It seems that Authorize.net returns an 'Error' status when transactions
fail (note that it can also return an Ok status for different types of
failures).
This is incoherent with the way the authorize requests are processed,
since an Error resultCode will raise a ValidationError, rollbacking the
complete cursor transaction. This makes little sense, since there should
be a trace of the payment.transaction in the backend (preferably with an
explanation for the failure).
This fix adds an error processing step to the response handling of
authorize.net - while before, it was assumed that an 'error' result
meant an issue in communication/setup, now it is treated as an error
in payment and the payment.transaction status is set accordingly.
I've added a test for this and it was green (pinky promise), but this
particular test suite is deactivated (or perhaps only on nightly, I need
to check the nightly process with @nim-odoo).
This commit add s2s communication to the Authorize.net payment
provider, allowing the user to:
- Create a payment token
- Charge a payment token
- Authorize/capture transactions
The installation of a new acquirer was a bit complicated : from settings,
check the acquirer, then apply (install the module) then list view of
acquirer and finally edit it in form view.
This needed to be simplified. The payment acquirers are pre-filled
in payment. From the kanban view an `Install` button installs and
redirects to the form field.
merge *ALL* the dicts
The form rendering used to receive a dict for partner information and a dict for tx information and to transmit another dict to the qweb template; now everything is done in a single dict
Besides, the test was particularly useful:
It tested that when 'Buyer' was sent as firstname
and 'Nobert' as lastname to Authorize,
authorize returned the opposite, 'Norbert' as firstname
and 'Buyer' as last name.
Romain Derie