Processing failed mails is quite consuming operation that leads to browser
slowness or even crash. It's especially painful, because user doesn't see the
reason for it.
Bypass the problem by processing first 100 notifications only.
---
opw-2810681
opw-2754243
task-2806549
closesodoo/odoo#90246
X-original-commit: ec2d3550f32ae1e0585630b5b38befb73ddf2b26
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Elizaryev (iel) <iel@odoo.com>
Even if ORM normally filters them out, no need to specify .id in domains.
This leads to better and easier to read queries / domains.
Task-2816580
closesodoo/odoo#85648
Related: odoo/enterprise#24911
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
The method find_or_create of res.partner overwritten in mail does not
take into account the parameter assert_valid_email. This commit adds a
simple check and test.
Task-2799577
closesodoo/odoo#86943
X-original-commit: 7a07b365370d03e963aa7f7d9d19df7ee33e8a1c
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
We are currently lacking an index with (author, failure) due to the information
being spread out in two different tables which are both rather big (there are a
lot of non-failure messages for the current user, as well as a lot of failure
messages for other users), so the fetch of failures for the current user can
become extremely slow (> 20s).
With this new index, the query takes less than 1ms.
task-2742946
closesodoo/odoo#83451
Related: odoo/upgrade#3204
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Since https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/73689 all internal users are no longer
known at init. Unlike what was stated in the corresponding PR, the code of
mentions wasn't actually good enough to allow it without any drawback.
This PR fixes the issue by prioritizing internal users on the result of the RPC.
As a bonus the internal user state is immediately returned when fetching
followers, which allows mentions to be accurate even before the RPC is done.
task-2695224
closesodoo/odoo#80645
X-original-commit: 86de2f231be87b289deb85c3b20b93d890cce918
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Before this commit, a user could DM a portal user.
Portal user are not supported and can't chat.
task-2632874
closesodoo/odoo#77568
X-original-commit: a7eda6d7314e7261ddda32620fae817f1d828bae
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
This commit enables tracking on vat, parent_id for the contact, because the
impact of changes of these fields are very important.
We also manually track portal status change. To avoid a costly computed
field, this is done through manually logging portal access change as a note
on the user partner's chatter.
VAT field naming is also updated to match view naming used in inherited
views.
TaskID-2586195
closesodoo/odoo#74692
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
* = crm_livechat, hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail_bot, purchase, sms,
snailmail, survey, test_discuss_full, test_mail, web_editor, website,
website_livechat
- Create new model `mail.guest` for guests.
- Rewrite some RPCs to target routes rather than model methods so that
guests are able to use them.
- Patch JS and python models to support guests.
- Create a stand-alone page and boot the channel in it.
task-2494829
closesodoo/odoo#75496
Related: odoo/enterprise#20417
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Reorganize code to ease future additions understanding and setting code
at the right place.
Rename some compute methods to have understandable names.
Remove dead imports.
Fix pytz.utc usage.
No functional change comes with this commit. This is only code move.
Task-2631873
PR odoo/odoo#75571
* = test_discuss_full
Overall less queries.
Changes:
- Batch `mail_partner_format`.
- Batch `user.employee_id` compute.
- Remove query for current leave state, use fields (and prefetch) instead.
- Move current leave state in partner format instead of channel info.
Part of task-2622462
closesodoo/odoo#73174
Related: odoo/enterprise#20186
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
* = im_livechat, test_mail
The goal of moving it in models and making it independent of current user is to
be able to test it easily in future commits.
Part of task-2622462
From this commit, it will be possible to access the chat window
of a partner/thread from the command palette.
In the palette command, if you type :
- @ then it will display partners
- # then it will display threads
TaskID-2593197
closesodoo/odoo#74436
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Opportunity is taken to clean the various follow/join/invite methods into only
one `add_members` method.
Part of task-2360169
closesodoo/odoo#74425
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Returning all the users at init does not scale. Mention suggestion code is good
enough now that this is no longer necessary.
closesodoo/odoo#73689
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
- Connect with Admin
- Go to Contacts, edit himself by adding a Private Address
- Create an Internal User without "Access to Private Addresses" right (i.e. User X)
- Go to any app implementing chatter (i.e. Sales)
- Create a SO
- Add the created Private Address as follower
- Make sure User X can access the record (i.e. Sales: Administrator)
- Connect with User X and open the SO
An Access Error is raised while trying to fetch data about the followers.
This commit prevents to:
- add a private address as follower of a record
- add a private address as Recipient in full composer
- propose private addresses when adding a mention to a partner
opw-2428936
closesodoo/odoo#68493
Task-id: 2463622
X-original-commit: 20536e1bbeb641539c0de44364f8376e7cef651b
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Anh Thao PHAM <kitan191@users.noreply.github.com>
The code from v13 used to look for partners in JS before making the RPC, which
was much faster, and also gave better results by returning partners that were
already known and therefore more likely to be selected.
The same logic is reintroduced here, and further improved to take into account
all known partners and sort them according to the likeliness they will be
selected based on various criteria.
task-2413776
closesodoo/odoo#68045
X-original-commit: 930e090ced8134c3819a5a87b9052467ba23e8e4
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
RATIONALE
A bit of history. Link between a message and its recipients has been added
at first mail refactoring towards a Chatter / Discuss feature. It was done
in v7 at d64f3c9783 with the base addition of mail notification model (lots
of commits follow that one but that's the first one about notification).
Due to some people thinking that it was unnecessary to keep a model for
notification it has been removed in v9 at 88b8cd0587. Notification table was
renamed from mail_notification to mail_message_res_partner_needaction_rel.
It was proven to be a mistake even if those "some people" were warned and
model made its way back to Odoo in v10 at 72dfcae2a4 . Table name mail_message
_res_partner_needaction_rel was kept to ease migration and backward
compatibility.
It is now time to complete the circle and rename it to mail_notification.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename ``mail_message_res_partner_needaction_rel`` to ``mail_notification`` .
RIP JEM.
Never forget.
LINKS
Task ID-2477444
Prepares Task ID-2377974 (trace management cleaning task)
Prepares Task ID-2070632 (channel members main task)
Prepares Task ID-2419762 (channel members followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#67382
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2245
Co-Authored-By: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Behavior before the commit
--------------------------
find_or_create define in mail module called
super if no partner is found based on the email_normalized
super call find_or_create define in base that make
a search again on the email before the creation
This cost two search every time a new partner should be created
and the search on email is less efficient than the search on
email_normalized
after the commit
----------------
Only the search on email_normalized is done before the creation
drawback: if a module that does not depends on mail module
override find_or_create the code will not be triggered anymore
the module should depends on mail module
closesodoo/odoo#65565
X-original-commit: 49d5b3813e57f2cd91d582de9b9bb534f05d2dc3
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Before this commit, archived and deleted partners had not their
im_status being updated automatically. There were some issues
with this, notably:
- odoobot 'bot' status was not displayed in chatter
- im_status of partners becoming archived were not updated.
This commit fixes both issues.
task-2329591
closesodoo/odoo#60567
X-original-commit: 63b081c49da089c839479b807de8c0cea45221da
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Improve mock server:
- add support for mocked `fetch`
- add support for `active_test`
- add support for x2m `in` in domains
- add support for default values computed from a function
- implement a more natural "next id" compute
- allow initial data without ids
- ensure write and x2m commands integrity
- improve bad data/bad commands error messages
- always warn for failing RPC, not only in debug mode
- fix all existing tests that had inconsistency data
Other changes done in mail (or dependents) that are not just related to tests:
- remove `direct_partner` from formatter result
->`correspondent` can be computed from other keys, especially `members`
- fix `livechat_visitor` convertData
-> only process if there is value
- add `current_partner` and `current_user_id` as `init_messaging` result
-> easier to mock than session
- remove usage of `need_moderation`
-> that was just a search indirection to `moderation_status`
- adapt `partner_id` -> `res_partner_id` key in `_notification_format`
-> to be consistent with field name
- add name in result of `mail_partner_format`
-> sometimes display_name is not the same
- remove usage of `is_moderator`
-> that was just an indirection to `moderation_channel_ids`
Enterprise counterpart: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/11523
task-2287171
closesodoo/odoo#55854
X-original-commit: 7ba3fecb3377a720d1eb70e7515a0c45da73836d
Related: odoo/enterprise#12391
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
In 6e25a510b3 `find_or_create` was
modified to return a recordset rather than just an id. This made it
incompatible with the RPC protocol and it was not annotated to
downgrade the return value back to an id.
Fixesodoo/odoo#54466closesodoo/odoo#54476
X-original-commit: a7e3894e20207b714cebefa908be090967866791
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
This commit is a significant rewriting of client-side discuss, chatter,
chat window, and messaging menu using OWL. The behavior should be broadly
the same, with some slight functional changes here and there.
From a technical standpoint, the code of messaging is mainly organized in 2
main groups of modules:
- models, which are logical entities that depict the client-side state of
messaging as a whole.
- components, which are in charge of displaying information from models.
This refactoring also introduces new JS guidelines regarding folder structure
(/static) and naming rules for JS modules.
Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/39023
Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/6249
Task-1914207
This PR is a collaborative work by Alexandre, Julien, Sébastien and Xavier,
with the precious help of Lucas to speed it up towards the end.
closesodoo/odoo#39023
Related: odoo/enterprise#6249
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Giannone <jgi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier Dubuc <xdu@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Get rid of email / phone behavior on lead that is hard to understand: if
and contact is set fields are readonly, if not they are editable.
SPECIFICATIONS
Track partner update of email and phone field. Now, when an user writes on the
email or phone of a lead, it also writes on the partner. That is why we want to
track those fields.
Task ID 2207636
PR odoo/odoo#48395
Related: odoo/upgrade#1025
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Rewrite code parsing name (_parse_partner_name) to make it easier to
understand. Tweak find_or_create to return directly a recordset with the
found partner / new partner instead of a name_get result.
Also inherit Partner.find_or_create() in mail in order to benefits from
email_normalized field, allowing to improve the search on matching emails
and avoid duplicates.
LINKS
Task ID 1963529
Community PR odoo/odoo#32397
Archived users are inactive, so we shouldn't be able to ping them.
Task-2046885
closesodoo/odoo#40814
X-original-commit: 8169e34a2230b9a2aff359dc6a69b59c04fc9908
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
Purpose of this commit is to improve performance of post and notify through
various code improvements.
Containing
* making of _notify_customize_recipients a mail.thread method;
* _message_auto_subscribe_followers optimized;
* renaming and optimisation of _notify_partners;
* message_post_attachements optization;
* remove unused mail_post_autofollow_partner_ids context key;
* minimize message create queries;
* only check record related access right for thread messages not in pending
moderation;
* get attachements from values instead of db;
* storing lang in ctx from the beginning;
* don't track on write on attachments;
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
Purpose of this commit is to clean notification process: calls, methods
API, method name, variable propagation.
Contains notably
* simplify API of methods used to group recipients when sending notification
emails;
* improve and rename methods used in email notification process;
* move some methods on model itself as non mail thread records could be
mass-mailed and _notify_email_headers could be called on other records;
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
Purpose of this commit is to move notification methods to mail.thread. Indeed
currently they are split among several models: thread, message, partner.
It makes code difficult to understand. Base record has to be propagated in
order to run methods on it. It is therefore simpler to make those methods
on mail.thread and correctly have model methods.
All notification methods are moved into a single section in the mail.thread
file. This implies some more code move inside mail.thread but allow to have
methods classified by their purpose.
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
Purpose of this commit is to clean some bits of code, notably calls to
message_post/log as well as notification methods. It will ease performance
improvement work.
Small optimization: account: read content after extension check
Parameter cleaning
* use message log with kwargs instead of args;
* remove message post after hook useless parameters;
* remove _notify_email_recipients useless message parameter;
* remove message_notify useless send_after_commit parameters;
* remove message post params matching default values;
Other improvements
* remove message_post commands support for partners and channels;
* only calls message_post with ids list for channels and partners. We
don't support mix of ids and command anymore to simplify code;
* remove support of private discussion in mail.thread adding partners
as recipients, as there is no use anymore;
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
* mail.blacklist.mixin now clearly make inheritance on mail.thread. Indeed
we consider models using the blacklist mechanism as being used in mailing
features, meaning they will anyway inherit form mail.thread. In standard
Odoo it is the case for the 3 models using it (Lead/Opportunity, Contact
and Mailing Contact);
* define message_bounce directly in mail.blacklist.mixin. Bounce counter
is indeed linked to the blacklist and mailing mechanism;
* rename mail.blacklist.mixin to mail.thread.blacklist to ensure coherency
with mail.thread and mail.thread.cc (another mixin build on mailL.thread);
Inherit declarations in various addons are updated accordingly.
Related to task ID 1911679
Linked to PR #29483
Purpose: make some methods from mail.thread mixin private and update their
naming if necessary. Some methods prepare data for business flows and deal
with internal information. Public methods should either use of give some
access to those methods. Computation itself should be keps internal.
In this commit we put message_get_suggested_recipients as private. As it is
used in discuss JS we define a controller that controls access to this method.
It explicitly checks for related document access rule and rights before
calling the private method.
Some addons are updated accordingly to the method change.
Related to task ID 1911679
Linked to PR #29483
Purpose: make some methods from mail.thread mixin private and update their
naming if necessary. Some methods prepare data for business flows and deal
with internal information. Public methods should either use of give some
access to those methods. Computation itself should be keps internal.
In this commit we put message_get_default_recipients as private. Its API
is improved to clearly separate model-inherited method (overriden in some
addons) and general tool method given by the mixin. Finally all sudo hidden
in the computation are removed. Caller now give a sudo-ed record set in order
to be more explicit. Low level method just computes the result and does not
care about sudo-ing or ACLs.
Note a model approach for this method is necessary as mass mailing using
mail.template records does not ensure records to check inherit from mail
thread.
Some addons are updated accordingly to the method change.
Related to task ID 1911679
Linked to PR #29483
This commit renames the `groups` field into
`field_groups`.
The previous name was impossible to grep as
the word `groups` is everywhere in the code base.
Also the new name better follows the implicit convention
that fields related to the tracked field all start
with `field_`.
Purpose
=======
Currently fields with a `groups` attribute can't be tracked.
Otherwise changes would be visible by all in the chatter, including
users which normally don't have the access rights because they are
not members of `groups`.
Specification
=============
Filter tracking field values according to the `groups` attributes.
Users without the access rights should not see them.
If a message is only composed of tracking values and the user doesn't
have the rights to see them, an empty message should not be displayed.
This commit is a refactoring of im_status management.
This commit also add im_status in two places, near the author in a mail thread and on each suggestion when using mentions.
A service to manage im_status will have multiple benefits here:
-centralise information, avoid to call the server multiple time for the same im_status
-update all im_status at once and keep consistency in display.
With this commit, the im_status updates are now done by rpc call.
Updates where previously made with the bus but this has some drawback,
since the bus will only give the information 50 seconds after the beginning of
the request, in the worst case, we van wait 2*50 seconds to get an update.
More than that, the im_status where only updates for pinned dm_chat. Dm chat
are synchronized cross tabs, making the use of the bus possible for this purpose.
Since we will need to display im_status not linked to dm_chat, the list to update
will be different from tab to tab making the use of bus difficult for this purpose.
Technical notes:
-im_search has been moved from bus to mail addons since it concerns mail.channel
-Update of an im_status should be reflected everywhere in the page.
Since im_status is a rendered template used in multiple widget, we should add
the correct logic to all concerened widget. The current solution is simple:
use a jquery selector to find every place where im_status is rendered.
-we add a new im_status: im_partner. This will indicate that that
the partner has no user linked to him, making it possible to avoid to ask
for status updates for this partner.
-The update will only be done when the tab is focused. (and will be done
asap once the tab get focus back)
- Create a PO for a French customer
- Send by email
The body of the email is in French, but some parts (such as the View
button or the footer) are not translated.
The body is translated following the field `lang` of the email template,
in this case `${object.partner_id.lang}`. This is done when opening the
mail composer (so the message appears in French). However, other parts
are rendered only when sending: at this point, the language to be used
in the template is lost forever in the darkness.
To avoid this, we keep a specific context key `custom_layout_lang` that
we retrieve when rendering the custom layout.
opw-1908420
When creating a mail for a user in an other company then the
record, the "send" button fails with a traceback because on
specific template try to access the company.id of the user
which is not accessible due to the access controle.
This PR fixes the problem by sudoing the access to company id.
The mail now sends without problem.
Step to reproduce:
1. Use two companies (comp1 and comp2)
2. Use 3 users (user1, user2, user3)
3. Be sure every user has a confirmed account
4. Change the users to set both company as allowed.
5. Set the current company of the users as follow:
user1: comp1
user2: comp2
user3: comp2
6. Install the project module
7. In `settings > security > record rules`, archive the rules named:
- `Project: multiple-company`
- `Project/Task: multiple-company`
- `user rule`
8. Using user1, create a new project and a new task.
9. Using user2, go to `Project module > Search`, remove `My tasks` filter,
select the task created by user1, in the chatter add user3 as follower.
10. Send the mail => access error.
The `AccessError` is due to user2 trying to access comp1, in particular
`company.name`.
By adding a `sudo`, we also make sure that the template rendering won't
fail bacause of a similar `AccessError`.
opw-1907844
closesodoo/odoo#28710
Purpose
=======
- Apply the blacklist implementation to Improve mailing subscription to be more
compliant with the European GDPR law. Keep a list of people who does not want
to receive promotional emails (or mass mailing in general) anymore.
- Allows the recipient to update himself his mailing preferences
Specifications
===========
This commit is regrouping some main changes on mass mailing.
Apply Blacklist for following models through blacklist.mixin :
- crm.lead
- res.partner
- mail.mass_mailing.contact
- mail.channel.partner
- Opt_out per mailing list instead of per mailing contact.
- Replace opt_out by blacklist in crm.lead + res.partner models
- Added 'ignored' state for mass_mailing. Ignored = blacklisted, opted-out
Ignored email are not included into final statistics to avoid confusion.
- Unsubscribe(d) pages migrated from website_mass_mailing to mass_mailing module
as thoses pages should work without having the website module installed
Detailed implementation
===================
Mass-mailing :
- A blacklisted email is notified by the ban icon next to the email field.
(at the left of the email field for display purpose)
- Renaming the '_get_blacklist' method that was actually
searching opt_out list into 'get_opt_out_list'
- Opt out per mailing list : Add opt_out + related fields (for display and
ergonomy reasons) on the relational model
- Display relational model tree view instead of mass_mailing.contact tree
view when clicking on mass_mailing_list in kanban view
-> In order to be align between contact_nbr displayed in kanban tile and
the content of the tree view
-> mass_mailing contact is accesible via the user icon in this tree view
- Remove custom filters 'filter_contact_subscription' and
'filter_contact_unsubscription' as opt_out is not on mass_mailing.contact
model anymore
- Add 'is_public' to mailing list
The name of this mailing list can be seen (or not) by recipient in
the unsubscription page
If the mailing lists used in the mass mailing are not public,
the user in only informed that he has been unsubscribed.
If the mailing lists are public, the user is informed that he has been
unsubscribed from the mailing lists
and he has the choice to modify his subscription to all the public
mailing list he is or was subscribed to.
- Unsubscription Page :
- mass_mailing_contact :
Opt_out per mailing list, done by email and not by id, as multiple
contact can have the same email
The recipient can add/remove himself to/from the blacklist
The recipient can send a feedback about why he unsubscribed
- crm.lead + res.partner :
Once the recipient unsubscribe, he is automatically blacklisted
The recipient can 'Come back' and remove himself from the blacklist
if he changes his mind
- Show blacklist button parameter added in config :
The idea is to enable/disable the fact that the recipient can add
himself to the blacklist by showing or not the 'blacklist me' button
Only applies for mass_mailing.contact. The recipient, once
blacklisted, can always, no matter the value of this parameter,
'come back' and unblacklist himself
crm.lead + res.partner :
- Replace opt_out by blacklist in crm.lead + res.partner models.
As when a res.partner or crm.lead unsubcribe, we assume that the recipient
does not want to receive mass mailing anymore, at all, even if we adds him
to a mailing list afterwards. He is then blacklisted to avoid this.
With this behaviour, if a new lead is created with the same email address,
he won't be able to receive mail in mass_mode.
But he will still be able to receive '1 to 1' direct email.
Task ID 33224
Closes#25966
Louis Wicket (wil)