Problem:
Have a pivot view in some state. Toggle a favorite with a context in
which a key "pivot_row_groupby" is defined. The pivot view should be
grouped (on rows) by that pivot_row_groupby but it is not always the
case. The basic problem is that the key "pivot_row_groupby" is never
considered after the first load (see method load in pivot_model.js).
Solution:
We make the search model used by the pivot view send as groupby for the
favorite its pivot_row_groupby instead of its groupBy (which can be
different). We do something similar for the graph view that presents a
similar problem.
closesodoo/odoo#95688
Opw: 2837428
X-original-commit: ea9f66f99caaa6136912c467e5b80fe605586845
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
This commit introduces the new kanban, list and form views written
in owl. Even though it contains the implementation of those 3 views,
only the kanban view is activated for now (the list and form views
aren't 100% ready yet, so they aren't added to the view registry).
Alongside the views, the fields (<field name="..."/> in archs) and
widgets (<widget name="..." in archs) of web/ have been implemented
in owl as well. Legacy ones remaining in other addons are supported
in our new views, thanks to a compatibility layer. The goal is to convert
them asap though.
Legacy views, fields and widgets are kept for now, which explains the
number of added lines in this PR (around half of them concern tests).
They are still extended by custom code in other addons, that still need
to be converted (a lot of them are already on the way). Moreover,
they are still used in Studio as well. The plan is to lazy load them in
the Studio bundle when all custom code extending them will be
converted. Studio will be converted for v17.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#92475
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Francois (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
Earlier in Odoo, JS views were defined by defining 4 elements: View,
Controller, Model, Renderer. This was complex in some way, because we
wanted to inherit behaviour as well, so it was necessary to think along
multiple dimensions to understand how the code was running.
Then, with Owl, we rewrote some views, and simplified them: views were
now just a Component. Most of the common behaviour now came from the
generic View component that instantiated the concrete view with the
proper informations. In practice, views were still split in views
(which was the equivalent of the Controller of earlier views), Model and
Renderer
Now, this commit reintroduce the Controller, and change the way views
are defined: by an object with multiple metadata, and an (optional)
props function to compute the actual props used by the view.
As a result, views are now much easier to extend/modify.
closesodoo/odoo#89889
Related: odoo/enterprise#26728
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the makeView test helper processed the given
arch and generated the fields to pass to the View component. This
led us to do a similar work as what is done in the view service,
i.e. duplicate code, or factorize/reuse code.
An alternative is to let the View component fetch whatever it needs
(view arch, fields, search view...). This is the purpose of this
commit. That way, the code of the view service is executed (and
thus tested as well) in each test doing a "makeView".
This commit makes that change, and adapts some tests accordingly
(mainly, tests doing assertions in mockRPC, since we do a get_view
in every test).
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87522
This will be useful to allow concrete views to attach event listeners to
their root element among other things.
closesodoo/odoo#85891
Related: odoo/enterprise#25030
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
With owl2, the `el` of components if no longer available. One must
use a t-ref instead. However, higher order components don't have
their own html element. This was the case of the View component.
However, it makes sense for this component to be the owner of the
view root element, which was previously owned by the Layout.
This commit refactors the View/Layout architecture s.t. the root
element is now owned by the View, and simplifies/generalizes the
Layout in the process. The Layout is no longer tied to the notion
of views, and can thus be used in client actions as well.
closesodoo/odoo#85639
Related: odoo/enterprise#24903
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
*crm, project
With owl2, the `el` of components is no longer available. It still
works in Odoo on LegacyComponent, which has been introduced to ease
the switch from owl1 to owl2, and we're now incrementally removing
it.
With this commit, the action scrolling helpers no longer rely on
component.el, meaning that views using them (through the hook
`useSetupAction`) no longer need to extend LegacyComponent.
More specifically, we move the action scrolling helpers from core/
to webclient/actions, as those helpers make no sense outside the
context of actions (and thus are unnecessary in the frontend).
Tests have been adapted as well.
closesodoo/odoo#85631
Related: odoo/enterprise#24902
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
This commit orders the records coming from the mock server the same
way they are ordered by the ORM, while also allowing it to support
multiple levels of orderby.
This has been done to increase consistency in the test suite and provide
a more accurate representation of how records would be returned by the
actual server.
Some tests performed their assertions based on this previous
undeterministic system and have been adapted, either by altering
the base setup or the assertions themselves.
closesodoo/odoo#84718
Related: odoo/enterprise#24509
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
When we group the record based on a boolean fields, we want to show
"Yes/No" instead of "True/False".
This has been done for the list view, the pivot view and the kanban
view.
Task-2648390
Part-of: odoo/odoo#79911
Before this commit, when comparing a period P of reference to another one,
some rows with only data comming from P would not always be presented
in the table. The problem used to manifest only when loading at least to
level at the same time (starting from Total or any header via expand all).
The reason is the following:
- the data comming from P are processed first: starting from somewhere
in the trees of headers, some nodes linked to the data comming from P
are progressively created with no children at first, then the children
(if any) are added later and so on progressively.
- the data comming from the other period is processed and nodes are
created with no children and so on in the same way, clearing possibly
all the node children comming from P.
For example, with
a row groupby = [field_a, field_b],
a group [v, v1] from P
a group [v, v2] from the other period,
a node corresponding to v would be added, then a node child for v1.
Then the node for v would be recreated with no children, then a node child
for v2 would be created. leading to a tree of row headers of the form
Total > v > v2.
Note that it was not affecting the measure values for the displayed rows
since those measures are stored separately from the tree and are linked
to the nodes via some ids.
We fix the problem by avoiding the recreation of a node if it already
exists.
opw-2635113
closesodoo/odoo#80468
X-original-commit: 364475b5da3d4aaa87db715f0c0bbaa9dd3e05c8
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrea Grazioso <agr@odoo.com>
This commit removes all the 'extend' initially introduced to avoid code
repetition and ensure visual consistency across Bootstrap and Owl dropdowns.
Despite achieving the desired results, using 'extend' in this context
was seriously impacting the bundle generation time, probably due to an
underestimated amount of Apps' legacy-code applied on these elements.
In order to achieve the same results, the chosen strategy is to add
Bootstrap default classes directly into Owl dropdowns.
Also, it moves code related to bootstrap dropdown in 'webclient.scss',
leaving 'core/dropdown/dropdown.scss' for Owl code only.
Due to the discrepancies between Bootstrap and Owl html
structure, the '.dropdown-item' class could not have been added
directly to Owl's '.o_dropdown_item' itself, without refactoring
the Dropdown component structure.
// ==== Bootstrap 4.6 default Structure ================================
<div class="dropdown-menu">
<button class="dropdown-item" type="button">Action</button>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="#">Another action</a>
</div>
// ==== OWL default Structure before this commit =======================
<ul class="o_dropdown_menu">
<li class="o_dropdown_item">
<span>Action</span>
</li>
<li class="o_dropdown_item">
<a href="#">Another action</a>
</li>
</ul>
// ==== OWL Structure after this commit ================================
<div class="o-dropdown--menu dropdown-menu">
<span class="dropdown-item">Action</span>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="#">Another action</a>
</div>
// ==== web.assets_backend.css Bundle Generation Comparison ============
With all modules installed (enterprise edition over runbot):
Before this commit, bundle took ~2.5s and ~4s to generate and weighted ~322kB (~2.5MB uncompressed)
After this commit, it takes between ~1.2s and ~1.6s and weights ~257kB (~1.6MB uncompressed)
closesodoo/odoo#77649
X-original-commit: 84715436d87bb05b421bc9ccaacda67d07571690
Related: odoo/enterprise#21370
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Stefano Rigano <sri@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: François Georis <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
This commit rewrites the pivot view template to make use of the view
layout component.
X-original-commit: ebb046c5b9b6b629fd6731a419c5b7daf57a9f7d
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77463
This commit replaces the control panel dropdowns with the new <Dropdown/> component, in order to get consistent through the new/legacy views (because the current Odoo version is in a state where some views uses the new infrastructure and some others are still not converted - see odoo/odoo#73311).
The diff seems massive, but it is mostly due to tests adaptations.
closesodoo/odoo#77001
X-original-commit: d679cd0d8ba9a2420e81a42a698763e9be2327e1
Related: odoo/enterprise#21077
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
This commit simplifies the props of the GraphView. We only keep
props that are necessary (e.g. for the dashboard view), and for the
others, we find the information in the arch. That way, there's only
one way to do, which is easier to understand.
We also remove the "display" and "title" props from pivot as they
weren't used.
X-original-commit: c26953ef15b0846282bbeccd7cf0de25e1a47392
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76918
- PivotModel: methods are protected, not private
- PivotModel: rename meta into metaData (same as in GraphModel)
- GraphView: use the "useEffect" hook
- PivotView and GraphView typo: ArchParser is a class
X-original-commit: 71059a4887cf208552e4932ed2f3b6f53d75c369
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76576
When hovering header cells in the pivot view, the whole column is
highlighted. In comparison mode, a wrong column was highlighted
when hovering a measure.
X-original-commit: 751c2a78d375d67fc7e2cc20342d29188a3d11b5
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76576
Before this commit, it was possible to alter the table while it
was being reloaded (e.g. because a filter had just been applied,
or a measure had just been toggled). Those operations that altered
the table (e.g. sort rows, add groupby, expand group, close group)
typically cancelled the reload, which led to a situation where the
table was frozen, and only another reload from the search could
unfreeze it.
With this commit, we simply ignore all operations on the table
itself when it is being reloaded.
X-original-commit: dcdec74dca65e91998d90e3da0c14d8ee3df1567
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76576
Before this commit, if the user clicked on flip axis while the
data was being reloaded (e.g. just after applying a filter), the
reload was cancelled, and the axis wasn't flipped.
With this commit, we wait for the data to be loaded, and then
flip the axis.
X-original-commit: 5dc0631e339d04cc9f696490e73cf85d45b918fa
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76576
Let's assume the following scenario in a pivot view
- toggle a filter on a slow network s.t. it takes a while to load
- while it's loading, toggle a measure
Before this commit, the view was kind of locked after those two
steps, i.e. toggling measures, expanding groups, flipping axis did
not work anymore (it could be unlocked by interacting again with the
search view though). The reason is that the new filter triggered a
re-rendering of the withSearch component (the parent of the pivot
view), thus calling willUpdateProps on the pivot view, which reloads
the data. Toggling a measure cancels the current load operation
(via keepLast), and the promise returned by willUpdateProps is thus
pending forever. From that point, only another re-rendering from the
parent (withSearch) could unlock the situation by cancelling the
previous rendering.
X-original-commit: b9278e07b9ff01e608ccba6f4602eb9069213a46
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76576
Before this commit, if the user quickly clicked on several measures
(before the reload is over), only the last click was taken into
account. With this commit, all changes are aggregated such that we
only display the final result, with the desired measures.
X-original-commit: a4bae57e1f3b095a4e2d35b3da424c34df59b8dd
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76576
Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine