*: website_blog, website_event, website_forum, website_hr_recruitment,
website_sale, website_slides
As indicated by previous commits, new custom list views are created to
fill the "Content" area of the main website menu with key app models:
blog posts, events, forum posts, jobs, products and courses (+ some in
the enterprise version, see related commit).
Those list views will act as the page manager one: a click on an item
redirect to the website iframe, the create button acts as creating a
record via the "+ New" systray button while being on the iframe, the
delete button will in the future allow to know the page that mentions
the related object before deleting it, etc etc.
task-2889981
closesodoo/odoo#98937
Related: odoo/enterprise#30782
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
*: website_blog, website_forum
A "page manager" list view will be created for key models in other
apps. This commit moves blog and forum views to a dedicated file to
save some history for the future introduction of that "page manager"
list view.
task-2889981
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98937
*: base, mrp_account, product, mail, website_blog, website_event,
website_forum
This commit improves the button that allows to go to the backend view of
an object when you are on its corresponding page on the website. The
button is more visible and the user can see which object he is going to
edit. Note that this commit also:
- Changes the access key to translate a website page to ALT + T.
- Adds a new access key to edit an object in backend with ALT + E.
- Removes the possibility to duplicate a blog post (but this feature
will be reintroduced later for all models, generically) **.
**: Note that the duplication of blog posts actually had a mistake:
The controller to create a new blog post has been added with [1] where
it has been decided to not be a follower of the blog posts at their
creation. A new controller has been added by [2] to be able to duplicate
a blog post, to be consistent with [1], here also the user does not
become a follower of the new blog post (the copy). So far, so good.
Finally, [3] has changed the blog post creation controller so that the
user who creates the blog post is a follower of the new blog post.
Unfortunately the same change was not made for the duplicate controller,
which is a mistake. There is no reason to be a follower of the newly
created blog posts when you go through the add blog post controller but
not when you go through the duplication controller. The behaviors should
be consistent and there is no reason for there to be a difference.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/4c3b516a7b988d758a67ff19242e8ed0837d756c
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/fe40538aff2b65f7719840c8e2d6e51e858f560f
[3]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/4bf9dc4078a5ca413539a6fd16400fd5aad46907
task-2889929
closesodoo/odoo#97353
Related: odoo/enterprise#30075
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: qsm-odoo <qsm@odoo.com>
*: website_blog, website_event, website_forum, website_livechat,
website_sale, website_sale_slides, website_slides, website_slides_forum
The goal of this commit is to adapt the website "new content" form
views to OWL.
Follows the merge of the "website in backend" task at [1].
[1]: 31cc10b91d
task-2687506
Part-of: odoo/odoo#96346
* = test_website, website_blog, website_event, website_forum, website_sale,
website_slides
`_search_get_details` extension in other modules can now be performed with
fewer lines of code by updating a search type-to-model mapping, without the
need for method override.
This will also have the benefit of slightly reducing the call stack length,
avoiding some unnecessary `if` statements and list lookups at runtime.
Task-2957361
closesodoo/odoo#98423
Related: odoo/enterprise#30946
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
* = blog, forum, slides
For performance reasons, allow to increment multiple fields of the same record
within the same query.
With python tests.
Task-2663320
Part of odoo/odoo#79615
Just doing the summer file cleaning. Move mail data into files named based on
their model, easing maintenance and searching for those data.
Spotted during Task-2207626 (Rating: Delay rating notification to ease feedback)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98661
If you delete a tag, but still have some link to this one, you arrive on
a 404 /blog/tag/.
We decide to redirect to the blog post without tag instead.
What is probably the expected behaviour for most customers.
closesodoo/odoo#98087
X-original-commit: 041ad20824e57b0850d7c74ca2ddbeab7f38990b
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten <jke@odoo.com>
Only for terms containing Credit Note and expenses
closesodoo/odoo#97840
X-original-commit: 1754b094a66476a0bdb29fe60dc5583c03336c3f
Related: odoo/enterprise#30262
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Before this commit field `visits` was not displayed on form view.
With this commit, Field is now readonly at model level and
added on form view.
closesodoo/odoo#74336
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
As a stable fix, to not touch XML templates and break existing
translations, the ⌙ character was automatically replaced by └ which
makes more sense for the usecase and should work properly in all
browsers. The ⌙ character is actually rendered mirrored on Windows 11
Chrome (and others) as the font used for those unicode characters is
left to the browser. We could force a font of our own but it's probably
not worth it.
A better solution with a SVG or CSS solution has to be done in master.
That would unify the look of the symbol across all browsers and
also prevent special characters to be placed in translations.
With this forward-port commit, we'll start first by using └ via a CSS
rule. Three new classes have been created: o_we_sublevel_1,
o_we_sublevel_2 and o_we_sublevel_3. Adding any of them on a widget
automatically adds the └ character. Then choosing 1, 2 or 3 controls
the indentation, which was previously controlled by placing the  
HTML entity directly inside strings.
This commit also takes the opportunity to fix some of those level
indentations (sometimes 2 was used instead of 1 or 1 was used instead of
2, etc) and also review some related labels.
closesodoo/odoo#97361
X-original-commit: e5d45643598671077ade7e41f0dbfe2b502665b8
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
> Media query mixins parameters have changed for a more logical approach
> media-breakpoint-down() uses the breakpoint itself instead of the next
> breakpoint (e.g., media-breakpoint-down(lg) instead of
> media-breakpoint-down(md) targets viewports smaller than lg).
> Similarly, the second parameter in media-breakpoint-between() also
> uses the breakpoint itself instead of the next breakpoint (e.g.,
> media-between(sm, lg) instead of media-breakpoint-between(sm, md)
> targets viewports between sm and lg).
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/5.1/migration/#sass
Task ID: 2766483
Part-of: odoo/odoo#95450
From [1]:
> Dropped all .badge-* color classes for background utilities
> (e.g., use .bg-primary instead of .badge-primary).
We now have to manage constrast for some badge. It's why we
add 'text-dark' at some point.
Note:
Due to the backport of 'text-bg-#{theme}', we can use this to
avoid to use 'text-dark'.
Ref:
[1] https://getbootstrap.com/docs/5.1/migration/#badges
Task ID: 2766483
Part-of: odoo/odoo#95450
*: website, website_blog, website_crm, website_event, website_forum,
website_hr_recruitment, website_mass_mailing, website_sale,
website_sale_loyalty, website_slides
This commit adds the current website displayed view xmlid outside of the
iframe, on its container, so that the tours registered with
registerThemeHomepageTour can continue to prepend their triggers with
the view xml id.
Introduce registerEditionTour: this function will allow tour maker to
more easily register a tour that needs to start in the iframe's backend
and go in edit mode.
See merge commit for more information.
task-2687506
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Vray <bvr@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Younn Olivier <yol@odoo.com>
*: web, web_editor, web_unsplash, website_blog, website_event,
website_forum, website_hr_recruitment, website_links,
website_livechat, website_sale, website_slides, website_twitter
This commit fixes two issues related to the loading the wysiwyg and
editor assets.
The media dialog components are now defined in a new assets_media_dialog
bundle, to make them available both in the frontend (needed to post
comments on the forum for example), and in the backend (used in the
context of the wysiwyg edition or in the seo dialog). Ideally, The media
dialog component would lazy load its own bundle, but right now, it is
not possible when used in a ComponentWrapper.
The wysiwyg assets are now completely loaded in the frontend, after
creating the website root, when the frontend is displayed in an iframe.
It would be better if the frontend loads only what it needs of the
wysiwyg assets (some editor classes and the drop zones css), an
improvement would be to create an assets_wysiwyg_frontend or
assets_wysiwyg_minimal bundle.
The website edition components are moved to the assets_editor bundle.
For now, this bundle is included in the backend and the edition menus
are hidden from the users that are not website publishers. Ideally, the
client action would lazy load the assets_editor, only if the user is a
website publisher.
Many optimizations regarding assets will be done post-merge.
See merge commit for more information.
task-2687506
*: website_blog, website_hr_recruitment, website_sale, website_slides
This commit changes the redirections from the controllers, that were
always redirecting to the frontend before.
Now, we want to open the website in its backend client action most of
the time (for example, when clicking on the "go to website" buttons on
the form views).
For that, a new get_client_action_url is introduced on the website
model.
See merge commit for more information.
task-2687506
The goal of this commit is to add the 'Page Properties' dialog using
the 'website.page' form view.
The PagePropertiesDialogWrapper was updated to work on pages listView
(to clone/remove pages).
A boolean field 'is_in_menu' was added to control if page is in menu on
page properties dialog. This should be refactored later as a wizard.
See merge commit for more information.
task-2687506
*: website_blog, website_event, website_forum, website_links,
website_livechat, website_slides, survey, web_editor
This commit removes the website navbar root widget, as the edition is
now handled in the backend through the client action and custom menus.
It removes associated widgets and their css.
See merge commit for more information.
task-2687506
*: mass_mailing, web, web_editor, website_blog, website_event,
website_event_meet, website_livechat, website_sale, website_twitter,
base
This commit does 3 things:
- Adapt existing code so that the editor can be run outside of its
editing element. Prior to this commit, it was expected that the
editor would be attached to the element it was currently editing.
This needs to change however as the editable is now inside an
iframe for the website edition. mass_mailing already had a similar
approach but the editor was started within the iframe.
With these changes, the editor is alongside the iframe, editing
the content that's inside it. This allows multiple features
such as reloading the iframe while keeping the editor visible and
resizing the iframe for a mobile preview.
- Adds logic to the wysiwyg_adapter so that it can undertake
the duty of the previous widget sytem. The wysiwyg existed not only
in the legacy widget system, but most importantly in the frontend.
One of the duties of this adapter is to send events inside the
iframe when it is necessary to reach the frontend public widget
(i.e. widgets_start_request)
- Removes existing SCSS that is no longer used.
See merge commit for more information.
task-2687506
This commit adapts "customize show" options from the website blog module
by creating new options available in edit mode.
See merge commit for more information.
task-2710582
*: website_blog, website_event, website_forum, website_livechat,
website_sale, website_sale_slides, website_slides,
website_slides_forum
The goal of this commit is to add dialogs to create new website content
using a 'target:new' action on the form view and an overridable
"website" form controller.
See merge commit for more information.
task-2687506
*: website_blog, website_customer, website_event_exhibitor,
website_event_track, website_hr_recruitment, website_sale,
website_slides
See merge commit for more information.
task-2687506
*: website_blog, website_event, website_forum, website_hr_recruitment,
website_livechat, website_sale, website_slides
The NewContentModal component is added. It displays tiles, which will
install a module if not already installed, or perform an action defined
by the module otherwise. So that modules can patch that component to
define an action when installed (for example, website_sale will handle
the logic of creating a new product), the elements to displayed and
their state (NOT_INSTALLED, INSTALLING, INSTALLED) are listed in the
state of the component.
A key 'isDisplayed' is added on the new content elements that should not
be displayed to the user, depended on his security groups.
By default, the new content elements are displayed to the system user.
See merge commit for more information.
task-2687506
*: web_editor, web_unsplash, website_event, website_blog,
website_event_meet, website_forum, website_links, website_livechat,
website_sale_slides, website_slides
With [1], many files will move as the website UI is moved in the
backend. This commit moves all the static files (JS/CSS/XML) to their
final destination without modifying them, in an attempt to preserve
some history and ease some forward-ports.
After this commit, everything works as before as the files are simply
renamed and the references to them adapted.
However, technically, many files will actually be split into multiple
files by the work made with [1]. While it is theoretically possible to
preserve history over multiples files, this would require inner merge
commits, which does not go well with robodoo. In those cases, the "main"
file of the split was chosen. Mainly, 4 worth-noticing splits were
detected (and so the history moved only to the first file):
move: addons/web_editor/static/src/js/wysiwyg/widgets/media.js
to: addons/web_editor/static/src/components/media_dialog/file_selector.js
- addons/web_editor/static/src/components/media_dialog/search_media.js
- addons/web_editor/static/src/components/media_dialog/image_selector.js
- addons/web_editor/static/src/components/media_dialog/document_selector.js
- addons/web_editor/static/src/components/media_dialog/icon_selector.js
- addons/web_editor/static/src/components/media_dialog/video_selector.js
move: addons/web_editor/static/src/js/wysiwyg/widgets/upload_progress_toast.js
to: addons/web_editor/static/src/components/upload_progress_toast/upload_progress_toast.js
- addons/web_editor/static/src/components/upload_progress_toast/upload_service.js
move: addons/website/static/src/js/menu/content.js
to: addons/website/static/src/components/dialog/edit_menu.js
- addons/website/static/src/components/dialog/page_properties.js
- addons/website/static/src/components/wysiwyg_adapter/page_options.js
- addons/website/static/src/js/website_page_list.js
move: addons/website/static/src/js/menu/edit.js
to: addons/website/static/src/components/wysiwyg_adapter/wysiwyg_adapter.js
- addons/website/static/src/systray_items/edit_website.js
- addons/website/static/src/components/editor/editor.js
Notice that as those moves were made post-work and the rest of the work
(80+ commits) rebased on top of it, some commits may remove more than
they should in a moved file to then reimplement some of what was
removed in a later commit... ideally this should have been avoided of
course but keep in mind that the final files are just entirely rewritten
and split as converted to OWL. It seemed however worth it to keep most
of the inner history of the work made here to see step by step what was
done. [1] will obviously be merged with a merge commit, binding the
whole work together.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/89223
task-2687506
Purpose
=======
In message_notify, when called on a recordset, call model methods instead of
base one defined on MailThread. This allows to use internal methods overrides.
Also perform some linting on calls to ``message_notify`` in order to better
spot calls, parameters, ...
Task-2852908
closesodoo/odoo#92868
Related: odoo/enterprise#28038
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
*: website_blog, website_event, website_sale
The "website.snippet.filter" model introduced at [1] was not marked to
have its "name" field to be translated. As those names are shown in the
website editor panel to be able to select a filter, they have to be
translated.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/0e7640b5f22d2bea04bbe22d3189cff7e03af545
opw-2852416
closesodoo/odoo#93074
X-original-commit: fc9e5619331cf22f8605a72907153f9431ca6b15
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
* im_livechat, test_event_full, website_blog, website_crm,
website_event, website_event_track, website_event_track_quiz,
webite_livechat, website_sale
There is 6 main changes in this commit:
1. Using raw SQL Upsert instead of the ORM methods. While raw SQL should
generally be avoided, it makes sense for such a low level behavior which
is impacting every flows.
Indeed, tracking visitors is a generic behavior done on all pages and
controllers. It is important to optimize it to reduce processing time
and SQL Queries.
Benchmark of that change alone:
> Rendering a tracked page improves from ~19.5ms to ~17ms (using `ab`
with 1000 loop) and the requests involved in the tracking process are
reduced from 8 SQL Queries to 3:
- 1 request to upsert the visitor
- 1 request to fetch the visitor data
- 1 request to add the tracking record
2. Adding in that upsert query the `visitor.track` insert, creating both
records in one go, bringing the query count from 3 to 2.
3. Refactoring of the `parent_id` behavior that was introduced in stable
with [1]. The purpose was to keep track of multiple visitor linked to a
same user to merge the tracking together. Especially useful for tracking
a same visitor on different devices (when logged in).
Only one visitor was kept as active, others would be archived and their
tracks would be set/moved to the main partner.
Removing those duplicate visitor was not possible because those archived
duplicated visitor were holding the devices notification push token.
Since [2], those token were moved to their own table, all related to the
main visitor.
We can then now safely remove those duplicate visitors after merging
their track to the main visitor. Thus, the `parent_id` field is no more
useful. Removing it removes a layer of complexity.
Note that thanks to this part, the `active` field can also be removed.
4. Deeper functionnal change, inspired from Plausible: The access_token
is no more stored in a cookie but is the result of a hashing method
based on <IP Adress, User Agent>.
The reason behind that change is that, in an upcoming refactoring,
sessions won't be stored anymore unless absolutely needed (login, add to
cart..). It will also ship a no cookies policy, trying to get rid of all
cookies.
This change is bringing some functional changes:
- Since the IP is included in the hash to generate the token, it means
that:
A. If an anonymous user switch IP (eg from 4G to wifi), it is
considered as a new visitor.
B. If 2 anonymous users with the exact same user agent (same browser,
same browser version, same exact os or phone) are on the same IP,
those will be considered as the same visitor.
- Since the request host is not included in the hash, it means that
visiting a DB from 2 differents URLs (domain and/or ip) on the same
device and same browser will result in a shared visitor.
It shouldn't imply any issue as this is A. not wrong and B. mostly
used for tests.
As all this is only related to non logged in user, it shouldn't be a
real issue as anonymous visitors are not supposed to be meant to be
business critical, even if we use them for "a bit more" than simple
analytics data.
5. The access_token is now replaced by the partner_id once the user logs
in, so:
- We don't need to either search on the partner_id field or the
access_token field (depending if the user is logged in or not), we can
only use the access_token row/field to do both.
- On logout, everything works out of the box as the access_token will be
regenerated since there is no partner_id anymore.
- On login, if an access_token matches the user's partner_id, that
visitor is returned.
If there is no such token, a new visitor is created for that partner_id.
In both 2 cases, tracks are moved to that visitor and the anonymous
visitor is removed.
- We can remove the code that was in charge of checking if the
access_token / visitor cookie was wrong (coming from another user eg,
different user login on same device). Indeed, such collision is not
possible anymore as the access_token automatically match the logged in
user.
- We can remove the code that was in charge of checking if the
access_token / visitor cookie was wrong (coming from a logged in user
while the current visitor is not loggedin). Such collision is not
possible anymore as the access_token is (re)generated as an anonymous
token (hash) when not logged in.
6. There is no more check to prevent a track to be created if there was
already a track for that URL in the last 30 minutes.
While this can easily be re-introduced (one CTE on the upsert), it was
adding ~100ms (from ~20 to ~110ms) to the request on a big database as
Odoo where there is ~100 millions tracks and ~100 millions visitors.
It has been validated that it was not a real issue as it is not
fundamentally wrong. If a visitor visited 20 times a product or a
specific page in that short amount of time, you might want to know that
because the user is most likely interested by it.
Changes (1+2), 3, (4+5) and 6 are all independant from each other and
could have existed on their own.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/c6b8a44b970a46dcd87a4e2cb1ad52fa340b209f
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/16781/commits/f75090fe8b42484e89e933976e8441d2f5eb9415
task-2867045
closesodoo/odoo#87857
Related: odoo/enterprise#28004
Related: odoo/upgrade#3566
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Using lazy values allows you to not do query when the content is not
displayed or if it is already cached. Adding `t-cache` only reduces
render time, but combining it with lazy values saves browses, computes
and query.
Thus for the `/shop` page the page is displayed in 60ms (before: 250ms).
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88276
Remove most values uselessly specified because giving the same value as
the default one (see _DEFAULT_MANIFEST in odoo/modules/module.py)
* auto_install is Falsy by default
* author is Odoo SA by default
* summary & description are empty strings by default
* application is False by default
* test, demo, depends and data are empty lists by default
This will reduce noise/inconsistencies between manifests specifications,
simplify analysis of manifests content, ...
closesodoo/odoo#90209
Related: odoo/enterprise#26807
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Current behavior:
When adding a "Heading" in the first 200 characters of a blog with
/Heading, the short description of the blog preview would have
unwanted stars (*) around the heading
Steps to reproduce:
- Create a blog article
- In the first 200 characters of the blog use a heading (e.g. /Heading1)
- Go back to the blog list, the description of the new article contains
unwanted stars (*)
opw-2798595
closesodoo/odoo#88352
X-original-commit: 6cb57d2f1ffb0adceaa3199cc0bf5140589d9328
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Since [1] when the blog layout was refactored between 12.0 and 13.0, a
negative word spacing was introduced in the blog post snippet with the
big pictures layout.
This commit removes this negative word spacing.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/bb0cdec4594fab8c22265ed8af0c2d431a263b72
task-2822436
closesodoo/odoo#88729
X-original-commit: c0e86be9074a0d72e6119801c7992232e9e32068
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Socias (bso) <bso@odoo.com>
*: test_website, website_blog (test perfs)
An error regarding tests was not catch during httpocalypse [1] review.
The test query counts were lowered in website by 2 everywhere, but it
shouldn't have as there were no SQL perf improvement from this
refactoring regarding website.
The query count actually decreased because the test-only SQL Savepoints
got divided by 2, probably thanks to a low level test improvement in
the PR.
But outside of tests, there were no SQL Query gained.
This should have been reflected in the `EXTRA_REQUEST` variable
instead.
Before:
Savepoint > Rollback > Savepoint > [Actual SQL Queries] > Rollback
After:
Savepoint > [Actual SQL Queries] > Rollback
It is important to fix it because:
1. (Minor) There is a de-sync between the query count in the test and
the actual query count (in the logs outside of tests), making it
hard to figure.
2. (Major) Some controller got then wrongly lowered to 0 query counts
instead of 2. An incoming PR in master would then make those tests
expects negative query counts, which doesn't make any sense.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/78857
Note that the exact commit can't be found by bisect as those don't work
on their own, DB can't be started due to circular import.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87856
There were inconsistencies in the calls to `_render`.
* the view context could contain information that misled developers.
Indeed, the context and value of the view are not supposed to be found
in the rendering. Thus by calling `ir.qweb` with the name of the
template, we ensure that there is no unwanted information and in
addition the cache key is that of the name of the template which saves
a query.
* the context used for rendering was modified by a method on
`ir.ui.view`, except this is not information used by this model. There
is now a `_prepare_environment` method residing on `ir.qweb`. This
method allows to modify the value dictionary as well as the context in
which the rendering will be done. This preparation of the data as well
as my security check is done only once per rendering. This also saves
some queries
* Freeze options for rendering were inconsistent. It could be that
options on which rendering depends were not part of the cache key. Thus,
depending on the user who generated the generation of the rendering
function, there was or was not information in the template. For example
for automatic branding. This is no longer possible, because it is the
context that is used. The options serving as a cache key are only
recorded for information (for the profiling system for example). A
simplification of the `ir.qweb.field` models could be made.
The report rendering and call `ir.qweb` instead of `ir.ui.view`.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#85110
Issue
-----
When website is installed, the rendering of template uses a side effect
of the ORM cache (cache shared between sudoed env vs non-sudoed env) and
the fields prefetching feature to work correctly.
The `self.visibility` in (`_handle_visibility`, website/ir_ui_view.py)
is done in sudo mode, then it will fetch all prefetchable fields and put
them in the cache (that will be read in non-sudo mode in the render of
the template). Another example of issue related to this:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/83341.
Because of this, the fields of mixin `website.seo.metadata` were forced
to be prefetchable (the default for translate is to be not prefetchable
since https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/82896), which causes a useless
LEFT JOIN on "ir_translation" in most of business flow.
Fix
---
Remove the `prefetch=True` on mixin fields, and add a extra read to fill
the cache in case of website rendering. It also allows to read these
fields at the same time.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#85220
* website, website_blog (perf)
If the source values is only composed of empty elements (list of `None`
values), don't try to translate it, as there is nothing to translate
anyway.
While the translation method being called (xml_translate,
html_translate) won't be costly as they will return instantly if the
provided value is falsy, there is still an SQL Query made to get the
callable translation method, which we won't actually use.
This commit avoids that query if we already know we won't do anything
with the translation method.
task-2774979
X-original-commit: e1eb5a6e1610a9550a59ba229a83b9e70e10aa88
Part-of: odoo/odoo#85456
* test_website
The `nocache` URL param was introduced with [1] which allows to bypass
the cache when serving a page.
Bypassing that cache, despite not being the most common flow, was done
in the perf tests since that commit. Ultimately, it was not testing
real use cases anymore (despite still being useful as it would still
prevent perf killer feature to be merged).
This commit ensures the perf tests are also tested with cache.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/cbf8d3b3047c94a2ff7fb197bbae92a402e0b58b
task-2774979
closesodoo/odoo#85261
X-original-commit: 5d44d890021cfc7767daa1f366e636288e84f1f6
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
This commit is the 14th commit of a comprehensive refactor of our HTTP
framework. See odoo/odoo#78857 for complete historic, discussions and
rationnals.
* `request.uid = x` => `request.update_env(user=x)`.
* `request.context = x` => `request.update_env(context=x)`.
* `request.context = dict(request.context, x=y)`
=> `request.update_context(x=y)`.
* `request.cr = None` => `request.cr.close()`.
* `http.mono_db()` => `request.db`.
* `http.dispatch_rpc()` => `service.dispatch_rpc()`.
* `@service.model.check` => `service.model.retrying()`.
* `request.endpoint`
=> `env['ir.http']._match(request.httprequest.path)[0].endpoint`.
* `request.routing_iteration `=> `removed`.
* `request.jsonrequest` => `request.dispatcher.jsonrequest`.
Note that `request.params` is now set much later in the process. If you
are in a situation where you values from the query string or the
http body you can use `request.get_http_params()`.
Note that using the new `request.future_response`, it is possible to
add headers and cookies on the response object before the response
object is initialized. Please note that headers/cookies saved on
the future response will NOT be injected in case of error.
PR: odoo#78857
Task: 2571224
The field prefetching mechanism was poorly customizable. Before this,
we could only tell if a field was prefetched with other fields or not at
all. We have no way to inform the framework, like: "When I need data of
that field, prefetch these other fields, which are likely be used in the
same transaction".
From now on, the `prefetch` attribute is used as a grouping key for
prefetching fields. When a field is fetched, all the fields with the
same value for `prefetch` are taken for prefetching.
For example, consider a small set of fields that are rarely used, except
for one flow A using them. You want to prefetch those fields only in
the flow A, and you want to fetch them in a single query. With the new
feature, simply set `prefetch=A` for some string `A` on those fields,
and they will be grouped for prefetching.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83818
Issue
-----
When website is installed, the rendering of template uses a side effect
of the ORM cache (cache shared between sudoed env vs non-sudoed env) and
the fields prefetching feature to work correctly.
The `self.visibility` in (`_handle_visibility`, website/ir_ui_view.py)
is done in sudo mode, then it will fetch all prefetchable fields and put
them in the cache (that will be read in non-sudo mode in the render of
the template). Another example of issue related to this:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/83341.
Because of this, the fields of mixin `website.seo.metadata` were forced
to be prefetchable (the default for translate is to be not prefetchable
since https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/82896), which causes a useless
LEFT JOIN on "ir_translation" in most of business flow.
Fix
---
Remove the `prefetch=True` on mixin fields, and add a extra read to fill
the cache in case of website rendering. It also allows to read these
fields at the same time.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83818
Reduces load_menus answer size by 32% (between 20kb and 200kb savings
for the initial loading of the backend, depending on the number of apps
installed). Support for SVG icons in the web client for menus/apps.
Reduced PNG icons for apps list (8 bits PNG instead of 24 as our icons
don't need more colors as they are flat designs)
closesodoo/odoo#84280
Related: odoo/enterprise#24200
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
With [1] in 13.0, the blog post layouts were reviewed. At the same time,
new demo data was introduced. By default, with demo data, you have now
two different blogs. The JS tour was adapted so that when you create a
new blog post, a step explains you have to select the blog you want to
create the post in with the dialog that opens. The main problem that
this PR aims to solve is that all users start without demo data and thus
with only one blog... so with the current tour, the users are blocked
very early in the tour as they do not have the dialog to select the blog
in which to create their blog post. The simple solution that was chosen
is to set the step as "auto", meaning it will only be used in runned
tours (like via python tests), allowing to still test the blog selection
dialog in our python test. Users will not be guided via a tip for this
specific modal but this is not a problem as this is very straightforward
to understand in the case the user explicitely created multiple blogs
before creating blog posts.
This commit also review commit merged at [2] which made that python test
more robust by not relying on the demo data. That was here improved with
explanations.
However, allowing the tour to go further than the blog post creation for
the user... revealed that the rest of the tour was still blocking the
user. The very next step is to modify the blog post title. That step was
simply not possible to consume. Indeed the tour system asks for a click
event on the title... which is never detected because our old editor
removes all click handlers on that specific top-level editable area. The
cleanest way of fixing that is actually to not wait for a click but wait
that the user actually types text. For this purpose a feature was
introduced in 14.0 with [3] (even if unfortunately, that commit was not
well split). Unfortunately again... that 14.0 feature is currently buggy
during test tours as choosing the "input" consumeEvent alongside the
"text" run method... changes the behavior of that "text" run method when
the affected element is a contenteditable element. That should be fixed
but this will be done in a further update. Meanwhile, this commit
chooses to use the consumeEvent 'mouseup' which circles around both
issues.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/bb0cdec4594fab8c22265ed8af0c2d431a263b72
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f16f2e212a30352ead86c2f876be02b5c5e23b07
[3]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/a34cd7c662b3753d630d83793ffcb53b4a0a92d2
Bug revealed by testing task-2728994
closesodoo/odoo#83721
X-original-commit: ca82efe0c7b9a5e98d5c9623b3ae0f1b88fc8091
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit is to make ``get_access_action`` private as it is not
necessary to expose it directly. Website management is also made explicit
using a ``force_website`` parameter instead of relying on context key of the
same name. This allows to better understand the method code flow.
Contains also some code fix / improvements :
* Website forum: update code to better skip the frontend redirection if the
forum is not active and frontend is not forced;
* Website slides: respect force website parameter in redirection;
Task-2710804 (Mail: Clean Mail.Thread API)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
PURPOSE
Global purpose is to rename some methods and add some docstrings to clean
API of notification methods used in mail thread. Notably use _notify_thread
prefix for main methods, and _notify_by_'mean' for tool sub-methods.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove unused arguments coming from old implementation and usage. They were
introduced notably for performance reason when cache was more often invalidated
which is not the case anymore. Anyway when parameters are unused it is always
better to remove them.
Remove ``notify_by_email`` parameter in ``_notify_thread``. It is only used
in channels to avoid notifying people of some automated notifications. The
same behavior has been cleanly implemented at odoo/odoo@018820d .
Rename methods, starting with ``_notify(_records)`` to ease their grouping
and understanding. Add some additional prefixes like ``_notify_by_'mean'``
and ``_notify_get_recipients`` for recipients related computation. Add some
docstrings, notably when parameters usage is not clear.
Some linting is also performed in updated actions, just to lessen styling
issues notably on runbot.
This commit should not change anything functionally as it contains only
some renaming and docstrings updates as well as some outdated parameters
removal.
Task-2710804 (Mail: Clean Mail.Thread API)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
Before this commit the tip of the cover selection step was drawn outside
the display.
After this commit the tip of the cover selection step is within the
display.
task-2728994 (was task-2675252)
X-original-commit: 04df7addb41600e458495caa512342e9840e1259
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83692
qsm-odoo