This commit removed static background color and the like in all event
modules. Since it's possible to configure colors from the website_editor,
we should used these ones in the frontend.
When an element is superposed on the background we used the later with a
mix of the primary color to have a demarcation and a better visibility
based on the colors chosen.
task-2845417
Part-of: odoo/odoo#91883
This commit adds a `sequence` field in `event.track.location`, allowing event
managers to organize their event location as they want in the "Agenda" page.
To allow re-arrangement of the locations a bit more visible and easy, this
commit adds handle widget on track locations tree view, and removes the debug
group from the menu "Events > Configuration > Track Locations".
To match the order on agenda page and on the back-end, the same ordering
is applied at model level as well.
taskID-2942634
closesodoo/odoo#97763
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Just doing the summer file cleaning. Move mail data into files named based on
their model, easing maintenance and searching for those data.
Spotted during Task-2207626 (Rating: Delay rating notification to ease feedback)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98661
Fixing the display of long track names by taking all the
width for the title in edit mode and forcing line breaks in
read mode.
Task-2941724
closesodoo/odoo#98396
X-original-commit: 4e2484e84bfaf8c4d21b0ac887c7c80594142792
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Dieudonné Amélie (amdi) <admi@odoo.com>
Oversight of: 129b91027700313066db0305876adcf9b2a3817d
If the view is not up to date, it will not display any agenda locations.
We need to keep the 'locations' key into the returned values for code
retro-compatibility.
Task-2942630
closesodoo/odoo#97751
X-original-commit: 6c72297e72e0936e5564f175dcb1716057e0ac4b
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
This commit adapts the agenda template to avoid displaying a complete column
for a location if that location is unused for this specific day.
This allows having multiple different locations for your different event days
without cluttering the display by showing empty columns for unused locations.
Task-2942630
closesodoo/odoo#97537
X-original-commit: 129b91027700313066db0305876adcf9b2a3817d
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Improve UI of event app.
Detailed changes:
1) change the wording of the selection item "sponsor" of
event_sponsor.exhibitor_type from "sponsor" to "Footer Logo Only"
2) event name placeholder changed to (quote added):
e.g. "Conference for Architects"
3) in the track page and exhibitor page, if the description is empty:
- for external user: hide the empty description zone for external user
- for internal user: display an alert (info) inviting the user to complete it
with a link that triggers the edit mode.
3 bis) in the track page and exhibitor page, the page and the menu aside
are glued to the top. Add some space there.
4) display unpublished tag on the side menu for unpublished tracks
Some other changes:
- When some content are empty, there were some awkward horizontal lines
separating nothing, we have decided to remove them
- Fix track layout and improve mobile layout
Task-2692907
closesodoo/odoo#83488
Related: odoo/enterprise#23798
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
This commit aims at removing unuseful help message to:
1/ reduce translators work, to focus on more useful translations
2/ not sending unuseful information in load_views
3/ reduce help message to useful messages, so that we can mark
fields having a tooltip in the future UI.
4/ some cleanup of existing messages too
The main use cases:
- REMOVED: help redundant with the field name, providing no extra info
- MOVED TO COMMENT: technical help messages, that should not be in UX
closesodoo/odoo#97279
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
*: website_event_exhibitor, website_event_track
This commit adapts "customize show" options from website event modules
by creating new options available in edit mode.
See merge commit for more information.
task-2710582
*: website_blog, website_customer, website_event_exhibitor,
website_event_track, website_hr_recruitment, website_sale,
website_slides
See merge commit for more information.
task-2687506
The condition to display the start event warning in the track view was that
the event was not ongoing. This fix adds the condition that the event is
upcoming, preventing the warning to be displayed after the event date.
Task-2692907
closesodoo/odoo#94066
X-original-commit: 17a46270dd826172e072ada1da9911c062a827fb
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
* im_livechat, test_event_full, website_blog, website_crm,
website_event, website_event_track, website_event_track_quiz,
webite_livechat, website_sale
There is 6 main changes in this commit:
1. Using raw SQL Upsert instead of the ORM methods. While raw SQL should
generally be avoided, it makes sense for such a low level behavior which
is impacting every flows.
Indeed, tracking visitors is a generic behavior done on all pages and
controllers. It is important to optimize it to reduce processing time
and SQL Queries.
Benchmark of that change alone:
> Rendering a tracked page improves from ~19.5ms to ~17ms (using `ab`
with 1000 loop) and the requests involved in the tracking process are
reduced from 8 SQL Queries to 3:
- 1 request to upsert the visitor
- 1 request to fetch the visitor data
- 1 request to add the tracking record
2. Adding in that upsert query the `visitor.track` insert, creating both
records in one go, bringing the query count from 3 to 2.
3. Refactoring of the `parent_id` behavior that was introduced in stable
with [1]. The purpose was to keep track of multiple visitor linked to a
same user to merge the tracking together. Especially useful for tracking
a same visitor on different devices (when logged in).
Only one visitor was kept as active, others would be archived and their
tracks would be set/moved to the main partner.
Removing those duplicate visitor was not possible because those archived
duplicated visitor were holding the devices notification push token.
Since [2], those token were moved to their own table, all related to the
main visitor.
We can then now safely remove those duplicate visitors after merging
their track to the main visitor. Thus, the `parent_id` field is no more
useful. Removing it removes a layer of complexity.
Note that thanks to this part, the `active` field can also be removed.
4. Deeper functionnal change, inspired from Plausible: The access_token
is no more stored in a cookie but is the result of a hashing method
based on <IP Adress, User Agent>.
The reason behind that change is that, in an upcoming refactoring,
sessions won't be stored anymore unless absolutely needed (login, add to
cart..). It will also ship a no cookies policy, trying to get rid of all
cookies.
This change is bringing some functional changes:
- Since the IP is included in the hash to generate the token, it means
that:
A. If an anonymous user switch IP (eg from 4G to wifi), it is
considered as a new visitor.
B. If 2 anonymous users with the exact same user agent (same browser,
same browser version, same exact os or phone) are on the same IP,
those will be considered as the same visitor.
- Since the request host is not included in the hash, it means that
visiting a DB from 2 differents URLs (domain and/or ip) on the same
device and same browser will result in a shared visitor.
It shouldn't imply any issue as this is A. not wrong and B. mostly
used for tests.
As all this is only related to non logged in user, it shouldn't be a
real issue as anonymous visitors are not supposed to be meant to be
business critical, even if we use them for "a bit more" than simple
analytics data.
5. The access_token is now replaced by the partner_id once the user logs
in, so:
- We don't need to either search on the partner_id field or the
access_token field (depending if the user is logged in or not), we can
only use the access_token row/field to do both.
- On logout, everything works out of the box as the access_token will be
regenerated since there is no partner_id anymore.
- On login, if an access_token matches the user's partner_id, that
visitor is returned.
If there is no such token, a new visitor is created for that partner_id.
In both 2 cases, tracks are moved to that visitor and the anonymous
visitor is removed.
- We can remove the code that was in charge of checking if the
access_token / visitor cookie was wrong (coming from another user eg,
different user login on same device). Indeed, such collision is not
possible anymore as the access_token automatically match the logged in
user.
- We can remove the code that was in charge of checking if the
access_token / visitor cookie was wrong (coming from a logged in user
while the current visitor is not loggedin). Such collision is not
possible anymore as the access_token is (re)generated as an anonymous
token (hash) when not logged in.
6. There is no more check to prevent a track to be created if there was
already a track for that URL in the last 30 minutes.
While this can easily be re-introduced (one CTE on the upsert), it was
adding ~100ms (from ~20 to ~110ms) to the request on a big database as
Odoo where there is ~100 millions tracks and ~100 millions visitors.
It has been validated that it was not a real issue as it is not
fundamentally wrong. If a visitor visited 20 times a product or a
specific page in that short amount of time, you might want to know that
because the user is most likely interested by it.
Changes (1+2), 3, (4+5) and 6 are all independant from each other and
could have existed on their own.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/c6b8a44b970a46dcd87a4e2cb1ad52fa340b209f
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/16781/commits/f75090fe8b42484e89e933976e8441d2f5eb9415
task-2867045
closesodoo/odoo#87857
Related: odoo/enterprise#28004
Related: odoo/upgrade#3566
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
PURPOSE:
This commit adds a min-height property to event pages so that
the footer does not take the entirety of the screen when a page
has little content.
To not have a strange empty space on the booth event page when no booth
is set or when the event is finished, the related error messages are
now displayed below the cover instead of inside it.
It also removes the default grey background on some templates,
so that the theme background color is used instead.
Task-2831951
closesodoo/odoo#89602
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Remove most values uselessly specified because giving the same value as
the default one (see _DEFAULT_MANIFEST in odoo/modules/module.py)
* auto_install is Falsy by default
* author is Odoo SA by default
* summary & description are empty strings by default
* application is False by default
* test, demo, depends and data are empty lists by default
This will reduce noise/inconsistencies between manifests specifications,
simplify analysis of manifests content, ...
closesodoo/odoo#90209
Related: odoo/enterprise#26807
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
In 2 ways:
- by ignoring prefetched pages: indeed some page were reported inaccurately
as being viewed by the user when they were only prefetched.
- by adding the page /event in the tracked page as the page is obviously
important in the event business
Technical notes:
- The prefetched pages are ignored thanks to an header X-Disable-Tracking added
on each prefetch request in the service worker.
- Adding the page /event as a tracked page has increased the number of queries
when browsing the page /event. That's why some query count have been updated in
TestOnlineEventPerformance.
Task-2476513
Part-of: odoo/odoo#86031
Cleanup all the places where an hour or a datetime is been used
to display with the date the corresponding timezone.
The goal is to know the timezone used where a datetime is displayed
on the event pages.
task-2458013
COM PR: odoo#78049
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78049
Correction that enables the display of the "unpublished" red label next to the
track name that are not published for the user of the group event manager only.
Task-2692907
closesodoo/odoo#86907
X-original-commit: 4d5f07dc5b393f15dc7c82e8af7da2cfeaf7720c
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
This commit modifies most of the usages of read_group and uses
_read_group instead. _read_group doesn't join automatically on the
many2one fields when no order_by is specified, making it more performant
when the "name" of the many2one is not relevant, which is the case for
most back-end cases
closesodoo/odoo#84908
Task-id: 2479334
Related: odoo/enterprise#24877
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
This commit is the community counterpart of the enterprise commit that
consolidates push tokens on website.visitors.
We now don't need to keep wishlisted tracks on children records of a
website.visitor and we can keep the whole wishlisted tracks list consolidated
on the parent only.
This allows some code cleaning and some simplification as well as a few
performance improvements.
Task-2429652
Part-of: odoo/odoo#65113
PURPOSE
Visitors are useful in terms of marketing analysis but they can bloat the
database really quickly if you have a lot of traffic on your website.
This commit aims to relieve the database by fully deleting inactive visitors.
SPECS
On an active website, you can easily reach hundreds or even thousands of
visitors per day.
While active visitors are useful for marketing purposes, inactive ones were
archived after a period of inactivity (i.e: not connected for X days in a row,
where X is configurable as a parameter and 30 by default).
But archiving visitors is not really useful either.
We don't see any specific cases where you would want to restore some visitors.
That means we are better off unlinking the visitors completely to save database
storage space.
We want to make exceptions and avoid deletion of inactive visitors in some
cases:
- When they are linked to a partner (meaning most likely linked to a
registered user)
- When they are linked to leads
- When they are registered to events
Several tests were added to ensure that leads matching these conditions are not
unlinked.
We also took this opportunity to enforce the "_link_to_visitor" rules in those
tests to make sure that:
- When visitors are linked, the leads are merged into the main visitor
- When visitors are linked, the event tickets are merged into the main visitor
- When visitors are linked, the wishlisted tracks are merged into the main
visitor
This is also preliminary work for a commit that will move the push_token of
website.visitors to a separate table.
That will in turn allow us to link the push_tokens within the
"_link_to_visitor" method and delete the linked visitor instead of archiving
it.
LINKS
Task-2410217
Part-of: odoo/odoo#65113
The concept of 'parent_id' on website.visitors was introduced in the saas-13.3
stable while implementing the "event online" feature:
However, it should have been part of the website module from the start since
it's a 'global' concept that does not depend on events at all.
See #53540 for more details.
This commit aims to clean the code by moving the field to the website module,
which allows a nice cleaning of associated overridden methods as well.
Along with that, we move the website.visitor demo data from the event module to
the website module, allowing a fresh install of website to showcase some of our
visitors feature.
We also took this opportunity to do some minor improvements in the visitors
kanban view in order to make relevant information more visible.
Task-2429652
Part-of: odoo/odoo#65113
Reduces load_menus answer size by 32% (between 20kb and 200kb savings
for the initial loading of the backend, depending on the number of apps
installed). Support for SVG icons in the web client for menus/apps.
Reduced PNG icons for apps list (8 bits PNG instead of 24 as our icons
don't need more colors as they are flat designs)
closesodoo/odoo#84280
Related: odoo/enterprise#24200
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Avoid to base64 encode, then decode to process assets and images for a ~25% speed improvement.
Change image processing tool to work on images, rather than base64 encoded strings.
Performance is ~25% faster on assets & images:
/web/assets/...frontend.min.css: 13ms to 7ms, base64 enc/dec: 2 -> 0
/web/image/XML_ID: 10ms to 8ms, base64 enc/dec: 3 -> 0
/web/image/res.users/2/avatar_128: 40ms to 20ms, base64 enc/dec: 6 -> 2
closesodoo/odoo#82851
Related: odoo/enterprise#23537
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Change weird formatting sometimes showing "In" or "ago" without
displaying any text, give user better awereness of when a room/track
starts or has started.
Specifications
=============
Change widget in website_event_meet to digital: False, display "Starting
now!" if track starts/has started within less than 60sec, display info
box showing when page was last refreshed.
Task-2677865
closesodoo/odoo#79082
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
In the event app, we have few email templates ('event.type') defined
in the data file so that when app is installed, user can have some basic
information readily available.
When needed, this data records are updated in few dependent modules
to provide more meaning to them. However, if these data records are
deleted, and someone tries to install it's dependent modules, it will
throw traceback because `<record>` tag won't be able to find the
linked record.
This commit makes the installation process more robust for such
modules by using write method with help of `<function>` tag, so
that if the record is available, it will be updated otherwise
no traceback will be thrown.
TaskID-2584092
closesodoo/odoo#80826
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Purpose is to have a common event class for users and useful stuff (customers,
products, ...) but lessen usage of common test data through sub modules.
Indeed having a "global event type" test data updated in various addons is
actually complicated to maintain.
Sub add-ons are updated to use mainly the ``EventCase`` test class holding
users and side data. Data specific to those modules (event type with some
specific configuration notably) is created and used in tests in the given
module only, and not through generic event_type_complex and event_0 test
data anymore.
With this commit tests are more localized to their add-on and modifying data
in a given add-on has less chances to have unwanted side effect in other event
submodules unit tests.
Task-2703285 (Event performance improvements)
Task-2703289 (Event testing and coverage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#81068
Purpose
=======
Give the user a better experience when handling events by removing
useless views and using coherent names of fields.
Specifications
==============
Add placeholders in multiple fields, change names in event_event module
to be more consistent with each other, remove and add filters/measures
in events and tracks.
Task-2646692
closesodoo/odoo#77389
Related: odoo/enterprise#21294
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
After some analyze on a lot of customer databases, seems like most of the time
their are performance probleme, and big store, it is due to a lot of big file
uploaded without reason. E.g. barcode, photo, ... a small one will be enough.
Now, we decided (in stable) to auto resize these pictures to 1920x1920px
by default and compress it with a quality of 80 when the source is bigger.
You can bypass this behaviour in your specific use case,
using a context key: 'image_no_postprocess' set to True.
You can disable the resize (and quality implicitely)
using an icp: 'base.image_autoresize_max_px' set to '0'.
You can change the default resize (1920x1920) format using an icp:
'base.image_autoresize_max_px' set to '<width>x<height>' (e.g. '1024x768')
You can change the default quality (80) using an icp:
'base.image_autoresize_quality' with a value between 0 and 100 where 0 skip it.
You can change the type of file that will be post process using icp:
'base.image_autoresize_extensions' (subtype of the mimetype comma separated).
Api of image has not be changed in this commit, only refactored to allow to
work with image directly without the need to encode/Decode in base64 the raw.
We decide to keep 1920x1920 by default instead of 1080p to avoid to resize
portrait picture in 1080px and stay consistent with field image_1920 that
return a 1920px image for width or height whatever the orientation.
+ fix some lint diff for ci style in master
closesodoo/odoo#78556
X-original-commit: d9ce0507960f247e1187baf7bd8399f90be237aa
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
This commit removes all the 'extend' initially introduced to avoid code
repetition and ensure visual consistency across Bootstrap and Owl dropdowns.
Despite achieving the desired results, using 'extend' in this context
was seriously impacting the bundle generation time, probably due to an
underestimated amount of Apps' legacy-code applied on these elements.
In order to achieve the same results, the chosen strategy is to add
Bootstrap default classes directly into Owl dropdowns.
Also, it moves code related to bootstrap dropdown in 'webclient.scss',
leaving 'core/dropdown/dropdown.scss' for Owl code only.
Due to the discrepancies between Bootstrap and Owl html
structure, the '.dropdown-item' class could not have been added
directly to Owl's '.o_dropdown_item' itself, without refactoring
the Dropdown component structure.
// ==== Bootstrap 4.6 default Structure ================================
<div class="dropdown-menu">
<button class="dropdown-item" type="button">Action</button>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="#">Another action</a>
</div>
// ==== OWL default Structure before this commit =======================
<ul class="o_dropdown_menu">
<li class="o_dropdown_item">
<span>Action</span>
</li>
<li class="o_dropdown_item">
<a href="#">Another action</a>
</li>
</ul>
// ==== OWL Structure after this commit ================================
<div class="o-dropdown--menu dropdown-menu">
<span class="dropdown-item">Action</span>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="#">Another action</a>
</div>
// ==== web.assets_backend.css Bundle Generation Comparison ============
With all modules installed (enterprise edition over runbot):
Before this commit, bundle took ~2.5s and ~4s to generate and weighted ~322kB (~2.5MB uncompressed)
After this commit, it takes between ~1.2s and ~1.6s and weights ~257kB (~1.6MB uncompressed)
closesodoo/odoo#77649
X-original-commit: 84715436d87bb05b421bc9ccaacda67d07571690
Related: odoo/enterprise#21370
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Stefano Rigano <sri@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: François Georis <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Jinja as a templating engine was problematic in differents respect:
- introduce external dependency to Odoo (less controll)
- add another templating mechanism in the stack
- specific feature in qweb cannot be reused
- difficulty in rendering easily editable templates
- more knowledge required with no betterment
By replacing jinja with qweb we can now build tools to edit a qweb
that will work with the previously jinja encoded document
(essentially `mail.template` records).
There is a catch however. Some email fields (eg. email_to) used jinja
syntax for rendering dynamic variables (ie. ${object.something} and
${object.something_that_should_not_be_escaped | safe}).
We still want user to use dynamic variables for some char fields (eg.
subject, from, to, ...). We made a new rendering engine called
"inline_template" that will render an expression enclosed by `{{` and
`}}`.
To be able to edit the templates from the backend interface, a
plugin to the Odoo editor has been made for seamlessly edit the
document.
This qweb plugin includes:
- make dynamic variables (eg. `<t t-out="variable"/>`) not editable
(for preventing the user to shoot himself in the foot)
- group and hide related logical branching (ie. t-if, t-elif, and t-else)
in order to see only one at once
- a floating select input to switch visibility of a particular logical
branching
Task-27033
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@68182baff4
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77377
Currently, while creating tracks on the fly from an event, we can
simply set the name, which is not enough, we should also be able
to set date, and display proper placeholder for the name field.
This commit add a new quick create form view for the track kanban
view, so that user can simply choose the track name and date and
can simply add tracks on the fly.
Note that it is mandatory to set event on the track. If we are
within an event, the default event is already available in context
so we don't display it while adding a track within an event.
But we are not within an event, we simply display 'event_id' on
quick create card so that use can select an event and create
track on the fly.
TaskId-2635390
closesodoo/odoo#76250
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
We clean various graph archs taking into consideration that:
- the default type of a graph is "bar".
- a bar chart is by default stacked.
- the field attributes type="row" and type="col" does not make sense for
a graph view (since its implementation was separated from the pivot
implementation a long time ago))
- the boolean attributes should now take 1 or 0 as value (but the other
values are accepted for retrocompatibility).
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76065
In the track stage model, the fields 'is_accepted' and 'is_done' of the
track stage model are not self-explanatory enough. The user may not know
that those fields will have an impact on the visibility and the accessibility
of the tracks in the frontend. We will then rename those fields and update
their use to make it clearer.
Rules are now
* a published track is always displayed in agenda, tracks list and page
view, whatever its state;
* a track in a 'is_visible_in_agenda' stage (replacing 'is_accepted') is
always displayed in agenda and tracks list. Its page view access is based
on ACLs: aka: published = everyone, unpublished = for event users only;
* a track in a 'is_fully_accessible' stage (replacing 'is_done') is
automatically published when entering this stage, allowing its full
display
This means that
* tracks may be displayed in agenda and tracks list to public without giving
access to their page;
* easy way to publish tracks at once is achieved by moving them in batch in
a fully accessible stage;
* early-disclosure of tracks is achieved by publishing them manually whatever
the stage;
* easy removal of track page view is achieved by unpublishing them manually
whatever the stage;
Page view still relies on ACLs, and therefore on published flag automatically
set when entering "fully accessible" stage.
task-2504216
COM PR: odoo/odoo#69585
UPG PR: odoo/upgrade#2408
In order to make the kanban view more customizable, we will allow the
administrators to give a custom legend on the event track stages. With
the custom legends, the employees should be able to find their way more
easily especially if the company uses its own internal processes.
The custom description of the track stage will appear in a tooltip when
the user hovers the corresponding kanban column and does not move for a
few seconds. It can help people understand the role of each track stage.
In order to ease track management, tags are now searchable directly from
track view.
task-2504216
COM PR: odoo/odoo#69585
UPG PR: odoo/upgrade#2408
On the website, the exhibitor cards only shows a logo. If the visitors
clicks on a logo, the visitors will be redirected to the website of the
corresponding exhibitor. If no website has been set and the logo of the
exhibitor is rather abstract, the visitors may not be able to recognize
and identify the exhibitor.
To provide more information about the exhibitor, we will add a small
popover that will be opened when the visitor clicks on the logo. The
popover will contain the following information:
- The name of the exhibitor
- The website of the exhibitor
Other information are considered as private and can be added through
customization if this fits specific use cases.
task-2504216
COM PR: odoo/odoo#69585
UPG PR: odoo/upgrade#2408
Currently, track proposals are submitted through an HTML form with an "action"
attribute, which requires that the associated route returns a redirect
response.
However, redirecting to a different page comes with its set of issues.
Indeed, when the track is submitted, the user that just submitted the track no
longer has access to it (because it's not published).
In 157a1d77058da97954edc9efba6ab9f43c7d13a2
We attempted to resolve this issue by checking if the partner set on the track
is the same as the partner set on the website.visitor record.
However, this does not handle every use cases since when specifying different
contact information, we create a different res.partner, making the check fail.
In this commit, we rework the track proposal submission to use AJAX instead.
This allows to dynamically show a "success" message while staying on the same
page, removing the need for redirects and "complex" ACLs checks.
While the main goal of this change is to avoid the need for that security
check, it also has a few additional minor advantages:
- Slightly faster UI, as you don't have to wait for a full page reload
- Fewer routes to maintain
- Easier and more thorough validation handling (current code returns a ugly
error page if validation fails server-side)
- Code makes a bit more sense, as we don't have a template that varies from
"form" to "success message" depending on the presence of a "track" variable
Task-2618734
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2722closesodoo/odoo#74848
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
This commit does not change anything, it simply applies linting on the track
proposal JS files to match our current guidelines.
This is done as preliminary work since we are going to change the way track
proposals are submitted (from POST request to ajax POST).
Task-2618734
Jérémy Hennecart (jeh)