Steps to reproduce :
- Create an invoice for a customer (ex $100)
- Create a payment for the invoice (ex $100)
- create a bank statement with a line item for $200
- In reconciliation, add either another journal entry or a manual operation without partner to reconcile the remaining $100
Issue:
All lines receive the partner from the invoice
opw-2691196
closesodoo/odoo#82517
X-original-commit: 6cda0780fdccf666f5a3fb0f39db59fcb0bd45c8
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Vanleynseele <guva@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Colson <oco@odoo.com>
Step to reproduce:
- Two internal users, A and B
- As A, create a calendar event and set its privacy to private
- As B, display everybody's calendar
- Double click on the private event created by A
- Click on save
Current Behaviour:
- True name is shown as part of the error
Behaviour After PR:
- For private event not related to the users, 'Busy' or it's translation is shown to the user
opw-2723904
closesodoo/odoo#82485
X-original-commit: 704a47a520c789906b7e98ef48e5cb4f6592a13a
Signed-off-by: Damhaut Florian (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
This commit:
1. Allows exporting the FEC without any VAT number. Indeed, a company can have to submit its FEC without being submitted to VAT regulation.
2. Allows non french companies to export FEC file.
3. The FEC now includes the journal items == 0 and/or journal entries which total is 0.
Initially, french tax administration rejected the journal items which balance is 0.
But after several requests from tax payers, they agreed because they prefer continuous sequences and some tax payers post entries which total amount is 0.
task-2717676
closesodoo/odoo#82456
X-original-commit: e6206b03ba245ece3d8f765644d71f2d2008398d
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
An error occurred when creating stock picking type from an xml file that
does not have a company
closesodoo/odoo#82514
X-original-commit: d02c9cf8d01e288c378e965c2f02f2436c478ca8
Signed-off-by: Florian Gilbert <flg@odoo.com>
By searching on account.move.line parent_state instead
of move_id.state, we avoid a join in many circumstances
and allow the database to benefit on an index on
company_id+parent_state to optimize several
queries, such as the default filter on the Journal Items
menu which shows posted items.
closesodoo/odoo#82504
X-original-commit: ef61db1cf8ebf1ab11e5dfdd439256d0607edba8
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Gilbert <flg@odoo.com>
- Move extra class to field to avoid reliance on specific template.
- Rename prop to be generic.
- Remove extra margin-top in message view outside of thread view (bonus fix).
- Move code using message view component out of message list update to break
infinite loop.
task-2728107
closesodoo/odoo#82415
X-original-commit: c002adeedeffa23190c7853a9d9643da7825ea33
Related: odoo/enterprise#23331
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Before this commit, attachments in attachment box (chatter) had no
left padding.
Mistakenly introduced by https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/80060
which changes classname passing from parent component to child
component with `t-attf-class`. AttachmentCard and AttachmentImage
components did not `t-attf-class` not on root node, which caused
the broken style that this commit fixes.
closesodoo/odoo#82515
X-original-commit: 429bcbcaad5164e9ecf6f518d4e5b0d1ada0bc4a
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Currently, when importing an invoice/credit note,
it is assumed that it is a vendor (bill/credit note).
But it is not always the case (accounting firms for example).
This is why the counterpart is now adapted based on the move_type.
opw-2697984
closesodoo/odoo#82495
X-original-commit: 8a7d41c99ec493d86166708552c8df51eaa268c2
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: John Laterre <jol@odoo.com>
First step to stream QWeb templates: removing the two post
processing operations applied on rendered templates. This
should slightly speed up the rendering of every page.
1/ Don't remove empty lines after rendering, but fix the root
cause of: view inheritancies and QWeb compilation that don't
add extra empty lines.
2/ handle page break in the two reports that uses it, rather
than processing every view produced.
closesodoo/odoo#82244
Related: odoo/enterprise#23328
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
In automated-AVCO configuration, buying a kit at a higher price than its
cost can create inconsistencies in the accounting.
To reproduce the issue:
(Need account_accountant. Use demo data)
1. Create a product category PC:
- Costing Method: AVCO
- Inventory Valuation: Automated
- Set up the Price Difference Account PDA
2. Create 3 products P_kit, P_compo01, P_compo02
- Type: Storable
- Category: PC
- P_compo01:
- Cost: 10
- P_compo02:
- Cost: 20
3. Create a bill of materials:
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo01
- 1 x P_compo02
4. On P_kit's form, "Compute Price from BoM":
- The cost should be $30
5. Create a purchase order PO with one line:
- Product: P_kit
- Quantity: 1
- Unit Price: 100
6. Confirm PO and process the receipt
7. Create and Post the bill
Error: There is an error in the journal items of the bill: the value for
PDA is $85
When posting the bill, for each account move line, the module computes
the stock valuation of the associated product and the price difference.
To do so, it sums the valuation of all related outgoing stock moves and
divides by the quantity to get the value per unit, then it compares with
the unit price used on the PO's line. Here is the issue: in case of a
kit, there is one outgoing move per component while the PO's line is
linked to the kit itself.
Therefore, in the above case, it uses the outgoing moves of P_compo01
and P_compo02, adds up their value ($10 + $20 = $30) and then divides by
the total quantity (one P_compo01 and one P_compo02, thus $30 / 2 =
$15). This is the reason why it considers that the unit value of P_kit
equals $15. Then, since the unit price on the PO's line is $100, it gets
a price difference value equal to $85.
When comparing the unit value of the kit and its unit price, the unit
value should not be divided by the quantity of components ($30 should
not be divided by 2). Moreover, when buying such a kit at $100, the
surplus ($70) should be distributed among each component. However, it is
difficult to define a rule to correctly weight this distribution.
Therefore, this surplus will be considered as a price difference.
OPW-2566546
closesodoo/odoo#82463
X-original-commit: 20888055d4271bf3cf9e7bc3d42150a1f72e4495
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
account.move.line has a journal_id field that is related on move_id.journal_id.
By searching on journal_id we avoid a useless join,
offering more room for database query optimizations.
closesodoo/odoo#81856
X-original-commit: 2741f245f8a47e971309e97128662f1863329e45
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Gilbert <flg@odoo.com>
createTransactionRequests can return responses like this:
{'messages': {'message': [{'code': 'E00027',
'text': 'The transaction was unsuccessful.'}],
'resultCode': 'Error'},
'transactionResponse': {'SupplementalDataQualificationIndicator': 0,
'accountNumber': 'XXXXXXXX',
'accountType': 'eCheck',
'authCode': '',
'avsResultCode': 'P',
'cavvResultCode': '',
'cvvResultCode': '',
'errors': [{'errorCode': '33',
'errorText': 'Bill To Address is '
'required.'},
{'errorCode': '33',
'errorText': 'Bill To State/Province is '
'required.'}],
'refTransID': '',
'responseCode': '3',
'testRequest': '0',
'transHash': '',
'transHashSha2': 'xxx',
'transId': '0'}}
_make_request() threw out the detailed errors ("Bill To Address is
required" and "Bill to State/Province is required") and only returned:
{
'err_code': 'E00027',
'err_msg': 'The transaction was unsuccessful.'
}
which results in the following vague error on an SO:
The transaction with reference SO1111/1111111 for US$ 100.00
encountered an error (Authorize.net). Error: Authorize.Net: Received
data with status code "3" and error code "The transaction was
unsuccessful."
This commit extracts the transaction errors and appends them to
'err_msg'. After this commit the above response results in this chatter:
The transaction with reference SO1111/1111111 for $ 100.00
encountered an error (Authorize.net). Error: Authorize.Net: Received
data with status code "3" and error code "The transaction was
unsuccessful. Bill To Address is required. Bill To State/Province is
required."
Ideally the error handling logic would be rewritten so that
_make_request() doesn't handle specific errors like this. But changing
it is too high risk in a stable release.
opw-2718318
closesodoo/odoo#82443
X-original-commit: c7b292f7b86679b11527a68093ed70b36dc2fd1a
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Header of XML files should not be translated.
Before this commit, some users may translate the XML header and get
invalid XML if translating words like "encoding"
Fixesodoo/odoo#82155closesodoo/odoo#82439
X-original-commit: aaac6fc04f4e5aa4c9ad68d9e844f3e786044800
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Previously, relational required fields had their auto-generated inverses
defined with `isCausal: true`, which seemed logical: if a record is
deleted, all the records that depend on it must be deleted too.
In practice, it turned out to be a bad idea since there are some cases
where you don't want the dependent records to be deleted. For example,
there is no point in deleting the current record when a required field
is replaced by another one.
Furthermore, this actually led to the introduction of new bugs, as the
one described in task-2730667.
Fixes bug described in task-2730667.
Reverts some of these changes: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/81679closesodoo/odoo#82437
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Since the refactoring of the views aeb8e49972f871b0c9b07c507987ee77cf5e8abbd,
the filters and date filters, the groupbys and date groupbys are now
always separated visually even if no separator/group tag has been
set in the search arch. We restablish the previous behavior that only
seperates them when a separator/group is set.
closesodoo/odoo#82418
X-original-commit: e281bd0850e935ce0d97226366114da4f5406c4d
Signed-off-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Step to reproduce:
- Inventory > Configuration > Operations Types > Manufacturing (or any other operation type with code 'mrp_operation')
- Change 'Type of Operation' to 'Receipt' (or any other but 'manufacturing')
- Uncheck box field 'Use Existing Lots/Serial Numbers'
- Change 'Type of Operation' back to 'Manufacturing'
- Set correct value for 'Default Source Location' (type Receipt changed the value to 'Vendor', need to fix it)
- Create a storable product with the route 'Manufacture' selected.
- Create a BoM for this product, with a component tracked by lot (Add quantity to component)
- Create a MO for the product > Confirm > Check Availability
Current Behaviour :
Quantity are reserved, but the lot_ids are not visible
The behaviour is due to the fact that hidden parameters still have effect when they should act as their default value. To ensure it's the case, they are set back to their original value when the user switch between configuration to avoid ending in a wrongful configuration.
Behaviour after PR :
Lot ids are shown no matter the hidden configuration of picking type
opw-2680370
closesodoo/odoo#82377
X-original-commit: 22bbf43eba0927bdf27218da16f8435b33756112
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Damhaut Florian (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
This PR make the activity popover test use the mock model and a chatter as
component.
closesodoo/odoo#82143
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
This commit adds the possibility to open the custom main command palette.
So it is possible to replace some parts of the default command palette
config.
For example, we will customize the placeholder:
```
this.command_service.openMainPalette({
placeholder: "My custom placeholder",
})
```
This commit also modify the api of CommandPaletteConfig, we replace
namespace by searchValue. Now it is possible to open a command palette
with a value in its input.
For example:
```
this.command_service.openPalette({
searchValue: "@test",
})
```
closesodoo/odoo#81814
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Change weird formatting sometimes showing "In" or "ago" without
displaying any text, give user better awereness of when a room/track
starts or has started.
Specifications
=============
Change widget in website_event_meet to digital: False, display "Starting
now!" if track starts/has started within less than 60sec, display info
box showing when page was last refreshed.
Task-2677865
closesodoo/odoo#79082
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Attachments that are uploaded on a record that isn't saved yet are
created with res_id set to 0. In the case of attachments linked through
a m2m rather than the usual (res_model, res_id), it means they may not
be readable afer the creation of the record, except by their creator.
Re-attaching them to the mailing / template at the end of the create()
call fixes the ownership.
Fixes#81935closesodoo/odoo#82120
X-original-commit: 05fb705f2729ffdf07ab36accda20415a44e1aa6
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony <odo@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Allow users with enough access rights to disable next-day report on
mass mailing lists. The option has been added in the mass mailing
settings and is enabled by default. Mass mailing reports can also be
disabled with a "Turn off mailing reports" button in the report email
itself. Reports are enabled and disabled for all responsible.
Task-2692211
closesodoo/odoo#82430
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Before this commit, a toaster notification would be shown in addition to
the dedicated error div in the inline payment form when an exception is
raised while trying to archive a payment token.
closesodoo/odoo#82420
X-original-commit: ff7368a4d140a5fe7cf995d61847e81c6a7fd65e
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Step to reproduce:
- Create a Project with task A
- Create a Sub_Task to task A named sub_task B
- Create a Sub_Task to sub_task b name sub_sub_task C
- Duplicate Project
Current Behaviour:
- sub_sub_task C (copy) has no parent_id
Behaviour after PR:
- sub_sub_task C parent_id is sub_task b (copy)
opw-2727220
closesodoo/odoo#82417
X-original-commit: dbf27b60041e53b12fc79ac2f67197d1a77a1d8c
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Damhaut Florian (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
Issue:
If the sales timesheet module is installed and the task has an Analytic Tag set,
the tag does not appear on the timesheet.
Reproduce Step:
- Install sale_timesheet
- Analytic Accounting Tags and Analytic Accounting active
- create the task
-Insert timesheet and Analytic Accounting tags
- Tag empty in Analytic Items
closesodoo/odoo#80494
task-2667754
closesodoo/odoo#82375
X-original-commit: 3289c23a4b1b3a43dc125acded1e790cfb826c95
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
When using a product attribute with a creation mode defined on "never",
the order sent to the kitchen doesn't consider the product attribute
value
To reproduce the issue:
(Use demo data)
1. Create a product P:
- In variants, add the "size" attribute with at least two values
- (Note that the creation mode of this attribute is "never")
- Available in POS
- Category: Miscellaneous
2. In Point of Sale, edit the "Bar" POS and enable:
- Product Configurator
- Order Printer (the Kitchen Printer must be working)
3. Start a POS session
4. Select a table and add:
- 1 x P with a size value
- 1 x P with another(!) size value
5. Send the order to the kitchen
Error: The printed order only contains one line: 2 x P with the first
size value selected
When checking if the current order has some changes, the lines summary
builrder does not distinguish the product variants
OPW-2698626
closesodoo/odoo#82316
X-original-commit: 911a178c99fe56c5f644083a0bb5e992a11f34ed
Signed-off-by: Masereel Pierre <pim@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
A lot of localization are inheriting reports and changing them.
This should be tested in a generic test like /base.test_reports to avoid
possible tracebacks.
closesodoo/odoo#82312
Related: odoo/enterprise#23299
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Two key are used for the same purpose. Remove one and
use its content directly in the report
clean commit bef1765b197a9e9d510a7d20d0364333402473b0
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82312
The number is set as zeros, but we should still provide
the IdPaese tag.
opw-2703669
closesodoo/odoo#82398
X-original-commit: 3e4361ff621e5458e6a2ad09610274bf33290106
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
In saas-15.1 move_lines on `stock.picking` has been rename in
move_ids.
It was miss during #81595 and it's fixed now
closesodoo/odoo#82397
X-original-commit: fd531c7b0baa742cefb7a09c557617806d8a563a
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the a subtask is in the same project than the
parent one and the internal user has manually set the project to see
this task in the main kanban view of tasks of the project. In project
sharing view, the collaborator cannot see the 'View Task' button in the
sub list view of subtasks shown in the form view of the parent one.
This commit fixes it to shown the button when the subtask is in the same
project than the parent one.
Steps to reproduce:
==================
1) Create a Project A
2) Create a Task T in the Project A
3) Add a subtask in T and set the project A in the subtask
4) Share in edit mode the project A to a portal user
5) Log out and log in as the portal user
6) Go to the Project A to see the kanban view of tasks in project
sharing feature.
7) Go to the task T and see the subtasks list view.
Expected Behaviour:
==================
The 'View Task' should be shown for this subtask because the subtask is
in the same project than the parent one.
Actual Behaviour:
================
This button is not shown.
Bug found during the testing of the task-2648955
closesodoo/odoo#82383
X-original-commit: ddafb7fa5aff30e2cb16dcdcb5cdbd44397de126
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
When we create a record with a very long continuous title (without spaces) the string comes out of the kanban block.
Reproducible on several applications such as Notes, CRM, etc.
opw-2680915
closesodoo/odoo#82348
X-original-commit: efe1312535b3af20c81cfd6cb10cbf3e7e5f8f90
Signed-off-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
The "My department" filter in the "Time Off" overview menu is changed to also include the leaves of employees from child departments (all the way to the bottom of the hierarchy).
task-2699541
closesodoo/odoo#81597
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
When we ack a file for having correctly received the response e.g.,
the file is deleted on the server and will not have a file key in the reponse,
at least before the server itself will have a new response to share.
Before, it would traceback, while now, we do nothing. (as we are still waiting)
Also, when we get the notice that the term of 2 weeks is passed, it means
it is successfull.
Also, for the batching we had a traceback, because it was possible to have
a batching mixing step 1 and step 2, which fails doing invoices.l10n_it_edi_transaction
So we added whether there is a tranaction or not in the batch key.
opw-2703669
closesodoo/odoo#82358
X-original-commit: c20e3b95a82fd35c1dcefd159525f59e2c255e9d
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Connect as Admin
- install stock_account
- Go to inventory > Product Variants > choose any product > click on the FORECAST button
- Traceback
Problem:
docs['product_templates'] can be False, so we can't use it to check the user's group: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/15.0/addons/stock/report/report_stock_forecasted.py#L98
Opw-2728473
closesodoo/odoo#82352
X-original-commit: 227a639b34fc5121d135346a158ab17486a53d40
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
use case to reproduce:
receipt a product tracked by lot
produce a lot with a component tracked*
open the traceability report for the lot's component
you have a traceback.
it's due to last_delivery_partner_id field present in the tree view of lots.
it triggers _compute_delivery_ids that call _find_delivery_ids_by_lot in multi.
the call in the recursion(trigger by *) redefine delivery_by_lot and erase the previous result.
so the cache is not correctly update and traceback
closesodoo/odoo#82351
X-original-commit: e6bcc77c58d39adbd782e776eb2f6d5c470eb0e2
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Current behavior :
When sending an invoice by email there was 2 signature in the mail
Steps to reproduce :
Create an invoice
Send it by email
Check the mail, there are 2 signatures
opw-2703272
closesodoo/odoo#82347
X-original-commit: 00965df4be591b952b339038c324d7e92596e3d5
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Suppose a product with several suppliers, all with the same partner. On
the purchase order, the product description will always be based on the
last supplier
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create a vendor V
2. Create a product P:
- Type: Storable
- In Purchase, add a line L01:
- Vendor: V
- Vendor Product Name: Name01
- Vendor Product Code: C01
- Quantity: 1
- Price: 10
- In Purchase, add a second line L02:
- Vendor: V
- Vendor Product Name: Name02
- Vendor Product Code: C02
- Quantity: 20
- Price: 2
- Once P is saved, ensure the lines order in the purchase tab:
- L01
- L02
3. Add a reordering rule on P:
- Min: 1
4. Run the scheduler
5. Open the generated PO
Error: The description is incorrect ("[C02] Name02" instead of "[C01]
Name01")
When computing the display name of the product,
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7691567286869ca65e63fc79c2cee11e1f415fcb/odoo/models.py#L1728-L1730
`name_get` returns a tuples list: `[(37, '[C01] Name01'), (37, '[C02]
Name02')]` where `37` is the product identifier. This list is then
converted into a dictionary and here is the issue: it will use the last
tuple to define the value for key `37`, i.e. "[C02] Name02". Therefore,
`name_get` should return the correct name, and only this one.
Another issue could be highlighted: when the user changes the quantity
of the purchase order line, if another supplier info is selected, the
description won't be updated (for the same reason as above)
OPW-2702616
closesodoo/odoo#82321
X-original-commit: a42608214f2e9ef3f5e59b4b54cd7f72a6019e06
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Current behavior :
Any users (not only internal users, but portal users too) can be selected
from the `Salesperson` field in the Settings.
Exepected behavior :
Only internal users can be selected.
Steps to reproduce :
- Install eCommerce
- Go to Settings, Website category
- Find Orders Followup category
- Try to pick a salesperson
OPW-2709759
closesodoo/odoo#81368
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
The enterprise module website_helpdesk_forum changes the demo data
karma_answer value to 0 for the default Help forum thus breaks the tour.
odoo/enterprise#19870odoo/upgrade#2681closesodoo/odoo#74353
Taskid: 2499623
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
The aim of this commit is to allow EDIs to create and save account move
even if a supplier reference is duplicated.
This is achieved by delaying the moment to which the constrains is
triggered.
Before this commit:
A user can only upload a bill once. (xml ubl format for instance)
If he needs to upload it a second time, he will be forced to find a
workaround.
After this commit:
User will be able to upload as many bill as he wants but will receive a
ValidationError when trying to post the invoice if the reference is
duplicated.
The user will be able to post the bill very easily by changing the
reference a bit if he wants to pursue.
closesodoo/odoo#82303
Community-pr: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/81748
Enterprise-pr: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/23255
Task: 2612299
X-original-commit: 200614876e62192e1a5ce2f30ec7aa8a1de77672
Related: odoo/enterprise#23281
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Steps:
- Users > Admin > Acces Rights > Human Resources
- Time Off : empty
- Time Off > a past day > Time Off Request wizard :
- Time Off Type : Sick Time Off
- Confirm
Issue:
- User Error : 'You must have manager rights to modify/validate a time off that already begun'
Cause:
- When creating the request, attachments are writen onto the record.
- Yet the user do not have rights to write in hr_holidays.
Fix:
- sudo in the compute and inverse methods that write the attachments.
opw-2714597
closesodoo/odoo#82311
X-original-commit: 9bc197fcf6c87678c82863706344e449b1cd69c1
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Onockx Audric (auon) <auon@odoo.com>
Current behavior :
Mail body is missing on mailing demo
Steps to reproduce :
- Install Email Marketing & Sales
- Go to Email Marketing
- Select "Our last promotions, just for you !"
Reason :
mass_mail used to the body_html but since this commit (de56e1919d11cc497341f59ef38fb2d756ede7a3) it now shows the body_arch field (and body_html in debug mode).
OPW-2702534
closesodoo/odoo#82279
X-original-commit: a4a6f786c5f8deb424132ef4edff62e2662d5d58
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Claude Thibault (thcl) <thcl@odoo.com>
* When a user is already muted when setting their state as deafened
the mute state should remain after the deafen state is removed.
* When a user clicks the microphone (mute/unmute) button while being in
the deaf state, the user should end up undeafen and unmute.
task-2720026
closesodoo/odoo#82197
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Before this commit, a ValueError would be raised upon receiving a refund
notification for a source transaction whose reference was not found in
the database. As only ValidationError's are caught by the webhook
controller, the acknowledgment string was never returned to Adyen and
the endpoint was automatically disabled.
This commits adds a check on the existence of the source transaction to
allow discarding refund notifications if it is not found.
task-2704522
closesodoo/odoo#82291
X-original-commit: 06d79dc3d01079db27f16dc56212cf68635e8c5d
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Guillaume (guva)