* commons & setup refactoring:
* convert setUp to setUpClass
* move setups where needed (stock/mrp commons or specific test
classes)
* create test data in batch (faster, less sql queries & batched
operations)
* move most tests post-install to allow runbot splits
* by default, run tests without mail logic
* by default, run tests in a consistent environment (fixed currency
imposed in the BaseCommon)
* refactor existing tests to use new commons data (while trying to keep
diff reduced)
* add dedicated test file to test the common data
* use mute_logger to reduce useless test logs (less spam to scroll in
logs, less data on runbot builds, ...)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#96791
this commit will allow users to setup replenish locations and replenish
them directly if they have negative forecast
instead of checking forecast qty per warehouse,
this adds the abiltiy to replenish to any internal stock location,
marked as replenish location, instead of just the warehouse location
Task Id: 2796757
closesodoo/odoo#93633
Related: odoo/upgrade#3626
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
The render API was confusing as mixing the access to the report and
the rendering env.
The ambiguity was present for code such as
`report.sudo()._render(record_ids)` where it was not clear if the
`sudo()` is needed to access to `report` or to `record_ids`. For low
priviledge users (such as portal or public), it was common to use
`report.with_user(SUPERUSER_ID)._render(record_ids)`.
This PR changes the render methods signature to be `api.model`. The
`report_ref` can be:
- ir.actions.report external id
- ir.actions.report id
- ir.actions.report recod
- `report_name` value
This will allow to call the report methods with any user and no longer
need to use `with_user(1)` to render reports as public user.
Task-id 2670865
closesodoo/odoo#91341
Related: odoo/upgrade#3650
Related: odoo/enterprise#27323
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
When canceling a transfer, all its moves and move lines having qty done
(if any) are canceled as well. But this doesn't happen on package levels
having such move lines with qty done filled, the state was set to
'confirmed' while all its move lines are 'cancel', which was not
consistent.
closesodoo/odoo#96764
X-original-commit: d9b16c3732c7e935c21a0396bb01ed4f19456827
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
When receiving more than expected, we try to redirect the SM thanks to
the putaway rules. This can lead to undesirable behaviors.
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable 'Storage Locations'
2. Create a storable product P
3. Edit the operation type "Receipt":
- Show Detailed Operations: True
4. Create and confirm a planned receipt for 1 x P
5. In the Detailed Operations:
- Set the done quantity to 3
- Set the destination location to Shelf 1
6. Validate the receipt
Error: The destination location of the SML has changed: Stock. It should
still be Shelf 1
When validating the SM, because the done quantity is more than the
demand, an exra-move is created. During such a process, the extra move
is confirmed and assigned, so it leads to the destination redirection
thanks to the putaway rules (that's the reason why the destination Stock
will be selected and defined on the SML).
In such situation, we should not try to apply the putaway rules.
OPW-2900283
closesodoo/odoo#96124
X-original-commit: 0183298293192538a801f52262c047ea34a1b76a
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
This follows revision
odoo/odoo@9925c8fbaf
On creation of an orderpoint,
if warehouse and location are not specified,
set default warehouse and location
if warehouse is specified but not location,
set default location according to the warehouse chosen
(and not the location of the default warehouse, as formerly)
if location is specified, but not location,
set default warehouse according to the location chosen
(and not the default warehouse, as formerly)
if warehouse and location are specified,
let them, do not overwrite them.
closesodoo/odoo#95851
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
In the web client, in a real use case, it's not possible
to write on fields which are invisible,
as it's not possible to write on fields which are readonly.
This is a first step in the goal to change the behavior
of the `groups=` attribute in the back-end views,
to remove them for the view instead of making them invisible.
This is mainly to reduce the diff of the revision that will introduce
the mentioned above behavior change.
As nodes with `groups=` will be removed from the view
when the user doesn't have the group, it's no longer possible
to set a value on a field having a `groups=` the user doesn't have
in the `Form` test class, as the field will no longer be at all in the
view.
However, these unit tests shouldn't have been able to set values
on invisible fields in the first place.
This revision therefore aims to correct the unit tests setting value
on fields which were invisible because the user executing the
test was not part of the required group(s) for these fields
to be visible in the view.
closesodoo/odoo#94337
Related: odoo/enterprise#28936
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Convert the onchange on `picking_type_id` to a compute field
This allows to create a `stock.picking` record without
the need to specify the locations during the creation nor calling the onchange
method. The locations defaults from the picking type locations.
This way, if the database is not configured to use multi locations,
the users do not have the specify the UOM to use.
For instance during an XMLRPC call to create a picking.
closesodoo/odoo#95423
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
This allows to create a stock.package_level record without
the need to set the `location_dest_id` during the `create` call.
For instance, this makes easier to create a package level
using XMLRPC when you do not use multiple locations.
closesodoo/odoo#95361
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
This allows to create a stock.warehouse.orderpoint record without
the need to call the onchanges to set the warehouse and location
or to set it manually during the `create` call.
For instance, this makes easier to create orderpoints
using XMLRPC when you do not use multiple locations.
closesodoo/odoo#95352
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
This allows to create a stock.move record without
the need to call the onchanges to set the uom
or to set it manually during the `create` call.
This allows to create a stock.move.line record
without the need to call the onchanges to set the uom and locations
or to set it manually during the `create` call.
For instance, this makes easier to create stock moves
using XMLRPC when you do not use multiple UOMs or multiple locations.
closesodoo/odoo#95332
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
In picking type, we introduce a new setting ask-always-never setting for
creating backorder. When a backorder is needed, the behaviour will be
different according to this setting:
- ask: popup a wizard to ask if a backorder is needed
- always: generate backorder automatically
- never: no backorder
The main reasoning behind this change is that there are some scenarios
in which operators always create backorders (e.g. by validating the
transfer after scanning a pallet and setting quantities). Hence, always
asking if the user (operator) wants to create a backorder can be confusing.
task-2648993
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83462
- Install stock
- Go to Inventory > Configuration > Settings and enable "Lots" and "Storage Locations"
- Create a Product tracked By Lots (i.e. Product X)
- Go to Inventory > Operations > Inventory Adjustments
- Create an Inventory Adjustment for Product X:
Product | Location | Lot/SN | Real Quantity
-------------------------------------------------------------
Product X | WH/Stock | LOT 01 | 20
Product X | WH/Stock | | 10
- Validate Inventory
- Go to Inventory > Operations > Transfers and create one:
* Source Location: WH/Stock
* Destination Location: WH/Stock/Shelf1
* Operation Type: Internal Transfers
* Operations:
[Product: Product X, Initial Demand: 25]
- Save Transfer, Mark As Todo and Check availability
- Click on list icon of Operation line for Product X to display Detailed Operations
- 20 units of LOT 01 and 5 units without lot have been reserved
- Set LOT 01 for the 5 reserved units without lot and confirm
- Open Detailed Operations again
- There are now 20 units of LOT 01 and 5 units of LOT 01
- Remove the row with 5 units and confirm
- Check availability and open Detailed Operation
- There is now only a row with 25 reserved units of LOT 01
- Unreserve
The following errror is raised:
"It is not possible to unreserve more products of P than you have in stock."
It happens because the system is not able to manage quants with lots and
wihtout lots at the same time. When modifying the move line to 25
reserved units. It's composed of 20 quants with lot and 5 quants without
lot. And when unreserving it will check if there is a quants with 25
units with the lot and if it's not found 25 units without lot. But never
25 units of quants with lots and without lots.
opw-2419444
Close#64497closesodoo/odoo#66029closesodoo/odoo#93141
X-original-commit: 83d55d8ed8b8b5a5232e3cdfc09abf5285f18ed7
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
When moving some products between two warehouses thanks to an internal
transfer, the forecasted inventory becomes incorrect
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Multi-Warehouses"
2. Let WH01 be the existing warehouse. Create a second one WH02
3. Create a storable product P
4. Update the quantity of P:
- 3 in WH01/Stock
5. Create a planned and internal transfer T:
- Source: WH01/Stock
- Destination: WH02/Stock
- Ignore the warning
- Operations:
- 1 x P
6. Mark T as todo
7. Open the Forecasted Inventory:
- Filters:
- Forecasted Stock
- Product: P
- Group By: Warehouse
Error: The report is incorrect, it says there are 3 P in WH01 and 0 in
WH02 (should be 2 and 1). It becomes worst if T is done (the quantities
in the past become incorrect)
We should be able to move a product between two warehouses thanks to an
internal transfer (so the warning of the step 5 should be removed).
Moreover, the `report.stock.quantity` should consider that use case.
When processing a stock move, the SQL view translates it as an in-move
or out-move for a specific warehouse. For instance, if the SM comes from
a warehouse and goes to a location without any warehouse (e.g., customer
location), the SM is considered as an out-move. But here is the issue:
in case of an inter-warehouse SM, both source and destination have a
defined warehouse.
Therefore, we need to:
- Duplicate the inter-warehouses SM (so we have one in and one out)
- Fake the values (no destination warehouse for the out move, no source
warehouse for the in move)
Also, before duplicating all SM, we filter out some useless SM:
- Draft and cancelled ones
- SM done more than 3 months ago (because the report only works for [-3
months; +3 months])
Considering some tests:
(SM are confirmed. Each test has been repeated 5 times to get an
average)
| | |
|:-------------------------------------:|:--------:|
| 5000 SM, 0% inter-wh, without the fix | ~715 ms |
| 5000 SM, 0% inter-wh, with the fix | ~710 ms |
| Impact | 0.99x |
| | |
| 6666 SM, 0% inter-wh, without the fix | ~911 ms |
| 5000 SM, 33% inter-wh, with the fix | ~999 ms |
| Impact | 1.10x |
| | |
| 7500 SM, 0% inter-wh, without the fix | ~1004 ms |
| 5000 SM, 50% inter-wh, with the fix | ~1097 ms |
| Impact | 1.09x |
The impact is not that significant
OPW-2752017
task-2822157
closesodoo/odoo#91772
X-original-commit: b1efc0243bbf886bbef42a32587f4a818fa34e64
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
The auto-reserve feature does not work if the products are received in
several steps
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Multi-Step Routes"
2. Edit the existing warehouse:
- Incoming Shipments: 2 steps
3. Create a storable product P
4. Create and confirm a SO with 1 x P
- The delivery D is created and is waiting for one available P
5. Create and validate a receipt for 1 x P
- An internal transfer T is generated (Input -> Stock)
6. Validate T
7. Open D
Error: The delivery is still waiting for the product while this product
should be reserved. This is correctly working in 1-step receipt
In 1-step receipt, when the user marks the receipt as done, the
destination of the associated SM is WH/Stock and its operation type code
is "incoming". Therefore, the module checks if some other moves (from
WH/Stock) can reserve the newly-available quantity.
However, in [2/3]-steps receipt, the operation type code of the
in-WH/Stock move is "internal". So, the conditions are not respected and
the module doesn't check the needs of reservation.
OPW-2806423
closesodoo/odoo#90715
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
A user should be able to scrap some products thanks to an internal
transfer.
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Multi-Step Routes"
2. Create a storable product P and update its quantity (> 1)
3. Create a planned and internal transfer T:
- From: WH/Stock
- To: Virtual Locations/YourCompany: Scrap
- With: 1 x P
4. Mark T as done
Error: T is still in draft
The `_compute_state` of a picking should not ignore the scrapped moves.
However, if we include them, we need to think about this use case: a
picking with a cancelled normal move and a done scrapped move -> its
state should be cancelled (see use case and test from [1])
[1] 429b589618e8dc2b0c0ccdec3f6eed88f1c73fc8
OPW-2841190
closesodoo/odoo#90870
X-original-commit: 1c956d49b45e9d3fec2bfa2c2020ea278ea80507
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
When triggering an inter-warehouses reordering rule, the partner of the
receipt is incorrect. When triggering several inter-warehouses
reordering rules, it will remove the partner of both receipt and
delivery
To reproduce the issue:
(Let C be the current company)
1. In Settings, enable "Multi-Step Routes"
2. Let WH01 be the existing warehouse. Edit WH01:
- Set a new address ADD01:
- Type: Individual
- Company: C
- Address Type: Delivery Address
3. Create a new warehouse WH02:
- Set a new address ADD02:
- Type: Individual
- Company: C
- Address Type: Delivery Address
4. Edit WH02:
- Resupply From: WH01
5. Create 2 products PA, PB:
- Type: Storable
- Routes:
- WH02: Supply product from WH01
6. For product PA:
- Update the quantity:
- 10 in WH01/Stock
- Add a reordering rule:
- Location: WH02/Stock
- Trigger: Manual
- Min = Max = 1
7. Run the scheduler
- It generates a delivery D and a receipt R
8. Open R
- Error 01: the field "Receive From" is incorrect (ADD02 instead of
ADD01)
9. Repeat step 6 for PB and run the scheduler again
- Error 02: R and D have no more partner
Error 01: see diff
Error 02: we have two SM (one for PA, one for PB) that have a different
origin (one per reordering rule). Therefore, we remove the origin of the
pickings. However, we also remove the partners while we shouldn't
OPW-2733989
closesodoo/odoo#90706
X-original-commit: 20e0ad13afa2a0ff85d555ab57a6800d3db30341
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Create two extra warehouses (B and C):
* Warehouse B: Resupply from San Francisco
* Warehouse C: Resupply from San Francisco
- Create a new Product:
* Storable
* Inventory > Routes: select only Warehouse B and Warehouse C
- Create a new Move:
* From WHC to a Customer
* Confirm the order
Issue:
In replenishment, the defined prefered route will be Warehouse B
Cause:
When the replenishment view is loaded, in
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/5757502a79c920e1aa4c7ca1c581c533907ce674/addons/stock/models/stock_orderpoint.py#L427
The preferred route (route_id) is defined as the first element of the routes defined for the produc which is wrong.
Solution:
Filter the route_ids by selecting the route for which the supplied warehouse is equal to the warehouse selected for the orderpoint.
Note:
1) The test in "test_bom" has been modified because it was using the wrong flow (a route should have been set by default)
2) In Master we only use the _set_default_route method
opw-2815462
closesodoo/odoo#90560
X-original-commit: 15b04d616a5196192a96e6bf2114698b34654348
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: yosa-odoo <yosa@odoo.com>
When filtering on product templates with a negative operator, the
result
is incorrect
To reproduce the issue:
(Need mrp)
1. Create two products P_compo, P_finished:
- Internal Reference:
- P_compo: 123
- P_finished: 456
2. Create a BoM:
- Product: P_finished
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo
3. Manufacturing > Master Data > Bills Of Materials
4. Remove search filters and apply this custom one:
- "Product doesn't contain 456"
Error: P_finished's BoM is still in the list, but '456' is the internal
reference of P_finished, so this BoM should not be displayed
The filter is applied on the field `product_tmpl_id` of the BoM, which
leads to the override of `_name_search` in `product.template`. In this
method, a call to the `_name_search` of `product.product` is executed:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/5ff4eb022757d7a522ccb975f8eb64053ef9780b/addons/product/models/product_template.py#L456
which is a good thing because the version of `product.product` handles
the case of the Internal Reference (`default_code`)
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1e8982e4cf6b604e4da2773f10bdf6cf94c7e683/addons/product/models/product.py#L532-L538
So, the call to this `_name_search` will not return P_finished. However,
later on in the `_name_search` of `product.template`, we call the
`_name_search` of `super` with the same domain (i.e., 'not 456 in name')
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/5ff4eb022757d7a522ccb975f8eb64053ef9780b/addons/product/models/product_template.py#L474-L485
This is the issue: it leads to the `_name_search` of `BaseModel`, which
is the classic version: it does only consider the record's name. So,
this call will return P_finished.
In the `_name_search` of `product.template`, there are actually two
calls to `super`. Considering the commits [1] and [2], it seems that the
goal is the same in both cases: find the `product.template` that do have
any variant yet. However, in the first commit, the domain given to
`super` excludes the templates that have at least one variant, which is
not the case with the second commit (the "problematic" one).
Since both codes have the same goal, we should merge them by keeping the
best idea of each one. From [1], we keep the idea of restricting the
domain: we only look for templates that do not have any variant.
However, this domain needs to be improved: we need to include the
templates whose all variants are archived. From [2], we keep the idea of
looking for the templates outside the `while True` loop. This allows us
to do the search only if required.
[1] 21ae503
[2] 99bae2c
OPW-2791255
closesodoo/odoo#90248
X-original-commit: 942814844e982cbaec2329709c6ba9dd810d0c3f
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Cancelling a picking with scrapped and done SM will cancel this SM too.
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Storage Locations"
2. Create a storable product P
3. Update the quantity of P: 10 in WH/Stock
4. Create a planned delivery order DO with 2 x P
5. Mark DO as todo, Check availability
6. Scrap 2 x P
7. Cancel DO
8. Open the SM of the scrapping
Error: The SM is cancelled. This is incorrect: the move was done, so
there is a quant with 2 x P in scrap location. There is now an
incoherence between quants and SMs report.
OPW-2805604
closesodoo/odoo#89987
X-original-commit: bd3324acc3ec227438d2cb25a1df1e0fca2a2789
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
The putaway strategies are not correctly working with packages
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable:
- Multi-Step Routes
- Storage Categories
- Packages
2. Create a Storage Category SC:
- Allow New Product: mixed
- Max Weight: 100 kg
- Capacity by Package:
- 1 x Pallet
3. Create two locations L1, L2:
- Parent: WH/Stock
- Type: Internal
- Storage Category: SC
4. Create a putaway rule:
- When in: WH/Stock
- Package type: Pallet
- Store to: WH/Stock
- Having Category: SC
5. Edit the warehouse:
- Incoming Shipments: 2 steps
6. Create a product P:
- Type: Storable
- Weight: 1 kg
7. Create a planned receipt R:
- To: WH/Input
- Operations:
- 100 x P
8. Mark R as Todo
9. Create two packages:
- 50 x P in PK01 (! PK01 must be a Pallet)
- 50 x P in PK02 (! PK02 must be a Pallet)
10. Validate R
11. Open the related internal transfer T
- Error [1]: Both packages are redirected to L01, but the capacity
by package is 1 x Pallet. PK01 should be redirected to L01 and PK02 to
L02
12. Set the done quantity of PK01
- Note: PK01 is now redirected to L02
13. Set the done quantity of PK02
- Error [2]: PK02 is also redirected to L02. Again, it violates the
package capacity constraint
**Context**
When validating the receipt (step 10), it creates a picking
Input->Stock. The module then tries to assign some quantities, which
leads to `_prepare_move_line_vals` for each package. In this method,
`_get_putaway_strategy` is called to define the best destination of each
stock move line:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d55a99ff2d2f7b8d44cde1db3b6d48cdaac1cd3a/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1313
The computation of the best location is in 3 phases:
- Phase 01: `_get_putaway_strategy` finds the relevant putaway rules and
computes the current and forecasted stock related to the current
package/product
- Phase 02: `_get_putaway_location` checks if, considering the putaway
rule and the current package/product, a location can be used
- Phase 03: `_check_can_be_used` checks if a location can receive a
package/product (considering the weight and the capacity constraints)
**Error 01**
During the first phase, in case of a package, the forecasted quantities
are computed by searching all SML that have the same package type:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4bae10e0d960e5b80055e0e44056493238e552d3/addons/stock/models/stock_location.py#L258-L263
This can not work. The SML used to move the product in PK01 (from Input
to Stock) is created but its field `result_package_id` is not yet
defined. This operation will be done at the of the assign process,
thanks to:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d55a99ff2d2f7b8d44cde1db3b6d48cdaac1cd3a/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1547
So, during the first phase, when searching a location for PK02, the
computations are not aware that PK01 is already sent to L01. This
explains the error [1].
**Error 01 (Other examples)**
Considering how it is currently working, we could imagine another
problematic use case: 2 different products on the same package. Since
there is one SML per product, `_prepare_move_line_vals` will be called
twice (as well as the putaway strategy process). It may lead to two
different locations while the product are on the same package.
**Error 02**
When setting the done quantity, an onchange method is triggered:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4202e46a8313fa9f1487d372ef0cb771f769be8d/addons/stock/models/stock_move_line.py#L200-L208
and tries to find the best location, considering the done quantity. As
said before, during the first phase, it looks for the current and
forecasted stock of a location. Since it will find the SML we are
writing on, the parameter `additional_qty` is used to subtract the
quantity of this SML (we need to ignore the current SML's quantity). But
here is a new issue:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4202e46a8313fa9f1487d372ef0cb771f769be8d/addons/stock/models/stock_move_line.py#L217-L222
`_get_putaway_additional_qty` returns the quantity of products while the
first phase is looking for the quantity of packages. As a result, we do
some operations between products and packages:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4bae10e0d960e5b80055e0e44056493238e552d3/addons/stock/models/stock_location.py#L290-L292
`qty_by_location[location_id]` is 2 (i.e. PK01 and PK02) for L01 while
`qty` is `-50` (i.e. the 50 products of the current SML), so the value
becomes `-48`. This can not work properly because the value doesn't have
sense anymore. Later on, during the third phase:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4bae10e0d960e5b80055e0e44056493238e552d3/addons/stock/models/stock_location.py#L340-L346
The forecasted weight is not subtracted by the quantity of the current
SML. So the weight is exceeded, this is the reason why the destination
of PK01 becomes L02 on step 12 (it will be the same on step 13)
**Additional error**
Suppose the user is receiving a tracked product (suppose qty > 1). When
confirming the picking, several SMLs are generated to "reserve" the
quantity from the customer:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d55a99ff2d2f7b8d44cde1db3b6d48cdaac1cd3a/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1469-L1471
Later on, thanks to the wizard `stock.assign.serial`, the user generates
all USN. However, because the option `show_reserved` is disabled, the
wizard creates some new SMLs. But here is the issue, the SMLs created
during the assign process are already existing. Therefore, when looking
for the best location (for the new SMLs), the existing SMLs will disturb
the result (`_get_putaway_strategy` will find these SMLs and think that
some products are already incoming in some locations)
**Solutions**
- We should compute the best locations once all SMLs are created (and
linked with their package)
- In case of a package with a type, we should try to find the best
location for the package itself, not for each product of the package
- When calling the putaway strategy process, we should provide the
SML(s) to exclude instead of providing some quantities. This will
prevent subtracting products with packages and allow the correct
calculation of the forecasted weight for each location
- When creating a putaway rule, we ensure that the option
`show_reserved` of the destination location is enabled
OPW-2746169
closesodoo/odoo#89350
X-original-commit: 98169b391f4610545b7f4745b729ad95eac3696a
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Even if ORM normally filters them out, no need to specify .id in domains.
This leads to better and easier to read queries / domains.
Task-2816580
closesodoo/odoo#85648
Related: odoo/enterprise#24911
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
SM doesn't contain its partner_id (Destination Address)
unless the partner is manually updated from the Stock Picking form.
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create a new "Planned Transfer" (e.g.: on a Delivery Order)
2. Fill in mandatory fields
3. Enter some "Product Operations" AFTER having selected a "Delivery
Address". THEN, save.
4. Now, go to "Reporting > Stock Moves" while in debug mode and group by:
"Destination Address"
5. The newly created SM will be included underneath the
"Undefined" section while they should be underneath the section
associated to the "Delivery Address" choosed in Step 3
Solution: The partner_id must be linked into the SM upon creation of the Stock Picking
opw-2784805
closesodoo/odoo#87507
X-original-commit: 759485afcf62b5f53f26c392644e7e6e54abc804
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Desausoi Laurent (lade) <lade@odoo.com>
The total ordered quantities on a delivery slip with order lines of the
same product was wrong + this PR
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/83591 was incorrect, the undelivered
products should be displayed once
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install the Sales and Inventory app
2. Create and confirm a sale order with two order lines, both with the
same product
3. Go to the delivery and confirm it with all demands met
4. Print the delivery slip
5. The ordered quantity of the product is wrong, it should be equal to
the delivered quantity
Solution:
Use all empty moves in package-less products
`qty_ordered` = `qty_done` when in a package (the potential remaining
quantities will be displayed in the package-less products or in the
backorder section) or when there is no backorder (as the undelivered
products will either be added to the package-less products section or
the ordered quantity will be incremented later)
If we are not in a package and there is a backorder, adapt the ordered
quantity to remove the quantity of the packages considered before
Convert `qty_done` to the UoM of the stock move
opw-2722203
opw-2758840
opw-2782572
closesodoo/odoo#87072
X-original-commit: 332ec796ac77c8383a04a924508013c735f67d1e
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Merlin (megu) <megu@odoo.com>
Usecase to reproduce:
- 2 product A in stock
- Deliver 1 the 1/1/2022
- Deliver 1 the 4/1/2022
- Deliver 1 the 2/1/2022
Current behavior:
Check Availability the 3 pickings at once. The 2 first are reserve
Expected behavior:
The picking for 1/1/2022 and 2/1/2022 are reserve
It happens because the sorted is only done on date deadline
opw-2762223
closesodoo/odoo#85584
X-original-commit: fb3b261ef56a62e2c753191313682287aa3a12fb
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
When unpacking a package, the quants are not merged
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Delivery Packages"
2. Create a storable product P
3. Update its quantity: 5
4. Create a planned receipt R with 10 x P
5. Mark R as Todo
6. Put the 10 x P in pack (PK)
7. Validate R
8. Unpack PK
9. Consult the on-hand quantity of P
The use case is already fixed thanks to:
5e08aa3def
This commit only adds the associated test
OPW-2713407
closesodoo/odoo#85575
X-original-commit: 76400ba0f6c2c15d9478b762a0a393129cd20f5e
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Some useless SMLs are generated when editing the on hand quantity in
inventory mode
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create a storable product P
2. Update its on hand quantity to 100
3. Inventory > Reporting > Inventory Report
4. On the line for P, update to quantity to 75
5. Inventory > Reporting > Product Moves, search for P
Error: There are two SMLs with a quantity equal to zero
Calling `action_apply_inventory` from the `write` is useless since the
method is already called in the inversed method of
`inventory_quantity_auto_apply`
OPW-2739833
closesodoo/odoo#85152
X-original-commit: c2164fba4a9049115a6a46de28a90fc779fb9eee
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
On a SML, when setting the done quantity, the onchange may change the
destination location selected by the user
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings:
- Enable "Storage Locations"
- (Then, ensure "Storage Categories" is disabled)
2. Inventory > Operations Types, edit "Internal Transfers":
- Enable "Show Detailed Operations"
3. Create an internal transfer IT:
- From: WH/Stock
- To: WH/Stock
4. Add a detailed operations to IT:
- Product: anyone
- To: WH/Stock/Shelf 1
- Done: 1
Error: One the field "Done" is modified, the "To" changes and becomes
"WH/Stock". This location should not change (it should be
"WH/Stock/Shelf 1")
When setting the done quantity, an onchange recomputes the destination
location of the SML. To do so, it uses a initial location and searches
among its children. Here is the issue: when "Storage Categories" is
disabled, this initial location should be the one selected by the user.
OPW-2704665
closesodoo/odoo#85151
X-original-commit: 4202e46a8313fa9f1487d372ef0cb771f769be8d
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
When performing a picking with a package, the source location of the
package level may become incorrect
To reproduce the issue:
(Use demo data)
1. In Settings, enable:
- Packages
- Storage Locations
2. In Operations Types, edit "Internal Transfers":
- Enable "Move Entire Packages"
3. Create a storable product P
4. Create a receipt R with for P
5. Put 10 P in pack and validate R
- Let be PK the package generated/used
6. Process an internal transfer with PK
- The destination location of the package level is WH/Stock/Shelf 1
Error: Once the picking is validated, the source location of the package
level is "WH/Stock/Shelf 1". This is not true, it should still be
"WH/Stock"
The compute method is incorrect. It uses the package location to define
the source location of the package level. However, once the picking is
processed, this package has moved so using its location to define the
source location doesn't make sense anymore.
OPW-2754179
closesodoo/odoo#84709
X-original-commit: 239898ed699d98ff185f6a18fc5a8529e126cecb
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
When a quant is creating, for instance thanks to an internal transfer,
some of these computed fields will have an incorrect value
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Storage Locations"
2. Create a storable product P
3. Update P's quantity: 100 P in WH/Stock
4. Process an internal transfer
- From: WH/Stock
- To: WH/Stock/Shelf 1
- Operations: 10 x P
5. Consult the on hand quantities of P
Error: There is a new line with 10 x P in WH/Stock/Shelf 1, which is
correct. However, the Counted Quantity field is defined and equal to 0,
and so does the Difference field with a value of -10. These two fields
should not be shown.
When validating the internal transfer, a new quant is created for the
location "Shelf 1". However, there isn't any value for the field
`inventory_quantity_set`. Therefore, at the end of the transfer
validation process, when the `flush` method is called, since
`inventory_quantity_set` is a computed field, its `compute` method is
called and define the value to `True`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8b155b695823dfa954464ad0d5dd07445ece2471/addons/stock/models/stock_quant.py#L134-L136
This explains why, on front-end, the Counted Quantity and Difference
fields are displayed.
OPW-2733937
closesodoo/odoo#84679
X-original-commit: c519e26adec85025f40f78c59a05b2385377fb5d
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
It is currently not possible to update the quantity of a product from
the inventory report
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create a storable product P
2. Update its on hand quantity to 100
3. Inventory > Reporting > Inventory Report
4. On the line for P, update to quantity to 75
Error: The quantity becomes 0 instead of 75
When setting the quantity from the inventory report, the client calls
the `write` method with the context key `inventory_report_mode` defined
and equal to `True`
This `write` leads to `_set_inventory_quantity` which triggers
`action_apply_inventory` (without disabling the context key!):
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8b155b695823dfa954464ad0d5dd07445ece2471/addons/stock/models/stock_quant.py#L150-L158
At the end of the inventory update, it resets the field
`inventory_quantity` to 0:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8b155b695823dfa954464ad0d5dd07445ece2471/addons/stock/models/stock_quant.py#L592
To do so, the `write` method is called again and here is the issue:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8b155b695823dfa954464ad0d5dd07445ece2471/addons/stock/models/stock_quant.py#L244-L248
Once `inventory_quantity` is updated, since `inventory_report_mode` is
still in the context and equal to `True`, `action_apply_inventory` is
called again. Then, when applying again the inventory, it will consider
the value of `inventory_quantity` (i.e., `0`) to define the new
quantity.
OPW-2737437
OPW-2746201
closesodoo/odoo#84002
X-original-commit: 6500e99cbfda44ebd1931acd657e86841ac2342a
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go to Settings > Technical > Decimal Accuracy
- Change Unit of Measure to 4 digits
- Go to Inventory report or Valuation report
Bug:
The decimal accuracy in Valuation report for quantity or reserved quantity was in two digits instead of four digits
The decimal accuracy in Inventory report for qty_at_date was in two digits instead of four digits
PS: In stock move report or stock move line report, the decimal accuracy of quantity fields are in four digits
By default digits of Product Unit of Measure is 3, that's why some test had to be modified
opw:2410981
closesodoo/odoo#82989
X-original-commit: 0cf5c4e8241c46724defc0ea7e0d2c881ec2eeab
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Fixes a couple of things;
1. Backorder use case when unassigning a move in reception report.
To reproduce:
- Create a Delivery w/ Demand = 8 of a stored product not in stock
- Create a Receipt w/ Demand = 10 of the product
- Assign 8 of product to delivery (don't forget to activate Reception
Report in settings
- Mark 4 of product as done > mark as done > create a backorder
- Open reception report in backorder (shows 6 instead of 4, this is a
known limitation of reception report) + unassign + close report
- Reopen report + assign 4
- Finish the backorder
Expected result: Delivery has 2 moves totaling a demand and reserved
amount of 8
Actual result: Delivery has 2 moves where 1 is fully reserved but the
other isn't and cannot be reserved (even though product in stock).
Issue was due to move split during unassign not taking into account that
the amount being unassigned could be greater than the amount still
assigned (due to backorder amount > demand qty since it doesn't know how
much was done in the original receipt). This would lead to the move
linked to the original receipt's move expecting a greater quantity from
the original move (and therefore not reserving any more quantities.)
2. Trying to unassign from an already done move. (i.e. backordered move
from above unassigned after the delivery is already done) isn't allowed,
so in case of unassigning from a done move, we don't do a split.
3. In case of failure of unassigning, fail gracefully (i.e. don't switch
button status since this is misleading).
Discovered during task: 2662730
closesodoo/odoo#83338
X-original-commit: 3c0c780032ed07da7ec14bdad8df2ff48fc5f4ef
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Allow use of reception report for MOs. Same behavior is expected as with
(non-outgoing) pickings. With exception that procurement group linkage
should be included when assigning.
Original Reception Report Task: 2500844
Follow Up Reception Report Task: 2632884
Task: 2662730
Part-of: odoo/odoo#79627
In some cases, when making an inventory adjustment, the `in_date` of the
new quant will be incorrect
To reproduce the issue:
(Let D01 be the current date)
1. Create a storable product P
2. Set its quantity to 1
3. Process a delivery order with 1 x P
4. Set the date in the future
- Let D02 be this date
5. Make an inventory adjustment with 1 x P
Error: The `in_date` of the quant (for P in the stock location) is D01
instead of D02 (can be observed either directly in PSQL, on the form
view of the quant (via Locations > Current Stock), or by adding the
field on the tree view)
When validating the stock adjustment, at some point, the module calls
`_action_done` on a SML (1 x P from Inventory Adjustment to the Stock
Location). To do so, it decreases the quantity of the origin location
and increases the quantity of the destination location thanks to
`_update_available_quantity`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b4a9e5b8307ab1b730effe2de23f15260326ef6c/addons/stock/models/stock_move_line.py#L485-L493
But here is the issue: when decreasing the quantity in the virtual
location (Inventory Adjustment), it finds an old quant (the one from
step 2 in above use case). It then stores its `in_date` (D01) and since
this date is before the current one (D02), D01 is kept, used to update
the quant quantity and returned in `action_done`. As a result, when
increasing the quantity in the stock location,
`_update_available_quantity` is called with the parameter `in_date`
defined and equal to D01. Again, D01 will be the earliest date, so the
date will be used to create/update the quant in stock location.
OPW-2702198
closesodoo/odoo#83009
X-original-commit: e27ee5cd6b19351a00030310d1db3a0defe5b31a
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
First step to stream QWeb templates: removing the two post
processing operations applied on rendered templates. This
should slightly speed up the rendering of every page.
1/ Don't remove empty lines after rendering, but fix the root
cause of: view inheritancies and QWeb compilation that don't
add extra empty lines.
2/ handle page break in the two reports that uses it, rather
than processing every view produced.
closesodoo/odoo#82244
Related: odoo/enterprise#23328
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
-Create a quote with 2 lines (same product - different lead time).
-When a partial delivery is made (e.g., 5 of 10), Odoo places the operation related to the remaining undelivered quantity (5), on the last line in the Operations list.
-When the next delivery is made, Odoo deducts the quantity from the first operation in the list instead of from the line whose deadline is closest.
Current Behaviour :
Odoo assign button assign quantity to the first move line in the list.
Behaviour After the PR:
Odoo assign button assign quantity to a move line based on the priority, the closest deadline and the id.
opw-2657048
closesodoo/odoo#82062
X-original-commit: 430f4f2ca1cebaea62415ee72bf4369684abbfaa
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Damhaut Florian (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
This commit rename product_uom_qty into reserved_uom_qty and product_qty
into reserved_qty on stock move line to stop mistake them with the stock
move quantities fields.
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
The stock convention on location name is always to name the destination
`location_dest_id`. It was not the
case on the stock rule model
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
Add a "clear qty" button to revert the change by "set qty" button in
(batch) picking.
On the move, Whenever the qty_done != reserved, we consider it a
manual change from the user. "set/clear qty" buttons won't change the
line with manual change.
Show "set qty" button when there are moves with 0 qty_done and non-zero
reserved. Show "clear qty" button when we don't show "set qty" button
and there are moves with qty done == reserved but the number is not 0.
Task-2659233
closesodoo/odoo#78737
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
Victor Feyens