*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2943607
closesodoo/odoo#97403
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2942001
closesodoo/odoo#97354
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2939083
closesodoo/odoo#97219
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
The way the code has evolved, `create` is now no more than an
unnecessary indirection for `insert`.
This PR removes `create` and replaces its uses with `insert` directly.
closesodoo/odoo#97058
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2937174
closesodoo/odoo#97030
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2928837
closesodoo/odoo#96690
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: im_livechat, snailmail_account, survey, web_editor.
The callback registered by the bus service method onNotification was
not the same unregistered by offNotification. Since those method were
superfluous, they have been removed in favor of (add/remove)EventListener.
closesodoo/odoo#96684
Related: odoo/enterprise#29819
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2925850
closesodoo/odoo#96447
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2925850
Part-of: odoo/odoo#96447
on/off are deprecated in favor of addEventListener/removeEventListener.
Calls to the bus service have been updated to reflect those changes.
task-2053917
closesodoo/odoo#96017
Related: odoo/enterprise#29501
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: bus, calendar, iap_mail, im_livechat, project, web.
In order to ease the PR introducing the websockets in Odoo, the bus service
has to be updated to be a wowl service. This PR takes care of it.
task-2053917
closesodoo/odoo#95824
Related: odoo/enterprise#29361
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Before this commit:
Attachments are not properly supported in livechat, so there is no point in
allowing attachments to be uploaded via drag and drop.
After this commit:
Disable attachment upload via drag and drop in livechat channels.
Task-2824502
closesodoo/odoo#95761
X-original-commit: 1aed05eb1c50ee69b974a140b3080e38c802cb2f
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
> Media query mixins parameters have changed for a more logical approach
> media-breakpoint-down() uses the breakpoint itself instead of the next
> breakpoint (e.g., media-breakpoint-down(lg) instead of
> media-breakpoint-down(md) targets viewports smaller than lg).
> Similarly, the second parameter in media-breakpoint-between() also
> uses the breakpoint itself instead of the next breakpoint (e.g.,
> media-between(sm, lg) instead of media-breakpoint-between(sm, md)
> targets viewports between sm and lg).
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/5.1/migration/#sass
Task ID: 2766483
Part-of: odoo/odoo#95450
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2898692
closesodoo/odoo#94914
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: im_livechat, website_livechat.
The autoOpenDiscuss parameter was used but is deprecated for a while now.
This PR removes it.
closesodoo/odoo#94716
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2896237
closesodoo/odoo#94722
Related: odoo/enterprise#28913
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2896237
Part-of: odoo/odoo#94722
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2894102
closesodoo/odoo#94508
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Follow-up of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/0c30945d364a8b986f0b48db28e42c7b355471e3
Commit above changed the message formatter in python,
so that `attachment_ids` now always return a list of field commands.
This work fine in backend code of discuss, but in public livechat,
it still uses legacy code. The legacy code do not support field
commands, so instead it thinks the command is data of an attachment,
thus showing an "unamed" attachment.
Actually attachments are not supported in livechat. Code had some
handling of attachments just because this was shared with the
backend in the past.
This commit fixes the issues by simply enforcing showing no
attachment in any message in public livechat.
closesodoo/odoo#94394
Signed-off-by: Louis Wicket (wil) <wil@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2892367
closesodoo/odoo#94347
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: im_livechat, test_mail, test_mail_full.
The createMessagingMenu helper was used during tests to mount
the messaging menu and test it. However, this approach is not
very realistic and blocks some waiting PRs. In order to get closer
from the reality, let's instanciate a webClient and a systrayService
for the messagingMenu to be present at all time.
closesodoo/odoo#94301
Related: odoo/enterprise#28747
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Currently, when the visitor closes the chatbot conversation, the script keeps
running as there is nothing in the code to tell it to stop.
Which can cause issues, because the visitor is still able to "post" messages
through the rating, which will trigger the next step of the script.
Even though the user cannot see those messages and bot reactions, we should
still correctly end the script when the conversation is closed.
Especially since the visitor can ask to receive the conversation by email, and
we don't want him too see that the script wrongly continued.
Task-2882341
closesodoo/odoo#94234
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2890189
closesodoo/odoo#94190
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2888734
closesodoo/odoo#94090
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2887296
closesodoo/odoo#93966
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
* = im_livechat, test_discuss_full
Various improvements to user settings, including:
+ Introduce new js models `res.users.settings` and `res.users.settings.volumes`
to mirror the python models.
+ Avoid reformatting server data and simplify the way notifications are handled.
+ Clean dead code (unused convertData).
+ Reword and add documentation.
closesodoo/odoo#93390
Related: odoo/enterprise#28291
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
This commit make messaging service available in the frontend and in
the livechat external lib bundle.
This is preparation to refactoring JS livechat to use models and OWL.
*: bus, mail, survey, web, website_livechat
Task-2870899
closesodoo/odoo#92786
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
1. Remove useless props category on component `ChannelMemberListCategory`
2. Make fields of model `DiscussSidebarCategory` more declarative,
i.e. by defining values from compute of field rather than imperative
code somewhere in the code of discuss.
3. Introduce a new model `PopoverManager`, which eases use of `PopoverView`s
as they are automatically added in the DOM in a similar way than `Dialog`s
with `DialogManager` or `ChatWindow`s with `ChatWindowManager`.
Doing so also make these popover view no longer deep child in component tree:
this fixes an issue in which popover views could be cut due to DOM tree.
Task-2871688
closesodoo/odoo#92896
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
The goal is to split the public_livechat.xml file into multiple parts,
and move each template into its own file located in
`im_livechat/static/src/legacy/widgets/`
Task-2825235
closesodoo/odoo#92671
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, test_mail.
The target returned by the mail's test utils start method is useless since it's
almost the same thing than querying document. Let's remove it and replace it by
document. This will reduce the diff in the PR introducing the new environment in
the discuss app.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#92077
Related: odoo/enterprise#27670
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
*: im_livechat, website_livechat.
In order to reduce the noise in the PR introducing the new environment in
the discuss app, calls to widget.call, env.bus_service.call during tests
have been replaced by a mocked implementation of _sendone/_sendmany. Moreover,
this approach will allow us to mock the longpolling during tests, resulting in
a more realistic behavior.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#90724
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Now that pyEnv is available, using it in the mock_server lighten the syntax.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#90783
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Before this commit:
- When the operator edit or delete a message, but the livechat visitor does not
receive the updated content.
- If the first message of a series of squashed messages is deleted, the avatar
and the name of the author are lost on the visitor side.
After this commit:
- Livechat visitors will receive the updated content instantly and disable
the reactions and replay buttons for the LiveChat channel.
- Displayed message with the avatar and the name of the author on visitor side.
Task-2678397
closesodoo/odoo#91084
X-original-commit: 3d6ff10055deaea1a2295740c5216efce0ef3ef5
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
This PR helps reducing the noise in the one intorducing the new environment
in the discuss app. Indeed, there won't be widget anymore since createWebClient
will always be used. createXXXComponent methods were relying on widget.el to
mount the components. Let's already replace it by target.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#90526
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
This commit introduces models that define records being 1:1 map with components,
as a step to move further to having essentially all business code in models.
Having code in models is desirable to have very maintainable code, thanks to
robust and declarative code with an ORM-like architecture.
Task-2831082
closesodoo/odoo#90427
Related: odoo/enterprise#26928
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
*: hr, im_livechat, snailmail, website_livechat.
This PR prepares the ground for the one introducing the new environment in the
discuss app. Indeed, tests will now use the mainComponentRegistry in order to mount
those components. Doing so, the parameters has{Discuss/Dialog/ChatWindow} will become
obsolete. Removing those parameters now helps reducing the noise in the main PR.
task-2582313
closesodoo/odoo#90120
Related: odoo/enterprise#26759
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Xavier Morel