_*= account, hr_timesheet
This commit improves the Portal functionality and add email template:
- improve email template for invoice includes timesheet (add link in mail which
redirect to timesheets linked with invoice).
- improve timesheets template by renaming labels and internal header/footer.
task-3251680
closesodoo/odoo#127224
Related: odoo/enterprise#43593
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Emails on Sale Order, Invoice, Recovery cart. When no sales on sale.order
use "COMPANY" <email of company> as fallback before the current user.
Reason is that odoobot is often used in automatized actions and having
it as email_from is not really user friendly.
Also add company fallback in auth modules email templates (if not already
using it) for the same reason.
Task-3346388
closesodoo/odoo#124472
X-original-commit: 597fc004148bf39e8f56e36e840aa6788872f237
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
RATIONALE
Improve usage of composer in comment or email mode: support batch-posting in
comment, support more configuration from templates, improve global model.
SPECIFICATIONS
Update report_template field on template model to be a many2many field instead
of a many2one. It allows to attach multiple dynamic reports to a given template
instead of being limited to a single one.
Name should now come from the report itself, which should be considered as
complete by itself. Template cannot override report naming anymore.
Task-2868153 (Mail: Allow multi reports in mail templates)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#99482
Allow our users to modify mail template more easily
- make the list accessible from the settings
- give them a link to update relevant views to update header/footer
- make the list and form of templates more readable
- add a description on templates, allowing to describe their usage
In order to better filter templates, a new category field is added that
is computed based on active flag, description being set and the template
having an xml ID. Master templates are active, with a description and an
xml ID.
Update master data to add description on some templates.
task-2944770
closesodoo/odoo#101730
X-original-commit: dfa867343ee8842f3f127ac62584fd471b41dde1
Related: odoo/enterprise#32079
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Improve the design of SO/PO/INV mails together with the other changes of the
release, i.e. fixes a few imprecisions introduced by odoo/odoo#82167.
In particular, these changes enforce
* a responsive, mobile friendly layout tested on many devices and OS
* more generally, a consistent styling. Note that some redundancy in directives
is required for compatibility across email clients.
Translation files are included.
Task-2751139
Follow-up of Task-2712450
See odoo/enterprise#25154closesodoo/odoo#86494
X-original-commit: 4914127b428802d2ff2e15351238a3ffef24b9cc
Related: odoo/enterprise#25306
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
* = account, purchase, sale
Purpose of this commit is to add signature only if really asked. A variable
is available for that purpose (``email_add_signature``, recently renamed from
``add_sign``). We also correctly check signature is not void or pseudo-void
using tool ``is_html_empty``. Indeed editor may generates pseudo-void content
like ``<p><br /></p>``.
As signature is not added when a template is used (see composer code) we ensure
it is defined in mail templates used in "Send by email" flows. Indeed we cannot
know if a template already has a signature or not. To avoid having twice a
signature no signature is added in email notification layout when a template
is involved.
Continuation of odoo/odoo#76418 .
Task-2712450 (Mail/Sale: Improve 'Pay Now' notification template)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
Jinja as a templating engine was problematic in differents respect:
- introduce external dependency to Odoo (less controll)
- add another templating mechanism in the stack
- specific feature in qweb cannot be reused
- difficulty in rendering easily editable templates
- more knowledge required with no betterment
By replacing jinja with qweb we can now build tools to edit a qweb
that will work with the previously jinja encoded document
(essentially `mail.template` records).
There is a catch however. Some email fields (eg. email_to) used jinja
syntax for rendering dynamic variables (ie. ${object.something} and
${object.something_that_should_not_be_escaped | safe}).
We still want user to use dynamic variables for some char fields (eg.
subject, from, to, ...). We made a new rendering engine called
"inline_template" that will render an expression enclosed by `{{` and
`}}`.
To be able to edit the templates from the backend interface, a
plugin to the Odoo editor has been made for seamlessly edit the
document.
This qweb plugin includes:
- make dynamic variables (eg. `<t t-out="variable"/>`) not editable
(for preventing the user to shoot himself in the foot)
- group and hide related logical branching (ie. t-if, t-elif, and t-else)
in order to see only one at once
- a floating select input to switch visibility of a particular logical
branching
Task-27033
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@68182baff4
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77377
Purpose is to have all mail template into a mail_template_data.xml file
when possible. It eases maintenance and update when having to work globally
on template records.
Also update some ``body_html`` declarations still using ``xml`` instead of
``html``.
Task ID-2534550 (Template usage improvement)
Task ID-2477164 (Composer mixin)
Prepares Task ID-27033 (QWeb in templates)
COM PR odoo/odoo#70889
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#18352
There is only a single mail template for invoices at the moment.
To make things easier to work with, this will add a new template for
credit notes.
Task id #2343331closesodoo/odoo#58244
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Clean organization of templates in odoo apps: mail.template records in data,
qweb templates (views) used directly in code, notably using post with view.
Purpose is to ease future improvements in posting based on templates.
SPECIFICATIONS
* move those templates in their own file to ease their discovering and
maintenance;
* put them into data (as those are not views even if it contains qweb)
* guidelines are now :
-> Qweb templates should be in data/mail_templates.xml;
-> mail.template records should be in data/mail_template_data.xml;
* put their declaration in no update when not done if template has no
technical code or complex dependency on underlying code;
* move found mail data (mail.message.subtype or mail.activity.type) records
in a mail_data file that should contain only "core" records linked to mail;
LINKS
Task ID-2375767
COM PR odoo/odoo#61814
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#14775
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#1936
Before, only when you had installed the Belgian
structured communication module, when you sent an
invoice by mail then only the structured communication
would be added in the mail.
But it should be visible all the time when
you have a payment reference.
closesodoo/odoo#52618
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
RATIONALE
Mail template model holds a field telling odoo mail engine to automatically
add the current user's signature to the body. Its use depends on the use
case
* using the template in the composer on a single record: it is displayed
in the rendered template in the composer, meaning people could change it.
This behavior is interesting as it allows to see the email content;
* using the template in the composer in mass mail mode: it is not displayed
as only the raw jinja is displayed. It is therefore not obvious that it
will be appended to the body of the mail. People could add it manually and
have 2 signatures as a result;
A mechanism automatically adding a signature to sent emails when posting a
message is already implemented and is based on template existence. If a
template has been used when posting, no signature is added in sent emails.
Otherwise it is automatically added. This behavior should not change.
Behavior will therefore be
* use a template -> specify signature usage in it manually through jinja;
* do not use a template -> signature added in sent emails;
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove user_signature.
Update template body accordingly. In customer oriented templates that are using
it and do not already contain it, manually add a call to user.signature within
the jinja code. When set to False, just remove its declaration.
Quickly clean some signature integration.
LINKS
Task ID 2089252
Community PR odoo/odoo#39482
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6459
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrate#761
Related: odoo/enterprise#6459
Related: odoo/upgrade#761
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
- 'partial' payment state corresponds to invoices whose payable/receivable move line has been partially reconciled with some other line.
- 'reversed' payment state corresponds to entries that have been cancelled by the creation of a single reverse entry (using the dedicated button on the form view). This state can be set on invoice as well as on regular entries.
=> To stay consistent with the naming conventions, this commit also renames invoice_payment_state field to payment_state, since it's no longer only applicable on invoices.
closesodoo/odoo#41723
Related: odoo/enterprise#7202
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Task 2038326
* Tick the credit note sequence by default on the customer invoices and vendor bills journals
* Write Customer Invoice/Vendor Bill/Credit Note/Customer refund at the top of the document
* The reference field should be printed on the credit note pdf (interesting because it gives source and reason)
* If the document is a credit note, there shouldn't be any payment information on the pdf (the customer doesn't have to pay you) (currently you see the "payment communication" the customer is supposed to use)
* Rename Credit Note to Refund on dashboard
* Add tooltip on payment widget
closesodoo/odoo#35231
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert (csn) <csn@openerp.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
Replace the email template content form if you have any question to if you have any questions.
task-1962924
Closes#33520
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Purpose: use more email_formatted when possible, clean and simplify
email_from, email_to and partner_to computation.
Next step is to try to extract some common patterns in tools or methods in
order to simplify template creation and customization.
Related to task 1972615
Linked to PR #32872
Currently when in payment is configure in automatic invoice mode,
customers don't receive anything.
If they want to see their invoice, they have to log into their portal
account.
Task #1866497Closes#25864
Purpose
* use the new notification template allowing to display the payment button
only in emails;
* reorder the fields definition to ease the reading;
* slightly clean the email body using a maximum of div and br tags as it
seems better integrated with Odoo edition capabilities;
This commit is linked to task ID 1860049 and PR #25824.
formataddr (from the email python library) writes email_from as '"name" <email>'
in the email_from field of the mail.compose.message record.
When the mail is rendered, onchange_template_id is triggered.
This then overwrites the values of email_from among other fields.
What happens is that it uses the email_from field from the template to render
the email_from, bypassing what was put by formataddr before.
What happens in some cases is that it is rendered as 'name <email>'
(note the quotes have been stripped away).
If name contains arbitrary symbols, e.g. name = 'pépé [company] <pdg>, ohlala',
then getaddresses which is supposed to parse the (name, email) pairs gets thrown
off (in particular, <pdg> will be interpreted as an email address, and many
other problems with the various special symbols).
It then gives these wrong elements as email addresses, which will usually crash
when getting non-ascii symbols (i.e. these strings don't respect the relevant
RFC for email addresses).
Closes:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/23502https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/2311823118
opw 815202
opw 1824243
All those templates are basically the same except some bug fixes that
were not propagated about company. Let us use just the one we just
defined in the mail module.
In this commit we change notification templates used to render
notification emails from jinja-based mail.template to pure QWeb
templates.
There are several reasons to do so
* those are not real mail.template records. Indeed they cannot be used
outside of the notification process as some values are computed
and not available on the mail.message record used to render the
template;
* we do not really need other fields than body. Indeed fields like
subject, email_from or email_to are computed from the notification
process;
* we do not want people to update the mail.template without knowing
the consequences, especially for fields like recipients that may
broke the mail gateway;
* using the html editor easily break the mail.template as it is very
custom and very to break without really realizing it.
It also simplifies template management as it lessens number of mail
template people have in their list view of mail.template. It avoids
mixing technical and functional templates.
We move to QWeb templates as those are not too hard to customize and
allow to perform body rendering which is what we really need when
notifying people of a new message.
This commit does not change the functional purpose and layout of the
templates. Behavior should be the same before and after this commit.
This commit adds a page view for invoices on the customer portal. Layout
is based on the invoice report to closely match what is already done in
Odoo. It replaces the old controller that returned only the pdf.
Customers should now be able to receive both.
Future commits will improve invoice page view notably in account_payment
while adding payment options in account customer portal.
* rename some files according to guidelines;
* clean template name to clean their ordering and ease template browsing;
* use html type for mail templates body instead of cdata;
* clean html for mail templates introduced at 96da10de6cc20486b3e37fd4c6c88eb61cbb919c;
No horse has been harmed and no functional change performed.
ravb-odoo