Before this commit, all mail templates were shared, which was cluttering the UI
for everyone.
Now, each user can have their own templates that they can edit and save. Access
is done through the mail composer wizard, where users can only access their own
templates and templates that don't belong to anyone.
Some groups are considered as admins and can access all templates in
Settings/Technical/Email/Email Templates:
- Sales Admin
- Project Admins
- Helpdesk Admins
- Accountants
- Event Admins
- Recruitment Admins
Task-2504439
Part-of: odoo/odoo#126049
Bug
===
The registration users should be able to read the event tickets.
Allow the registration users to see unpublished event record on website
(Jitsi room, sponsors, track...).
Task 2506148
closesodoo/odoo#70615
X-original-commit: 3eef17203661919a067a4f0d8d99c2b3b6fcf233
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Clean the ACLs related to the Event application.
Add a new group to manage the registration in the entrance of an event. This
group should not be able to modify or remove records in Event but should be
able to create and manage the registrations.
Specifications
==============
Now, there are 3 event groups
* ``Registration Desk User``, who can manage the registrations and
read all event-related information;
* ``Event User`` who can create event, sponsor, ticket... His role is
to globally handle events on a day-to-day basis;
* ``Event Administrator`` who can create event type, sponsor type,
ticket type... His role is to manage the way events are managed withint
its company:
Each group implies all previous groups.
Compared to previous event users gain a lot of rules, allowing to update
records like tickets, registrations, ... Low-end event users should now
use the registration desk group.
Links
=====
Task ID-2204364
COM odoo/odoo#57022
ENT odoo/enterprise#13984
UPG odoo/upgrade#1897
Purpose
=======
In event, many files have different naming format. We want to clean
them, to group the lines by models before changing and adding a new
event group.
Task 2204364
PR odoo/odoo/pull/65867
Migration odoo/upgrade/pull/2150
PURPOSE
Provide some fixes after internal test deployment of event online features.
Notably: user registration flow, various fixes in templates.
Also add some unit tests to avoid regressions while working on event features.
LINKS
Task ID-2169118
odoo/odoo#55967odoo/enterprise#12438
X-original-commit: e66684b23eebaadc3df7b908427d3d7a83d4f0a0
This commit changes the display name for the model event.type from
"Event Category" to "Event Template"
This change was needed before introducing the new model event.tag.category
which will be used to group tags (event.tag)
This commit introduces two new models: event.tag.category & event.tag
The tags will be grouped by category and will be used to filter events.
In the front-end, if the user activates the "filter by categories", each
event.tag.category will generate a new dropdown of related tags.
Clicking on one of these tags will add a new "tag badge" above the events
(same way as in eLearning).
LINKS:
TaskID:2162438
PR: #43856
PURPOSE
Integration between event and eCommerce is required only when users handle the
entire selling process online. However users may require ticketing support
while managing payments outside of Odoo. Purpose of this commit is to support
tickets directly in event application without need of sales.
RATIONALE
Remove the need to have event_sale installed to manage basic multi ticket
event type. Integration with eCommerce is needed only when one wants to handle
the entire selling flow online, i.e. order, payment, ... Integration with
Sales is needed only when one wants to create sale orders linked to attendees.
Many event users do not need all of this. Their attendees pay through bank
transfers or they simply manage payments outside of Odoo while still
requiring tickets management.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove the need to have event_sale installed to manage basic ticketing on
events.
Move ticket model (event.event.ticket) directly into event, copying most
fields from event_sale. Only sale specific fields and behavior should be kept
in event_sale :
* keep product_id and price information in event_sale;
* keep sales analysis in event_sale;
We also split tickets model used for event type (event.type.ticket) and
events (event.event.ticket). Indeed previously to this commit both are
modeled in the same table, with the following issues :
* tickets on templates use only a subset of fields: name, seats availability,
product, price;
* a ticket has either an event_id, either an event_type_id, and there are
constraints to try to avoid having lost tickets. This leads to a strange
model where m2o fields are required only in some cases with a dual
behavior;
* tickets are not shared between event.type and event.event. They are copied
and having a single model is therefore not necessary;
We therefore choose to have a light model for event.type.ticket. It is linked
to event.type when configuring template tickets. They are copied in the
onchange copying event template configuration to the event itself, leading
to event.event.ticket creation.
Some tests are moved / completed accordingly.
Access rights are copied from website_event_sale to website_even concerning
ticket access for public / portal. Currently they are kept as they are with
some rewording as it is not the purpose of this commit to rewrite them.
LINKS
Task ID 2177281
Community PR odoo/odoo#43488
Purpose
=======
Remove the state on the event and add a stage.
So, we can have more control on the event flow, and we will have less constrains.
Website event
=============
Before
------
People can register for an event if "seats are available" and if the state is "confirmed".
After
-----
People can register for an event if `event_registrations_open` is True,
- Event: seats are available and the event is not finished
- Event sale: One or more ticket has `sale_available` set to True
Task #2088538
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Access group terminology is missleading. Yous have to be manager to administrate
an application. This task consists to rename groups to be understandable for everyone.
Groups should be reorganised on the users form to be more explicit.
Specification
=============
1/ Rename 'Manager' to 'Administrator' in users groups.
2/ Define a hierarchy on access groups by using the category_id in the manifests
A category 'Operations/Project' will create a category Project with a parent
category 'Operations', and something smart is already developed (in modules/db.py)
to avoid duplicating categories.
3/ Add a group in expenses to be able to approve expenses reports for my team.
4/ Add a group in timesheets to be able to approve timesheets for my team.
5/ Remove partially the useless crap in ir_module_category_data.xml
6/ Sort access rights groups on users form according to its parent category
closesodoo/odoo#29362
Signed-off-by: "Yannick Tivisse (yti)" <yti@odoo.com>
This commit improve event.type (Event Categories) model and views in order
to ease event configuration through more detailed categories. The purpose
is to be able to define categories holding default data for website,
tickets, attendee mailing, ... Choosing a category on a new event takes
those default values to help users creating finely-tuned events.
Main configuration on event.type is
* auto confirmation, replacing the old system-wide auto confirmation
parameter
* seats limitation
* location: online events, timezone
* communication: reply-to email address, twitter hashtag, automated
mailing of attendees
* ticketing
* website parameters: display on website, display tracks, allow track
proposal
* question to attendees
* reporting: remove report.event.registration as it can be replaced by
pivot and graph views on event.registration model directly. The
custom SQL view does not add any valuable information;
* event: correctly take limitations from event category and check
minimum seats is lesser or equal to maximum seats;
* event: reorganize a bit the form view
* avoid some kind of random ordering of buttons;
* move seats availability directly in the form view;
* ticket page is now used only for ticketing purpose, not a mismatch
with seats;
* registration: attendees can be set as done only for confirmed events
to avoid confusion when working with draft events;
Misc usability
* event.type: rename event type to event category to have a unified
term across various event addons;
* event: stop tracking active field as it does not add interesting
information; it should not toggle everyday;
* event: track location as it does add valuable information;
* event: rename some labels to ease user experience;
* event.mail: add missing description and rec name;
* event, website_event, website_forum,
* website_hr_recruitment, website_sale
Website access rights were buggy. The editor assets and website editor
assets have to be loaded together to work so the previous behavior
which only loaded one with the restricted access right was not right.
Also, people which had the "Manager" access right for model like event
or job only got access to creation and edition of those objects if they
had the full access to website access rights.
Now the website module creates the two same groups :
* group_website_publisher: load all editor assets, give access to
page creation for model the user has access (event, job, ...) and
edition of those pages
* group_website_designer: implies the first one and give access in
creation and edition of all pages + access of all website menus
The manager access rights for event, product, jobs, etc now implies
the group_website_publisher group for the user (so that the manager
have the editor assets and editor ui).
Note: some python codes use the group_website_publisher for no right
reason, this has to be adapted.
Add a link in the general settings to access easily the default_user form view in order to modify the default access rights
The default_user manager rights declarations in all the applications have been move in a noupdate="1" definition to avoid the manual configuration overwrittings
In the interface using the email scheduler of events is limited to a group
that is not activated by default. However by default emails are sent and
therefore cannot be configured by the event maanger.
As managers should always be able to configure sent emails we decided to
remove the group and always give access to the email scheduling tab of the
event form view.
* Limitate rights of event user to reading an event
Event user should not be able to create events. Its rights should be limited
to reading events, creating and updating registrations. Only event managers
are allowed to create and modify events.
* Sudo access on ir.values in event config settings
Configuring events imply modifying auto confirmation parameter which is stored
into an ir.values. As this model is limited to values with user_id = uid we
have to sudo the access here as it is not a user-defined value.
* Add some tests for the various fixed issues
Coming from a bug in web_settings_dashboard. Invited user didn't have any rights
when created from the dashboard, which was leading to an error.
This bug leaded to a new discussion. Better to have basic employee having user
rights for all main applications. For bigger entreprises there is an admin that
will carefully remove extra rights, if necessary. The target is small businesses,
it makes sense that every way to create a user gives the same result.
In conclusion, each new user has a full access to the applications by default
How is it implemented ?
We added an inactive default user which original access right to the groups
'base.group_user' and 'base.group_partner_manager' in base. Each
application will extend the default user's access right by adding the maximal
access right for this application.
On user creation, we will use by default the 'group_id' field from the default
user. We will in the same time remove the ugly 'default_groups_ref' key which
was passed sometimes in the context for some fields in some views, and sometimes
nothing.
So, the user can modify the access rights for the default user, but he should be
aware that removing project user access rights for a default user will prevent
a *created on the fly in a task* user will not be able to access the task.
- New filter "not cancelled" for attendees management
- No more readonly nor invisibility on "minimum number of seats"
- Event questions and mail scheduling have been put under an optional
tab
This commit adds a way to configure scheduled emails on events. It replaces
existing automatic emails at confirmation and subscription. It proposes to
configure some schedulers, based on subscription or event, using a template
and a configurable timedelta.
A cron is added that regularly checks for event mailing schedulers to execute
and launch them. The granularity of send emails is therefore limited to the
granularity of the cron, aka 1 hour.
[TEST] Added tests for this feature.
Also cleaned a bit event, country_id is now a pure related instead
of a computed field trying to be a related. Also removed default templates
on event category. Configuration in the event itself should be easy
enough for most use cases.
ir.rule records are in noupdate data blocks to let the admin
alter them without fear of them being reset at next update.
Other records such as groups are in normal mode, so they
can be updated whenever necessary
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20121218232001-t425t4hi7qbmsip2
miad-odoo