When we use the `|` (or) version of this rule the ORM generates two
sub-queries when checking the company. This causes sub-optimal and in
some cases really bad planning for the queries and thus PG takes hours
to complete them.
Example (formatted):
```sql
SELECT "mrp_routing_workcenter".id
FROM "mrp_routing_workcenter"
LEFT JOIN "mrp_bom" AS "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"
ON "mrp_routing_workcenter"."bom_id" = "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."id"
WHERE "mrp_routing_workcenter"."workcenter_id" in (1)
AND ( ("mrp_routing_workcenter"."bom_id" in (
SELECT "mrp_bom".id
FROM "mrp_bom"
WHERE ("mrp_bom"."company_id" in (1))
)
)
OR ("mrp_routing_workcenter"."bom_id" in (
SELECT "mrp_bom".id
FROM "mrp_bom"
WHERE "mrp_bom"."company_id" IS NULL
)
)
)
ORDER BY "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."sequence",
"mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."id",
"mrp_routing_workcenter"."sequence",
"mrp_routing_workcenter"."id"
```
If we use the single term version the generated query has only one
sub-query:
```sql
SELECT "mrp_routing_workcenter".id
FROM "mrp_routing_workcenter"
LEFT JOIN "mrp_bom" AS "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"
ON "mrp_routing_workcenter"."bom_id" = "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."id"
WHERE "mrp_routing_workcenter"."workcenter_id" in (1)
AND ( ("mrp_routing_workcenter"."bom_id" in (
SELECT "mrp_bom".id
FROM "mrp_bom"
WHERE (("mrp_bom"."company_id" in (1))
OR ("mrp_bom"."company_id" IS NULL))
)
)
)
ORDER BY "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."sequence",
"mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."id",
"mrp_routing_workcenter"."sequence",
"mrp_routing_workcenter"."id"
```
In this version PG is able to produce a better query plan resulting in
better execution times.
Also, the `company_id` field is required on some models, so the "= False" comparison is useless.
closesodoo/odoo#159123
X-original-commit: 1b5c41f36801fb886ec591f29dba42787d698526
Related: odoo/enterprise#59378
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis (chs) <chs@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Time Off : New Dashboard, Accruals feature, Public holidays, New time off type configuration view.
- Review of Dashboard
- Accrual feature : Currently, when you create an allocation, it's possible to create an
Accrual, but there is no appraisal Plan. An Appraisal plan is use to define steps of accruals
for each employee.
In Belgium, we use accrual Allocation for European Leaves, or compensatory hours, it's a
simple use case. But in USA, it's possible to change the calculation mode each year.
Also, in USA, it's possible to deal your accrual plan when you arrive on the company. It's a
HR Officer task to create the right Accrual allocation for each new employee.
- Public Holidays :
Improvement of global time off feature located on Working hours calendar. Now, Time off
application have to manage Public Holidays.
- Review of Time Off type configuration
COM PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/72511
ENT PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/19157
UPG PR: https://github.com/odoo/upgrade/pull/2791
TaskID:2475413
closesodoo/odoo#72511
Related: odoo/enterprise#19157
Related: odoo/upgrade#2791
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: William Braeckman <wbr@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier BOL (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Laurent Stukkens (LTU) <ltu@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Yannick Tivisse <yti@odoo.com>
ir.rule are default values but can be customized based on the
company's policy and needs.
This is typically a record that is in noupdate as should be
customization-friendly.
The field user_id on resource.resource is optional but the access rules
on resource.calendar.leaves request that field set. Which means a user
can only see his own leaves but not the ones of a machine's calendar for.
instance
This commit relax those rules to give access to the user's leaves and the
one not assigned to a specific user
Task : 1892819
Commit 27d41ccb introduced record rules on resource.calendar.leaves.
However it gave no way to create, edit or delete a global rule.
We grant this right to the group_erp_manager, so that an admin can do it.
opw 1968376
closesodoo/odoo#32832
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose is to replace existing inherits of resource.resource by an inherit
on the mixin itself. The mixin offers several methods to compute working
intervals, attendance, hours, ... This mixin will be improved in future
commits when new methods that will be required with future improvements
of various service apps.
This commit also adds tests for the mixin itself. A new model is defined
only for testing purpose to test the mixin.
