Commit:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/818c18e55d0718286ff5bf332186a10f4d7a58ef
Updated the resequence logic in a way that was almost falser than before.
The added test however did work by coincidence, as index values were equal to
the sequence field values.
To be sure that we synchronize with what happens on the server, we do a read
after the resequence.
Additionnally, we take into account the result of the server resequence return;
if it is false, it means no resequencing happened, so we should not do a read.
opw 1867049
closesodoo/odoo#27184
With this commit, we introduce a new 'fail fast' feature to our qunit
test suite: when it is activated, the qunit test suite will immediately
stop after the first failed test.
It is accessible as a flag in the url (failfast), or by clicking the
checkbox in the UI. It is currently not activated by default.
Note that this commit also change the url for the runbot phantomjs test
in order to activate this feature. This allows us to increase the global
timeout for the js test suite without fear!
Backport of 611c836a46
Let x_1, ..., x_a, x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k}, x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n} be a record
sequence ordered by its 'sequence' field.
Suppose the reordering occurs between elements x_{a+k} and x_{a+1}.
If the subsequence x_1, ..., x_a is ordered, then it does not change.
This is also true of the subsequence x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n}.
The resquence function makes exactly this assumption, and only sends the server
the subsequence x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} to update its 'sequence' field.
The update of x is done as follows: it is index + offset, where index is the
position of x in the subsequence, and offset is the 'sequence' of the first
element of the sequence (i.e. x_{a+1}.sequence).
It is easy to see that we need another hypothesis: that the sequence numbers are
unique. To show it, suppose that the sequence of x_1, ..., x_a is 0, then all
x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} have sequence 1, and lastly all x_{a+k}, x_{a+k+1}, ...,
x_{n} have sequence 2. Then after the call to the server resequence, the
subsequence x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} would have sequence numbers 1, 2,..., k.
Since the x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n} subsequence have 'sequence' value 1, this would
obviously be incorrect.
We fix the reordering of the data in the js frontend to be consistent with
what is done by the server.
Note that this is only pertinent for sequences of reordering moves, since
otherwise the data comes directly from the server.
opw 1867049
The 'drag and drop' function defined in test_utils should be aware of four
different cases, moving up or down, above or below another row.
We need an offset of one pixel for the function to work when moving down
(this is a case of broken symmetry because of <=)
Related to opw 1867049 regarding sequences of resequence moves.
Have a view with a field as:
<field name="stuck_in_the_middle" attrs="{'readonly': [('with_you', '=', False)]}"/>
Before this commit, the contents of attrs were parsed and merged into the modifiers
and the attrs attribute of the node was deleted
which might cause divergence between reality and tests
After this commit, the mock server does what the server does in this case
closes#25583
The way the calendar view selected its form view was broken for two
reasons:
- any value given in the form_view_id attribute was kept as string,
which means that the string value would be sent to the server, and
this is not good.
- if no value was set, the calendar view then simply did a do_action
with the form view id set to false, which means that the default form
view is used. This is mostly ok, except when we are in the context of
an action with a form view which is not the default one. In that
case, we clearly prefer the form view from the action.
For example, before this commit, the form view in the timesheet
application (community) is not the same as the default form view on
account.analytic.line.
Note that this commit also adds a small tweak to the mock server to
better simulate errors like the web client does (in session.js).
Before this, the progressbar values were not updated (both count and progress)
after archiving all the records of a column.
Multiple things have been done here to update it.
Firstly, a optimization had been done to avoid reloading the progressbar when
updating a column ; this optimization was not correct due to this precise use
case. This will update the progressbar.
Secondly, the `aggregateValues` are reset when putting empty groups back in the
datapoint. This attribute is used to compute the counter if a `sum_field` is set
on the progressbar widget. It needs to be reset because the loop that computes
it won't iterate on empty groups.
Eventually, the mockRPC of the progressbar route was not taking the `group_by`
argument into account (probably a typo).
When a user creates a new column in a kanban view, leave the action and
comes back, the order is not preserved. With this commit, we force a
call to resequence to ensure that the order does not change.
Before this commit, some breaking spaces were present in the js code.
Such spaces are misinterpreted and worked by luck.
This has become a problem with exported js bunldes (e.g. the
external_lib bundle in im_livechat).
This commit replaces breaking spaces by regular spaces.
Before this rev., it might happen that the parent of BasicModel instances
wasn't correctly set to the Controller instance. It was actually set to the
ActionManager instance, which is never destroyed. So when this happened,
the BasicModel instance wasn't destroyed when it's controller was.
There is a drawback in 12048bd6, if a kanban view with an
"Undefined" column (exist when a kanban view grouped on a relational
field and some record have this field unset) had a column resequenced a
traceback would happen if more than one column was displayed.
This happen because before we had a "undefined" ID for the "Undefined"
column and after 12048bd6 we get a framework unique ID which was not
managed.
note: this commit also adds `left`/`right` values in the dragAndDrop
test utility function so an element can be dropped at the right/left of
another element.
related to opw-782433
closes#21708
This rev. introduces two helper functions for the tests: patch
and unpatch. Those function allow patching an Odoo Widget (e.g.
AbstractField), and unpatch it at the end of the test with the
guarantee that the Widget's prototype is exactly the same as it
was before the test.
This was necessary because the way it was done before was a little
bit too naive, and could lead to unexpected behavior. Indeed, doing
var someFunction = AbstractField.prototype.someFunction;
// test content
AbstractField.prototype.someFunction = someFunction;
is correct if someFunction is actually define (or overriden) in
AbstractField, as in that case, it really exists on its prototype.
Otherwise, it isn't correct if it is not directly defined on the
prototype before the test, as it will be after..
Before this commit, it was not possible to reexecute functions using the
_.throttle function in the same test (e.g. drag and drop two elements in the
studio tests).
Before this rev., sorting groups in list views wasn't supported. It
hadn't been implemented in the new views.
This rev. activates the feature, so groups can now be sorted on
their aggregates again. It also implements a basic (first level
only) sorting in mockReadGroup, in the mock server.
opw 781288
Here is a situation where we had a problem:
- a form view with a one2many field, which has no inline views
- the (non inline) list view has a field A, and is not editable
- the (non inline) sub form view has fields A and B, with an onchange on
B which modifies A
In that case, the user could do this:
- go to edit mode
- click on 'add' a new one2many line
- change the value of B in the form view, this changes the value of A
- click on save to close the modal form view
- click on the new o2m record to reopen the modal form view
- rechange B
=> the onchange does not work
The explanation is that when we reopen the modal, we update the known fields
information, but we had to perform a fieldviewget to fetch the list
view, so we have a full knowledge of the fields. However, the code did
not update the fields info (because it uses _.default), which means that
the onchange information contained in the form view is lost.
Note: the test system had to be adapted to more closely simulate what
actually happens. In particular, the onchange flag is no longer added
by the mock server, since it should be done by the data manager, like
'real' code. This change broke the basic model tests, which had to be
modified accordingly, by setting manually the onchange flag.
A recent fix in web changed the field FieldImage to make sure it also
loads a __last_update field. This is fine, except that a test in
enterprise (web_clearbit_tests) was using a field image, and failed
because it could not find the __last_update field in the demo data.
With this commit, we make sure that the mock server is always aware of
the __last_update field.
With the new views, we mainly focused on making them work. But we also
need to be able to handle unusual cases, such as some RPC failing. An
example of such a problem was the following:
- a form view with a one2many with an onchange
- edit mode, change a field in the one2many, click elsewhere
- the onchange triggers, calls the server
- it may happen that the server fails with a ValidationError
- the onchange deferred fails, the line in the one2many is restored to
the value known by the list renderer, which is the previous value (but
the new value was applied to the model)
- we now have a 'corrupted' state: clicking on save will send the
invalid value, even though the UI displays the previous one.
We solve this problem in this commit by making sure that the onchange
deferred returned by the _performOnchange always succeed (or stays
pending). If the rpc fails, the deferred will succeed with an empty
dictionary. This means that the list renderer will be updated with the
value from the model.
Note that it may not be intuitive that a failure in the onchange is not
seen as an error from the perspective of the _performOnChange, but I
think that it still makes sense:
- the validation/network errors are not really a concern of the UI. The
UI just display the values entered by the user.
- if an onchange fails (for example, because of a coding error), we do
not really want to prevent the user from working.
Also, when the onchange is performed, the initial change was already
applied to the local data. Rollbacking them would be a more difficult
task.
Note that we also improve the mock server in this commit, to allow
mocking failures.
This commit introduces a new way to hide a column in a x2m list view.
The attribute 'tree_invisible' can be add in the field attrs in the x2m
view definition. This attribute can use the 'parent' key to make a reference
to the parent record (e.g. 'parent.id').
When the mockserver handles an unimplemented route, it just log an
error. This is annoying because it does not break the QUnit suite, so
if the developer does not look at the console, it will look like the
test suite pass. However, the runbot will see that as an error.
With this commit, we throw an error to force the test suite to fail in
that case.
The server postproccess the view to add attributes on many2one fields, i.e.
`can_create` and `can_write`, according to access rights.
These attributes are parsed by the client as string but should also be parsed by
the many2one when evaluating them.
The mock server has also been adapted to set these attributes.
* crm, project
Add a new feature which allows to put a progressbar in the kanban
columns. The progressbar shows with the same color the amount of
records whose value of a given field are the same in the column.
It also indicate the sum of another given field or simply the total
number of records. It also allows to subgroup the column content.
To define a progressbar, add this as a direct child of the kanban
arch:
<progressbar field="<name of the field to use for subgroups>"
colors="{<one possible value for the above field>: <success, warning or danger>, ...}"
sum="<name of the field to sum or nothing to use total number of records>"/>
Also:
- Properly update record model data's parentID when moving a record
- ...
Before this commit, the xml attributes defined with 'context.get(key)' in the
subviews not inline were not evaluated correctly. This was caused
by the loss of the one context in the '_loadSubviews' method.
This commit fixes this issue and modifies the mockserver in order to be able
to use the parameter 'viewOptions.context'.
Before this commit, only the routes which began by '/web/image' were
mocked (simply ignored). This forgot the case were it is a full URL
(http://www.test.com/web/image). Now, also mock the static images
routes (for .png and .jpg).
Prevents false positive error in tests.
Issue: If an error occurs that the view remains visible, then other tests that use a pointer or focus can not be performed. Errors occur because the new views are introduced afterwards and are therefore not always visible.
Since the new views, most of the barcodes feature was
broken. This commit re-enables the support of commands like
'edit', 'save', 'cancel', 'previous' and 'next'.
Also changed javascript event handler to jquery event handler to
make barcodes testable in phantomjs.
With the new views, we stopped using the browser timezone to
display the dates in Odoo, and we used the timezone defined on
the User profile instead. When loading the webclient, the
timezone offset was put into the session and used to display all
dates. This wasn't a good idea.
The given offset was computed for the current time, meaning that
it may be incorrect for specific dates (e.g. with the daylight
saving, the UTC offset of today is not the same as 6 months ago).
Moreover (but less likely), as the offset was stored in the
session, it wasn't recalculated afterwards. So if the offset
actually changed during the session (e.g. from or to daylight
saving time), the displayed dates were incorrect until the user
reloaded the page.
With this rev., we don't retrieve the offset from the server
anymore and we use the browser timezone again (like before the new
views). However, we keep the computation of the offset (on the fly)
in the session, so that it can be mocked in the test environment.
Some one2many fields are called with a many2many widget to unlink
records instead of delete them. But this behavior was modified with the
new views and the records were deleted anyway.
In this commit, we restore the previous behavior, and create a FORGET
command in basic model
to do that. Note that the widget='many2many' is a hack, and a better way
to accomplish this is to use a new custom option. But this would be a
fix for master (PR #18413)
* web_editor, web_planner, website
The 'Dialog' class is used in both backend and frontend. Also, lots of
actions can be done without the use of any modal. It thus makes sense
to lazy load its related xml only when a first modal is opened.
This change also allows to get rid of the "base_common.xml" file as the
dialog template is the only remaining one in there and, in the future
website update, it will allow to not load any static XML file on website
page loadings.
len-odoo