Previously the "call to tender" flow involved creating a
`purchase.requisition` record, creating each RFQ via that record, and
then manually going through each RFQ to compare the prices/dates/etc.
By linking the "call to tender" POs within the POs, we remove an
unnecessary `purchase.requestion` record and makes it easier to track
which RFQs are related to each other as an Alternative RFQ.
On top of this, we add some comparision features to make it easier to
determine the best RFQ, specificially the ability to compare PO lines in
the same view with some visual aids (best price/date colored green +
buttons to check these lines to make them easier to view). We also add
an extra feature to set the qty of selected/non-chosen PO lines to 0 to
aid in the RFQ selection process (only applies to non-confirmed/done/
cancelled POs).
Some other features included with this:
- option to cancel alternative POs when confirming one, which purposely
does not cancel ones that have already been confirmed/completed.
- new wizard for creating alternative POs so user can select whether or
not they want to copy the products/qtys from the original PO.
Important Notes:
- JS Customizations:
- custom many2many widget added so user:
- can click between alternative POs in same window + keep breadcrumb.
This is because all alt POs are interconnected and long breadcrumb
chain is possible (+ we want to avoid windows within windows.) It
is expected that user will be aware that unsaved changes will
auto-save when alt PO is clicked on.
- cannot unlink a PO from itself (this is automagically done during
the write) since this will remove all of its linked POs and might
confuse users.
- custom view js for Comparing Order Lines to help highlight best
options, including ensuring that the best options are still
highlighted after clicking on Choose/Clear buttons (since the best
option can change afterwards, we recalc + update via RPC)
- General implementation warnings:
- Anytime any button/alternative PO is clicked on within a PO, the
form will auto-save. This is due to how the current action service
handles changing views.
- POs created via "Create Alternative" button purposely:
- require a vendor to ensure correct lead times/prices
- show all vendor/product warnings in wizard because we cannot
reproduce the pop-up warning that would occur in the PO when
they are selected. We also purposely block the PO creation when a
blocking warning is set since we cannot remove the values
(especially in the case of a blocking vendor message) from a
newly created PO.
- Technical purchase.order.group model created to help with difficult
management of complicated behaviors:
- unlink from self if a PO is no longer linked to any other POs
- linkages must be symmetric (i.e. linkage PO1 => PO2 must
reflect PO2 => PO1 in their form views)
- don't lose existing linkages (i.e. PO1 => PO2 and PO2 => PO3
should auto-link PO1 => PO3)
These last two behaviors are difficult to do without grouping due to
possibility of remove and adding linkages at the same time. To avoid
complex code to ensure these complexities hold when when creating a
new PO, linkaging to alternatives is not allowed when PO is not yet
saved as a record.
Task: 2695116
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3586closesodoo/odoo#87656
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Instead of having to repeatedly manually call `onchange_quantity` at
different points in the code, it is better to have it be computed
instead.
- Logic is left unchanged,
- onchange calls from other methods are removed, and
- tests are adjusted to properly handle compute. I.e. remove
'date_planned': datetime.today().strftime(DEFAULT_SERVER_DATETIME_FORMAT)
from when PO lines are created since this sometimes resulted in
inconsistent date_planned values for PO line and the PO date_order
(by 1 sec), which could lead to inconsistently created 'date_deadline'
values for stock_moves' created by PO line qty changes. Issue
previously didn't exist because onchange was not always called.
Part of Task: 2695116 (to avoid adding more onchange calls for new
feature)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87656
This commit removes the call for tender feature via a
purchase.requisition. This feature is to be replaced with the ability to
directly compare prices/options of POs/RFQs within a PO to remove extra
steps to compare them. The linkage between POs previously provided by a
purchase.requistion is replaced by the POs being directly linked to each
other. Feature to auto-create call to tenders via a product option is
removed and the user is expected to know/be responsible for when they
should do a call to tender themselves.
All references to old Call to Tenders replaced with Blanket Order, and
we remove/rename the menu items since Blanket Order is now the only
purchase.requisition.type option (we expect minimal customizated types).
Follow-on refactoring to switch purchase.requisition to
purchase.blanket.order to come later. Follow-on refactoring to switch
purchase.requisition to purchase.blanket.order to come later.
Part of Task: 2695116
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3586
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87656
Current behavior:
If you have 2 time the same product in the agreement and you confirm an order with just one line of this item
the 2 lines in the agreement will have the quantity.
Expected behavior:
Only the ordered item should have the quantity applied. In this case the products are compared with the price and
product ID. If you modify the price in the PO the first line of the agreement will have the quantity by default.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a new Purchase Agreement
-Add two lines with the same product
- First line has a scheduled date and price that are different from the second line
2. Generate RFQ and confirm PO with only the first product line and a set quantity
3. Once the PO has been confirmed, going back to the Purchase Agreement, the ordered quantities on both lines will be the same, although the PO was generated for only the first line.
opw-2627898
closesodoo/odoo#79322
X-original-commit: c09a16fb2483e8cec4c9c9e6a936ae2bcc490646
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Engels Robin (roen) <roen@odoo.com>
Setting a default value on a readonly related field without an inverse
method is nonsense. We log some warning when it happens.
We also fixed other cases where a related field has a default value
that overrides the target field's value.
closesodoo/odoo#67762
Related: odoo/enterprise#17313
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <Julien00859@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
1. Activate the 2 language “’English’ , ‘Spanish (AR) / Español (AR)’ ”
2. User -> select the language ‘Spanish (AR) / Español (AR)’
3. Create a new product (Test Product).
4. Create a another product using “Duplicate” function.
5. Rename new product name(Test Product -1)
6. Translate the name ( “Spanish (AR) / Español (AR) : 111 Spanish product “ , “English: English Product” )
7. create a purchase agreement -> select product “111 Spanish product ” -> Save -> confirm -> new quotation.
8. Purchase Quotation -> Order line
Bug:
Description shows “Test Item (copia)”
opw:2582778
closesodoo/odoo#72997
X-original-commit: 947484cd9a082003bfd5b3c2e64d6033b863aa84
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Replace text fields to html fields as we have our own 'OdooEditor'.
Indeed, it gives more options to users in the way they format their
content without weighting too much on the UI
(tools appear on demand and not by default).
Models -> Fields
1) purchase.order -> notes
2) purchase.requisition -> description
Task Id: 2499504
X-original-commit: 43958eff2b9346420104002d628d5ca9225f8090
Related fields are by default readonly and they should be when it
is possible. A editable related field will write on the related
model and will cause extra unwanted write of data. These unwanted write
can cause performance issues in some case (see odoo/odoo#63865).
Then remove the `readonly=False` of some related fields
(where it is useless):
- In 'mrp.workorder' (mrp): `working_state` and `production_date`
should be readonly.
- In 'purchase.order' (purchase): `product_id` should be readonly.
- In 'purchase.order.line' (purchase): `state` should be readonly.
- In 'product.supplierinfo' (purchase_requisition):
`purchase_requisition_id` should be readonly.
- In 'purchase.requisition' (purchase_requisition):
`product_id` should be readonly.
- In 'product.template' (stock):
`route_from_categ_ids` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.move.line' (stock):
`is_initial_demand_editable` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.move' (stock):
`product_tmpl_id` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.production.lot' (stock):
`product_uom_id` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.quant' (stock):
`product_tmpl_id` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.rule' (stock):
`route_sequence` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.change.product.qty' (stock):
`product_variant_count` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.return.picking.line' (stock):
`uom_id` should be readonly and also because it
is forced by `_prepare_stock_return_picking_line_vals_from_move`,
it should be related to the product uom not the one on the move.
task-2424248
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a user with only access rights, Inventory = Administrator, Purchase = user
- Enable feature Purchase order approval in Purchase > Settings
- Agreement Type = Exclusive, lines of Agreement, Quantity of Agreement
- Login as a new created user and navigate to a menu Purchase > Purchase agreement and
create a new Purchase agreement, confirm it
- From the button create two PO (having a total > 5000)
- Cancel one of the PO first and try to approve another one
Bug:
A UserError was riased: You have to cancel or validate every RFQ before closing the purchase requisition.
opw:2368999
closesodoo/odoo#64431
X-original-commit: dfee34b0b9c83beca9aca0b21e7f130ae86c0ee6
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
With this commit, all instances of errors being raised inside
`BaseModel.unlink` overrides are moved into methods decorated with
`api.ondelete` which is safer.
And other reported English mistakes in source string
Courtesy of Transifex translators
And remove leftover from gengo
closesodoo/odoo#59022
X-original-commit: 26efc84c5cac47a2cc83d7b084f8b71528fec6c7
Related: odoo/enterprise#13781
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Clean code. Be more performance oriented.
SPECIFICATIONS
Improvements applied in this commit
* not all() --> any(not) for earlier returns;
* all([generator]) --> all(generator) to avoid unnecessary list casting.
This code construct is better managed by all;
This commit will probably not have a big performance effect on standard
production databases. However each performance and cleaning improvement
is welcomed.
LINKS
Task ID-2328619
closesodoo/odoo#56810
X-original-commit: 1cc6bb1231401ea7f501d2f5b5e9641ec8734850
Related: odoo/enterprise#12802
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Replace wrong usages of any(list|recordset), by any(generator)
to speed up computations, avoiding list creations and/or looping twice on a recordset
for nothing.
any([generator]) => any(generator)
any(filtered) => any(generator)
closesodoo/odoo#55768
Related: odoo/enterprise#12360
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Using a few regex like
\((_\(.*%s.*)(\) % )([\w\[\]][\w .\[\]\(\)'"]*)\)
($1, $3))
Old syntax is still compatible but starts the migration to the new
syntax that catches error.
Several improvements in order to improve user interface are done here.
[IMP] purchase: Prevent create PO&RFQ in calendar
It was possible to create PO's and RFQ's from the calendar view.
The Product Owner wanted to prevent the users from doing so.
[IMP] purchase: Add tooltip to Receipt Date
[FIX] purchase: Align report & stat button data on product form
The use of Last 365 days time_range in the purchase analysis was automatically
excluding today's purchases wich was confusing users as the stat button info
was taking those into account.
Different behaviours were implemented for product template and product product
in the filters that were used which makes no sense.
Use of context_today() instead of datetime.now() in order to take the user's
timezone into account.
[IMP] purchase: Use relevant dates for RFQ's and PO's in calendar view
The date used in order to display RFQs and POs in the calendar was date_planned
which is not mandatory and so not always filled. It has been decided to use the
order_date for the RFQ's and date_approve for PO's.
[IMP] purchase_requisition: Making Agreement selection type more explicit
[IMP] purchase: Show UOM menu only if installed
[IMP] purchase: Add product variant in settings
[IMP] purchase: Remove Favorites predefined filters
[IMP] purchase: Rephrase PO action helper
[IMP] purchase: Allow open/edit Agreement Type
[IMP] purchase: Rephrase RFQ action helper
[IMP] purchase: Remove PO's and RFQ's name from fields in calendar
The Product Owner originally wanted to have a link on the PO name field
that was shown in the calendat popover. As the Edit button already allows
to edit the PO's or RFQ's from the popover it was decided to simply remove
the field (as it was already displayed at the top of the popover)
[IMP] purchase: Open the right view when click on Reporting top menu
Task ID #2196688Closes#47810
Related: odoo/enterprise#9294
Related: odoo/upgrade#961
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
_prepapre_tender_values in only call from purchase_requisition_stock.
It's not needed to have 2 functions, everything should be in
purchase_requisition_stock.
Steps to reproduce:
- install contacts and purchase
- go to purchase > configuration > settings > activate "purchase agreements"
- go to general settings and activate multi-currency
- go to contacts > select a contact > edit > sale & purchase > change the currency
- go to purchase > purchase agreements > create
- change the agreement to a blanket order > add your modified contact as the vendor
Previous behavior:
the currency is not updated
Current behavior:
the currency is updated on vendor change
opw-2177431
closesodoo/odoo#43877
X-original-commit: 764135630949eb01cb2b3a4a19d6ec5b1bd39400
Signed-off-by: mightyjol <jhk-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Use correct company to get fiscal positions and properties
Ensure company used to fetch fiscal positions is always the correct one
when coming from a company restricted model (company_id required, or
related.required).
NB: if the company_id isn't defined, with_company doesn't change the
environment.
purchase: get_fiscal_position doesn't consider company_id ctxt key
others: properties were accessed with potentially the wrong company.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a purchase requistion with type Call For Tender
- Update a line and set the price to zero.
UserError 'You cannot confirm the blanket order without price.' raised.
It happens because the write don't process the same check than create
and don't check if the purchase_requistion is a blanket order or a call
for tender. It also doens't check the current state of the
purchase_requisition.
closesodoo/odoo#39980
Task: 2120211
X-original-commit: 7d69f01477a2d5dd93974737978d7af11cfc8b6d
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Use correct company to get fiscal positions and properties
Ensure company used to fetch fiscal positions is always the correct one
when coming from a company restricted model (company_id required, or
related.required).
purchase: get_fiscal_position doesn't consider company_id ctxt key
others: properties were accessed with potentially the wrong company.
Pre-filter lines based on known products.
Closes#36854
opw-2074824
closesodoo/odoo#37383
X-commit: bd3997b79a075a24afce749474fc32b43ac8c03f
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
When a blanket order is opened, a supplier info is created and should be
used in priority over a regular supplier info with the same values.
That's what rev [0] tried to do but there was some mistakes: the
`purchase_requisition_id` field added in the order is ignored since it
isn't stored and the test didn't failed because the created blanket has
a lower price unit than the regular supplier info, meaning it is used in
priority. Setting the same price unit (50) result in the new purchase
order line merged in the first one.
Do not re-implement the same order.
Adapt the test now that we know the order didn't work (see rev[1]). The
user has to manually set a higher priority to the supplier info
generated by the purchase requisition.
[0] e85838d358
[1] 2ac4f2ee0fclosesodoo/odoo#36840
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
When .with_context() is called with a dictionary as 1st positional
argument, it will replace context (and not modify the referenced keys)
It may create bugs when losing the content of the context (e.g. remove
partner's language)
This is a cherry-pick to saas-12.5 of odoo/odoo#36164 of the logistic
part as discussed
closesodoo/odoo#36690
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
When the many2xxx field relates to a model where company_id is required, set
this domain [('company_id','=',company_id.id)]
When the company_id field of the related model is not required, set this domain
['|',('company_id','=',company_id.id),('company_id','=',False)]
When setting the domain on a field which is in the treeview of a xxx2many field
evaluate against the company_id of the 'parent'.
Some constraints have been added on sereval models. Take a look at the complete
specification for more details.
TaskID: 2024446
Closes: #35266
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
Since previous commit moved decimal_precision module's feature into base,
use the new syntax for fields declaration
Remove the imports to the removed module
Remove the module from dependency in manifest
sed -i "s|digits=dp.get_precision('\([A-Z a-z]*\)')|digits='\1'|" **.py
sed -i "/from odoo.tools import decimal_precision as dp/d" **py
Enforce the domain of the UOM not by an onchange but by a domain.
Exemple of issue if the domain is enforce by an onchange:
- create a picking
- add a move
- select the product
- select an uom
> the uom presented are the one from the product category.
-Save
- edit
- select an uom
> all UOM are presented even the ones of other categories
This commit enforce this new logic at most places.
task: 1886272
closesodoo/odoo#33083
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
purpose of this task is do not set default purchase representative in the purchase order when the PO is created automatically.
When the purchase order is created automatically, this purchase order would be assigned to odoobot.
Odoobot is not a real user. so nobody notified any activity of that purchase order.
so keep the responsible field empty when the PO is created automatically.
Purchase manager can easily filter "unassigned" purchase order and he can assign unassigned PO to someone (real user).
Task-1940489
closesodoo/odoo#31729
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Tiffany Chang (tic)