On a new DB with demo data, as Demo User:
- Create a partner
- Unlink the partner
An `AccessError` is raised.
The error is raised on `ir.property`, for the field
`property_product_pricelist`. An entry was indeed automatically created
at partner creation. However, a regular user is not allowed to delete an
`ir.property`.
The property can be safely deleted as SUPERUSER as long as the proper
unlink access rights have been tested beforehand.
opw-1870737
This reverts commit 2054b59285 which
already has been fixed multiple times [0].
However this change does not correctly handle successive onchange calls on
ony2many fields which alter existing rows.
i.e., in saas~11.4, an onchange has been added on move lines [1] in
order to create and/or update lines containing taxes amounts.
However, with diff-only onchange, a second call to onchange will discard
changes made by a first one as nothing change between the 2 calls.
Scenario: On an existing account.move, add a new credit line with a tax set.
The first onchange will update the tax line with new amount. Add a
second line (with debit amount balanced). The onchange will not change
the tax line, resulting as it value being reset to initial value. As a
result, the move is not balanced and cannot be saved.
[0] cd2ccc4110, 5e58ac16c3, 07023137cd
[1] d49ab568a2
Since 2054b59 if we created a record in a many2many relationship of an
onchange, we would also possibly erreneously return the NewId.
The logic of convert_to_onchange of _RelationalMulti doesn't send back
the ID field (if the ID is needed, it is part of the command, not the
update/create dictionary values of a command) and this commit does the
same for the code changed in 2054b59.
This commit also adds a test for this fix, and a test for the regression
corrected with cd2ccc4110 reported in #25969
fix for https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/2054b5928#commitcomment-29837226closes#25984
Without the call to `super`, with at least two level off expected
onchange return data (eg. `invoice_lines.name`) we have an error in
python2, python3 python implementation of OrderedDict and possibly other
python implementation.
So this worked most often (with python3 CPython C implementation of
OrderedDict) by chance.
closes#25960
With website_version, when publishing a version and copying the current version,
the copy_translation wrote a new translation for the copy of master in the published
view instead of the copied view.
Reason:
When writing in the view, odoo checked in the context the current version and
wrote in the view corresponding to the key and the verion seen in the website.
So when copying a view, it translated the copied view instead of the copy of
the view.
The write is made by the function copy_translation with the line:
"new_wo_lang[name] = old_wo_lang[name]"
opw:1856150
In 10.0, the resolution of the m2o field in a read group was
done with a `read` (which sudo the name_get). So, the access
rights were bypassed to get the display_name of the related
records.
In 11.0, a call to `name_get` but not as `sudo` causing access
error in some case. For instance;
- a user has read access on project
- he log some timesheets
- its access to project is removed, but not the timesheet ones
- trying to access its own timesheet via the grid view (which does
a read_group)
- the user gets the access error for project.
The read_group should reproduce the behavior of the `read` method,
so the `name_get` for m2o field during a read_group is now sudoed
to restore previous behavior.
opw-1855942
When ir.values was removed and the "action" ir.values were merged
directly into the actions themselves, "client_action_relate" was
discarded as unused (and possibly too similar to
client_action_multi?). *However*:
* it was actually used implicitly as "relate" was the default key2 of
the <act_window> XML tag
* and it had a crucial difference from client_action_multi:
client_action_multi is shown on both form and list views by default
and only on list if multi=True, whereas relate is shown on *either*
the form or list view (tree if multi else form)
This means without relate the actions which should be only visible on
the form view are now on both list and tree, which leads to
overpopulated `Action` menus and odd behaviours (e.g. actions relying
active_id on lists, which id do they get and why?)
=> reintroduce relate as "action_form_only" for the specific case of
multi=False and either no key2 or a key2 of client_action_relate. If
multi=True then binding_type=action.
Fixes#20124
Followup: Task 1843603 to remove #multi and redundancy
New records (with a NewId) are not necessary in the cache, but should
not be prefetched.
This check has been omitted during optimisation in b0c08a6846.
opw-1843566
opw-1843636
opw-1843683
opw-1843548
opw-1843629
opw-1843657
Closes#24595
Instead of searching for ids in the whole cache, search for the ones we will potentially prefetch.
Example: imagine you have 1K records in cache, and only 3 records in your prefetch set. Instead of retrieving the 1K records that have a value in cache, retrieve which of the 3 records that have no value in cache.
Restore behaviour of not adding the separating dot if the module field
of an ir.model.data record is empty. This is useful/important for
interop with external systems.
Assume a custom field F is defined on model 'res.partner'. The setup of F may
silently fail because of missing stuff. In that situation, setting up the
field inherited from F on model 'res.users' should also silently fail.
To reproduce the bug, install Invoicing, create a related custom field F on
'res.partner' with 'property_account_position_id.active', and install another
module. Setting up F after loading module 'base' will fail because the field
'property_account_position_id' does not exist yet. The error is not caught by
the inheritance of F on model 'res.users', and the installation crashes.
Assume a custom field F is defined on model 'res.partner'. The setup of F may
silently fail because of missing stuff. In that situation, setting up the
field inherited from F on model 'res.users' should also silently fail.
To reproduce the bug, install Invoicing, create a related custom field F on
'res.partner' with 'property_account_position_id.active', and install another
module. Setting up F after loading module 'base' will fail because the field
'property_account_position_id' does not exist yet. The error is not caught by
the inheritance of F on model 'res.users', and the installation crashes.
OPW 1835872
The issue occurs when `read_group` is called with a date/datetime field to
group and order on, and the group_by is qualified, such as:
model.read_group(..., groupby=['date:week'], orderby='date')
The ORDER BY clause in the query should use the same term as the GROUP BY
clause for the corresponding field.
OPW 1834148
d28f8f704f carefully clears only the
relevant bit of the cache (only the top-level object which we're
exporting), however the commit did not considert that _export_rows
calls itself recursively for relational fields, and thus when
exporting relational fields the relation would become the new
top-level and get cache-cleared on every iteration, significantly
slowing down cases where such records are shared and would need to be
re-fetched every iteration, even more so if they're somewhat/somehow
expensive.
OPW-1833545
OPW-1836361
While c059e7b93c64b9dd9bc96eeb6ee5cadf significantly lowers the cost
of generating xids, a safety invalidate cache can regress cases
significantly e.g. 18s -> 430s (7mn) for some recursive exports of
xids as the cache would be completely cleared *after each record*
requiring complete fetching & recomputation of the following records.
Fix by only clearing the cache if we've actually had to create
xids *and* only for ir.model.data records.
It's possible that clearing the cache isn't even necessary at all (?),
check with @rco-odoo
OPW-1835226
* add UUIDs to XID sections (4 bytes / 8 hex digits) so it's not
necessary to handle collisions & add a fallback generator
* use COPY for performances over executemany: executemany just
performs an implicit loop on all statements (in psycopg2)
* ~pure SQL was possible:
INSERT INTO ir_model_data (module, model, name, res_id)
SELECT
'__export__',
'{model}',
'{table}_' || A.id || '_' || uuid_generate_v4(),
A.id
FROM {table} A
LEFT JOIN ir_model_data B
ON A.id = B.res_id AND B.model = %s
WHERE B.res_id IS NULL;
but would have required installing pg extensions (problematic
especially in stable) and performances are about the same as
the COPY version
task 36343
Fixes#22493
This fix avoids wild prefetching when serializing
onchange results.
We fell on a strange situation in method `onchange`, where
some data was missing from cache when serializing the
result. In that case, the prefetching overwrites so
many stuff in cache that the results of the onchanges
are lost.
Don't let that happen.
This is a backport of 5f660cd, with rco-odoo's blessing.
A use case this commit solve is
- Install the sale app.
- Create new quotation and assign new partner
- From inline editable listview add a new order line
(created the product inline) then directly save.
- Click on the order line (NOT IN EDIT MODE). This opens
the order line in a popup.
- Close the popup.
- Click edit again.
- Now change the order line description.
When unfocusing order line field, the description is reset
to previous one.
Closes#23276Closes#23277
Issue: when the inverse method writes on a dependency of the first record, it
invalidates the cache of the field for the other records... Solution: simply
evaluate the inverse method one record at a time.
Configurations uses an onchange to populate the fields visible to the
user. However, the related fields are by default called sudo, when it is
an onchange, there may be a missmatch in the cache, the cache used being
empty, there is no value to return (cache fix is not currently possible).
Before this fix we must use 'related_sudo=False' to use the good cache but
it's an inconsistent fix because in some case we must use sudo to avoid
access error.
opw-1823363
Overly attached cache's overhead turns out problematic. Clearing the
cache after batches of records keeps the cache overhead low and does
not change performances.
Explanations:
env.cache is 3 levels of maps {field: record_id: {env: value}}, where
env can be either an Environment or a pair (cr, uid) depending on the
field's dependency on the context or not.
This can be an issue when the current request loads many fields in an
enormous number of records in a single environment. The (PaaS) case
here was the export of a res.partner field from 36358 records in a single
environment[0]:
* prefetch expanded the single field to 68, leading the base `cache`
to have 68 entries. getsizeof(d<len=68>) == 3360 (3kB, which we will
soon see we can ignore entirely).
* *each* of these entries would hold a map of 36358
records. getsizeof(d<len=36358>) = 3146016 (3MB), 68 times = 213MB.
* finally each record entry is also a {(cr, uid): value}, here the
dicts have a single entry which makes them 280B, and their key is a
2-tuple "worth" 72B, or 352B/record/field, or 352 * 36358 * 68 ~
870MB[1].
For a total of ~1GB, which is roughly the issue we can observe.
Future possibilities: extract the cache-clearing iterator to be more generic
and available on BaseModel directly? Or even make the default iterator
batched & cache-clearing?
[0] note that sys.getsizeof only provides the size of the object it's
called on, it is not recursive
[1] slightly more in actuality as there's some variation between the
leaves depending on the field type e.g. M2O values are a 1-tuple
adding 60B, ...
Fixes#22475
If a record is deleted *and* has property fields, the deletion of the
property fields will trigger the various recomputes before the record
itself has actually been deleted, and thus stuff which depend(ed) on
that record will be recomputed under the assumption that the record
still exists, which probably will not work.
Under the assumption that the same issue would occur when deleting
more than one batch of records (unlinking the data, values or
attachment would also trigger a recompute before the proper end of the
function and could lead to incoherence, e.g. some of the records being
deleted being visible to recomputes), lift the entire effective body
of the unlink into a norecompute context, to ensure that only the very
final recompute (from the top-level unlink) is actually triggered.
opw-807036
Before this commit, if the first exported field of an M2M is `id` (the
xid) the entire M2M is folded into a single cell with comma-separated
xids and any following field is ignored. If `id` is any but the first
field, the export behaves normally (with the m2m exported as a "table"
inside the parent record).
This behaviour makes sense for import-compatible exports where the id
is the only thing which can be exported anyway, but it is troublesome
outside of that mode as the behaviour of m2m under export becomes
incoherent/unpredictable (ish) as it depends on the position of the
m2m's `id` in the exports list.
Change it so we only perform folding in import-compatible mode (which
is the default for backwards compatibility with e.g. API calling
export_data directly & the like).
opw-813361
Fixes#22600
Current behaviour when duplicating a record:
apply copy override in the user language (e.g. "%s (copy)")
copy the previous term in all the other languages (including)
So if product was named:
cheeses (en)
kaas (nl)
fromage (fr)
Duplicating the product, while in French, will result into:
cheeses (en)
kaas (nl)
fromage (copie) (fr)
This is a problem if there is a unicity constrain on the field, it will be
raised (there is already a product named 'cheese')
After this PR:
Duplicating the product, while in French, will result into:
fromage (copie) (en)
kaas (nl)
fromage (copie) (fr)
This applies **only** if there is an override of copy
This is detected by comparing the old and new value for the user language
Fixes#7010Closes#22052
Christophe Simonis