No longer show the reserved column from by-products production registration on an MO.
Task ID: 2797692
closesodoo/odoo#87225
Pr: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/86768
X-original-commit: 7aa08fe325490bf6ca5efe8b9b7be4bcae843826
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a storable product “P1”
- Add a BOM
- Try to add the product P1 as a component > save > validation error is triggered
> it's not possible to add the same component as the product to produce > correct behavior
- Create a manufacturing order:
- Select the product “P1” as product to produce
- Add the product “P1” as component
- save
Problem:
no validation error is triggered, It's possible to create a MO in which the final product is included in the component > wrong behavior
opw-2796750
closesodoo/odoo#87262
X-original-commit: f38727ee4e7b6596a9da5f3285c7622da0ac6772
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the issue:
- create product P
- create a Engineering Change ders ECO in PLM app
- attach documents to ECO and apply changements
Bug:
- go to the product, try to open uploaded documents. they are not found
This bug happened since odoo/odoo@114b71f
opw:2762448
closesodoo/odoo#87176
X-original-commit: 779a0df6732db51af652d6c282490187d11244a1
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin <sig@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: mart-e <mat@odoo.com>
Current behavior:
When using a product kit that have a product kit in his BoM some move line where merging when they shouldn't.
Because of this the delivered count wasn't correctly updated in any sale order using this product
Steps to reproduce:
- Create product B to manufacture with a BoM (type Kit) using component A and component B
- Create product A to manufacture with a BoM (type Kit) using product B and component A
- Create a sale order with product A
- Confirm the sale order and validate the delivery
- The delivered count of product A on the sale order stays at 0
opw-2777810
closesodoo/odoo#87000
X-original-commit: 0e6480811e2144a1034f1347a816a0bd052c4516
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Engels Robin (roen) <roen@odoo.com>
When changing the structure of a kit, it lead to undesirable behaviors
on Odoo
Issue 01:
1. Create 3 products P_kit, P_compo01, P_compo02
- Type: Storable
- Category: PC
2. Create a bill of materials:
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo01
3. Create a purchase order PO with 2 x P_kit
4. Confirm PO and process the receipt
5. Edit the bill of materials of P_kit:
- Add 1 x P_compo02 in components
6. Return 1 x P_compo01
7. Go back to the PO
Error: The received quantity is 0 while it should be 1.0
When processing the return, the received quantity is recomputed, which
lead to:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/59fcb31f5a0b8136dae26b70ca0087f9b5cf3d24/addons/purchase_mrp/models/purchase_mrp.py#L29
However, since in the mean time the user added a new line in the BoM,
`_compute_kit_quantities` doesn't find any associated SM
(`bom_line_moves` is empty in [3]) and thus returns 0.
Issue 02:
(Need account_accountant. Use demo data)
1. Create a product category PC:
- Costing Method: AVCO
- Inventory Valuation: Automated
- Set up the Price Difference Account
2. Create 3 products P_kit, P_compo01, P_compo02
- Type: Storable
- Category: PC
3. Create a bill of materials:
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo01
4. Create a purchase order PO with 1 x P_kit
5. Confirm PO and process the receipt
6. Edit the bill of materials of P_kit:
- Add 1 x P_compo02 in components
7. Create and Post the bill
Error: an Odoo Error is raised "ZeroDivisionError: float division by
zero"
While confirming the bill, some anglo saxo lines are generated. To do
so, the valuation of the kit is computed: [1]. In the above case, it
will lead to [2]. However, since in the mean time the user added a new
line in the BoM, `_compute_kit_quantities` doesn't find any associated
SM (`bom_line_moves` is empty in [3]) and thus returns 0. Back to [1],
the quantity is used to divide the total price -> it will raise an error
if this quantity is zero
Suggestion:
Such situations should not happen: once a product is used at least once,
it should not become a kit nor have a new structure (if it was already a
kit). Otherwise, `_compute_kit_quantities` will not correctly work since
it is not possible to take the BoM changes into consideration.
[1]
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/abfe37fcea5b20f77799d9331d4d011530880669/addons/purchase_stock/models/account_invoice.py#L72-L74
[2]
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/75191404788ab83645ee35b779991ea6fcdfa406/addons/purchase_mrp/models/stock_move.py#L19
[3]
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7d1af314320547ab5e37c1d97cad22992c98565b/addons/mrp/models/stock_move.py#L275-L294
OPW-2780855
closesodoo/odoo#86821
X-original-commit: 33fa43f795798276fa9d29dd0810289cbb1a2a9c
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Workorder _action_confirm works in batch and is designed to
link workorders and moves per production.
Original code breaks the 'per production' constraint by linking
moves from all productions to workorders of the last one when
called on workorders from multiple productions.
closesodoo/odoo#86698
Task: 2797201
X-original-commit: b25f1e005987641a208de30162808005ad6e705a
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
On product list we can see that kits are listed with quantity on hand
equals to the lesser quantity of the kit's components.
When applying the filter **Quantity on hand greater than 0**, the kit
disappears from the list.
The issue is that we compute product quantity from stock.quant, for kits
we don't create a quant beacause it's not a physical product.
Specification
=============
To solve the issue, we extend the method **_search_qty_available_new** from
**stock.product** in **mrp.product**, where we fetch all kits and add the id
of the products that verify the given condition.
opw-2717594
closesodoo/odoo#86262
X-original-commit: 9db235a0d8cb1f7a371a1dec8a441329de5d5eb8
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: abla001 <abla@odoo.com>
Re-integrate code from 37681e9d2e24663691b4be022f34c29c7126d9f6
lost with f11fcf6bb4
allowing different quantities to be recorded on work orders
and generate back orders with correct quantities on back work orders
(cancelled if no remaining quantity).
closesodoo/odoo#84502
Task: 2751230
Related: odoo/enterprise#24624
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
Go to a work order that is ready or waiting, try manually changing the scheduled start or end date > save
Problem:
Traceback is triggered because when we modify the date, we check if the start date is before the end date. But we cannot compare a False with a date
opw-2768054
closesodoo/odoo#85991
X-original-commit: 1768a072fd40d14dc8c402c3ccad9a6733460c03
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
To reproduce the issue:
1. Storable product with MTO and manufacture route
2. On your warehouse set 3 steps manufacture
3. Create and Confirm a SO for this product
Error: The smart button linking the Manufacturing order does not appear
on the MO.
Problem was introduced by [1] and fixed by [2,3]. Moreover, [1] wasn't
deployed on versions >14.0 so there was no need for [2] on these
versions ([3] has been merged on all versions). However, [1] have
recently been deployed on next versions ([4]) so we need to FW [2] too
without disturbing the improvements from [3].
[1] 7ab0ac3e56949e5015bb2dcfd2af34b56dee92c8
[2] 96b56ea350c283d824468c591d42e4aeeada0d69
[3] 475e6b3cb027b3127b8e46fd8c9f90abc35162d7
[4] 7d7976a61d0af41ebb4df2e24ba222f6570f689c
OPW-2778883
closesodoo/odoo#85676
X-original-commit: 8ce61133af600ffec4c43033e64c2460366856ce
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Grazioso Andrea (agr) <agr@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
ISSUE 01
When adding a product to a sale delivery, another picking is generated
to return the additional product
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create two consumable products P01 and P02
2. Create and confirm a SO with 1 x P01
3. Add 1 x P02 to the delivery and validate it
4. Go back to the SO
Error: Another picking has been generated, it's a return for P02. This
picking should not exist.
When validating the picking, because of the new line, a sale order line
is created with a quantity equal to 0. During the SOL creation,
`_action_launch_stock_rule` is called and checks if a procurement must
be created and processed. To do so, it checks if the SOL quantity (0 in
our case) is the same than the procurement quantity (1 in our case):
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6a0cbff92141961655a5f3e33abc23a2c5b1045d/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order.py#L543-L549
Since the values are not the same, a procurement is created and
processed.
The feature that updates the SO when adding some products to the picking
has been introduced by 1f0835a9d01b46b5cc617756f854c25541b644a7 and is
correctly working in 14.0 because the condition (in
`_action_launch_stock_rule`) is not the same:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/ec5475ee881c5ca2bcc992592bfa4edf12f492df/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order.py#L572-L574
In 14.0, we check if the SOL quantity is greater than the procurement
quantity. The condition has changed in 15.0 due to a new feature
(bda3225c6cc27bb2c2933eda3cc68c6f9708daf3).
ISSUE 02
When delivering more than sold, a useless SM is generated.
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create a consumable product P
2. Create and Confirm a SO with 3 x P
3. Deliver 5 x P
Error: A new line appears (Demand: 2, Done: 0)
Because the delivered quantity is more than expected, an extra move is
created. Then, the extra_move is merged into the initial one a condition
is respected:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6f2ba1e1b40a458e23c8ed712927c44d75d86614/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1603-L1610
Here is the issue: the field `date_dealine` is not copied anymore (see
[1]). Therefore, the condition will never be respected
[1] fb781dcf57
OPW-2716309
closesodoo/odoo#85649
X-original-commit: fabc32c4733bb404e74dc111d80aa1fe1edd4bfb
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
This commit modifies most of the usages of read_group and uses
_read_group instead. _read_group doesn't join automatically on the
many2one fields when no order_by is specified, making it more performant
when the "name" of the many2one is not relevant, which is the case for
most back-end cases
closesodoo/odoo#84908
Task-id: 2479334
Related: odoo/enterprise#24877
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
When unbuilding a MO, if the latter has several lines (in its
components) for the same tracked product, it won't work.
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create two storable products P_compo and P_finished
- P_compo is tracked by USN
2. Update P_compo's quantity to 2
3. Create a MO:
- Product: Finished
- Quantity: 1
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo
- 1 x P_compo
4. Process the MO
5. Unbuild the MO
Error: a validation error is displayed while it should not "The serial
number has already been assigned: Product: P_Compo, Serial Number: C01"
The for-loop in `action_unbuild` do not handle the case where there are
several SMs for the same product. In the above case, there are two
component lines for P_compo, so there are two SM in `MO.move_raw_ids`.
When unbuilding the MO, the module creates and processes two SMs (SM01,
SM02) that "produce" two P_compo (stored in `produce_moves`).
When processing the first one in the for-loop, it takes the original
moves (so the `MO.move_raw_ids` with the same product) and uses them one
by one. Since SM01 needs one P_compo, it uses the first SM of
`MO.move_raw_ids` (and reuse the lot of that SM). Later on, when
processing SM02 in the for-loop, it does exactly the same thing: it
takes the original moves and uses the first one. Here is the issue: this
first SM has already been used and so does its lot, so this SM should
actually not be used again.
OPW-2715155
closesodoo/odoo#85354
X-original-commit: 8d2597965202a76ddeea8d8fed60b7ac014e2df8
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Fine tuning of commit 6acfb2e
It correctly merge the purchase.order in case of direct link and
avoid to relaunch the procurement.
It also correctly set the created_production_id if the demand come
from a SO
closesodoo/odoo#85301
X-original-commit: 9b6fa6c3db55daa3533c0d5cb13da7c98fc3e936
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Usecase:
- Create a BoM with a product tracked by SN
- Create a MO with qty 5
- Mass produce
- Generate
-> All the `stock.move.line` in the move_raw_ids don't have
the qty done prefilled. The purpose of the feature is to create
and validate a lot of MO at once. Which is impossible if you have
to fill all the quantity manualy.
The choice of a new kwargs that directly set the qty_done is justified
by the performance.
-> For On a BoM with 10 components for a final product. For 1000 finished
product with SN
- If we do a loop on each `stock.move.line` to set
qty_done as the reserved quantity. It goes from 40s to 135s
- With the kwargs. It remaines 40s
closesodoo/odoo#83123
X-original-commit: 8ce5926b5a337dc97237f39492e094288b453743
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Set the warehouse with manufacturing 3 steps
Create a BoM with a Components that use a Sub BoM
Set Both product MTO + Manufacture
Create a MO
You have only 2 picking for the first MO with the SFP
that contains both the finished product and the intermediate
component. However they are created and moved at two different times
since you could not create the finished product withtout the
component, so there is no meaning to put them both in the same picking.
It happens because the _assign_picking will merge moves with the same
procurement group. In our case, it's the wanted behavior to have the
2 differents SFP linked to the same MO.
The idea between the fix is:
- We want to have the pick components picking merged.
- We want to have the store components split since they come from
different MO
So we create the different procurement groups during the _run_pull with
the picking type of store finished product. This way the pickings won't
be merged during _assign_picking
We will also propagate those groups to the newly created MO in order to
keep the picking type sequence and correct name.
FW PORT of
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/bcfa03821b92bf52675db0e3b54d3cb19dfe3087
opw-2585525
closesodoo/odoo#85195
X-original-commit: a647e680a196f7e6d9147d51dd80f8c31e0e741b
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go to inventory > configuration > Products > Attributes
- Create a new Dynamic Attributes > add two attribute values
- Create a storable Product “Test”:
- Add the two attributes
- Save
- Create a BOM related to this product
- Create a new manufacturing order:
- Do not choose a product
- Select the BOM related to the product “test”
Problem:
Traceback is triggered because as the product template only has dynamic variants, there is not a `product.product` record created yet.
but we try to access it in the onchange: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/14.0/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L598
Solution:
do not set the product when a BOM of a product_tmpl without a variant was chosen
opw-2732254
closesodoo/odoo#84543
X-original-commit: 50b538e7d32bbce7cad7c05f0bc80db6b969a70b
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Create + confirm a MO
- Add a byproduct with a Produced (qty) > 1
- Change the `qty_producing` to a non-zero qty
Expected result:
Byproduct's "Produced" qty stays unchanged and its "To Produce" is 0
Actual result:
Byproduct's "To Produce" defaults to 1 and its "Produced" qty is
updated to scale to the according to the amount `qty_producing` (i.e.
if `product_qty` = 2 and `qty_producing` = 1, then by-product's
"Produced" = .5
Additionally, a Missing Record error pops up because of missing
stock.move.line
Solution, don't allow byproducts added after MO is confirmed to default
to 0. Additionally allow byproducts to have 0 "To Produce" quantity and
don't sum the cost share of merged byproduct moves since when Produced
> To Produce then an extra move is created and the cost share ends up
being doubled during the merge.
closesodoo/odoo#85130
Task: 2716164
X-original-commit: 51ff14a56b909bdf22c9f1c4540347655578e1f4
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
When creating a MO _date_planned_finished_ is not added.
Consequently calculates wrongly the date planned to finish the MO.
X-original-commit: 2b2509e154af0e58a3f30f1d7fe40fb854b6b881
Part-of: odoo/odoo#84896
Rewrite _post_inventory to make it work better
with mo batches. This mainly improves the
time it takes to mark_as_done manufacturing
orders from the Workorders ListView.
stock.move._action_done is faster
when called outside of a for loop, i.e.
directly on self.
opw-2760394
closesodoo/odoo#84846
X-original-commit: 4cc6083ea1bd28be07e275322481ad11d8995d58
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
decimal places while we compute stock_quants.
closesodoo/odoo#84708
X-original-commit: fba9c9f32cb3d53841946588a999998f6c936e26
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
To reproduce the issue:
1. Produce a SN product P with lot L
2. Unbuild it
3. Produce 1xP with lot L
Error: When setting the lot, an error is displayed. When marking the MO
as done, a second error is displayed
Both domains in `_onchange_lot_producing` and in the beginning of
`_check_sn_uniqueness` are incorrect. We should centralize the
uniqueness checking thanks to all existing computations in
`_check_sn_uniqueness`. This way, unbuilt/scrapped moves will be
considered
OPW-2721205
closesodoo/odoo#84374
X-original-commit: 2540104e95cea7baaa22ccfce97759771dbbaf34
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Previous versions of backorder mechanism would trigger reordering rules
for components of backorder MOs. This could lead to a procurement_group
mismatch (see original commit for details).
Backorders no longer trigger reordering rule, but it is still safer if
we clean the default_mo_ids when making backorders just in case. One
rare use case would be: if a user deletes multiple MOs'
procurement_groups, then creating backorders for those MOs at the same
time (i.e. via list view > multi-select + action > Mark As Done) can
result in incorrect procurement_group assignment due to default value
(same reason as explained in original commit).
closesodoo/odoo#84351Fixes: odoo/odoo#83742
X-original-commit: e3af56520fc3397f24c05b64d991f28a3227262b
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
In 9f7e6d2bb6ae0a6b0257edf26a5aa069cd00d78e , when start a workorder, we
always suggest the qty to produce to be the full qty to produce on MO.
If the previous WO produced less than the full qty to produce on MO,
user won't aware of that when start the WO. We revert it in this committ
Task-2678388
closesodoo/odoo#83389
Related: odoo/enterprise#23961
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Split a manufacturing order in several parts
using the back order mechanism
Merge several manufacturing orders related to the same product/bom
by cancelling all of them and creating a new one
closesodoo/odoo#82427
Task: 2662566
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
When start_nextworkorder, if the WO is already cancelled, we
should try to check next one the this WO.
Task-2678388
closesodoo/odoo#83566
X-original-commit: 30fcfcc6c6ebb6fe9620d29475e1a7b6f1a46923
Related: odoo/enterprise#23819
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Huang (yhu) <yhu@odoo.com>
The possible index names have been renamed "btree", "btree_not_null"
(instead of "not null") and "trigram" (instead of "gin").
Task 2742526
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83274
It is sometimes impossible to unbuild a product because of decimal
values.
To reproduce the issue:
(Enable debug mode)
1. In Settings, enable "Units of Measure"
2. Set the decimal accuracy of "Product Unit of Measure" to 4
3. Set the rounding precision of "Units" to 0.001
4. Create two products P1, P2
5. Create a BoM:
- Product: P1
- Quantity: 3
- Type: Manufacture
- Components: 5 x P2
6. Process a MO with 3 x P1
7. Create an unbuild order UO:
- Manufacturing Order: MO
- Quantity: 1
8. Unbuild
Error: An error message is displayed "The quantity done for the product
"P2" doesn't respect the rounding precision[...]"
At some point, for each SM associated to the UO, the modules uses the
value of `product_uom_qty` to write the done quantity of the SM. The
rounding of `product_uom_qty` is based on "Product Unit of Measure" so
the component's SM has its quantity equal to `1.6667`. Moreover, writing
the done quantity trigger the creation of the associated SML. As a
result, the SML has its done quantity equal to `1.6667` while the
rounding of the associated UoM is `0.001`. When calling `_action_done`
on such a SML, it will raise an error because the value doesn't respect
the rounding.
Side note: the error message is incorrectly written, the indents in the
file are displayed on the front-end.
OPW-2710038
closesodoo/odoo#83369
X-original-commit: c11d772f39179c5dec5eb431b6f4bc02c680643a
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
There were some discrepencies when adding to/removing from WO Real
Duration:
- When adding time that is brings the total Duration over the expected
duration, the time should be split between the "productive" and
"performance" (i.e. reduced speed) times. This is already happening
when using start/pause buttons, so now it is consistent.
- Use 'id' instead of "Start Date" to determine which time_ids
to reduce/remove since adding a large enough "real duration" value
compared to previous time_id(s) could result in an earlier "Start
Date" for a newer time_id (i.e. results in which one is adjusted/
deleted = confusing). Using "End Date" was considered, but same
non-sequential issue can occur during time split from point above.
- Correctly determine if the "productivity" should be 'productive' or
not (i.e. 'performance') based on total WO duration (not duration
of newly added time_id)
Refinement of Part 4 of Task: 2667151
closesodoo/odoo#80319
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Due to many move values being set only during an onchange, there were
inconsistencies with the values of the products to manufacture and the
MO's components in the following cases:
- when a MO has manually added components/byproducts (i.e. not from a
BoM or a MO with no BoM) = missing values
- a MO is copied = incorrect values copied
- a backorder is made = backorders' moves contained new "-00#" name, but
original "-001" MO did not update all corresponding values to new name
There were also a couple of default values for manually added moves that
were either incorrect or not correctly saving.
Most of these inconsistencies are not visible to the user unless they do
a data export or are playing close attention (e.g. copying an MTO
triggered MO will copy the date_deadline, and this value cannot be
edited by the user.)
Part 6 of Task: 2667151
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80319
Several UX improvements:
1 - Add "Unbuild" filter to MOs (1 or more 'Done' unbuilds) + added
Unbuilds smart button to MO form view
2 - When copying an operation across BoMs, it is annoying that it adds
"Copy" to the end of the name, so we remove that.
3 - Display a warning when using an expired Lot/SN in detailed operations
view (burger window + tab).
4 - Allow adding/removing WO Real Duration + add/remove/edit specific time
time tracking (time_ids) for Done, Unlocked MOs.
5 - Allow search WOs by product to manufacture
7 - Fix validation error message typo
Parts 1-5 and 7 of Task: 2667151
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80319
Allow use of reception report for MOs. Same behavior is expected as with
(non-outgoing) pickings. With exception that procurement group linkage
should be included when assigning.
Original Reception Report Task: 2500844
Follow Up Reception Report Task: 2632884
Task: 2662730
Part-of: odoo/odoo#79627
Three supported types:
- btree (default for index=True)
- btree not null (when >90% of the data are null)
- gin trigram search (for char fields)
Review of indexes on all objects.
closesodoo/odoo#83015
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Suppose a tracked-by-usn and consumed product returns in the stock
thanks to a repair order. Using again this component in a new
manufacturing order will raise an error
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Storage Locations"
2. Create two products P_finished, P_compo
- Storable
- P_comp tracked by USN
3. Update the quantity of P_compo:
- WH/Stock: 1 x Lot01
4. Create a manufacturing order MO:
- Product: P_finished
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo
5. Confirm, Check availability and Mark MO as Done
- (Lot01 should be consumed)
6. Create a repair order RO:
- Product: P_finished
- Parts:
- Type: Remove
- Product: P_compo
- Lot: Lot01
- Destination Location: WH/Stock
7. Confirm RO, Start RO, End RO
- (There should be one Lot01 available in stock)
8. Repeat 4-5
Error: When checking the availability on the MO, Lot01 is correctly
reserved. However, when marking the second MO as done, a User Error is
displayed: "The serial number Lot01 used for component P_compo has
already been consumed" although this lot should be available
When checking the uniqueness of the lot, nothing includes the products
back in stock thanks to the repair orders.
OPW-2701668
closesodoo/odoo#82544
X-original-commit: 3d9355f90fa1dd9436f1745c515c89947ed04de0
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Unlinking a workorder which was in the middle of a chain of workorder created two subchains which both created a product when reaching their new respective ends.
The issue was solve by assuring that when we a link is remove from a workorder chain, their adjacent workorders are linked together using next_workorder_id
opw-2669514
closesodoo/odoo#82553
X-original-commit: a826608044f2a0b50c2ad9ed0228717f9ec66522
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Step to reproduce:
- Inventory > Configuration > Operations Types > Manufacturing (or any other operation type with code 'mrp_operation')
- Change 'Type of Operation' to 'Receipt' (or any other but 'manufacturing')
- Uncheck box field 'Use Existing Lots/Serial Numbers'
- Change 'Type of Operation' back to 'Manufacturing'
- Set correct value for 'Default Source Location' (type Receipt changed the value to 'Vendor', need to fix it)
- Create a storable product with the route 'Manufacture' selected.
- Create a BoM for this product, with a component tracked by lot (Add quantity to component)
- Create a MO for the product > Confirm > Check Availability
Current Behaviour :
Quantity are reserved, but the lot_ids are not visible
The behaviour is due to the fact that hidden parameters still have effect when they should act as their default value. To ensure it's the case, they are set back to their original value when the user switch between configuration to avoid ending in a wrongful configuration.
Behaviour after PR :
Lot ids are shown no matter the hidden configuration of picking type
opw-2680370
closesodoo/odoo#82377
X-original-commit: 22bbf43eba0927bdf27218da16f8435b33756112
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Damhaut Florian (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
Mass produce originally prohibited multiple lots components.
Later commit removed this limitation (among others).
This one displays a warning to make sure it is intentional.
task 2633369
closesodoo/odoo#77254
Related: odoo/enterprise#22797
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
There is 2 major issues with the production of multiple serials number
- Performance issue
- Duplicated code with classic backorder mechanism
The performance issues exist since backorders were create one by one
and `stock.move` and `stock.move.line` are always recomputed. They
are not created in batch neither.
_generate_backorders is removed and replace by _split_productions. The
functionality are the same. Technicaly it does the maximum in batch,
first it creates all the `mrp.production` then all the `stock.move`
and finaly, it splits the existing `stock.move.line` among the new
`stock.move`
It means that the reservation is not recompute anymore during a
backorder process and will remain the same than the splitted production
order.
Performance metrics (10 components):
| 2 | 10 100 1000
before | 0.47s | 2.84s | 32.25s | 580.53s
-----------------------------------------------
after | 0.13s | 0.36s | 2.60s | 35.17s
task 2633369
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77254
Fixes 2 issues:
Issue 1: wrong view shown when registering strict consumption
To reproduce:
- create tracked product to subcontract
- create subcontract BoM with no tracked components + strict consumption
- create receipt of subcontracted product (remember to select From =
subcontractor)
- click on `action_show_details` burger button in Operations
Expected result:
- Detailed Operations window with no move lines in it (i.e.
stock.view_stock_move_nosuggest_operations view)
Actual Result:
- Detailed Operations window with move lines w/ 0 Done
(i.e. stock.view_stock_move_operations view _ lines also do
not get filled in when using the `action_assign_serial_show_details`,
=> twice as many lines as needed end up in view)i
Similar issue can occur when using a non-strict BoM + tracked product.
Issue appears to be that conditional was incorrectly updated during
refactoring to allow non-strict BoMs also record components.
stock.view_stock_move_operations view should only appear when all
productions are recorded
Issue 2: Consumption warning wizard not showing correctly
To reproduce:
- same as Issue 1, except consume less than BoM amount
Expected result: Consumption Wizard
Actual Result: stock move view shown instead
Issue was due to 'form_view_ref' value in context of picking view,
therefore we force clear this value everytime we expect this wizard
to open.
Task: 2695173
X-original-commit: b9990a5dab8731a8f69fd07aa73a318fc9d4a808
Part-of: odoo/odoo#81649
This commit adds an index on picking_type_id for models stock.picking
and mrp.production.
Filtering on picking_type_id is often done via the Inventory Overview.
This should speed up the list render in case of many object.
Task : 2648449
closesodoo/odoo#80434
Related: odoo/upgrade#3068
Related: odoo/enterprise#22535
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
This commit rename product_uom_qty into reserved_uom_qty and product_qty
into reserved_qty on stock move line to stop mistake them with the stock
move quantities fields.
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
The stock convention on location name is always to name the destination
`location_dest_id`. It was not the
case on the stock rule model
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
Previously, when underconsumption occured, we split the move (in
post_inventory). And if backorder, the moves not done would be linked to
the new backorder MO (when backorder MO is created).
After 8883c06ada, we create backorder MOs
before _post_inventory, making it so the moves not done will not be
linked to the backorder MOs and reserved qtys are not released.
To fix, we set cancel_backorder to be true to cancel all the leftover
moves and release the reserved qty.
Task-2697611
closesodoo/odoo#80446
X-original-commit: cffb2b455d73f64d96f91b9e0301c346989eae63
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
When cancelling a manufacturing order that does not include any
component, the associated moves won't be cancelled.
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create a storable product P
2. Create & Confirm a MO for 1 x P
3. Cancel the MO
4. Consult the form page of P
Error: The forecasted quantity of P is 1 instead of 0
The finished move associated to the MO hasn't been cancelled. Since [1],
we have the possibility to process MOs without any component, so the
cancellation process shouldn't be bypassed anymore.
[1] bf5e1debf9
OPW-2691422
closesodoo/odoo#80407
X-original-commit: 2adff866a598fc8fb872fb8127875fbb7cc7335c
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Fixes 2 issues:
1 - odoo/odoo#61027 made mrp.routing.workcenter.company_id =
self.bom_id.company_id. This made it so the work center selection is
empty until a BoM is selected, which is confusing to users. To make it
less confusing, we switch the order since we expect users to fill in
the fields from top to bottom.
2 - odoo/odoo#65628 made it so the BoM can be changed. This made it so
it's possible to save the record and have the company of the BoM and
the work center not match. This can lead to a usererror when users try
to start the WO associated with the operation. Steps to reproduce:
- create a new operation from Configuration > Operations
- select a BoM from company 1 and a Work Center from company 1 + save
- edit and change BoM to a BoM from company 2 and DO NOT change the
Work Center
Expected result: save error
Actual result: Save will be allowed, but WO will throw an usererror
when you try to start it.
To fix this, we prevent the user from saving when the workcenter
company does not match the BoM's (if both have a company_id assigned).
closesodoo/odoo#80337
Task: 2682365
X-original-commit: f77c9560ad304940610d797018246a8f5d32f721
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
In multi steps configurations, the additional products of a MO could be
missing in the associated picking
To reproduce the issue:
(Use demo data)
1. In Settings, enable "Multi-Step Routes"
2. Update the current warehouse:
- Manufacture: 2 steps
3. Create a MO for product "Table Top"
4. Edit the MO:
- Add 1 x Screw in the components
5. Confirm the MO
6. Open the generated Picking
Error: The operations only contains one line for "Wood Panel". There
should be a second line for the "Screw"
When adding the new component, a new stock move is created but the
latter does not have any `group_id` defined. This is the reason why the
generated picking does not include this stock move.
OPW-2671995
closesodoo/odoo#79894
X-original-commit: 720f29fc6b7626ae734187242870a27065441ac2
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Pieter Claeys (clpi)