PURPOSE
Provide some fixes after internal test deployment of event online features.
Notably: user registration flow, various fixes in templates.
Also add some unit tests to avoid regressions while working on event features.
LINKS
Task ID-2169118
odoo/odoo#55967odoo/enterprise#12438
X-original-commit: e66684b23eebaadc3df7b908427d3d7a83d4f0a0
PURPOSE
Allow "free text" questions in the event questions asked to attendees, in
addition to the existing "selection" type.
e.g: "What are your allergies?"
SPECS
The implementation is heavily based on the modelisation we chose for the survey
module since the features become similar in terms of question types and inputs.
- Introduce a 'question_type' that is either 'simple_choice'
(= previous behavior) or 'text_box' that will contain the attendee text
answer.
- Rename the event.answer model to event.question.answer to make it more
obvious that it contains answer "suggestions" to a question of type
'simple_choice'.
- Introduce a 'event.user_input.line' that is an answer to a specific question
for a specific registration.
It works very similarly to 'survey.user_input.line' but it's not contained in
a 'user_input' model, it's directly linked to the registration using a
'user_input_line_ids' o2m field.
The frontend view has been adapted accordingly to display either a selection
input or a textarea based on the question type.
The frontend orm processing now takes in both answer types (id of suggested
answer or text input).
On the backend side, views have been adapted to display event questions and
attendee answers in a more convenient and logical manner.
LINKS
PR #45497
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#799
Task ID 2189529
When user register to an event from website, they can answer questions
specific to a given registration or to all registrations. However they
are not correctly parsed and not saved.
Task 2188857
PR #44545
X-original-commit: e27d9b5c4f234f6ce64456c2f52e7cfb0331332f
PURPOSE
Integration between event and eCommerce is required only when users handle the
entire selling process online. However users may require ticketing support
while managing payments outside of Odoo. Purpose of this commit is to support
tickets directly in event application without need of sales.
RATIONALE
Remove the need to have event_sale installed to manage basic multi ticket
event type. Integration with eCommerce is needed only when one wants to handle
the entire selling flow online, i.e. order, payment, ... Integration with
Sales is needed only when one wants to create sale orders linked to attendees.
Many event users do not need all of this. Their attendees pay through bank
transfers or they simply manage payments outside of Odoo while still
requiring tickets management.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we move frontend part of ticket support from website_event_sale
to website_event. Now eCommerce / event integration adds only payment
information when registering.
About tickets
* if there is no ticket -> generic registration allowed;
* if there is one ticket -> quick registration box;
* more than one ticket -> unfolding registration box with all available
tickets;
About price
* sale not installed -> no mention of price. A ticket without price is not
free. Its description allow to tell how to pay for example;
* a price is set: price is displayed;
* no price is set: FREE is displayed;
Most event frontend templates and controllers are therefore moved from
website_event_sale to website_event. Only part about pricing and sale order
creation is now located in website_event_sale.
Buy flow remains mainly untouched. Indeed this commit is mainly about moving
template to support tickets.
LINKS
Task ID 2177281
Community PR #43488
Now that we're closer to switching to P3 for good, these helpers have
outlived their usefulness, and mostly add noise.
All remaining dict.iter*() or dict.view*() must be converted to the
normal keys(), values() or items() calls.
Whenever the result is likely to be used for more than the scope of a
loop, or when the dict needs to be modified during iteration, the calls
must be wrapped in a ``list()``, to protect the new P3 semantics.
Those cases are very exceptional.
Also removed some dead code or improved the API to remove unnecessary
conversions.
In Python 3:
* various builtins and dict methods were changed to return
view/iterable objects rather than lists
* and the separate Python 2 view/iterable builtins and methods were
removed altogether
This is problematic when using these items as list (which the happens
repeatedly in Odoo), but more viciously when iterating *multiple times*
over them (which also happens, which I've messed up multiple times while
writing this, and which is a pain to debug even when you've just created
the issue).
Convert all code using these to semantics-matching cross-version
helper functions to get the LCD behaviour between P2 and P3, and
forbid the builtins via lint.
issue #8530
std-odoo