In the web client, in a real use case, it's not possible
to write on fields which are invisible,
as it's not possible to write on fields which are readonly.
This is a first step in the goal to change the behavior
of the `groups=` attribute in the back-end views,
to remove them for the view instead of making them invisible.
This is mainly to reduce the diff of the revision that will introduce
the mentioned above behavior change.
As nodes with `groups=` will be removed from the view
when the user doesn't have the group, it's no longer possible
to set a value on a field having a `groups=` the user doesn't have
in the `Form` test class, as the field will no longer be at all in the
view.
However, these unit tests shouldn't have been able to set values
on invisible fields in the first place.
This revision therefore aims to correct the unit tests setting value
on fields which were invisible because the user executing the
test was not part of the required group(s) for these fields
to be visible in the view.
closesodoo/odoo#94337
Related: odoo/enterprise#28936
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Currently, in demo data (or data) of some surveys, there are records of
'survey.question' having 'is_page' field value as true and 'question_type'
is not defined. When question type is not defined, default value
'simple_choice' is assigned to the 'question_type' field. Now when we
create a live session of that survey and go to the page, it tries to read
the data for bar chart but data is not available (undefined) and the
traceback is thrown. This happens because question types 'simple_choice'
and 'multiple_choice') are expected to load a bar chart.
It used to work before commit[1] where default 'question_type' value was
being set to 'text_box' (so attempt to load bar chart was not made).
This commit improves the behavior by adapting data/demo data/test cases
and by adding a python constraint that prevents question creation of
page type if there is a question type set, and compute `question_type`
based on `is_page` field. Now that we have python constraint and a
compute method, we no longer need the `default_get` method, so it is
also removed.
commit[1] - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/1fb99d79b1567d4c150dc07f309ce54a3beea8e3
taskID-2841582
closesodoo/odoo#93414
Related: odoo/enterprise#28305
Related: odoo/upgrade#3600
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
The goal of the draft state on survey is to have the survey under edition
mode before before sending it to participants. Under this mode:
- the responsible can test it (can be done with "In Progress" mode)
- the survey can't be answered (same as the state closed)
The risk that the survey can be leaked before being ready is really
limited. If it's a live survey, participants will have to guess the
4 digits access code and wait for the host to go to the next question.
Else, participant will have to guess the token.
Considering these facts, the use of the draft state is very limited so
'draft' state can be dropped. If we do so, we are left with only two
stages that are 'open' and 'closed'. But whether to consider survey
open or closed can be simply achieved with active field we already
have (if active=False, survey is closed, otherwise it's considered
as open).
So with this commit, we remove the state field from survey and thus
simplify the flow. It means that we no longer require 'Start Survey'
button, and so that button is also removed, and for the closed surveys,
instead of the button 'Set to draft', now we have a 'Reopen' button
which will activate the survey. And instead of displaying few buttons
after saving a record, we now display all the buttons from beginning.
Task ID-2389434
COM PR odoo/odoo#62712
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15217
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2006
Issue
- Install Survey & Contacts
- Have 2 contacts with the same email address
(e.g. test@example.com)
- Create a survey, send it only to that
email address
Email sent 2 times
Cause
When looking for partners linked
to that email address, we do not
provide any limit so the system
send the email to all partners
found.
Solution
If I set one email address,
I expect one email to be sent.
So, the solution would be to
apply a limit of 1 when login
is not required.
OPW-2247693
closesodoo/odoo#51155
X-original-commit: 55b1cc3108d6b672f10ece26db7e13a65ff655d3
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Van Malder (jvm) <jvm@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.
SPECIFICATIONS
To better understand question type and their input type, we update some of
``survey.question`` ``question_type`` keys :
Type----Old type-----New type
text----free_text----text_box
char----textbox------char_box
Untouched question types: ``numerical_box``, ``date``, ``datetime``,
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice``, ``matrix``. Those are already
understandable.
Then ``survey.user_input.line`` ``answer_type`` keys are also updated to
match their question type counterparts
QuestType--------Old type-----New type
text_box---------free_text----text_box
char_box---------text---------char_box
numerical_box----number-------numerical_box
Then ``survey.user_input.line`` fields used to store the value are updated to
propagate the new naming
AnswerLineType----Old field----------New field
text_box----------value_free_text----value_text_box
char_box----------value_text---------value_char_box
numerical_box-----value_number-------value_numerical_box
Untouched answer types and field storing value: ``date``, ``datetime`` still
refer to same question type and use value_date / value_datetime fields.
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice`` and ``matrix`` still use ``suggestion``
answer type and ``suggested_answer_id`` (+ ``matrix_row_id``) to store link
to ``survey.question.answer`` records.
LINKS
[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)
PR #40765
[PEP 594] is going to depreciate the legacy `email.message.Message` API
and its related modules. Among them the `email.utils.formataddr`
function, this function takes a `(name, email)` pair and returns a
string value suitable for From, To and Cc headers.
The stdlib function is capable of handling several character encoding
and two binary-to-ascii encoding. Odoo only uses `utf-8` which is
compatible with the base64 b2a encoding. The re-implementation of that
function has been simplified to only support base64-ed utf-8 and ascii.
[PEP 594]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0594/\#email-lagacy-api
Stages modification through the clickable statusbar wasn't very intuitive.
By fixing default behavior through states (and corresponding buttons), default user experience is simplified.
3 static states available : draft, open, closed
Form view: navigation through states with buttons
Kanban view: disabled modification of survey state
Task ID : 1949110
closesodoo/odoo#32325
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Task #1902306
Purpose
=======
survey.question is now also the model used for the survey's pages (with the "is_page" field set to True).
This allows to put all the pages and questions together in a o2m field on the view side and
easily reorganize your survey by dragging the items around.
It also removes one level of encoding by directly having 'Add a page' and 'Add a question'
links on the tree view of questions, enabling a faster encoding.
However, this has the downside of making the code reading a little bit more complicated.
Efforts were made at the model level to create computed fields so that the use of these models
still seems somewhat logical. That means:
- A survey still has "page_ids" (question_and_page_ids filtered on is_page = True)
- These "page_ids" still have question_ids (questions located between this page and the next)
- These "question_ids" still have a "page_id"
That makes the use and display of these information at view and controller levels easier to understand.
Purpose of this merge is to improve access mode and authentication management
introduced at 9771fdfe8f . Purpose of this cleaning is to simplify options and make
them clearer. Instead of a selection with 4 entries we propose to use two
fields on survey model :
* access_mode: everyone with a public link can access and answer; or only
invited people;
* login required: whether people have to login to answer or not;
All main use cases are covered with combination of those two options.
This commit is linked to task ID 1932508 and PR #30508.
Purpose is to clean and simplify invite wizard on surveys. Main purpose is
to simplify options.
Public link is displayed for public surveys, allowing to quickly share
it. When sending emails a token is now generated for each recipient. There is
no "batch public link" sending option anymore as it is not really necessary.
Check is done on recipients and emails to match the access mode option. Having
a restricted survey gives the same limitations on people to invite (users,
employees, ...).
Code is cleaned to ease its understanding and prepare future evolution notably
with appraisals.
An existing mode field is added on invite model. All options are currently
not used but it prepares future addition to survey, notably for certifications.
Its purpose is to know what to do with existing tokens when inviting new
recipients. It is used notably to resend tokens through the user_input form
view instead of relying on a custom context key.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911586 and PR #28986.
Purpose of this commit is to clean existing tests in survey. This commit
* removes unnecessary tests checking that basically create / write correctly
works;
* removes tests based on implementation details;
* cleans tests for validation and answer creation to make them more easier
to read and understand;
* moves invitation tests into their own file;
Some helpers methods are added in common.py to ease question and answer
creation.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911238 and PR #28831.
Denis Ledoux