Before this PR cache control header for avatar was set to no-cache which is not
the right value.
This PR mark the avatar routes response as immutable when a unique string is
present. We also use the partner write_date as unique string when possible.
task-3551636
closesodoo/odoo#141326
X-original-commit: 3de4f1f1225229cbdb0512df5790ce491f04ea7e
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
- Remove "channel" field in thread formatter.
- Pass `type` for all persona formatters.
- Remove some snake_case to camelCase conversions.
- Add support for inverse fields in discuss JS models.
Details:
1. [REF] mail: remove field 'channel' in thread formatter
This field was used for channel-specific fields, which made
sense when there was a dedicated Channel model that was modeled
with composition with Thread.
To simplify formatter of threads, it's best to flatten props
so that channel-specific fields are immediately available on
thread model. This will improve insertion of data with Threads.
This commit also makes the following other changes:
- remove `discuss.channel/legacy_insert` to use
`mail.record/insert` instead.
- Introduce `toData()` on record, which is helpful to have record
in data format e.g. to pass as a JSON.stringifiable object.
2. [REF] mail: slightly simplify Message.insert from notif
The handling of `mail.record/insert` for Message was handling
transition from starred non-empty message to starred empty message.
To simplify all record insert from server formatted data, the notif
data is just inserted in Message. The adjustment of starred counter
is managed at model level.
This is a prerequisite to significantly simplify all
`mail.record/insert` handling.
3. [REF] mail: rename 'res.users.settings' notifications
Before this commit, notifications related to changes of user
settings were using named notification `mail.record/insert`.
This named notification should be only used for Discuss data that
should be inserted in models. `res.users.settings` is not integrated
in Discuss model, thus it has no reason to use this named
notification.
This commit rename the notification name to `res.users.settings` for
these specific notifications. This prepares simplification on
handling any `mail.record/insert` notifications that should simply
call `Record.insert()`
4. [REF] mail: make dedicate notif for Thread/fold_state
This was using named notif "mail.record/insert", which should
be used to immediately insert data in models. This is however
a dedicated notification to imperatively manager chat window
state based on timing of receiving thread data.
This may eventually become a `mail.record/insert` in the future,
but right now it's much simpler to define it as its own named
notification, in preparation to simplify `mail.record/insert`
notifications handling.
5. [REF] mail: remove Channel in mail.record/insert
This is replaced by `Thread`, so that these data can be
immediately inserted in Thread model.
6. [REF] mail: simplify slightly Attachment.update()
Now that data containing commands is supported, we could
just assign with the command rather than destructure and pick
the dict data part.
7. [REF] mail: introduce assignIn() utils
This function helps reduce LOCs from using the "in" conditional
in sequence:
```js
if (a in data) {
this[a] = data[a];
}
if (b in data) {
this[b] = data[b];
}
if (c in data) {
this[c] = data[c];
}
```
To simply:
```js
assignIn(this, data, [a, b, c]);
```
8. [REF] mail: remove snake_case to camelCase conversion in models
They exist for the sake of keeping Python code snake_case and
JS camelCase. While it's good that each language have a community
that prefer syntax convention, when a codebase uses both languages
and they should work with the same data, it's not great to convert
snake_case to camelCase and vice-versa all the time.
Since server has authority over the data, the server chooses the
format for the keys. Most of them are snake_cased, therefore this
is usually the one we pick.
9. [REF] mail: rename Message.messageReactionGroups to Message.reactions
Easier to read, and matches relation name in JS model
10. [REF] mail: remove explicit assign of some many relations in Message
This reduce amount of custom code in insert(), in preparation to make
all models behave the same in response to inserting data.
11. [REF] mail: rename Thread.customName to Thread.channel_custom_name
To match server data field name, and avoid useless conversion in JS.
12. [REF] mail: simplify Message.insert for recipients
Have formatted data contain `type: "partner"` so it can be assigned
in relational field without adding `type: "partner"` manually in JS.
13. [REF] mail: introduce inverse field in discuss models
With this commit, fields in different models can be linked
together, so that one is mirror of the other field.
This simplifies some `onAdd`/`onDelete` that were added to
sync such fields, and this also simplifies insertion in
relational fields for discuss models that are identified
by records, such as the `MessageReactions` that is identified
by the message and the emoji.
14. [REF] mail: rename CannedResponse.name to 'source'
To make JS model and server data more alike.
15. [REF] mail: remove assignDefined in Persona model
So that eventually all model inserts use `Object.assign()`.
16. [REF] mail: remove 'last_message_id' from channel_info
At some point it was used to display last message in messaging menu.
This is already covered by `channel_fetch_preview` when opening the
messaging menu for the 1st time, so passing `last_message_id` in
channel_info is obsolete.
closesodoo/odoo#137750
Related: odoo/enterprise#48484
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Stockbauer (tsm) <tsm@odoo.com>
This PR adds a panel to consult all attachments of a discuss channel
easily.
task-3476444
closesodoo/odoo#132784
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Stockbauer (tsm) <tsm@odoo.com>
Before this PR, suggested recipients without partner where not
checked and needed to be manually created. This is prone to mistakes
when sending an email to the suggested recipient.
This PR checks all the suggested recipients by default and create
the missing partners when a message is posted, and when full composer
is open. That way, there's far less risk to not send the email to
suggested recipient, and instead the user should manually uncheck
to not send the email.
closesodoo/odoo#128647
X-original-commit: 258b2420676fb1a0d7e834ab79f6bf1ec0f73254
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
The method 'add_member' has 'partner_ids' as a optional parameter , but
the thing is the test 'test_attachment_hijack' is only passing it as a
single ID off res.partner record. Let's say if somewhere we overide this
method and write something like
self.env['res.users'].search([('partner_id', 'in', partner_ids)]) , it
will fail because 'partner_ids' should be a list.
closesodoo/odoo#128759
X-original-commit: 75cb1266afa8b921f8d0ca153f5d05ad47c9b14c
Signed-off-by: Vranckx Florian (flvr) <flvr@odoo.com>
Didier (did)