Before this commit, if the website's company was different than the user
company, the ecommerce would use the user's company instead of its own
pricelists.
Step to reproduce:
- Set company2 to website1
- Create a pricelist1 for company1 and a pricelist2 for company2
- With an user from company1, visit the website1.
- The pricelist used will be the one from the user, pricelist1 and not the
pricelist2 from company2 which is the website1 company.
Set up env & tools for module website multiwebsite (blog, event, sale..)
website_id in modelConverter and ir_rule
add _compute_domain_keys to have a different cache per website
or rules would not be correctly website_dependant
eg: blog 1 on website 1, blog 2 on website 2
access blog 1 from website 1 => can access -> normal
access blog 1 from website 2 => can access -> should crash because (ir rule)
split mixing website.published.mixin and website.published.multi.mixin to have
website_id only on last one.
multi mixing will:
- override website_published compute to take current_website into account (not in backend)
- force website when clicking on published in backend
- website blog, website_sale, website_event, website_forum, website_slides are now multi website
Co-authored-by: Derie Romain <rde@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Kersten Jérémy <jke@odoo.com>
This implements support to administer multiple websites. Although the
core functionality already existed, managing multiple websites was
fairly technical.
In the interest of database updates and migration this attempts to
keep duplicated data to a minimum. To do this the usual generic
records are rendered unless some website-specific record exists that
replaces it. Copy-on-write (COW) is used to create these
website-specific records. Through this mechanism creating a
website-specific record is delayed until necessary. A COW mechanism
has been implemented on 4 models: ir.ui.view, website.page,
website.menu and ir.attachment. These COW mechanisms are activated
when editing data through the website (aka frontend). These frontend
edits (e.g. with web_editor) will be website-specific, possibly
creating a website-specific record when necessary. When editing data
in the backend nothing special will happen, even when editing a
generic record. Note that because of this mechanism also facilitates
the ability to create new, uncustomized websites because the generic
data is kept.
Support is provided for a website to have any theme. Themes are fairly
complex to handle. Standalone themes can depend on other standalone
themes (e.g. theme_beauty depends on theme_loftspace) and themes
usually modify some data of the themes they depend on. Because a theme
can be installed on multiple websites, using website_id m2o fields
does not work well. It would require duplicate data, making updates
and migration harder. Because of this, data for themes (ir.ui.view and
ir.attachment specifically) have a theme_id m2o. website has a
theme_ids m2m that identifies all theme modules currently installed on
it. Through these fields we figure out what to render. A theme is only
fully uninstalled when it's no longer active on any website. The
advantage of this approach is that upgrading or migrating theme data
is no different from the single-website case.
The website.published.mixin class was modified to handle multiple
websites. A wizard was added in the backend to easily manage this for
multiple website.
Although not used anywhere in this commit, a 'website_id' variable has
been added in the evaluation context of ir.rule. It allows to easily
make any model multi-website aware, all that's needed is a custom
website_id m2o field on a model and a custom record rule.
Romain Derie