Purpose
=======
By using the user's related company to create a employee, we prevent
creating several employees for the same users on the basic flow.
But this is exactly the way we want people to use the system.
Example: Jojo is working in Belgium, has a belgian employee liked
to a belgian user in the system.
Now Jojo is about to work during 1 year in another company, based in
the USA. Jojo wants another employee, to manage the HR things
properly (payroll, ...), but he doesn't want to have 2 users, he
prefer to manage all its notifications in the same place.
We create another employee for Jojo, in the US company.
So instead of creating the employee in the user's company (Belgian),
as it would raise an error for the second employee, we should use the
contextual company instead, allowing to create the second employee
smoothly.
closesodoo/odoo#51435
X-original-commit: 0318f0acc5e98950c274c90a86a94d4588d2966d
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the `Create Employee` button was not visible if user is linked to employee in any other company as the domain was based on `employee_count`. (Which represents Employee belongs to all companies)
With this commit, we check for `employee_id` which makes sure if the user has linked Employee for currently activated company.
Followup on 95564bcd2c
X-original-commit: cb9ac24caea53615e2808a36e850939a1ccaa041
PURPOSE
=========================
The goal of this task is to set up some kind of guidelines to make
kanban views consistent.
It is fine having different kanban views, but if a UI element is shared
among several kanban views, it should behave/look the same so the user
knows what to expect.
Kanban views can be split into two types:
==> 'documents' kanbans, such as res.partner, crm.lead, etc.
- those records are created/edited often, numerous
- 'opening' the card means accessing the record
==> 'dashboard' kanbans,such as stock.picking.type,account.journal, etc.
- those records are not created/edited often, there are much less numerous
- usually presented as dashboard, where 'opening' the card means
accessing a set of related 'documents' (clicking on a account.journal
to access account.move, or stock.picking.type to access stock.picking)
- configuration of the 'card record' is done through a dropdown to
access configuration
Here are some guidelines for consistency. Bear in mind that those are
not rules, but guidelines for consistency that we'd like to keep in
mind when designing.
==> 'documents' kanbans
- the record is accessed through global click
- the user avatar is at the bottom right
- the activity widget is at the bottom left (in last position if
there are other elements)
==> 'dashboard' kanbans
- the record is accessed through a 'Configuration' option in the card dropdown
- there is no global click, and therefore no focus shadow
- the dropdown icon (o_kanban_manage_toggle_button) is always visible,
with icon fa-ellipsis-v
- the listview counterpart should be presented as a dedicated
configuration menu, and shouldn't be in the 'dashboard action'
- links in the body of the card are structured as follows: link with
<count>+label, then any additional aggregated metrics (not link) to the right
example https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZP6HDHTtC7cQ6rDWgqLoPs6U8JCeNVkW/view?usp=sharing
==> global guidelines
- the title font color is #212529, with 500 weight
- the subtitle font color is #666666, with 400 weight
- the font size is 1.083rem
- text overflow is handled through linebreak, not ellipsis
- numerical values are aligned to the right
- the kanban state widget is at the bottom right
SPECIFICATION
=================
AS per guidelines Improved follwing kanban/dashbaord view
- hr_job
- hr_department
- hr_work_entry
- hr_appraisal
- fleet_vehicle
- product_template
- sale_subscription_template
- crm_team
- res_partner
- event
- stock_picking_type
- mrp_eco_type
- maintenance_team
- quality_alert_team
- account_journal
Added the department menu on employee with default kanban view
Added sequence in hr_work_entry list view
TaskID: 2206372
Related Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/10341Closes: #50536
- Employees > Configuration > Planning Types and ensure the activity
type "To Do" is set to scheduled date several days after previous
activity (default should be 5 days);
- Check that onboarding Plan has at least 2 activities with activity
type "To Do";
- Click launch plan.
Before this commit, the activity type configuration is ignored and all
activities are due tomorrow.
Now, the activities are due taking into account the activity type
configuration.
opw-2255586
closesodoo/odoo#51423
X-original-commit: c159479d7f714f2ec871cc4b965de3f961160789
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
The following task implemented new widgets/features in the listview for better UI.
https://www.odoo.com/web#id=2195254&action=327&model=project.task&view_type=form&cids=1&menu_id=4720
The goal of the current task is to use those to upgrade our listviews
Specification
=============
Below are change requests on various listviews.
Remove decoration-bf="message_needaction==True" from every listview in every module.
PRODUCT - stock.view_stock_product_template_tree (product template)
remove all decorations from <tree>
set the following decorations on 'virtual_available' and 'qty_available'
decoration-danger="virtual_available<0"
decoration-warning="virtual_available==0"
also set decoration-bf on 'virtual_available'
apply the same modifications on stock.view_stock_product_tree for product variants
SUBSCRIPTION - sale_subscription.sale_subscription_view_list
remove all decorations from <tree>
'stage_id' field
set <field name="stage_id" widget="badge" decoration-info="stage_category == 'draft'" decoration-success="stage_category == 'progress'"/>
'recurring_next_date' field
set <field name="recurring_next_date" string="Next Invoice" widget="remaining_days" attrs="{'invisible': [('stage_category', '!=', 'progress')]}"/>
set decoration-bf on 'code' and 'recurring_total_incl'
move 'percentage_satisfaction' before 'recurring_total_incl'
set widget="many2one_avatar_user" on 'user_id'
add <field name="activity_ids" widget="list_activity"/> after 'user_id'
ELEARNING - website_slides.slide_channel_view_tree
set widget="many2one_avatar_user" on 'user_id'
'enroll' field
set <field name="enroll" widget="badge" decoration-success="enroll == 'public'" decoration-info="enroll == 'invite'" decoration-warning="enroll == 'payment'"/>
POS - point_of_sale.view_pos_order_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
make visible and move it at the end of the view
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-success="state not in ('draft','cancel')"/>
set decoration-bf on 'name'
APPRAISAL - hr_appraisal.view_hr_appraisal_tree
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state in ('new','pending')" decoration-success="state == 'done'"/>
'date_close' field
set <field name="date_close" widget="remaining_days" attrs="{'invisible': ['|',('state','=','done'),('state','=','cancel')]}"/>
PAYMENT - account.view_account_payment_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-success="state == 'posted'"/>
move 'company_id' before 'amount'
CONTRACT - hr_contract.hr_contract_view_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-warning="state == 'close'" decoration-success="state == 'open'"/>
set widget="many2one_avatar_employee" on 'employee_id'
PAYSLIPS - hr_payroll.view_hr_payslip_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-warning="state == 'verify'" decoration-success="state in ('done','paid')"/>
set decoration-bf on 'number' and 'net_wage'
move 'company_id' before 'basic_wage'
set widget="many2one_avatar_employee" on 'employee_id'
SURVEY - survey.survey_tree
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-success="state == 'open'"/>
APPLICATION - hr_recruitment.crm_case_tree_view_job
set widget="date' on 'create_date'
set widget="priority' on 'priority'
set widget="many2one_avatar_user" on 'user_id'
TIME OFF - hr_holidays.hr_leave_view_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-warning="state in ('confirm','validate1')" decoration-success="state == 'validate'"/>
apply the same changes in hr_holidays.hr_leave_allocation_view_tree
closesodoo/odoo#51305
Taskid: 2256589
Related: odoo/enterprise#10614
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
render, render_template, load, activity_schedule_with_view,
get_website_pages should all be private:
It should not be possible to render an aribtrary template only with
its name or id
Still need to render some qweb views from js so the method
render_template is kept public.
This explains why the website editor still need read access on
ir.ui.view as we want to allow any snippet to be rendered.
Before this commit, Creating New Employee from User's form was taking default company from the current logged-in User instead of the User for which it Employee is being created.
With this commit, We take default company from User for which employee is created.
closesodoo/odoo#51014
X-original-commit: 9206cc4db2a8dc5a7fbc281c1574f09bfba76544
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
For a tag to be displayed on a kanban card, it needs to have a color set.
We won't be changing that behaviour, since it would mean having
two options > the color, and whether or not to show it in the kanban
The purpose of this task is to set a color on new tags to make the user
save a bit more time, set a color for him as he might not find the feature,
and make sure the tag will be on the kanban cards.
Specification
=============
For each of the following models, at creation, set a random integer between
1 and 11 in field 'color'
Models:
res.partner.category
crm.tag
project.tags
hr.applicant.category
helpdesk.tag
hr.employee.category
event.track.tag
mrp.eco.tag
repair.tags
closesodoo/odoo#49967
Taskid: 2234527
Related: odoo/enterprise#10112
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Impacted modules: account_analytic_default, crm, event,
hr_recruitment, maintenance, mass_mailing, project,
purchase_requisition, stock_picking_batch, website_slides
The default image displayed when the record is unassigned is
confusing, so we are removing it.
FP request
Task 2234524
closesodoo/odoo#49333
Related: odoo/enterprise#9834
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit, It was not possible to copy An employee which is already linked to User due `user_uniq` constraints.
Now we add `copy=False` on `user_id` field, so Employee will be copied without linked User.
closesodoo/odoo#49915
X-original-commit: 2a63df03859166414be338c6655ee8c4052666b7
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
In v12, the hr module did not have a hard dependency on mail_bot, so the
users could uninstall it if they did not want/need its functionality. In
v13, mail_bot was added as a dependency to include the notification
widget and the odoobot state in the user forms modified by the hr
module. However, this also brings potentially unwanted functionality to
anyone who installs an hr related application.
This commit removes the dependency on mail_bot by adding the mail_bot_hr
bridge module, which provides integration between mail_bot and hr if
both modules are installed.
Impacted modules:
hr, hr_contract, hr_recruitment, hr_payroll, fleet, hr_skills, hr_appraisal, ....
Several onchanges have been converted to computed fields in the following modules :
Community :
- hr
- hr_contract
- hr_recruitment
- hr_work_entry
- hr_maintenance
- hr_expense
- hr_expense_check
- hr_holidays
- sale_expense
- account_analytic_default_hr_expense
Enterprise:
- hr_contract_salary
- hr_referral
- hr_payroll
- hr_payroll_expense
- test_l10n_be_hr_payroll_account
There are still 2 onchanges with complex behavior that couldn't be converted easily:
- an onchange that updates "tz" (timezone) that is defined as a related field
to "resource_id.tz". Apparently it is useless except to initialize the default
value of "tz".
- an onchange that updates "name" that is defined as a related field to
"resource_id.name".
the applicant.
closesodoo/odoo#45414
Taskid: 2169099
Related: odoo/enterprise#8572
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
"Edition" is a French-English false friend word. "Edition" in English
means "version" whereas "edition" in French means "editing". This commit
updates user facing strings/documents that incorrectly use "edition" instead
of "edit" or "editing". Attempts were made to clean up English around
"edition" usage so please excuse any errors from lack of context
knowledge. Code comments and names incorrectly using "edition" were NOT
updated.
Currently there is two ways in view to have a phone number displayed in
LTR in a RTL language:
- have `widget="phone"` on a field
- have a class o_force_ltr on the field
But this is currently done very rarely and fail in list view because the
direction of data cells is used, eg.:
```
<div style="direction:rtl">
<table><tr><td style="direction:ltr">
<span>+1 2 3</span>
</td></tr><tr><td>
<span style="direction:ltr">+4 5 6</span>
</td>/tr></table>
</div>
```
will be displayed as:
+1 2 3
6 5 4+
In this commit, we use unicode-bidi* to optionally add an additional
level of embedding so direction is taken into account by the
bidirectional algorithm.
This commit also adds o_force_ltr class or phone widget on phone fields
where it is not already defined.
*: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-3/#propdef-unicode-bidi
opw-2224828
closes#48425closesodoo/odoo#48588
X-original-commit: ab067218e069f0a92610c3f0d4137e563e47755c
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
With this commit, Selection fields with `required=True` which are
extended via `selection_add` are given proper ondelete policies to
ensure the cleanup of records containing these extended options during
uninstall of the extending module.
This commit also cleans up leftover uninstall hooks that were being used
to handle the same set of problems prior to the ondelete mechanism being
implemented for Selection fields.
closesodoo/odoo#46325
Related: odoo/enterprise#9117
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
If employee is not set, the default picture will be user-slash
instead of camera.
Task ID 2221250
closesodoo/odoo#48114
Related: odoo/enterprise#9398
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose of this task is to prevent users from setting portal users on
internal documents by mistake, and preventing noise and performance
issues resulting from loading all the portal users in those fields.
This commit fixes internal many2x fields to res.users which are now
restricted to internal users by setting domain (share=false) on form view.
closesodoo/odoo#47553
Taskid: 2172779
Related: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/9204
Related: odoo/enterprise#9204
Closes: #47553
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
When incoming emails bounce due to alias security bounce email is quite
generic. Purpose of this task is to ease its customization and update.
SPECIFICATIONS
In order to improve the flexibility of alias, add a customizable html field
on the alias model. This html content will be send as bounce email core content
in case of bounced/unauthorized mail received for this alias,
Obviously it has no effect on 'everyone' security setting as no email will
bounce due to that issue.
If it is not set a default generic mail will be send depending on security
setting. It allows to keep void html fields when no specific bounce content
is required
In HR, an old template allowing some light customization for employee based
security option is removed as it is completely replaced by the new feature.
Also add references message-id of the mail received to the answer so that
threads are correctly set.
LINKS
Task ID 2126509
Issue
- Install Employees
- Create a new user
- Click on "Create employee"
Traceback
Cause
In 999ced42989f, we add the user_id key but we
already have in the action_create_employee method
The key is duplicated so this is why there is a
traceback
Solution
Remove the key in action_create_employee since
we have it in _sync_user
OPW-2205354
closesodoo/odoo#46375
X-original-commit: e0c29f1a4cd8d95654963b024fd0b0e1b0578776
Signed-off-by: Jason Van Malder (jvm) <jvm@odoo.com>
When creating a new user on-the-fly on the employee detail page (HR Settings/Related User), if the employee is never linked with a user before, the new created user will not be linked with the employee automatically and we have to select the user again.
With this commit, the new created user will be linked with the employee automatically.
Fixes#44442closesodoo/odoo#46125
X-original-commit: 136c0dbea0ab00ff27daac69c27dc0824a16ff70
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose of the task is, when creating a new employee, the default
gender should be empty.
closes odoo/odoo#42843
Taskid: 2165484Closes: #42843
Related: odoo/enterprise#7648
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The image illustrating some kanban cards (like "Employees" or
"Contacts") has a weird scaling and rendering on smaller screen sizes.
Step to reproduce (on small screen):
1. Open Employee
2. Apply a filter
3. Picture is ugly (shape changes to get something pretty weird)
This commit fixes it by:
1. removing the rounding which was only applied (sic) on smaller screens
2. adjusting the size and/or the margins of the image to keep its ratio
and the alignment with the other kanban cards.
Task ID: 2198419
closesodoo/odoo#45956
X-original-commit: dd5db84464998b45d0524055f9c96bcad894c4c9
Signed-off-by: Pierre Paridans <pparidans@users.noreply.github.com>
Picture of employees are maximazed directly which is annoying when
you move the mouse in kanban view.
Add the ability to put a waiting time before opening the zoom in
option of the field in the view (default value is 0).
closesodoo/odoo#45229
Taskid: 2191289
X-original-commit: a264b17d8fe18464df439d896ecb7dea106caa5a
Signed-off-by: jbm-odoo <jbm-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
* modify client-side domain normalisation to error if the domain is
invalid (not enough terms / segments for the number of operators)
* add better error reporting to attrs / modifiers parsing
* add a few layered error augmentation to provide clearer context
e.g. "error: invalid domain <thing>" is helpful but "error while
parsing modifiers for field foo: modifier invisible: invalid domain
<thing>" is much more helpful
* rework _evalModifiers to deduplicate it in order to more easily
implement this contextual augmentation
* test that improper domains are properly found improper
* fix a bunch of incorrect attrs domains
* also removed an apparently undefined (& unused) "options" argument
to a _applyModifiers call
closesodoo/odoo#44642
Related: odoo/enterprise#8175
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
[1] transformed the button to be `a` instead of `button` for validation reasons
however `header` only renders `button` tags so the chat button was not visible
anymore.
[1] eb2f0aabcfclosesodoo/odoo#45129
X-original-commit: 0075dc37b07b1e81ff8c20e5af49173bf69d55ed
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
RATIONALE
Mail template model holds a field telling odoo mail engine to automatically
add the current user's signature to the body. Its use depends on the use
case
* using the template in the composer on a single record: it is displayed
in the rendered template in the composer, meaning people could change it.
This behavior is interesting as it allows to see the email content;
* using the template in the composer in mass mail mode: it is not displayed
as only the raw jinja is displayed. It is therefore not obvious that it
will be appended to the body of the mail. People could add it manually and
have 2 signatures as a result;
A mechanism automatically adding a signature to sent emails when posting a
message is already implemented and is based on template existence. If a
template has been used when posting, no signature is added in sent emails.
Otherwise it is automatically added. This behavior should not change.
Behavior will therefore be
* use a template -> specify signature usage in it manually through jinja;
* do not use a template -> signature added in sent emails;
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove user_signature.
Update template body accordingly. In customer oriented templates that are using
it and do not already contain it, manually add a call to user.signature within
the jinja code. When set to False, just remove its declaration.
Quickly clean some signature integration.
LINKS
Task ID 2089252
Community PR odoo/odoo#39482
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6459
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrate#761
Related: odoo/enterprise#6459
Related: odoo/upgrade#761
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Followup on 5ce8f1e375
Before this commit, There would be traceback on Launching Plan with `Responsible` set to `other` and No `Responsible Person` defined on activity due to Extra argument.
In this commit, We remove that extra Argument.
closesodoo/odoo#44965
X-original-commit: 009e5526ee398415693d1d3df8f3c2ac546fd258
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
======
Our current integration between FSM and Stock works well for basic flows, but quickly shows limitations. We don't handle warehouse by employee. Use-case: each worker has a dedicated van with a dedicated stock. I want to track the material used for each intervention to make sure that nothing is stolen.
+ This is also useful in usecases outside of FSM. Example: I have 3 shops (= 3 warehouses), each employee works in a different shop, the default warehouse set on the Sales Order should be the default warehouse of the salesperson. So this should be done sale_stock (and not in FSM)
Specifications
===========
Add a 'Default Warehouse' field on the user only visible if :
- sale_stock is installed
- the 'multi-warehouses' feature is enabled
- domain should only include warehouses which belong to a company the user has access to
- not required
The field should be editable by a user on his own profile and by the admin on all users.
When creating a FSM task from scratch, adding some products creates a SO, the warehouse on the SO should be the default warehouse of the user set on the FSM task.
On SO creation, set the 'default warehouse' selected on the user assigned to the SO. If there isn't any 'default warehouse' set on the user, fallback on the current behavior (warehouse with
lowest sequence)
The field on the res.user should be a property field to allow multicompany usage.
Task : 2166382
closesodoo/odoo#44257
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
We had a default warehouse_id on the users to allow
a better stock managment based on the sale person.
The warehouse_id on a sales order is now computed from
the property_warehouse_id field on a user.
If the user doesn't have a property_warehouse_id set
the warehouse_id on the sales order is the one with the
smallest sequence number in the company of the SO.
Task-2166382
In 0.15 accessing werkzeug.urls functions directly through werkzeug
is deprecated, the shortcut will be removed in the eventual werkzeug
1.0.
Fix existing uses of these shortcuts. Also cleanup some imports when
they're not far from a werkzeug* import being altered.
Following changes needing ir.model.access on transient models too.
Remove groups declaration on the action to move it to ir.model.access
when possible.
Rules are strict by default with no unlink access by default and high
priviledge asked. Adaptations may be needed later.
Write access is given as a wizard may need to be modified in case the
action triggers an error and the user has to correct a value
account*: use account.group_account_user for all transient by default
remove account.print.journal relic
stock*: use stock.group_stock_user by default
survey: survey user can send invitations
mail: allow any employee to execute wizards
additional verifications are made to ensure they are executed
only on the documents the user has access to you
give portal access to mail.compose.message as portal still does
some actions like posting messages on the forum
add ir.rule to avoid reading somebody else messages
increase the query count because of undeterminist count
crm: saleman for lead2opp, manager for massmailing
partner manager for actions linked to partners
avoid a write in test_lead_lost
sms: any employee can send sms
mrp: mrp user can execute wizards
give unlink access as making write during do_produce operation
base_import: employees can import files
delivery: stock user can deliver
event_sale: sale user can configure the wizards
event user inherit from sale rights
gamification: employee can give badge
google_service: resolve FIXME
hr: add specific rights
manager can set a plan according to group on button
anyone who can write on an employee can register a departure
hr_expense: set rights based on buttons
hr_holidays: an approver can make a summary report
hr_recruitment: recruiter can refuse a candidate
hr_timesheet: can use the wizard if can create a timesheet
l10n_eu_service: managers can create fiscal positions
mass_mailing: same group as on mass.mailing.list
membership: accountant can create invoice from membership
payment: accountant can create a link
as the source is an account.move
keep the payment.acquirer.onboarding.wizard to system user
only as it is called during company configuration
point_of_sale: PoS manager only can use wizards
never create closing_balance_confirm_wizard records
product_expiry: stock user has rights on stock.picking
product_margin: access from accounting menus
repair: same rules as for above models
sale: set ir.rule for self wizard only
add rule from model introduced in payment to add salesman group
sale_crm: saleman can create a quotation from a lead
sale_coupon: any saleman can generate coupon
add self ir.rule
sale_product_configurator: salesman can select product variants
snailmail: employee can send letters
website: designers can write on website
website_crm_partner_assign: same rule as group on action
website_sale: sale ACL as for payment.acquirer.onboarding.wizard
website_slides: anyone can send invitation
base: base.language.*: allow employee (cf lang_install)
change.password.user: can not read change password wizard of
other users
test.*: no access is needed
Courtesy of Damien Bouvy, William Andre and Antoine Prieëls for review
of acl
PURPOSE
=======
When you close a payroll (employees), there are often a lot of document
linked. Archiving an employee should archive the contract, cancel future
leaves, archive the private address
Specification
=============
Add departure date (hr):
- Add a Date field to both hr.departure.wizard and hr.employee. In
the wizard, the field is required.
- In toggle_active() method in hr.employee, set departure_date to
false when unarchive the employee.
- If user has a current running contract, a user error will raise if
user enter a departure date earlier than the start date of the
contract.
Add checkbox to set a closing date on hr.contract (hr.contract):
- In the hr.departure.wizard, set the departure date to be the end
date of runing contract. Set the states of all draft contracts to
"cancel".
Add checkbox to free car (hr.fleet):
- In the hr.departure.wizard, set end_date to
fleet.vehicle.assignation.log, if there is no end_date or end_date >
departure_date
- Go through fleet.vehicle, find records with dirver_id to be the
employee, set it to False.
Add checkbox to archive private address (hr):
- when the private address not link to a internel user, set
employee.address_home_id.active to Flase
- unarchive it after the employee unarchived
Add checkbox to cancel future appraisals (hr.appraisal)
- find all appraisals link to the employee and state in
['new', 'pending'], set their state to 'cancel'.
Add checkbox to cancel future leaves (hr.holidays):
- only consider leaves are not in state ['refuse', 'cancel'],
find leaves with to_date > departure_date, set their state to
'cancel'.
PR #42526
Task 2153106
Related: odoo/enterprise#7471
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
In Employee / Work information / Responsible: there is a lack of
information on the "help message" The objective is to change text
in the help message by the ones below:
Field "Coach":
-Employee responsible of this employee.
-The "coach" has no specific rignts or responsibilities by default.
Field "Time Off":
-User responsible for approving "time off" of this employee.
-If empty, the approval is done by any administrators or approvers (determinated in settings/users)
Field "expense":
-User responsible for approving "Expenses" of this employee.
-If empty, the approval is done by any administrators or approvers (determinated in settings/users)
TaskId :2168330
closes odoo/odoo#43467
Closes: #43467
Related: odoo/enterprise#7778
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Open Employees>[DEMO]. Go to HR Settings and generate badge id
Now go to POS Settings, enable "Login with Employees". Now open
the session and login by scanning the [DEMO] employee badge.
The badge will not be recognized, this is caused by the fact that the
badge is 8 digits randomly generated, while the parser recognize
cashiers only if the barcode has a prefix of 041.
Fixed the badge id generation, and adjusted the length to other barcodes
in the system
opw-2151942
closesodoo/odoo#43228
X-original-commit: 90bcda64ba6058169b48ff8214e7c2a98eb9a0f8
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Without demo data, for the odoo-master transifex project
closesodoo/odoo#41935
X-original-commit: dab7670b73506fb3a835695ee3bd735e0c5e5c2b
Related: odoo/enterprise#7287
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Followup of a425695e
The terms were back in 12.0
Courtesy of Juan José Scarafía
closesodoo/odoo#41624
X-original-commit: 85d0c7001a997748d7691205bbb8d066597591a5
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
When we add a user to employee, we can have problem with leave,
expense or coach manager. It's due to those compute fields.
closesodoo/odoo#40795
Related: odoo/enterprise#6865
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Yannick Tivisse