoo@a3e404e17e
Add some information and values propagation in some custom asserts in mail
test tooling.
Partial backport of odoo/odoo@b915617569
Allow to return <mail.mail> records and found outgoing emails when using
asserts. It eases doing checks in some specific tests e.g. checking
notification layout usage in emails. Indeed this is quite low level and
does not really deserves its own assert tooling methods.
Partial backport of odoo/odoo@bbf4783ac6
Improve checks and asserts done when asserting content of produced
mailing content (mails, traces, ...).
Task-3438381 (TestMail: backport tools)
Prepares Task-2612945 (Mail: Defensive email formatting)
X-original-commit: 2bc28c804a92f206133c352c046dcdd4971fd4a6
Part-of: odoo/odoo#129839
This commit implements a mixin, `MailTrackingDurationMixin`, that can be added
to a model with a `many2one` field. It computes the time a record spends in each
value the many2one field takes and stores it in a JSON field
(`duration_tracking`).
The primary use is with the StatusBarDurationField
(`widget='statusbar_duration'`), to compute and display the time a record has
spent in each stage in the form view statusbar.
To specify on what field the computation has to be done, the model that inherits
from this mixin has to specify `_track_duration_field`. (e.g.
_track_duration_field = 'stage_id')
Computation is based on `mail.tracking.value` messages, so tracking has to be
activated for that field.
Task-3032773
Part-of: odoo/odoo#108554
Before this PR, suggested recipients without partner where not
checked and needed to be manually created. This is prone to mistakes
when sending an email to the suggested recipient.
This PR checks all the suggested recipients by default and create
the missing partners when a message is posted, and when full composer
is open. That way, there's far less risk to not send the email to
suggested recipient, and instead the user should manually uncheck
to not send the email.
closesodoo/odoo#128647
X-original-commit: 258b2420676fb1a0d7e834ab79f6bf1ec0f73254
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
The method 'add_member' has 'partner_ids' as a optional parameter , but
the thing is the test 'test_attachment_hijack' is only passing it as a
single ID off res.partner record. Let's say if somewhere we overide this
method and write something like
self.env['res.users'].search([('partner_id', 'in', partner_ids)]) , it
will fail because 'partner_ids' should be a list.
closesodoo/odoo#128759
X-original-commit: 75cb1266afa8b921f8d0ca153f5d05ad47c9b14c
Signed-off-by: Vranckx Florian (flvr) <flvr@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Settings allow to change colors used in emails (primary and secondary colors).
Those are used for headers and buttons. They are currently shared with colors
used for base documents and reports layout: changing email colors change
documents colors, which is not expected nor clearly indicated.
SPECIFICATIONS
Split configuration: colors used in documents may differ from colors used in
emails. Duplicate color fields (primary and secondary). To ease setup when
updating documents colors, update mail colors accordingly. Inverse is not
true as we consider documents being the main configuration, and emails a
more fine-grain configuration.
Task-3346388
Part-of: odoo/odoo#123678
Purpose of this commit is to regroup some tests, or rename some too specific
files in order to avoid explosion of files, making tests hard to find when
looking for feature-specific tests.
Task-3346388
Part-of: odoo/odoo#123678
- Improve performances, as the ir.rule restricting private partners
visibility is also applied on res.users by inheritance, on each
prefetch.
- Solve the issue of partners set as followers on records (eg: application
form) and then made private, making them impossible to contact via the
chatter.
- Solve the multiple access issues when trying to access the bank
account, or the private address for non HR people like the accountants
forcing the usage of sudo in the business code.
TaskID: 3101400
Improve the _get_link_preview_from_url method to:
- Only load necessary data (only the <head> instead of
the whole page).
- Handle optional request session.
- Handle all image mimetypes.
- Add a fallback on the <title> tag when no og:title have
been found.
Moving the method out of the model to facilitate
its use as a tool.
Task-3234864
Part-of: odoo/odoo#122087
In [1] the order by `id ASC` has been removed from the
`_message_fetch` method. This is wrong since we want
to load the messages coming DIRECTLY after the given
id thus, this order is required.
In order to solve this issue, this commit ensures the
order of the messages returned by the `_message_fetch`
method is always in descending order as it was done
implicitly before [2].
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/123664
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/116666
task-3349175
closesodoo/odoo#124169
X-original-commit: 074a5fea5a7f08c7018620cb9b2b956b3a871344
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Didier Debondt (did) <did@odoo.com>
Prior to this fix, elements with background images were converted to
images via the html2canvas library. This made them work in Outlook at
the cost of several tradeoffs:
- the process was slow and asynchronous
- there could be no interactivity (links, buttons, etc.) in the
converted element
- responsive behavior was wonky: if only a slice of the image was shown
when it was converted (due to background-size cover behavior), the
rest was lost so if more width was needed in mobile, we would be
zooming on that slice, making it sometimes irrelevant and pixelated
This replaces all that with a conversion to VML, which is a vector
format supported by Outlook. This conversion is done only for Outlook,
which means that all other clients are getting the original background
element again.
There is a way to keep the background-size cover behavior in VML, using
the "aspect" attribute with value "atleast" but this only works on
v-fill elements and sadly putting the image on a v-fill element bugs in
Windows Mail (which is the default mail client on Windows 10 and 11) and
this client can't be singled out of mso conditionals. To get around this
issue, since this is only for desktop clients, we assume the width of
the screen to be large and mimick the cover behavior by cropping the
image to the target size. This allows us to put the image on the v-image
element and have proper rendering in Outlook and Windows Mail on
desktop.
Note:
When retrieving the image by URL in Python in order to crop it, we need
to ensure we have an absolute path. This is done - perhaps seemingly
naively - by checking if the URL contains '//'. Here's the reasoning
behind that choice. To check if a URL is absolute, we could use
`urllib.parse.urlparse` and check if it has a scheme but that would lead
to `www.odoo.com/path` being considered relative (and thus we'd add a
host to the URL even though there's already one). Instead, we could
check it it has a netloc but that would lead to the same issue since the
documentation of `urlparse` says:
> Following the syntax specifications in
[RFC 1808](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1808.html), urlparse
recognizes a netloc only if it is properly introduced by ‘//’.
Still, it would be more technically correct since `//some/path` would be
considered absolute (which it should be since it resolves to
`<current_scheme>//some/path`).
Base on that documentation, it seems that simply checking if the URL
contains '//' is pretty much equivalent to checking if it has a scheme,
with the double advantage that it's simpler and that it works for
`//some/path` as well. However, note that it doesn't solve the issue of
`www.odoo.com/path`.
In summary, here are the results with the current method:
```
http://www.odoo.com/path -> http://www.google.com/path // OK
some/path -> http://localhost:8069/some/path // OK
/some/path -> http://localhost:8069/some/path // OK
//some/path -> //some/path // OK
www.odoo.com/path -> http://localhost:8069/www.google.com/path // WRONG
```
X-original-commit: 9561ba31917024825705c876442139405e7a7957
Part-of: odoo/odoo#124465
Since [1] the pyhton discuss tests have been splitted into a
subfolder. They are wrongly immported and cannot be run at the
moment. This commit solves this issue.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/120062closesodoo/odoo#124114
X-original-commit: b796704408d0511af2c310fde5964003dc25190e
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
[FIX] *: selectors in tours
[FIX][TMP] account: CogMenu selector in tours
[FIX][TMP] web*: Breadcrumb targetting in tours
Adds a `o_breadcrumb` class to target the whole breadcrumb, no matter
how much elements it contains (collapsed parts, visible path, single
name...).
add classname on last breadcrumb item
[FIX][TMP] project: View buttons selector in tours (moved away from CP)
[FIX][TMP] project: Kanban selectors in tours (quick create)
[FIX][TMP] *: SearchBar selectors in tours (toggle menu)
[FIX][TMP] *: ButtonBox selector in tours
[WIP][IMP] web: add toggleSearchBarMenu in search helpers
adapt and unskip 3 list tests
adapt and unskip calendar tests
unskip web_tour test that actually pass
post rebase fix
allow to lose cell focus after multi edition (given to searchbar) - bug reported, to check later
post rebase fixes
fix
Part-of: odoo/odoo#116641
Before this commit:
when reset template, the strategy is
1. write the template value from the data file with_context(lang=None)
(some legacy translations may be kept, if their en_US values were not changed)
2. use the translations in the po file to override current translations
But when a term is not translated in the po file
(for example, all en_UK terms, since we don't have en.po),
the old translation of the term cannot be overridden and reset
After this commit:
Thanks to the new feature introduced in #109858, the translation for a term can
be voided before the step 2
As a result, translations for model translated fields can be correctly reset
opw-3241014
closesodoo/odoo#121201
X-original-commit: 43afdc20d2fc01668ae2665240fc2be26b45ebf5
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Chong (cwg) <cwg@odoo.com>
This commit focuses on removing all references to discuss.channel from
code located in /models of mail module.
In preparation of splitting discuss and mail modules.
Part of task-3265211
closesodoo/odoo#119413
Signed-off-by: Debondt Didier (did) <did@odoo.com>
* = bus, calendar, crm_livechat, hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail_bot,
mass_mailing, privacy_lookup, test_discuss_full, test_mail,
test_mail_full, website_crm_livechat, website_livechat, base
In preparation of splitting discuss and mail modules.
Part of task-3265211
closesodoo/odoo#118354
Related: odoo/upgrade#4553
Related: odoo/enterprise#39661
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Templates could previously be created for abstract models.
The methods are not written with that in mind and most useful ones will
raise an exception when calling them on that template.
task-3162320
X-original-commit: 0d4b473ee54d2376f4f71efd864aa0e16822d4ba
Part-of: odoo/odoo#118710
Alexandre Kühn